March 30, 2017

I Traced Officer Mark Ninehouser through the NFL

The Pittsburgh Steeler's football stadium stands very close to the world famous 
Three Rivers Confluence of Western Pennsylvania.   Yes, the investigation of the 
Anthony Cipolla Case brought us to the National Football League, being that the 
most important witness in the 1978 case became employed with the NFL.

Every time Cipolla accuser, Diane Thompson, gets caught lying, she changes
her story.   She and her accomplice in libel,  Randy Engel,  are both going to
have to overhaul that story, especially when it comes to the signature at the
bottom of a sheet of paper that Engel called the last remaining piece of evi-
dence which was handwritten in cursive writing, contrary to Pittsburgh po-
lice regulations at the time.  Concerning this, that sheet of paper was NOT
filled-out or signed by any police officer, especially a detective.

Mark Ninehouser is the man whom Randy Engel called "M.N. Nehouser."
Plus, he was NOT a detective in 1978, as Engel so confidently asserted
in her Nov & Dec three-part article which damned to the inner recesses
of Hell the man formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla..

The fact that Mark was not a detective, alone, tossed the whole Cipolla-
retaliation scenario out the door as a sophomorically contrived fraudulent
misrepresentation.  And and and, that sheet of paper which Engel called
the last remaining piece of evidence, in itself, created the burden of proof
and was NOT the proof itself, being that it was merely the accusation of
a private citizen and NOT a police form.  Mark Ninehouser expressly
made it known to me that he did NOT sign such a sheet of paper and
that he would not have written any report in cursive handwriting.

That retaliation saga, now proven false, was the entire foundation stone of
Thompson's entire nightmarish tale.  That tale is now  proven to have been
a lie from Stage 1.  I told Engel, over the phone, that the Cipolla Case was
an easily provable fraud.  Engel's article which possessed numerous prov+-
able falsehoods made the  Cipolla Case even more easy to prove as a fraud.  \
The more they damn him, the more fallacious they are discovered to be.

For those new to law, that sheet of paper which Engel called the last re-
maining piece of evidence was merely the setting forth of accusations
which created the BURDEN OF PROOF.  It was not proof (evidence)
in itself.  Plus, Mark Ninehouser expressly made it known that he did
NOT sign such a sheet of paper and that he would never have written
it in cursive handwriting.  Thus, we have a case of fraud, here.  Yes,
that which Engle so arrogantly proclaimed as evidence was a forgery.
After all, the only thing the Thom

  Killer Hags.                   Killer Crones.                   Libel Kills.
Way to go, Engel ... and her New Jersey Conspiracy Theory Sidekick.
Nobody messes with you.
After he retired from the Pittsburgh police force, Mark Ninehouser be-
came an employee in the security department of the National Football
League.  For my friends in Russia, the Ukraine, and elsewhere in Europe,
the NFL is the most prestigious league on earth for American Football.

Now, if Mark Ninehouser were not employed by the NFL, I would have
never tracked him down.  Just thought I'd mention it, in order to give the
aspiring investigative journalists out there a feel for what it's like to do
true investigative journalism . . . as opposed to the farcical type done by
Randy Engel, in her hairdryer salon form of gossip.

For those new here, Mark Ninehouser was claimed to have been one of
the two police officers who arrested the man formerly known as Father
Anthony Cipolla.  This was claimed as true by Randy Engel and Diane
Thompson-Labiaux-Mangum-Whatever.  He told me that he never did

In fact, Mark become instantly curious as to the mystical sheet of paper
which bore his name and his correct badge number.  When I said that the
sheet was signed "badge #46,"  Mark said, "That was my badge number."

 I then mentioned "badge #37," upon which Mark said that it\ was definite-
ly the badge number of his former work partner.  The problem is that Mark
Ninehouser never signed any sheet of paper titled,  Offense/Incident Report.

Now, Engel and Thompson both claimed that Ninehouser (incorrectly
spelled Nehouser) was a detective in 1978.  He was not.  Therefore, no
signature on any such sheet of paper had any significance to it.

FURTHERMORE, for such a paper to have gained legal weight to it, it
needed to have been signed by an assistant DA, and not a detective or an
uniformed police officer.  The sheet of paper was actually the 1970s ver-
sion of the Private Criminal Complaint ... not the Police Complaint.

Aside of getting Mark's last name wrong, while getting his badge number
correct, Randy Engel stated that he  1} was a detective,   2} told Diane
Thompson to take young Tucker to a hospital,  3} was then given a med-
ical report from a physician at the same hospital which stated that "traces"
of a lubricant used to molest Tucker was still lingering on Tucker,  4} was
telephoned by Diane Thompson on July 30, 1978, to go over to her home
where Cipolla was standing as an intruder, clad in a cassock,  5} filled out
a report called an Offense/Incidence (or Incident) Report and signed it,
along with his partner, Robert Fogle.

Now, in October of 1995, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reported that two de-
tectives were called to the hospiral bedside of a young molested boy who
was molested by Anthony Cipolla.  Thus, we have yet another instance of
contradictory assertions-allegations-averments between the 1995 newspap-
er article that damned Cipolla to the innermost recesses of infamy, while
Randy Engel's 2016 article which damned the same Anthony Cipolla to
the innermost recesses of Hell.

The only thing that was true about this nightmarish narration written by the
less than factual Randy Engel was Mark's badge number and Robert Fogle's
badge number.  For the record, today Pittsburgh Police officers have four-digit
badge numbers.

All in all, Mark was NOT a detective.  He was NOT called to any hospital
to attend to a Tucker Thompson who was reported as having been molested.
Mark was NOT given any medical report by any physician pertaining to the
young Tucker Thompson.  Nor did he suggest to Diane Thompson that the
young Tucker needed to go to a hospital.  In addition, Mark Ninehouser was
NOT telephoned by Diane Thompson on July 30, 1978, and he did NOT go
over to Thompson's residence to respond to an Anthony Cipolla intrusion.
In facgt, Mark was NOT in the DA's office with Diane Thompson, bearing
a look of disappointment at her signing papers with tears in her eyes, and
and and Mark was NOT called to respond to Tucker being slapped in the
face by any 70 year merchant or any younger aged merchant ... or anyone
at all..

And and and, Officer Mark Ninehouse was NOT called to respond to any
claim that Diane Thompson's residence was vandalized by a stone being
thrown through a window.  Furthermore, there was NO CALL for Mark
to respond to any report of any tire belonging to any car of Diane Thomp-
son being slashed.

In addition, there was NO MAN IN THE HOUSE during July of 1978.
This is pertinent, being taht Randy Engel made it sound as if there were
a dad there throughout the entire time, psychologically impaired.   NO.
Thompson .... at that time .... in July of 1978 ... was the stereotypical
single mom.  She and Engel lied yet again.

All in all, Officer Mark Ninehouser only took a statement from Thompson
and then printed-out a report on her averments, followed by him giving the
report to the actual detectives..  If there were a man of the house living in
the Thompson residence in June and July of 1978, then he was the Invisible

That ENTIRE story which damned Anthony Cipolla to the depths of Hell
was FALSE, except for the mention of the badge numbers of Officers Nine-
houser and Fogle.

Moreover, there was a photo placed online purported to have been the
only piece of evidence remaining in the 1978 Cipolla caset.  It was a
photo of part .... and only part ... of the Offense/Incident Report which
Engel claimed was filled-out by eithery Mark Ninehouser and Robert
Fogle and then signed by both officers whom she identified as detectives.
Well, the description of the crime committed on that sheet of paper was h
andwritten in cursive handwriting, meaning that NO POLICE OFFICER
in Heaven, Earth, Purgatory, or Hell filled the sheet of paper out.  This is
because Pittsburgh police officers were forbidden to fill-out their reports
in cursive handwriting. They were required to hand-print their reports.
In as much, were those signatures anything other than forgeries?

Keep in mind that Mark was surprised to hear that his name and badge
number was on that particular sheet of paper.

The flag of the Sovereign State of Pennsylvania, where within
there are statutes against Libel and Wrongful Death, as well
as the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.

NOW . . . after having received the information that I received from the
in-good-standing though retired police officer, Mark Ninehouser, the Ci-
polla Case became a matter of CASE CLOSED.

Other evidentiary findings during this particular time were uncovered also,
confirming that Diane Thompson and even her son, Frank Labiaux, are liars.
For example, it was found that a 12 year old Frank Labiaux did NOT vandal-
ize a nearby church by means of a fire extinguished in 1977, as an act of retal-
iation for having been molested.  This is because the vandalism of the nearby
AME Church  was done by a 14 and a 15 year old TWICE, in November of

The first time involved the fire extinguisher vandalism and the second
time  (Nov 17, 1978) involved the two vandals slitting tires in the AME
parking lot, while the congregants were attending a "tent revival" type of

Plus, Diane Thompson changed her story about the place where Frank
was "allegedly" molested.  She originally told the 1990s press .... and
me in 2014 ... that Frank was molested by Cipolla on the property of
the PIME seminary, in Michigan.   I then found a witness who went to
the PIME seminary with Cipolla and even Tim Bendig.  The witness
said that no sexual harassment or molestation of any kind occurred.

