Above: This is where Donald Wuerl lived, while he was orchestrating the case that would destroy Anthony Cipolla for life and which would simultaneously provide for Wuerl a wide cloak of diversionary cover, for Wuerl's actual abusive priests ... ... and doing so while Wuerl had non-Catholic Ann Rodgers-Melnick of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette LIE to humanity, in proclaiming him to be the bishop of zero tolerance. Incidentally, I presently live about six blocks away from that house and have done so, since 2022. This means that I'm typing this post six blocks away from Wuerl's former palatial living quarters which complemented his Marie Antoinette Lifestyle ... otherwise known as his Pillow Mint Lifestyle. The Actual Points of Defamation The specific accusations were already online. Randy Engel's very nasty and non-factual article was once headlined under the title, "Setting the Record Straight on Anthony Cipolla." At present, there is still online the three-part article. It was
a display of egregious defamation which rendered heart patient, Anthony Cipolla, into an untold state of
Emotional Distress. He was in so much shock that you could hear it in his voice. During the last phone conversation I ever had with him, he simply hung up on me. Shortly thereafter, he was dead. More specifically, shortly after knowledge of the contents of Engel's 2016 article reached Anthony Cipolla, he ever-so-coincidentally underwent a cardiac arrhythmia while driving and crashed into a tree.
It was a display of defamation which could also provoke unhinged persons to literally hunt-down and kill Cipolla ... or to starve him out of existence. However, unhinged
people weren't needed to achieve the goal of ousting Cipolla from
humanity's midst. The 2016 Randy Engel article literally
killed him. After all, Cipolla was a heart patient who had multiple heart
surgeries. He was also a diabetic enduring neuropathy. Then came Randy Engel's ambush of lies, rendering Cipolla into a state shock ... in 2016. To be more exact, that which Randy Engel did shortly before Cipolla died was play "gotcha journalism. It was an emotional ambush. Yet, it was based on a series of easily-provable falsehoods. Cipolla's End As was previously mentioned, during the last telephone conversation I had with Anthony Cipolla, in 2016, he was beyond emotionally distressed. I could hear the frantic quiver, or at least feel it in his voice. In fact, he literally hung-up on me without ever saying goodbye ... or "till the next time" ... or "catch you later," etc. Then, a few days later, a 6'6" Penn State grad notified me that the Anthony Cipolla whom he personally admired had died in a car accident. In as much, if you attach the memory of a guy's stress-ridden voice to the subsequent notification of him being the central focal point in a fatal car crash ... it WILL have its affect on you. The Profile of the typical Cipolla follower None the less, there was a purpose for mentioning the messenger of Cipolla's death as a 6'6" Penn State grad. Well, he was once sent a letter from Joe Paterno's main office, inviting him to join the Nittany Lion football team. Another admirer of Cipolla whom I met was a varsity wrestler. Meanwhile, another one was a construction contractor, and he was the one who said to me that Cipolla "was such a wonderful man." Cipolla's Padre Pio Chaplin replacement was a weightlifter. Another Cipolla admirer was an actual coal miner who operated dragline excavators, while his son ... another Cipolla admirer ... was a carpenter. There was even a Cipolla follower who was an electrical engineer for the main electric company, with all of its surging power and the need to possess a sense of maturity to harness such deadly power. In light of the aforementioned list of Cipolla followers, answer the following question: If Anthony Cipolla were an effeminate, homosexualistic, pansified, prissy-boy child molester, then why were his male followers all stereotypical macho men? Hello? Is anybody home? Earth to Randy Engel followers. Come in, Randy Engel followers who are not yet in "assisted care living centers." More lies in specificity, from the Randy Engel Camp Here
is a three-part series,
making restitution for the lies told about Anthony Cipolla which Randy
Engel and her accomplices refused to retract for the past ten years. And
remember, there does exist the legal doctrine of Ongoing Wrong. As of
2026, the horror movie script written by an aging Randy Engel in 2016, and which starred a soon-to-be-dead Anthony Cipolla, is still online, meaning that the defamation is still ongoing. In as much:
The 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury report on Cipolla proved the
accusations asserted by Engel to have been falsehoods. After all,
Cipolla was NEVER arrested, there was no DNA evidence in the case, and it took 52 days to get the results of a DNA test in 1978, in the first. But, Engel claimed that Cipolla was arrested in 2 or 3 day after a DNA test that never occurred, in the first place. In addition,
in 1965, the Spartanburg South Carolina military base had been complete
closed in 1947, meaning that Diane Thompson had no husband getting hurt
there in any kind of special forces training event. That 1965 event was just another Diane Thompson lie, like the DNA lie. Oh, and the tale of two detectives driving her, Frank, and Tucker to a courtroom was another outright lie. There was only one detective in the 1978, as I explained perhaps a dozen times, previously. The Original Beginning of this post: It is best to begin with the most readily & instantaneously identified LIE told by a Mrs Randy Engel, in her 2016 defamatory article on Anthony Cipolla which is still online, in all of its defamatory glory. This particular averment of Engel is something so easy to prove as a lie that there's nothing to debate. With this lie heading the lineup card of the Randy Engel's Lies, the reader will easily see that this post is not a matter of personal opinion or debate or sleight of hand semantics. It's about outright blatant and easily provable lies that made Anthony Cipolla look like the Son of Satan and which made Diane Thompson look like the harrowed victim of destiny. Then
came the LIE of a 1965 Special Forces training collision
& explosion involving Diane Thompson's husband, at a Spartanburg South Carolina military base ... ... which completely ceased operations in
1947. According
to Mrs Randy Engel, some sort of husband of Diane
Thompson underwent a special forces training accident that
involved a vehicle collision & "an explosion," during 1965, at a military base in Spartanburg, South Carolina. That fictional 1965 Spartanburg South Carolina military base accident was said to have been the cue ball which caused Diane Thompson ... the 1978 accuser of Anthony Cipolla ... to be forced to fend for
herself as a single mother, in the era of food stamps, welfare checks,
and federally funded HUD housing. The special forces training accident story made Diane Thompson look like a harrowed victim of circumstances. It then made Cipolla look like a monster taking advantage of a harrowed victim of circumstances. Now, in the 2016 Renew America
article of Randy Engel, it was claimed that Diane Thompson was once
married to a Tom Thompson ... in the mid-1960s ... with everything ending
perhaps in 1977 with an alleged barbiturate overdose suicide. Randy described the Spartanburg vehicle crash & explosion as such: ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★ ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
Response to Engel's Assertion go as follows: That Spartanburg South Carolina military base actually CLOSED IN 1946,
one year after the end of WWII. It was then officially disbanded in 1947. It was called, Camp Croft. There was no Vietnam-era training
there. The place was a tourist sight in 1965.
