The Corruption of Cardinal Donald Wuerl
 
Current archbishop of Washington, D.C.   Former bishop of Pittsburgh.
Your Subtitle text

                      Donald Wuerl:  Wolf in Shepherd's Clothing


The Contradiction Found in the Media Praise of Donald Wuerl




This subject will be handled discretely.  It will be addressed simply by posting two links
which cover that topic.  It will be stated herein that, yes, it is acknowledged that Wuerl
has catered to the unnatural world, and it is obvious that there generally exists something
likened to what is called the Lavender Mafia.  The same one article is highlighted in both
links provided directly below.  The introductions to that one article are different.  Each link
is configured to open in a new window.  It isn't denied that there is a Sodomite Cabal who
hijacked the Catholic Church.  The objective is for Catholic to take their church back:

http://www.motherswatch.net/content/view/13/15/

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/060518

-    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -   


Donald Wuerl:  A Clone of the Scribes & Pharisees

Worldly Honors and the Absence of Humility


The following passage of Sacred Scripture was spoken by the only Messiah that mankind will
 ever have:  "A prophet is not without honor, except in his native place, among his own
kindred, and in his own house
."  Conversely speaking, one can deduce from the same Sa-
cred Script that he who receives great honor in his native place and amongst his own people
is not a prophet.  Well, Donald Wuerl is a native of Pittsburgh, and he had a gluttonous supply
of honor bestowed upon him there.  Therefore, according to the Gospels, Wuerl is not a . . .

The local media's portrayal of Donald Wuerl was equivalent to their having said, "our
bishop can beat up your bishop."  Now, it can be reasonably suspected that the local
media's praise of Wuerl was done to keep the Catholic anti-defamation league off of
the local media's back.  However, in praising Wuerl the way in which he was praised,
the local media de facto belittled the other Catholic bishops of  America.  That is de-
famatory to Catholics elsewhere.

The Isolate-and-Converge Tactic


Wuerl closed 35% of the 333 Pittsburgh area parishes that were in existence the day he
took charge.  Yet, between 1988 and 2004, the Catholic population in the Pittsburgh vi-
cinity only dropped 3% (837,000 to 812,000).

One of the 118 parishes designated for closure was a Franciscan and Croatian parish that canonically belonged to the same province as does the famed (or infamous) Saint James
Parish, in Medjugorje.  It is known as the Province of the Assumption in Hercegovina

Shortly after Donald Wuerl announced his intent to close that parish, its pastor signed a letter stating that Wuerl violated canon law in his having chosen to close it.  In response, Wuerl or-
dered the pastor to his office.  But, Wuerl did not order the pastor there for the purpose of having a friendly dialogue.  In fact, as soon as the pastor entered Wuerl's office, he found him-
self surrounded by a entourage of people who served the function of intimidating office decor.

Such a technique can constrict a invited person's mental processes so much so that it can
easily close a case before it's even opened.  There was no one-on-one meeting with a kind-
ly father figure.  There were no prior meetings with courteous canon lawyers.  There was
no point by point discussion of the contents of the letter.  There was not even an acknowl-edgment that closing an unique parish could be emotionally painful for its ethnic parishioners.

There was one question posed to an isolated priest, by a bishop who was sitting amidst an
inhospitable entourage.  Wuerl challenged the pastor to show him where he violated canon
law in announcing the closing of the Croatian parish.  Now, intimidating someone is an effec-
tive way of preventing that person's thoughts from flowing. 

Wuerl could have been courteous and understanding about the grief of the parishioners, but
he elected to operate in the intimidation mode.  Wuerl's thug tactic didn't cause the parishion-
ers to back down.  They ended up filing a lawsuit against him.   Numerous lawsuits were filed
against the tiny statured Donaldd Wuerl.   When as many lawsuits are filed against a bishop as
were filed against Wuerl, it indicates that there is something deadly wrong with that bishop.