Therefore, Thompson changed her story, by saying that it happened
in a motel, while Cipolla, Frank, and other lads where in Michigan,
to see the Henry Ford Museum.

In continuing with Diane Thompson's unbroken pattern of pathological
lies, she boldly stated that she drove to Pittsburgh at her own financial
expense and gave a deposition for the Bendig lawsuit.  I then announc-
ed to the reading public that the entire package of depositions in the
Bendig lawsuit were found and sent to Europe at a relatively hefty
price.  I then mentioned that THERE WAS NO NO NO DIANE

So, what did the same Diane Thompson do, in response to having been
caught\ lying yet again?  ANS:  She claimed that the deposition was only
video taped.  To her asininity, there still would have been the legal require-
ment, under the Rules of Discover, to submit a copy of the video-taped de-
position to the defense team headed by my former neighbor, John Alan
Conte.  Incidentally, John said that Diane Thompson was "an adroit liar."

Once again, deep appreciation from Anthony Cipolla's brother Vince, cer-
tain close friends of the late Anthony Cipolla, and from me goes to hono-
rably retired police officer, Mark Ninehouser for the information that he
amicably volunteered and provided to us all.  It was a tremendous relief.
It was liberating.

This is a multiple topic post.  It also covers Cipolla's transfers to parish-
es in his early years ... during the mid-1970s, when American culture was
much different than today.

This post furthermore covers the comment made by the New Jersey Con-
spiracy Theory sidekick of Randy Engel, in her stating that Diane Thomp-
son choose not to sue the Diocese of Pittsburgh in 1978, as if Thompson
were a noble and self-giving per- son.

The reason why that comment is an extreme insult to me is addressed.  It
has to do with my mother dying when I was young.  A hospital blood trans-
fusion killed her, but only after a long and painful illness.  Lots of pain.
Lots of pain.

We family members, in our graciousness, decided not to sue the hospital
under the logic, "Well, it won't bring back mom.  So, what's the point?"

In as much, it is deeply offensive to see the vicious, insulting, and lying '
Diane Thompson being counted among the self-giving and me ... the guy
who sues everybody, according to Thompson.

Uhhhhhm,  I have not filed a personal lawsuit since the Year 2000.  That
amounts to seventeen years ago.  So, Thompson once again lied about me.

Randy Engel's great downfall is that she is not a team-player.  She is mere-
ly out for herself.  She's the overly domineering hag who wants to run the
show and be the queen.  It's her way or the highway.

Well, she'll be dethroned in due time.  But for now, she shows no signs of
remorse for inflicting the added amount of stress that was imposed upon
heart patient, Anthony Cipolla ... an amount of stress that could kill him.
And of course, during Engel's doing of the three-part article, Cipolla ever
so coincidentally died of a heart attack.

Engel and her New Jersey Conspiracy Theory friend couldn't let Cipolla
rest with his diabetes, bypass surgery heart condition and his neuropathy (
intense back pain included).  Naaaaaah.  Not them.

Engel couldn't let Anthony get a drop of emotional rest.  Then, after Ci-
polla died, Engel just couldn't spare pain from being inflicted upon the
same Anthony Cipolla's own family members.  She had to write the
most damning article anyone could have written about Cipolla.  But,
she included a narration of Pennsylvania criminal procedure which
did NOT exist, instantly showing what a farce that article was and is.

None then less, mighty Randy Engel had to reek further havoc on the
Cipolla family reputation.

Now, I had the Cipolla situation completely monitored, to see if he were
a molester or not.  I then discovered that there was no need for monitor-
ing.  In as much, to think that I was the one who spoke the most with
Cipolla during the last three years of his life was an erroneous thought.
He had ample telephone contact with others, being that he still had a
following.  None the less, the most common thing Cipolla said to me
through the years was  "I have another call coming.  I have to take 
this call."

Furthermore, Diane Thompson made it sound as if I had no sources
of information and that I only wrote what Cipolla told me to write.
Oh no.  Nobody tells me what to write, unless I am taking direct
orders from either the president of this C-corporation here or a
government administrator or even a grounds keeper, inspector,

In as much, in order to be a great leader, you have to first prove that
you faithfully take orders and follow them.  None the less, when it
came to the Cipolla Case, I wrote as I saw fit.

Mike Volpe of Chicago autonomously wrote what he willed about
the case, and others spoke about the case from their free will.  No
one was anyone's puppet.

In fact, as I previously stated, not only was I NOT Cipolla's puppet,
Cipolla and I had mini-World-War-III over the telephone more than
once.  After all, Donald Wuerl brings out the worst in everybody.
He surely brought out the worst in me.  None the less, I was NOT
Cipolla's yesman and he surely was not mine.

I wrote only that which could be backed-up with evidentiary support
and corroborative witness accounts, as well as an occasional expert
witness conveyance.  After all, I kept telling the public to test my
writings for cracks.  So, go ahead and test my posts about Cipolla,
Ference, the Seminary Whistleblower, and Torquato's accuser for
cracks, along with my writings on Wolk, Zula, Pucci, Hoehl, Huff,
etc for cracks and contradictions.

Of course, I originally opened the lines of communication with
Anthony Cipolla, because I was asked to meet with him.  I then
kept the lines open with him, waiting for him to confess that he
molested Diane Thompson's two sons.  Then the evidence came
in, and everything alleged about Cipolla turned out to be a sick

When the truth was finally found, I ended up saying, "You idiots!
Why didn't anyone show me this stuff sooner?"

While we are at it . . .

Let's address Engel's insinuation that Cipolla had to have been a
serial molester, being that he received more parish assignments
than is regarded as normal by today's standards.

1}  As was observed in the history of the Diocese of Pittsburgh,
     when a priest commits sexual abuse, what is done with him???
     ANS:  He is first moved OUT OF STATE.  Hoehl to Toronto.
    Wolk, Zula, and Pucci to Maryland.    Edward Huff to St. Louis.
     Esposito to Arkansas.  Torquato to Rome, "to finish his educa-
     tion."  Etc.

     Now, was Cipolla sent out of state in the 1970s?  ANS:  NO.

     In as much, the story of Diane Thompson being told by then
     Bishop Vincent Leonard that Cipolla was diagnosed with a
     severe form of sexual pathology was nothing more than the
     story of a repeatedly proven liar.  She fabricated the story.
     She lied.  I saw the psychiatric paperwork.  It has my finger-
     prints on it.  Mike Volpe saw the digital version of Cipolla's
     psychiatric assessment.  No sexual perversity mentioned.
     Only Depression and Suicidal Tendencies.

2} Cipolla's last two assignments were five years each.  That is a
     lot of time to be posted anywhere as a diocesan priest.  More-
     over, the early 1970s were the Vietnam Years, followed by
     the Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and College Campus LSD
     days.  They were the "I have to find myself" days, as well
     as the Kwai Chang Caine (of Kung Fu fame) days, where
     people have the idea of searching for the truth, mingled
     with the onset of college campus hedonism.  Now, Cipolla
     was trained at a missionary seminary which had the mission-
      ary mindset . . . the traveling mindset.

     Plus, plus, plus, during the 1970s, Pittsburgh was one of the
     most prosperious cities on Earth.  There was not yet the priest
     shortage that accompanied the Donald Wuerl years.  A priest
     was NOT bound to a parish out of logistical desperation on
     the part of the bishop who couldn't attract enough seminari-
     ans.  Cipolla's goal was a Padre Pio Franciscan-type Mission.
     And he WAS extremely popular during his Padre Pio days.

     All in all, Cipolla was never shipped out of state during the
     1970s.  That was the tell-sign ... tale-sign.

Then came the theatrics which made Thompson and her family
look like a monastery of saintly heroes.  The "second dad" was
said to have gone through an accident and explosion at a mili-
tary base that did NOT exist as one since 1946.  None the less,
the easy sign of a liar and double sensationalism, such as an
accident and explosion.

