itemization of all editor's corrections needed to be made.
February 1993, and in one of the two pages, she was identified as Diane Mangum
as opposed to Diane Thompson.
The point to mentioning her name is that, in th October 1995 Pittsburgh Post Ga-
zette article which quoted Thompson, she claimed that she was only at her second
marriage and that the guy attached to the second marriage would occasionally come
back into her life and then go. In the 21st Century post, Thompson claimed that her
married name ... from her third marriage ... was Mangum. Thus, she again contra-
The deposition sheets posted by Thompson/Mangum were those of a stenographer-
recorded deposition, as opposed to a video taped deposition. This is important in
that Randy Engel's three-part article of Nov/Dec 2016 stated that Diane Thompson
gave a deposition by means of video tape. Again, we have contradictions and no
reliability of allegations made. Diane Thompson is the opposite of a reliable wit-
Concerning those two photographed sheets of paper which were posted on Diane
Thompson's September 2017 post, if they were authentic, then the Thompson de-
position was NOT video taped as Randy Engel claimed, showing yet again no re-
liability in the Thompson/Engel allegations.
tion looks as follows: Below is a page of the Bendig deposition. At the bottom of
the page, at the center is AKF. Also at the bottom is CAT-LINKS, DISCOVERY.
the above-entitled case of action, pursuant to the PA Rules of Civil Procedure,
before Kim Simms Strnisa, Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public within and
for the Commonwealth of Pennsyvania . . . on Friday, February 12
Shorthand reporter is a stenographer, and there is no reliable testimony from the