Shortly after that office visit, the pastor made a public apology for having signed the letter,
while also mentioning how intimidating that meeting was.  In fact, he said that he had to take
a few days off, being that it was such a traumatizing experience.  All in all, it is not healthy for
a bishop to employ those types of tactics.  In fact, when a bishop is a notably frail 5'4 or 5'5,
and then he orchestrates an intimidation ploy, that bishop shows himself  to be a coward who has to hide behind thugs.

The Common Tactic


This case and the case of Wuerl's former personal secretary have one common trait.  In both
accounts, you can see that the chosen technique of Wuerl is to isolate you and then converge
upon you.  Let it be repeated.   Donald Wuerl's noted tactic in Pittsburgh was to get you iso-
lated, defenseless, and abandoned.  Then he attacked.

In the case of Wuerl's former secretary, the accuser was told that bringing his pieces of evi-
dence to the diocesan building would be helpful.  Take note that he was not asked to bring
copies of the evidence.  Well, a letter was sent back to Wuerl's personnel, informing them
that they would only be shown the pieces of evidence in a neutral place, with a third party
holding them, allowing diocesan personnel to see every inch of every piece of evidence, but
never enabling them to get their hands on any of it.  It was the point in time when serpentine
behavior turned into full scale hammering.

Wuerl's Use of a De Facto Corruption of Blood Policy,
in Punishing the Children of those Adults who Publically
Objected to Donald Wuerl's Breaking of a Promise


Risen Lord Parish is one of the Pittsburgh diocesan parishes.  It had a parochial school when
Wuerl assumed power in Pittsburgh, but it has no school at present.  He designated Risen
Lord Parish School for closure.  The excuse was the lack of financial resources.  Parents of
the student body appealed to the diocese, in their desire to have Risen Lord Parish School
kept open.  So, a deal was made by the diocese, where the school would remain open if
the parents and teachers raised a certain sum of money.  It had to be cash, and not merely pledges.  The parents and teachers did successfully raised the required sum of money, if and
only if pledges were counted.  Wuerl closed the school.

In response to Wuerl's closing of the school, a number of the parishioners performed a pub-
lic protest, even with protest signs in hand.  In fact, the event made local television headline
news.  In response to the protest, the diocese mandated that all Risen Lord Parish protest-
ers were required to attend classes on how to show respect to one's bishop, under penalty
of having their children barred admission into all other Pittsburgh diocesan schools.  This pol-
icy was euphemistically called "denying school transfers," and the mandated classes were
euphemistically called "Three Hours of Reconciliation Counseling."

Punishing children for actions of a parent is known as Corruption of Blood law.  Corruption
of Blood actions consist in denying the children their inheritance, on account of a treasonable
act of at least one of their parents. The children of Risen Lord Parish School were faced with
loosing the inheritance of a Catholic school education at the hands of Wuerl, even though they
did absolutely nothing wrong.  Wuerl is heralded as a protector of children who cares about
their education.  Yet, he was ready to keep a number of children out of diocesan schools.

One question remains in the Risen Lord Parish School case.
What happened to the actual cash that the people raised?

The Cult of Personality: 
Turning the Tiny Donald Wuerl into a Graven Idol


If you read the first web page, you saw that the Wuerlite propaganda machine was rewriting
history and deceiving America in the process.  Concerning the deliberate deceiving of Amer-
ica, observe the following lie put into print by Pittsburgh Post Gazette writer, Ann Rodgers.
It was published in the March 24, 1996 edition, in the Local Section, at Page A1.  The ar-
ticle makes Wuerl look like an Greek god who descended from Mount Olympus:

                                "At 55, Wuerl is 5 feet 11 inches
                                  tall and ascetically thin from
                                 exercise and abstemious living."