Thompson's fatal is that fairy tale consisted in her omitting the
#1 symptom that all guys get when in an explosion.  That of
ringing in the ears.  My dad, of course, was a decorated Air
Force combat veteran who even saw and heard the right wing
airship blow into a ball of fire while the bomb group was over
its target.  Dad suffered from chronic ringing in the ears.  So,
the description of that accident and explosion that was said to
have occurred at a base no longer in operation was sophomor-

The Engel article made the Thompson clan sound like a clan of
saints.  Way over the top.  Then, the woman who provoked En-
gel into writing the article had the audacity to state that Thomp-
son heroically refrained from suing the diocese.  Well, the tale
of Diane Thompson was go bogus at face value that no lawyer
would waste his/her time with it.  I've explained the fallacies
set forth as face, especially in the description of criminal pro-
cedure narrated by Thompson through Engel and the Pitts-
burgh Post Gazette of years past.

Proof that Thompson elected to not sue the diocese out of the
goodness of her heart is that Thompson publicly sought to get
a law firm to sue me.  Of course, her story is such a farce that
no law firm would waste their time with her.  The New Jersey
Conspiracy Theory Housewife was more than willing to lie,
and she was more than willing to believe a story of criminal
procedure that didn't come close to having ever existed.  An
SNL skit couldn't be more ridiculous then the narration found
in the Engel three-part article.

Randy Engel and her New Jersey Conspiracy Theory Obsessed friend
intervened and robbed Anthony Cipolla of the little life he had remaining.
Diane Thompson's damning accusations, now proven to have been
complete fabrications, were her murder weapon.  She casued Cipolla
untold pain, and she showed herself to have no remorse of it.

March 29, 2017

Yes, I Spoke with Mark Ninehouser and he said that he never arrested Cipolla and never filled-out any police report in cursive handwriting.

However, he did say that his badge number was 46, as Randy Engel
claimed, and that his partner's badge number was 37.  However, he
was NOT a detective, as the same Randy Engel claimed.  Therefore,
Engel got everything wrong except for the two badge numbers, in
her nightmarish narration of an arrest which has now been 100%
proven to never have existed.

Quick March 2017 note:  More information of the Edward Huff case is
forthcoming.  The Huff Coverup, alone, proved former Pittsburgh Post
Gazette writer, Ann Rodgers (formerly Ann Rodgers-Melnick), to have
been nothing but Wuerl's propagandist.   That was an abuse of the press.

It is now Liberation Day for all of those who believed in the good character
of the man formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla.  In late February of
2017, I finally made contact with ... and conversed at will with ... one of the
two police officers who responded to Diane Thompson's phone call to the po-
lice, in 1978.  Randy Engel stated that they arrested Cipolla.  In fact, Engel
stated that they were detectives.  No, there weren't.  None the less, one of
the two police officers who Engel claimed to have arrested Anthony Cipol-
la categorically stated that he did NOT do so.  Engel is now dangling at
the edge of a business-destroying lawsuit which has a statute of limitations
a lot longer than the average American attention span.

Randy Engel's didn't merely accuse Anthony Cipolla of molestation.  She
accused him of harassment and terrorism, all the while stating that the Bish-
op of Pittsburgh at the time and the Allegheny County DA at the time were
accomplices to such criminal conduct.

It has now been proven to be a lie that a young Frank Labiaux ... eldest son
of a Diane Thompson whose timeline identifies her as a teenage pregnancy
queen .... vandalized a church out of sheer frustration for having been mo-
lested.  Being that this Frank Labiaux is a proven liar, one can plausibly
conclude that he also lied about being molested.

Whatever be the case, Frank Labiaux made his debut instantly destroying his
credibility.  This will especially be the case in the eyes of an entire jury who is
given the time to assess a case that now qualifies as actionable libel.  Then comes
the Eggshell Skull Rule, where Anthony Cipolla was forced to endure the stress
heaped upon him by libel and defamation.

As I stated perhaps twenty times previously ... and which never sunk into Randy
Engel's mind, Donald Wuerl used the Cipolla Case to finally get out of the spot-
light placed on him by Washington County DA John C Pettit.  This case also
made the Edward Huff indictment largely unknown by the Pittsburgh people,
even though it did make the mainstream media newspaper, at the time.

For those unaware, Diane Thompson and Randy Engel made elaborate and
damning accusations against Anthony Cipolla, former DA Bob Colville, and
the late Bishop Vincent Leonard, concerning the assertion that Cipolla mo-
lested her son, Tucker, in 1978.  The added assertion, never prefixed with
the lawsuit-prevention word, ALLEGED, was that massive and violent re-
taliation occurred after Thompson "filed charges."  No civilian has the
power to "file charges."

You see, Engel asserted that an M.N. Nehouser, Badge #46, and an R. Fogle,
Badge #37 arrested Cipolla for molestation, filled out an Incidence Report,
and hung by Diane Thompson's side, telling her to not "drop charges, de-
spite all of the harassment she was going to get.   The narration all turned
out to be a fraudulent misrepresentation, except for the officer's badge

In fact, in 1995, Thompson narrated a harrowing tale to a Pittsburgh Post
Gazette writer on how disappointed the two detectives looked when she
"dropped charges," with tears in her eyes, in the DA's office, signing a
paper that she couldn't read, due to the tears in the eyes.  That story
... and the story of her youngest son vandalizing a church out of the
frustration of having been molested ... have all now been proven to
be libel.  Provable lies.  Orchestrated falsehoods conjured by one of
the my incompetent liars you can encounter.

Let us proceed:

Mark Ninehouser was one of the two police officers who responded to Di-
ane Thompson's call in 1978, concerning her claim that her son, Tucker,
was molested by the man formerly known as Anthony Cipolla.

In her three-part article, Randy Engel referred to him as M.N. Nehouser.
None the less, he remembers the case and said the following:

      All that he did was take a report from Thompson, and then filled
      out a form by means of hand-printing it, and NOT handwriting it
      with cursive hand writing.  He said that he simply handed the re-
      port to the detectives, and that was it.  Nothing more was done
      by him.  Thus:::::

      1} He did NOT arrest Cipolla.  2} He was not called back to Diane
      Thompson's home, to respond to a call that she made, reporting that
      Cipolla was at her kitchen door.  3}  Plus, Mark was not called to
       the scene of any face-slapping of nine year old Tucker by a 70 year
       old man, and therefore, that account also turned-out to be a lie told
       by Diane Thompson. 4} Mark was also NOT called to respond to
       Diane Thompson's home, on account of any rock throwing incident
       which broke one of her windows,

All in all:

That which happened was NOT the way described by Randy Engel or by
the media in their 1990s reports about Cipolla.

Let's Review:   Concerning police officer, Mark Ninehouser, who respond
to Diane Thompson's original phone call to the police:

1}  He categorically stated that he NEVER put any Catholic priest in hand
cuffs in 1978, including Anthony Cipolla.  Neither he nor his partner Robert
W. Fogle arrested Cipolla.

1b}  Ninehouser was NOT a detective.  He said that he took the report of
Diane Thompson's accusations and handed it to the detectives.

1c}  At this point, the following must absolutely be remembered:

Randy Engel wrote that Diane Thompson started getting harassed by Cipolla
on July 30, 1978, upon which she called Ninehouser (misspelled as Nehouser
by Engel) and Officer Fogle.  Former Officer Ninehouser categorically stated
to me that, after he handed his hand-printed report to the detectives, he walked
away from the Diane Thompson case.  Thus, she did NOT call him, saying that
Cipolla was in the house.  He did NOT say to her, "Diane, they are going to try
to harass you into dropping charges.  So, be strong and stand your ground." Etc.

And and and he most certainly did NOT go to her home after "she was forced to
drop charges" and give her a copy of the Incidence Report which apparently was
a counterfeited one filled out by a non-police officer under the guise that it was
done by a police officer.  He did not walk up to her and say, "You're going to
need this one day."

The whole account about the detectives was a complete fraudulent misrepresen-
tation, and the detectives mentioned by Engel weren't even detectives.

2}  Keep in mind that I stated that the Incidence Report mentioned by Randy
Engel, part of which was photographed and put online, looked like a forgery.
For those unaware, the online photo which was purported to be the Incidence
Report of 1978 was handwritten with crowded handwriting and the letter "l"
always being looped widely.   The reason why that photograph was the photo
of a forgery ... of a fraud ... is very simple:

         Honorably retired Mark Ninehouser said that he and his fellow
         police officers were required to print (hand-print) all police re-
         ports.  No cursive handwriting was permitted.  The fact that the
         photo purported to be the actual Incidence Report of 1978 is
         handwritten with cursive writing, and not hand-printed, proves
         that the sheet of paper called "the one remaining piece of evi-
         dence" by Randy Engel is a very counterfeited fraud.  No po-
         lice officer of the 1970s would have filled-out the report in
         that fashion.

3}  Randy Engel stated that Cipolla was arraigned "at City Court" in a
      Pittsburgh Police Station.  This is a complete lie, because no arraign-
      ment ever took place in a police station.  ALL arraignments took
      place in one of two places:

              1} At the Public Safety Building which was located at First and
                   Grant Street, at one time.


               2} At City NIGHT COURT.

Cipolla was never arraigned, because he was NEVER arrested.  He was
accused in a private criminal complaint and served with a SUMMARY
NOTICE only signed by Diane Thompson.  She was to appear in city
court ... at the Public Safety Building ... and state due cause as to why
Cipolla should be arrested.  It was a hearing equal to a preliminary
hearing, but without the accuser having been first arrested.  It was
a hearing that would judge if Cipolla were to be arrested or not.

4}  There is NOT any mistaken identity of police officers in this case,
being that Mark Ninehouser remembers the case in outline form, and
being that Randy Engel did get his badge number and Robert Fogle's
number completely correct.  Mark's badge number actually was 46,
and Robert's actually was 37, as Engel stated.  BUT, they were NOT

In addition, there was ... at the time ... a #9 Police Station in the Northside,
located on Federal Street.  So, that part was gotten correct by Engel.  But,
there were NEVER arraignments taking place at any police station.

In addition, Engel stated that the incidence report was signed M.N.
Nehouser.  So, I asked Mark what the N stood for.  He said that he
did NOT have a middle name.

Once again, for those who are incredibly prejudiced against Cipolla:

5}  Rest assured that there was NO CALL to the police that a 70 year old
man working at any kind of a store slapped Tucker in the face, for having
accused Anthony Cipolla of wrong-doing.

6} Rest assured that no one called the police and reported a rock smashing
through any window at the residence of Diane Thompson and her children.

Take note that Mark was very articulate, talkative, and easy-going in his
conversation with me.  He did not stop to think of what he was going to
say.  He did not have time lapses of  momentary silence.  He simply spoke
spontaneously, hiding nothing.  He and I were literally shooting the breeze,
it was that easy-going of a conversation.

There is more to convey to you.  The bottom line is that two parts of the
three-part Randy Engel article that damns Anthony Cipolla and the late
Bishop Vincent Leonard to the Depths of Hell is complete libel.  If you
are a fan or friend of Randy, tell her that she better start talking to an
attorney.  There still is ample time before the statute of limitations ex-

I'll eventually have to notify Stephen Stone of Renew America that many
editor retractions and corrections need be made.  Moreover, if you pasted
that Engel article on your own website and you refuse to remove it once
notified, expect a summons to appear in court as a defendant, somewhere
down the road.

There WILL be other defendants, too.  I'll continue this at a later time.
For now, you have enough substantive information that it should easily
break the hypnotic trance that Engel has on the weak-minded & gullible.
She is NOT a guardian of Truth, Justice, and the American Way.  She's
a gossipy and libelous hag who actually thinks that the historic red
Shoes of the Fisherman are homosexual shoes.

I give you your freedom from Randy Engel's influence and her pretense
of being the deliverer of truth and her hatred of the Shoes of the Fisher-
man.  Be free.

Till the next time,

Patrick Anthony Pontillo

In America, Truth ends up prevailing.

Proven: A 12 year old Frank Labiaux did NOT vandalize a church out of "molestation revenge" in 1977. Two teens, 14 & 15, did it in Nov of 1978.

PREVIEW:  Randy Engel stated that, between August 15 and 17, 1977 , twelve
year old Frank Labiaux was molested by Anthony Cipolla for the first time ever,
in a Dearborn Michigan motel room.  This, according to Engel, was followed by
Frank vandalizing a church near his Mexico Street home, one week later, done
completely out of rage and frustration for having been molested.  Engel stated
that twelve-year-old Frank and another youth entered through a church window,
and took a fire extinguisher, unleashing its foan upon a podium and pews.

Now, there was a church on California Avenue, very near to St. Francis Xavier
Parish, which was vandalized via fire extinguisher foam.  HOWEVER, it hap-
pens in NOVEMBER of 1978, fifteen months after Engel said it happened.

Plus, the two vandals were aged 14 and 15.  They did NOT include a twelve
year old Frank Labiaux.  Furthermore, two weeks later, the same two youths
went back to the same church and slit the tires of the cars in the parking lot
during a Protestant Revival Meeting there.  The pastor of the church quickly
recognized the youths as the same ones who committed the fire extinguisher
vandalism, two weeks prior.  Neither of the two was Frank Labiaux.  Diane
Thompson and Randy Engel lied.  Frank Labiaux lied.  It is 100% proven
to be such.

Incidentally, the church was the Avery Memorial AME Zion Church, located
at 3403 California Ave, Pgh 15212.


Pittsburgh Post Gazette archives, at
the SATURDAY NOVEMBER 18, 1978 edition, at PAGE 18.

The one excerpt exposed here is so blatant a falsehood that it should set a
spark in your mind, in having you realize that the damning accusations in
the Cipolla Case were a series of orchestrated lies.  This one cannot be de-
fended by the Engel People, in any capacity.

At this point, however, keep in mind that Cipolla was NEVER tried at the Vatican
for molesting Tim Bendig.  He was tried for a diagnosis of Depression & Suicidal
Tendencies, making that case a procedural law case, only.

Wuerl refused to let Cipolla back into ministry out of fear for District Attorney
John C Pettit who publicly announced that Wuerl's cooperation in the investiga-
tion which lead to the indictments of Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci was MINIMAL
at best.  Petti also mentioned that investigations would continue.  Therefore,
putting Cipolla back into ministry would have triggered the very Grand Jury
Investigation which is now transpiring upon the Diocese of Pittsburgh at this
very moment.

Concerning this,  if you have anything that you would like me to add to my re-
port to a very courteous special agent who personally invited me to submit to
her digitally the outline on Donald Wuerl's corruption, call me or email me.
If you are one of those persons who backed-out in the past, in fear of retali-
ations by the effeminate and ungracefully aging Donald Wuerl, know now
that your back will, by law, be covered.  Contact me via:


If you regard yourself as a devout Catholic, know that cowardice and negligence
are identified as sins in Catholic Church moral theological teachings.  If you have
info, come forth.  I will take care of the rest.  After all, I'm the front-man who takes
the hits.  Soon, WE shall be hitting back.  Join in the victory and contact me via
the above-mentioned address and/or cell phone number.  May Our Lady turn you
into a hero.

None the less, the only thing that is going to spare Randy Engel from being even-
tually dragged into a court of law is World War III - - - literally.

When it came to Anthony Cipolla, there was no respect for the dead,
despite the numbers fact-checking findings that the accusations
against him, former DA Bob Colville, and former Bishop Vincent
Leonard were complete falsehoods, actionable in a civil court of law.
Forthcoming, in either this post (as an update) or in another post, is one of the more
easily provable lies told by accuser Tim Bendig and written into the 70+ year old
Engel's Nov/Dec 2016 three-part article as if it were undeniable truth.  That one
deals with the true identity of a Mark Hamilton.  Bendig told Engel that he was
a teenager who frequented the McGuire Home.  Engel believed him without
fact-checking Bendig.  Mark Hamilton was a high administrator/manager of
the McGuire Home, according to what a source told me.  And it logically fits.
I'll cover that feature, later.

Other lies of Diane Thompson/Mangum/Labiaux are yet to be addressed, as well.
One included Engel's mention of "detectives" R. Fogle and M.N. Nehouser.  Uhhm,

Now, as the usual preamble, I state that I am more than willing to declare the man
formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla an egregious molester who earned a
one-way ticket to Hell.  But, the fact-checking of the accusations against Cipolla
keep resulting in finding that Diane Thompson/Mangum/Labiaux lied.  It was
recently found that even Frank Labiaux lied to Randy Engel.  We continue.

This post/article details an elaborate lie told by Diane Thompson/Mangum/Labiaux
and published as if it were fact-checked truth by Randy Engel.   That specific asser-
tion concerns the claim that a young Frank Labiaux co-committed vandalism upon
a church near his Mexico Street domicile in 1977, out of frustration for having been

The fact-checking on this one is so exact that it should finally jar the most stubborn
person into realizing that the Engel article is nothing more than a collection of easi-
ly provable falsehoods, and thereby, a long-winded piece of vicious and actionable

Concerning the Big-Lie-at-Hand and how easy it was to disprove, let's get to it.

Ladies and gentlemen,  Randy Engel wrote that, between August 15 and 17 of 1977,
Anthony Cipolla molested Frank Labiaux in a Dearborn Michigan motel.  Frank
was 12 years of age plus 10 or 11 months.  She asserted that Cipolla took 3 or 4
lads to Michigan, to see the Henry Ford Museum.  The other boys weren't moles-
ted according to her.  Only Frank was.