As has been previously stated, Wuerl is either approximately or exactly 5'4".  A Pittsburgh
diocesan Eucharistic minster and lecteur who was formally introduced to Wuerl said that he
had the second softest hand shake he ever encountered.  He described Wuerl as "scrawny."
In addition, a parish council woman who encountered Wuerl in a church basement said that
he acted "girly."   The Donald Wuerl who walked up to me reminded me of a 14 year old
teenager with jet gray hair.  Only the thing impressive about Wuerl was that he did not have
the common "middle aged spread."


Wuerl is approximately the same height as was his immediate Pittsburgh predecessor, An-
thony Bevilacqua, and he's approximately the same height as is his abusive former secretary.  Yet, photos of Wuerl repeatedly make him look much taller than he is.
  Newspaper photos
of Wuerl have him
often set in a position that will enable him to appear to be the tallest per-
son in the
photo.  This was done by placing him on an elevated step or the such.

Whenever Wuerl would be photographed next to a person much taller than he (whenever an
elevate
d step was not available), he would stand at a notable distance from the person, so as
to offset the disparity in height.
  However, whenever he would be photographed next to a tall
attorney or the such, the photo would let the viewer know the height of the person in a posi-
tion of power standing next to him.  This has even been the case, when the pe
rson in power
lacked the trappings of an imposing figure.  Incidentally, the phrase"lacking the trappings of
an imposing figure" is the polite way of saying
"Big dork."  The objective
of Wuerl, it repeat-
edly appeared, was to intimidate you and me.

In 2006, Wuerl was on CSPAN.  In the parting scene, he was outside of the national shrine,
shaking hands with a passerby or two.  In that shot, he literally looked 6'2.  In that scene,
Wuerl was standing on a stairway step that was hidden by a long limousine.  He then got in-
to the limousine and rode off.   Needless to say, it was not a scene of Franciscan poverty or
Carmelite simplicity.  It certainly wasn't a scene of Dominican wisdom, either.  Wuerl's exit
via limousine was enough to turn off any prospective convert watching CSPAN at that mo-
ment.

The Vanity in Being Height Conscious


What is wrong with being 5'3, 5'4, 5'5, or 5'6, if you are male?  In the sixties and seventies, it
was accompanied by a presumption of streamlined coordination, depending on the person's
width.  There have been extremely popular celebrities in that height range.  There was Davey
Jones, a popular celebrity among the youth.  There was also Paul Simon, Dustin Hoffman,
Bob Dylan, Sammy Davis Jr.,
Dudley Moore, and a three-time major league all star named
Freddie Patek. 

Add to the general list Michael J. Fox, NBA basketball player Earl Boykins, Rechrd Dreyfus, Peter Falk, Richard Dreyfus, Mahatma Gandhi, Pablo Picasso, Seth Greene, Gustav Malher,
and others.   In the grand scheme of things, height doesn't matter.

In addition, there are entire nations where the common height of a male is lower than that of a
John Wayne.  In fact, how tall was Mother Theresa?  How tall was St Margaret of Costello?
It's not the height that counts.  It's the impact on on another one's life that does.

"The Elizabeth Ann Seton Award for Contributions to
Catholic Education" Has Nothing to do with Educating
or Writing.  It Involves Financial Contributions only.


Donald Wuerl was advertised as the winner of the "prestigious Elizabeth Ann Seton Award
for his ongoing work as a teacher and educator
."  That claim was a lie.  The Elizabeth Ann
Seton Award is simply an award for supporting Catholic educational institutions with money;
by either fund raising or philanthropy.  It's a "thanks for the money award."

The founder of the National Dance Institute won that award in 1996.  Wuerl won it in 1995.
Therefore, if you win the lottery and then donate $5 million to a Catholic school, while making
it known that you are considering to donate an additional $5 million in the near future, chances
are that you will win the exact same "prestigious" award that Wuerl won in 1995, even if you
know little about Catholicism.  In fact, how prestigious can an award be when eight people
win it in one day?