In fact, Engel stated that it was a long and tiring trip from Pittsburgh, and therefore,
Cipolla didn't have the energy to molest anyone on the first night.  Now, concerning
the trip to Dearborn being long and tiresome, BULL CRAP!  I know this from person-
al experience, being that I had a girlfriend in Grand Rapids whom I would visit via
highway travel, and the drive to the Detroit area was only halfway to Grand Rapids
and not tiring at all.  In fact,  Pittsburghers used to travel to Detroit and buy cars there.
They would then return to Pittsburgh on the same day.

The trip to the Ann Arbor / Dearborn / Detroit area is only FOUR hours.  Now, I have
traveled as far as 1,000 miles in a day (from SC to Texas) and I did more than one 14
hour trip between Pittsburgh and the Carolina coastline.  A four hour drive is nothing.
The sign of a liar is exaggeration.  Engel exaggerated on purpose, insulting the intelli-
gence of any American used to really long road travel.

We need to keep the following in mind:

Diane Thompson wrote to me and specifically stated that Frank was molested at the
PIME seminary, and NOT at a motel.  Then, I produced a witness who went to the
seminary with Tim Bendig and Anthony Cipolla.  He said that nothing immoral
happened there.  He said that Cipolla did NOT do anything queer.  Therefore, Di-
ane Thompson/Mangum/Labiaux ever-so-coincidentally changed her story and
placed the molestation in a motel room.  Quite frankly, people who drive to the
Henry Ford Museum can easily drive back to Pittsburgh on the exact same day.

We continue:

Engel wrote that one week after the motel molestation which is highly unlikely
to have occurred, Frank vandalized a church near his Mexico Street home, using
a fire extinguisher as the weapon of vandalism.  That would be AUGUST 24,
1977.   Engel wrote that Frank and an accomplice entered a church window
and sprayed fire extinguisher foam on to a podium and church pews, result-
ing in his arrest and visit to juvenile court.  Got it?  Let's continue.

On California Avenue, near Saint Xavier Parish, a church was vandalized by means
of fire extinguisher abuse, damaging furniture and carpets.  It was the Avery Memor-
ial AME Zion Church, locate 3403 California Avenue.  HOWEVER, it was NOT
vandalized on August 24, 1977.  In fact, it was NOT vandalized in 1977, at all,
It wasn't vandalized until November 1978, fifteen months after Engel said that
it was.

Now, Engel stated that Diane Thompson took her family in flight to Cleveland,
in the middle of September 1978, after she was harassed into dropping criminal
charges that were never filed in the first place.  Yet, the vandalism did not occur
until November of 1978.  And and and, the vandals were a 14 year old youth and
a 15 year old one who would then commit vandalism at the same church two weeks
later, sometime around November 3rd and 17th, 1978.

In as much,  if Diane Thompson fled Pittsburgh in September 1978, then how did
she know about the fire extinguisher vandalism of November 1978.  This would
indicate that she didn't leave Pittsburgh as was reported by Engel.

In their second vandalism spree, the two boys slit the tires of the cars in the park-
ing during a Protestant Revival Meeting.  The pastor recognized those two boys
as the ones who did the fire extinguisher vandalizing two weeks prior.  And neith-
er one of the boys was Frank Labiaux.  Thus, Diane Thompson lied through her
teeth, and we now have evidence to prove Frank Labiaux to be a liar.

Now, you can do the fact-checking for yourself.  Go to the:

Pittsburgh Post Gazette archives, at
the SATURDAY NOVEMBER 18, 1978 edition, at PAGE 18.

It mentions both acts of vandalism, including the one that Diane Thompson claims
to have been done by Frank a year and a quarter before it actually happened.  In as
much, I can assure that Frank was NOT taken to Juvi Lockup & Court, as Engel
claimed.  Thus, Frank Labiaux was NOT frustrated for having been molested, and
therefore, he probably was NOT molested.

This one lie should break the hypnotic trance upon you, in thinking that Engel is the
holiest woman alive.  You might then say, "Hey, she was in Vietnam as the voice of
Saigon."  Uhhhm, the Voice of Saigon headquarters was in Dayton Ohio where one
can find the Wright-Patterson air base.  That is the air base which has the memorial
plaque of the my father's Air Force Bomb Group.  None the less, we now have very
convincing evidence that Diane Thompson and her children orchestrated a theatrical
lie about Cipolla molesting the family.  And why?

ANS:  The custody of two grand children who were 12 and 14 in 2016.

Moreover, if Frank said that he did this act of vandalism upon the AME Zion
Church in his interview with Randy Engel, then it's proven that he IS a LIAR.
A lawsuit deposition will find out if this is so, unless if Engel committed the
act of SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, by destroying the interview notes.

Ladies & gentlemen, this is the southern end of the very
short Mexico St about which Randy Engel wrote.
It's a glorified back alley and little more than that.

Now we address Engel's mention of two "detectives." Firstly, one's name was
NOT Nehouser, as Engel stated.   It was NINEHOUSER.   Mark Ninehouser.
As far as goes the R. Fogle mentioned by Engel, it was ROBERT W FOGLE,
Ninehouser's partner.  And yes, at times, Fogle would do "plain clothes stake-
out" assignments.

The pertinence in the misspelling is this:   If Engel saw the "Incidence Report"
and if she saw clearly saw the name, Nehouser, then it was a forgery.  If Engel
saw the actual Incidence Report and the name of NINEHOUSER was hard to
read, then the sheet of paper didn't have a forged signature.

Now, Diane Thompson is an exceptionally dimwitted person who lived in an area
where people could not pronounce words correctly.  She might have heard the name
Nehouser, because the nearby people couldn't pronounce NINEHOUSER.  She then
would have had someone sign on the Incidence Report "Nehouser" and make up a
badge number.  None the less, in later years, Mark Ninehouser became the NFL
Security Representative in Pittsburgh.  In fact, before becoming a police officer,
Ninehouser was a welder.

Concerning this,  Pittsburgh Police badge numbers were four digits and not two,
because they were more than 99 police officers in Pittsburgh.  In fact, there are
presently approximately 900 sworn Pittsburgh police officers and about 188
non-sworn ones.  None the less, Mark Ninehouser might have signed his name
illegibly on the private criminal complaint form that also goes by the name In-
cidence Report.  None the less, that Incidence Report mentioned by Engel is
suspect, because of the badge numbers she reported it as having.
Observe:  FOUR digit badge number.
Observe the words Pittsburgh Police
One more thing,  Engel kept mentioning Police Station #9, and I said that, in
Pittsburgh history, Police Station #9 was on Mount Washington.  I furthermore
stated that there are presently only SIX police units in Pittsburgh and that the
iunit covering the Northside of Pittsburgh is Unit #1.  Now, in the 1970s, there
was a Police Station #9 in the Northside, but it was NOT a jurisdictional identi-
fying number.  The number on police complaint forms that mattered was the
number of the COURT of jurisdiction.  None the less, in the 1978 case, we
were dealing with a private criminal complaint form and NOT a police crim-
inal complaint form.  And we are dealing with four-digit badge numbers and
NOT two, as Engel reported.  In as much, is that Incidence Report a forgery?
Any civilian was able to obtain a copy.

Concerning Fogle & Ninehouser

The irony here is that both police officers were involved in a murder that they
could have prevented, on October 4, 1978.  The murder took place on Buena
Vista Avenue, when a man named Robert Tucker was shot to death by a Ty-
rone DeVaughn.  Tucker was walking from the police station and then shot
dead.  You see, Fogle and Ninehouser gave the man a private criminal com-
plaint to fill-out, upon which one of the officers went to night court to get a
motions judge to sign-off on it and allow DeVaughn to be arrested and pro-
cessed.  Of course, the 1970s version of a private criminal complaint is an
Incidence Report.

This October 1978 murder case shows that Engel and Diane Thompson lied
about their description of Anthony Cipolla's pretend July 1978 arrest.  At no
time did they mention a judge's signature, and I told my readers on multiple
occasions that you either need a judge to sign-off on a complaint or an assis-
tant DA to approve a complaint and then direct the local magistrate to "issue
process."  To issue process means to "Book him, Danno."

Another 1978 case involving Robert W Fogle should give light on how high
the bail would have been imposed upon Anthony Cipolla IF he actually were
arrested.  And remember, Cipolla only received a summary notice that was
only signed by Diane Thompson by which he was to appear before city
court magistrate Stephen Laffey, to see IF Laffey would issue process
on Cipolla or not.  It was up to Thompson to show probable cause.
She simply dismiss her complaint the day before the hearing.

None the less, once upon a time Fogle had undercover (plain clothes) duty, and
he caught two thugs assaulting and robbing two 80+ year old sisters.  The two
alleged robbers were John Knox and Samual Wade.  Both were held on $10,000
bond each.  Thus, if Cipolla molested Tucker Thompson, he would have been
held at a high price tag.  Probably $10,000.  He would NOT have been released
on his own recognizance.  Thompson lied.