Incidentally, Wuerl's achievement consisted in the corporate fund raising effort to keep four
inner city Pittsburgh diocesan schools open.  The total enrollment of the four schools at any
one time was only 850 students, and the students did not attend for free.  For the 2002/2003
school season, each student's guardian or parent was charged $1,480 of the $3,700 tuition
bill.

The organization which was ultimately formed to maintain the inner city schools is called the
Extra Mile Education Foundation.  It had twenty board members other than Wuerl in 2002,
and the vast majority of them came from the corporate and finance world.  So,  why didn't
they get win the Elizabeth Ann Seton  Award, also?

Now, keeping these four schools open was a good cause.   But, it seems to have been a
cause for Donald Wuerl's public image more than the children.  Concerning the Extra Mile
Education Foundation, 85.7% of its 2004 operating budget went to the programs and ser-
vices that it was established to provide.  Its Charity Navigator Rating was 56.59.   That con-
stitutes a three star rating.  So, if it still  exists, give if you can. 

Keep in mind that any person with the influence that comes with the title, Bishop of Pittburgh,
could have done the same thing.  In  fact, you would expect someone with that influence to
accomplish much more that what Donald Wuerl accomplished during his 18 year tenure.

The Hypocritical Irony Attached to Praising
Wuerl for this Effort which was only Made
Possible by Corporate Intervention


The irony to giving Donald Wuerl the Elizabeth Ann Seton Award is that, if he were so great
a maintainer of Catholic school education, then why did he close the number of Catholic par-
ochial schools that he closed?  In fact, the parents of Risen Lord Parish should all have been
given the Elizabeth Ann Seton Award for their efforts.

Concerning Donald Wuerl being claimed as the great catechist, know that he did not author
the catechism book titled, the Teachings of  Christ.  He was merely one of three compilers
of that book which was first published in 1976, and even that claim was placed in contro-versy.  This is mentioned, because it was repeatedly claimed that Wuerl wrote that book
single handedly.  That claim is a lie.  A compiler is not an author.

Matthew, Chapter 6:  Do Not Be Like the Hypocrites

It is written:

When you give alms, do not blow a trumpet before
you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in
the streets, to win the praise of others.


Concerning those four inner city schools, Wuerl definitely blew a trumpet before him.  It was
not even his alms that were being given.  It was someone else's money.  None the less, such
trumpet blowing, according to the Gospels, is the sign of a hypocrite. 

Who is More Valuable: The Jesus Christ who never
won an award or the Donald Wuerl who Waves his
tokens in your Face?


Jesus never received a single award during his lifetime.  Does this mean that he was an inept
teacher who should be ignored and replaced by Wuerl?  It is a valid question to ask in light
of the observation that, whenever Donald Wuerl's name is brought into a conversation, Jesus'
name seems to be left out. In as much:  

Jesus gave sight to the blind and functionality to the crippled.  He cast out very ferocious
demons, multiplied loaves of bread, and calmed a stormy sea.  How often has Donald
Wuerl done this?

- Did Donald Wuerl ever stop a war as did Francis of Assisi?
- Has Donald Wuerl ever converted a nation as did Patrick?
- Has his preaching ever made fish leap throughout a lake, as
   did that of Anthony of Padua?
- Did Wuerl ever risk his life for what is right? 

How many times did Wuerl give the fullness of breath to asthmatics, instead of letting them be
on the run during the course of a diocesan retaliation?  In fact, how times has Wuerl's admin-istered the seventh sacrament of the church and it resulted in a healing, as the Epistle of James
promised it would? 

Zero times?

Well, if that's the case, then why all the media praise about Wuerl? 
Praising someone like Wuerl makes the press look insignificant.