Of course, Engel said that the police let Cipolla go on  his own "cognisance' (it's
recognizance).  But, only a judge can order a man released onhis own recognizance,
at a courthouse or magistrate's office.  Plus, there are no arraignments in police sta-
tions.  Again, Thompson was fabricating a story ... a false story.

Forrmerly St. Francis Xavier Parish and presently
Risen Lord Parish. California Ave, Northside.
By the way, concerning the Officer Robert Fogle and Mark Ninehouser case
that involved the murderer Tyrone DeVaughn, go to the Wednesday, February
28, 1979 edition of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, at Page 18.

Now, let me squelch an easily refutable piece of libel written ABOUT me by
Diane Thompson.  It's something which shows that someone was obsessively
attempting to dig up dirt on me.  Perhaps Randy Engel's paranoiac side kick
from New Jersey did the digging or Randy herself.

None the less . . .

The snide libel, in this case, asserted that my family kicked me out of my
"deceased father's" house.  Stop there.  Firstly, there is no such thing as a
deceased man's house after the probate period.  It belongs to his heirs.  I
was one of my father's four heirs.  Thus, it was MY HOUSE co-owned
with my three siblings.

Concerning that house and my father's other house, I WAS BOUGHT-OUT IN
FULL.  Now, I was offered as my inheritance either one of my father's houses,
but I did not except the offer.  I took the equivalent money, instead.  Thompson
and her source are bumbling and defamatory buffoons who kept going out of
their ways to make you disrespect and despise me.   You need to be snapped
out of the hypnotic trance that has you thinking that Randy Engel is the all-
knowing goddess of the ages.  She presented as truth many fact-checks lies.

Remember one thing.  I was the one caught in the Fr Torquato Retaliations.
And usually, a person caught in a corrupt bishop's retaliations is one who
wins the compassion of the people.  You people might as well go out and
ridicule cancer patients and robbery victims, as well.

The fact that Thompson/Mangum/Labiaux ridiculed a retaliation victim of
a corrupt bishop shows that she was not one of us.  There is an unwritten
code of respect among us.  Thompson showed zero respect for me.  Plus,
Thompson was found to have lied repeatedly.  Do the math as to whether
or not Diane Thompson suffered a priest's retaliation, and keep in mind
that Frank Labiaux is now proven to be a liar, concerning the AME Zion
Church vandalism which occurred 15 months after he claimed to have
done the vandalism.

None the less, this shows that someone has been striving to dig up dirt on
me and such a thing is a form of harassment.  Once again, I was NOT
kicked-out of my deceased father's house.  I WAS bought-out of my
own inherited house..  This ends another piece of libel against me.

I have to go, right now.  I will continue ... either here or in a new post.
By now, you should realize how incredibly non-factual and defamatory
is the Engel three-part article.  In as much, when she is dragged into
court sometime around November 2017 or so, I will not tolerate your
condemnation of me or Anthony Cipolla's 70+ year old brother who
wants his brother's name restored.

March 28, 2017

Let's set the record straight, here & now ... with evidence ... concerning the fact that Anthony Cipolla was NEVER arrested.

Okay, let's cut to the chase and get this done.  Look at the evidence directly
below here.  It is the public notice published in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette,
in late July 1978, on a day when there was no school and therefore no home-
work for Tucker Thompson to be doing at the Mexico Street kitchen table.

The public notice is only three sentences long.  You can read that much.  After
all, it's the evidence to prove that Anthony Cipolla was NOT arrested and put
into handcuffs in July of 1978, as the disrespectful and contemptible Randy
Engel claimed, in her self-assured arrogance.   The notice expressly states that
Anthony Cipolla:
                             was served with a summary notice by
                               police, signed by the youth's mother

A SUMMARY NOTICE is not not not an indictment or an arrest.  Plus, the
hearing that Cipolla was to attend and did attend, only to find out that Diane
Thompson ended up withdrawing her private criminal complaint shortly be-
fore said hearing, was to see if whether or not Anthony Cipolla was going to 
get indicted, arrested, processed, and sent to trial or sent to plea bargaining.  

Thompson exaggerated the whole story to the point of ridiculousness.  That
narration was found to be shear fiction (actionable in a court of civil law) via
fact-checking.  However, experience in how whistle-blower retaliation works
gave an instant red flag that the woman was lying, in addition to the fact that
the same Diane Thompson-Mangum-Labiaux kept changing her story.

All in all, I know whistle-blower retaliation from the front row seat of a wit-
ness.  I was there, in the middle of said whistle-blower retaliation, and I know 
how the M.O. works.  It does NOT transpiration the way in which the overly
sensationalistic Diane Thompson-Mangum-Labiaux said it did.  She fabricat-
ed a fiction, assuming that you are stupid enough to instantly believe her. 

The story was an insult to human intelligence, and it has been now categorical-
ly proven as such, even by one of the two "detectives" who were said  by Randy
Engel) to have arrested Anthony Cipolla,when the truth is that neither one of 
those two gentlemen arrested Cipolla and neither one of those two men were
even detectives.

As I previously stated, when you speak a lot, you get fact-checked as much.  
You then, you get caught contradicting yourself and contradicting known truth 
all the more easily.  

The Nov/Dec 2016 Engel article was very long and wordy.  It was easier to pick-
off the multiplicity of falsehoods stated by Engel than it was to pick-off lint from 
cheap polyester.  
Now look.  It's says SUMMARY NOTICE.  A summary notice is NOT an arrest.
Do you understand, yet?  Diane Thompson is a liar, just like when she said
that Tucker was sitting at the kitchen table, doing his homework on
July 30, when there is NO SCHOOL in Pittsburgh and therefore
no homework for Tucker to be doing.

It then stated that he faced a hearing in city court on Aug. 28.  It was a hearing
which would determine if whether or not Anthony Cipolla was to get arrested,
booked, put into the Pennsylvania criminal court system, rraigned, and set for
trial.  He was NOT yet arrested or indicted, etc.

Wow.  This is soooo frustrating, in trying to get basic information out to the com-
mon public which shows the People that Donald Wuerl is a completely abusive
fraud, living in Marie Antoinette luxury throughout his years of deceit.

Furthermore, Cipolla was served with a summary notice, because the police had
NO EVIDENCE with which to get him indicted via presenting to a judge for sig-
nature a Police Criminal Complaint form.  Therefore, the story of the hospital
finding traces of a lubricant around Tucker's anus is a complete falsehood, es-
pecially in light of the fact that hospitals do NOT do trace testing, but forensics
departments do, and it takes about 56 days for the results to come back.

Think.  When there is a death, it takes weeks to get a toxicology test concluded.

Now, being that I spoke person to person with the retired Officer Mark Ninehous-
er whom Randy Engel erroneous called M.N. Nehouser, we now have a corrobor-
ative witness to testify that the very man who was said by Engel to have arrested
Cipolla categorically stated, in a very easy-going tone of voice, that he did NOT
arrest Cipolla.  He stated that he merely took a report from Diane Thompson,
and then transposed it into a hand-print report that he gave to the detectives.
And that was his only involvement in the case.

In as much, Mark turned out to NOT be a detective as Engel asserted.  Mark was
NOT called ... no police officer was called ... to Diane Thompson's home, on ac-
count of any windows being smashed or any tires being slit.  Moreover, there
was NO POLICE CALL about any 70 year man slapping young Tucker in the
face at a store, on account of "telling on Anthony Cipolla."  Those stories writ-
ten Engel now are proven to be actionable libel.  No such events occurred.

Furthernore, Engel expressly said that Mark Ninehouser and Robert Fogle were
the detectives standing by the side of Diane Thompson until she "dropped crimi-
nal charges" that only a DA or judge can drop.  We now know that there was NO
SUCH INCIDENT of Mark Ninehouser and Robert Fogle being in the DA's own
officer with Diane Thompson, watching her sign a sheet of paper with tears in her
eyes or with tears not in her eyes.  She is now proven to be a complete liar, and
now Randy Engel is on the hook for conveying easily provable lies or extreme
defamation to the public.

At the time of this writing Engel has shown zero signs of contrition and has NOT
sought to correct her ridiculously obvious libel.  So, your lesson is that corruption
is NOT so ornately theatrical.  Corruption tries to go about like a shadow, and go
unnoticed.   Incidentally, I have not yet contacted Bob Colville's survivors, to see
if they want his name cleared via civil action.  Plus,  I don't even know how to con-
tact any surviving family member of Bishop Vincent Leonard.

Concerning Bishop Leonard, Chicago's Mike Volpe and I saw the psychiatric eval-
uations on Anthony Cipolla AND there is NO MENTION of sexual perversion of
any kind in them.  The only mention was DEPRESSION and SUICIDAL TEN-
DENCIES.  Therefore, it is not proven that Diane Thompson lied about Vincent
Leonard telling her that the diocese was aware of an intensely morbid psychiatric
diagnosis of Cipolla.  Engle tried to get you to believe that Cipolla was molesting
kids left and right.  NO ONE, in over 44 years came forth and accused Cipolla of
any wrongdoing, except for proven pathological liar Diane Thompson and proven
con artist and trouble maker Tim Bendig.

Think:  I recently received THREE security clearancers and have had others ones
in years past, yet Thompson made me out to be a violent mad man, even though
she NEVER spoke with me and NEVER received as much as an email from me.
All that she will ever get from me, through an officer of the court, will be a sum-
mons to appear in a court she would much rather not approach.  Then I start talk-
ing to her ... on record ... in very strict and legal settings.  Then she gets the de-
struction that she gave to the Cipolla family.  Bendig too.  And now Randy.
Engel, an utter self-righteously smug buffoon who didn't know that no one is
ever arraigned at a police station and that all Pittsburgh arraignments were
done at the Public Safety Bldg which once was at Grant and First.

Wuerl is conning the public.  Public, please wake-up.  He started lying to the
public as far back as 1979, when he returned from a ten year desk assignment
in Rome.  He deceived the press into thinking that he single-handed wrote the
Teachings of Christ catechism book.  He did this by saying, when you start
writing, you just have the urge to keep on going --- or something to that effect.

Concerning that con game, no one writes a catechism book anew.  A person
simply hands down, via writing, what the original apostles taught.  In fact,
there is a specific outline one must follow in putting the Catholic catechism
to written script.  None the less, there were multiple co-authors and THREE
editors of th bokk, Teachings of Christ.  This is why it was an outrage for
Wuerl to have been photographed solo while holding a copy of that book.
Only sole authors legitimately can do such a thing.

The falsehood that Wuerl recently set forth was that the Cipolla Case involved
judging --- or accepting as evidence --- the allegation that Cipolla molested Tim
Bendig.  The whole Cipolla Case at the Vatican was a procedural case that dealt
with the diagnosis that Cipolla received at St. Luke's in Maryland.  The diagnosis
was DEPRESSION & SUICIDAL TENDENCIES, a diagnosis declared errone-
ous at St. Michael's of NYC.  The Vatican did NOT NOT NOT spend five years
trying to discern if whether or not Cipolla molested Bendig, as Bendig falsey
stated to a journalist.  Bendig is a perpetual liar.  Plus, he NEVER sued me for
calling him a liar ... because he is one.

Here is the evidence that Cipolla was only served with a summary notice that end-
ed up going nowhere, because Diane Thompson withdrew her private criminal com-
plaint shortly before the Auguste 28th hearing, where she was to give to Judge Stepj-
en Laffey "probable cause" that would result in Cipolla finally getting indicted and
having "due process issued upon him."

Concerning the "issuing of process," there is one very simple thing that happens to
the defendant first.  Neither Randy Engel nor Diane Thompson no the Pittsburgh
Post Gazette mentioned what that is, thereby showing that neither entity knew
what they were talking-about, and thereby showing that the whole arrest-and-
retaliation narration was a fabricated exaggeration of what really happened.

Do you finally understand?  This is soooooooo exasperating.  No handcuffs.
No night in jail.  No being released on his own recognizance - - - and quite
frankly - - - I can assure that, if Cipolla were arrested on Indecent Assault
of a Minor charges, the bail would have been approximately $10,000.  In
that type of criminal charge, you do NOT get to prance off on your own

Thus, the lesson here is to NEVER believe anything written by any hag who has
absolutely no legal background of any kind.

You can believe with reasonable plausibility a law student, a paralegal, a lawyer,
a clerk of court, the employee of a corporation who does all of its legal filings,
(from judgments to mechanic's liens to petitions for writs of execution) and
you can even believe with reasonable plausibility an ex-con who was in the
criminal court system.

Believing what novice Randy Engel had to say about the subject was equivalent
to getting advicce on your broken-down car from an adolescent riding a bicycle.

The public notice below is enough evidence to prove that all of the dramatic
narration that Randy Engel typed into her Nov-Dec 2016 three-part article
was complete defamatory FICTION.  Read the notice.

PS --- Keep in mind that the photo posted online which was purported to be
          a section of the 1978 Offense/Incidence Report written by "detectives"
        "M.N. Nehouser (actually it's Ninehouser) and R. Fogle was an obvious
          counterfeit fabrication, because it was handwritten in cursive handwrit-
          ing.  The Pittsburgh police in 1978 were required to hand-print all of
          their reports.

           Moreover, Ninehouser and Fogle were NOT detectives.  Very simply,
           according to Mark Ninehouser himself, he filled-out the true report
           (in hand-printing) and then handed it to the real detectives.

           By the way, contrary to Engel's self-assured and arrogant claim, no
           one in Pittsburgh in the 1970s ever got arraigned at a police station.
           They got arraigned at the PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG that was located
           at Grant and First.

           Now, and only now, is the record set straight.

          Till the next time, if there is a next time,

          Patrick Anthony ... severely hated by some, but needed by others.

Free yourself from the Gulag of the over-domineering Randy Engel and
the easily provable lie she conveyed to Americas, as well as her rude
disrespect for the dead who suffered much while they were alive.
When you realize that she's a fake, you will feel very free.

Let's review Randy Engel's two personal lies told in her Nov/Dec 2016 three-part article that was fact-checked and found filled with falsehoods.

This is an August photo.  Cipolla died in August.
I should have time this weekend to do the official report on the Cipolla Case which
I will also post online.  This is what bar members get to view, as well as a certain
agent in the State Attorney General's office.  Then again, I might turn it into the
Reader's Digest version, just so that you'll see how intensely you were deceived
by Wuerl ... Bendig ... Thompson-Labiaux-Mangum ... Ann Rodgers, etc.

Now, Randy Engel posted as reality Diane Thompson's fact-checked falsehoos.
Engel also told two personal lies . . . or else she has Alzheimer's Disease at 70+
years of age.  Moreover, she proved herself to be an utter moron when it comes
to basic knowledge of basic law.  For now, her two lies:

At the outset of her Nov/Dec 2016 article, she said that her good good New Jersey
friend 'dropped the bomb' in January of 2016, by telling her that Anthony Cipolla
was looking for a job, teaching youth.  LIAR.  I dropped the bomb in the Year
2011, directly quoting that New Jersey lady.  I then found out later that the rea-
son why Cipolla did so was because he had a stellar reputation in New Jersey,
for his youth program there, and has literally made man of the year in that spe-
cific New Jersey locale.  I posted the Oakland NJ police plaque of appreciation
about ten times thus far.  So think . . .

Wuerl illegally cut off Cipolla ... and Randy Engel was dead wrong is stating that
Wuerl had no canonical obligation to pay Cipolla a monthly stipend.  Wuerl was
paying convicted felon, Richard Dorsch, all along, and Wuerl kept Francis Pucci
safe and fed, even to the point of letting him perform the Catholic mass for a
province of local nuns.  And then there is Robert Wolk, not to mention others.
Cipolla was NEVER even indicted.  Yet, Wuerl completely cut him off, stating
that he will let all prospective employers know that Cipolla was accused of
molestation.  Yet, Wuerl was NOT going to mention that both accusers were
found to be liars and that he declared Tim Bendig on record as NON-credible.
Wuerl was also NOT going to admit that Bendig only come forth in the public
eye after Wuerl was caught performing a triple-cover which resutled in crimi-
nal indictments.

So, Cipolla was out of money and Wuerl was going to make sure that Cipolla
would not get the opportunity to be gainfully employed.  So, what does one
do?  One goes underground to a place where he had many good character
witnesses, including police officers.

Plus plus plus, as soon as Cipolla got a benefactor to pay his monthly rent,
he did NOT look for any work ... including home schooling work. If he
were a molester, he would have tried many ways to get near kids.

In addition, Cipolla was not a friend of Maciel and had NO connections
with the Legionaries.  In fact, he told me of one encounter he had with
them, and he didn't like them at all.

Incidentally, Cipolla did NOT like the alleged Medjugorje visionary, Ivan
Dragicevic.  He said that Ivan was arrogant and rude.  I never met Ivan.

All in all, Randy Engel IS a deliberate liar or she suffers for Alzheimer's
Disease.  So, sue me for libel, Engel.  You liar.