The Stalin Complex


The Napoleon Bonaparte who was portrayed as a 5'2" (even 4'11") corporal was actually a
5'7 1/2" graduate of the Royal Military School, in Paris.  His height was slightly above aver-
age for an early 19th Century continental European male, and he was only called the Little
corporal as a show of filiality by his soldiers, on account of his camaraderie
with them.  So,
historic fact would have you refrain from ever using the phrase, "Napoleon Complex."  How-
ever, the phrase "Stalin Complex" would be applicable in describing Donald Wuerl.  That
appears to be the state of mind displayed in either Donald Wuerl or in the public relations
person who constructed Wuerl's public image.

Joseph Stalin was a frail 5'5 1/2.  He was only slightly taller than Wuerl.  Yet, film clips and
statuary made him appear to be of an intimidating height and stature.  In fact, Stalin was giv-
en the titles, Brilliant Genius of Humanity, Gardener of Human Happiness, and
the Father of Nations.  His reputation for protecting people's rights was such that, whenever atrocities were
being committed against Soviet citizens, the people caught in the middle of them were telling
each other that Stalin probably didn't know they were happening.   The fact was that he was
the one ordering them.

Despite all of the media propaganda, deceptive photographs, and exaggerated statues, Sta-
lin was condemned in 1956 and even into the 1980s.  His propaganda image had collapsed.

Oliver Cromwell, three years after his death, was exhumed, hung, drawn & quartered, having
been formally declared a criminal.  In like fashion, the surviving accomplices of Cromwell who
cooperated in the regicide of Charles I were then executed.  Cromwell's legacy was erased,
yet he was called Lord Protector a few years prior.

Robespierre was publicly heralded as the Incorruptible.   But, he was to later meet the same
destiny that he was imposing on others, during his Reign of Terror.

One of the marks of a tyrant is that he is repeatedly praised in the press, amidst the absence
of questioning his actions and motives.  The news articles about Donald Wuerl that appeared
in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette and in
the Pittsburgh Catholic consisted more of indoctrination
than information.

Another mark of a tyrant is that of performing some type of purge.  Wuerl's great reional purge saw to the dissolution of 118 parishes in a geographic area that only saw a 3% decrease
in its Catholic population (between 1988 and 2004).  Now, concerning Donald Wuerl par-
taking in a great nationwide purge, consider the following:

According to Omaha archbishop Elden Curtiss, today's shortage of priests was being arti-
ficially contrived during the same time when Wuerl was closing multiple  parishes and Cath-
olic schools in Southwestern Pennsylvania.  It was also during the time when Wuerl was
influential in the Office of Priestly Formation.  In addition, other sources have reported that
an ongoing purge in the ranks of seminary candidates consisted in rejecting the applications
of very candidate unwilling to coexist with homosexuality. 

Seminary management pertains to the office of Priestly Formation.  Wuerl was involved with
the national office of Priestly Formation during the thinning of the herd.  Therefore, if Elden
Curtiss and other sources are correct, then Donald Wuerl partook in a second great purge.
That purge consisted in purging naturally inclined men from the ranks of the seminary.  Con-
cerning this, keep in mind that Donald Wuerl has been repeatedly noted as being effeminate
and unnaturally inclined.   This is even mentioned at the website of author and expert witness
Richard Sipe.

Those who ignore the errors made in history are condemned to repeat them and to then share
in a destiny similar to those who previously engaged in the errors.  History has shown that tyr-
ants and egomaniacs fall with the weight of gravity, along with their emblems and public re-
lations images.  History has also shown that tyrants are known to be disowned after their deaths, even to the point where their successors apologize to the people for their actions.

Sincerely,


Patrick Pontillo, Acting Ghost of Christmas Future

================ + + + ==================

For the convenience of each reader, the links to the other
pages of this website have been post directly below:

Wuerl's Multiple Cover-ups
       and the Exaggerations Reported in the Cipolla Case


               www.donaldwuerl.com
 
Wuerl's Abusive Secretary
      and His Ratification of His Secretary's Abuses


               http://www.donaldwuerl.com/JamesTorquato.html

==========================================