Second personal lie of Randy Engel:

She stated that she wondered for years what the name of the 1978 accuser of
Anthony Cipolla was.  LIAR!!!!  I personally let her know in 2009.  Then,
years later, I wrote to Engel and stated, "I guess that there is no way that we
can defend against Diane Thompson's accusations, is there?"  Engel respond-
ed, "You can't be too sure of that."  That was all that she stated.

Now, the Cipolla New Jersey "job-hunt" lunch was reported by me in 2011,
and in 2011, Engel read my newest site and sent links of it to her friends.
Plus, in 2011 and 2012, I used to publish Engel writings.  She was familiar
with my sites at the time.  I sent her an email or two or three, mentioning
the name of Diane Thompson.

All in all, as I previously stated, either Engel is a liar or is succumbing to
dementia, and the way in which she wrote her article which damns the
late Anthony Cipolla to the depths of Hell, she is losing her mind or
her sense of morals.  Libel is a mortal sin.

Moreover, she defamed Cipolla in a way that was super-easy to refute after
he was dead.  Engel would not let him rest.  Engel WILL be held account-
able for this, especially being that her article was the easiest thing to pick
apart.  After all, there has been NO military base in Spartansburg since
1946.  There is no school on July 30 in Pennsylvania.  M.N  Nehouser,
Badge #46 was Mark Ninehouser, Badge #46 and he was NOT a de-
tective.  Plus, he expressly told me that he did NOT arrest Cipolla
and that he had nothing to do with the case after hand-printing a
report and giving it to the real detectives.  Thus . . .

Ninehouser was NOT in the DA's officer with Diane Thompson, looking
disappointed, after she signed "the dropping of charges" with tears in her
eyes.  Ninehouser was NOT telephoned by Diane Thompson on July 30,
in any capacity.  Thus, he was NOT called to her home, to get Anthony
Cipolla, clad in a cassock, out of her home.  Moreover, Anthony Cipo-
la's own brother and one of Cipolla's closest personal friends NEVER
saw Cipolla clad in a cassock, ever.

The Randy-Engel-Lies go on and on and on and on.   You and the rest
of the Catholic public MUST see how much of a farce the Cipolla Case
was, in its presentation.  The public must see how false was the Randy
article, the arrogant Randy Engel, lord and judge of all ... in her arro-
gant mind.

You do NOT go about, inflicting perpetual emotional distress on a
heart patient and not expect to him die of a heart attack.  It's amaz-
ing how Engel, her New Jersey Conspiracy Theory fried, Bendig,
Thompson, and Wuerl were indifferent to the untold paint that
they caused Cipolla.  What if it happened to you?  How long
would you last?

There's more.  I have to go now, and deliver something that literally
could blow up if handled wrongly.  If professionals are involved, it
won't happen.  But, the pros have to be free of this emotional trauma
that hags like Diane Thompson, Randy Engel, and the paranoid con-
spiracy theory housewife of New Jersey inflict with their screaming
Mimi sensationalism.  The National Enquirer is in the other direction,
and not in this direction, you insufferable hags.

I have to go.

Till the next time, if there is a next time.

March 27, 2017

Mexico Street, Part 1: To prove how much of a liar Diane Thompson is.

Welcome to the Mexico Street mentioned by Randy Engel in herdamning telephone gossip 
article against Anthony Cipolla. We are looking for a one-floor domicile, under at least one
floor of apartments and equipped with a kitchen door.  These townhouses do not qualify, 
because they are multi-floor dwellings w/ upstairs, downstairs, and basement.  That 
wall of short concrete protecting the townhouses from car traffic is called a Jersey Barrier.
In re:  The three-part Randy Engel article of Nov/Dec 2016, where she narrates
an overly theatrical and virtually hysteric account of Anthony Cipolla being the
molester of a family in such a way that numerous contradictions and blatant
falsehoods were uncovered via fact-checking.  That which was contradicted

1} the most basic facts pertaining to the Pennsylvania Code of Criminal Proce-
dure,  2} the October 13, 1995 Pittsburgh Post Gazette article which quoted the
damning accusations of Diane Thompson against Cipolla, DA Bob Colville, and
former Pittsburgh bishop, Vincent Leonard,  3} documented fact,  4} the answers
given to me personally by one of the two "detectives" who were asserted to have
arrested Anthony Cipolla, when they did no such thing.

The setting was Mexico Street, on the Northside of Pittsburgh ... in Brighton
Heights.  Actually, it was more close to a suburb known as BELLEVUE.  The
street was parallel to the very active CALIFORNIA AVE which is a long stretch
of road that passes train tracks and a massive US Postal facility.  Mexico Street
is also adjacent to the Termon Ave which gets busy at the rush hours.

If you look toward the west, while on Mexico Street, you can see the Ohio River
and the four-land highway which travels parallel to the river for approximately
30 or so miles, until you literally drive into the main street of Beaver Falls, PA,
a town made famous by Super Bowl champion Joe Namath.  That road is known
as Route 65.  However, you can NOT commit vandalism on Mexico Street and
run toward Route 65, for an effective escape.  This is because you will encounter
a pronounced drop in the land, equivalent of the slope of a sink hole.

In fact, if you do commit vandalism on Mexico Street, it's pretty easy to get caught ...
... or at least be seen by a sufficient of witnesses.  Therefore, the reports of Diane
Thompson being victimized by slashed tires and broken windows was easy to sur-
mise as another sensationalistic falsehood.

Now, Thompson's specific claims of vandalism were instantly dispelled & summar-
ily debunked by one of the two police officers whom Randy Engel claimed to have
arrested Cipolla.  His name is Mark Ninehouser and his averment of fact is that he
did nothing more than go to Diane Thompson's residence and hand-printed a report
which he then gave to the detectives.  He was never called to respond to a vandalism
at Thompson's home and he surely wasn't called to any store to respond to any claim
of any man of any age slapping young Tucker Thompson in fact for any reason.

Of course, in her repertoire of proven lies, Diane Thompson claimed that a 70 year
old man slapped young Tucker in the face, for reporting Cipolla to his mother.  Uhm,
I know Pittsburgh, and something like that would never have happened in the 1970s.
Hags hits kids in the face, not Pittsburgh men who fear getting caught up in a crimi-
nal court system or in a civil lawsuit.

Quite frankly, if any store owner knew of the accusations against Anthony Cipolla,
he/she would have kept a distinct distance from Tucker, n fear that Diane Thompson
would file a private criminal complaint against the store owner, also.  The logic is
that such a woman is trigger-happy with filing private criminal complaints.

Keep in mind that I worked throughout the City of Pittsburgh and the nearby
bureaus for consecutive years and I know the Pittsburgh mindset.  Engel did
NOT here where I am presently writing, as I wait to get called back to Chica-
go for another round of life in what used to be the prairie lands of Illinois.
Thus, Engel doesn't know how we think.

Anyway, the assertion of Engel is that Tucker used to have a female buddy he would
regularly visit who lived in an upstairs apartment from him.  Plus, a completely de-
bunked claim of Diane Thompson and Randy Engel was that Cipolla appear at the
apartment's "kitchen door" at the end of July, clad in a cassock, as young Tucker,
afflicted with ADD, was sitting at the kitchen table studiously doing his home-
work on a day when there was no school anywhere in the Sovereign State of

In as much, we need to find an apartment that is one-floor only and which has a
kitchen door.  That was a challenge.  When you see the panorama of photos I took
of Mexico Street a couple weeks before the writing of this article / text / post, you
will understand.  .

Two quick points:  1}  In the 1960s and 1970s, if you buddied-up with a girl, you
were sissy.  Interest in girls didn't arise until the age of 12 or 13.  Now, there was
the phenomenon of having a crush on a teacher, but not on a nine year old girl.
So, either Diane Thompson lied again or else Tucker was in a dysfunctional
setting.  Going by memory, youths aged 8, 9, 10 wanted to go down to the
nearest creek, play army, turn their bicycles into hot rods and Hollywood
stunct vehicle, play with hot wheel cars, go to the camera and card shop
and pickup model kits of the hottest hot rods in existence, play baseball,
go see a Pittsburgh Pirate baseball game, study about the NASA program,
watch war movies, detective movies, monster movies, get taken to the
nearest drag strip by their older brothers, watch neighbors supe-up their
cars, etc.  Only 8 and 9 year old sissies play Barbie Dolls with their 9
year old neighbors.

2} No one with whom I have spoken EVER saw Anthony Cipolla wear a
cassock.  This includes Anthony's own electrician brother and Cipolla's
6'6" friend who was actually the son of the man who personally knew
Padre Pio during the American occupation of Italy after WWII.

The northern end of Mexico Street.

An assisted living home.  No back-kitchen doors here,

                                          TO BE CONTINUED ... WITH NARRATIVES.