Perhaps Diane Thompson meant to say, North Carolina base, instead of South Carolina. Well, the special forces training center in Camp Mackall,
North
Carolina, was NOT in operation in the 1960s. Thus, you cannot say that
Diane Thompson meant to say, North Carolina, instead of South Carolina. This means that you can be assured
that Randy Engel's Special Forces Crash & Explosion narration was a
deliberate lie, designed to make you "feel sorry" for Diane Thompson and
hate Anthony Cipolla all the more. Below: Look and see what LIARS Randy
Engel & Diane Thompson have been, in the claim that a "second
husband" ... or the father of the second son of Diane Thompson .... was
heroically serving his country, in Spartanburg, South Carolina, where
there was no military base in operation, in the first place. ★☆★☆★☆★☆☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★ Now,
concerning North Carolina's Camp Mackall, whoever this "second husband"
or "father of the second child" of Diane Thompson was, he definitely
did NOT do any special forces training there, either. Thus, he did no
special forces training in 1965 in either of the two Carolina states. To get to Vietnam, you needed to embark from California on the West Coast and NOT from the Carolinas on the East Coast. Moreover, Spartanburg was inland, near the northern border of South Carolina, far enough away from a coastline. Plus, in 1965 you needed to train in a hot jungle environment, and North Carolina did not have that environment. Meanwhile, South Carolina's Camp Croft had already been closed for 18 years, by the time 1965 arrived. Those
two observations, alone, should have alerted the 2016 readers of the
defamatory Randy Engel article that the contents of that article were
fiction. In as much, let us now adjourn to the famous Fort Bragg, also
located in the Carolinas. A
Randy Engel defender might come to say that Diane Thompson was
mistakenly referring to Fort Bragg as the place of Vietnam special
forces training, in Thompson's claim that her "second husband" was
severely injured during special forces training. Well,
if Fort Bragg were in California or Hawaii or Guam, the special forces
claim in the Engel article might have had some legitimacy. If Fort
Bragg were situated in a heated jungle, then the defamatory Engel
article of 2016 might have had an element of credibility to it. HOWEVER,
the reality with Fort Bragg is that there was the 5th Special Forces
stationed there and the 10th Special Forces Psychological Warfare unit, also. However, both special forces units were stationed there, only
for the purpose of paperwork and management. Any physical training
maneuvers which involved "explosions" were conducted elsewhere, in a
heated jungle environment called Vietnam.
Now,
the 5th Special Forces was indeed established in 1961 and assigned to
Fort Bragg. HOWEVER, between 1964 and 1971 its special forces training
bases were literally IN VIETNAM, to acclimate soldiers to the hot jungle
environment. Thus, there was no second husband of Diane Thompson ...
or father of Diane Thompson's second child ... involved in any 1965
special forces training in either one of the two Carolina states, especially
in Spartanburg where there were no military training exercises since
1945. Fort
Bragg became the center of Psychological Warfare in 1952, and the 10th
Special Forces Group was assigned to be stationed there, in the
psychological warfare capacity. Then, in 1962, JFK moved the
embarkation point of 10th Special Forces to the West Coast, being that
the West Coast was closer to Vietnam than was North Carolina. The
important point here is that the 10th Special Forces was a cerebral
military unit of psychological academics and mind games. The 10th
Special Forces was even involved in radio transmission academics, as
well as electronics. It was an Information Operations unit. Its
training was the opposite of the violence seen in the stereotypical
Chuck Norris movie. The 10th Special Forces Unit was not trained to
blow you up. It was trained to take over your radio stations and to
intercept enemy messages, as well as disabling enemy electronics. It s personnel were trained to intercept your phone call, instead of blowing up the
office where your phone was located. Thus, there was no way in which
10th Special Forces training resulted in any vehicle crash &
explosion. Moreover, there as sure as Hell was no 10th Special Forces training in Spartanburg, South Carolina. This
shows that Diane Thompson was NOT honestly mistaken, but rather, she
was a deliberate liar in her harrowing special forces training tale
which was nothing more fiction. There was no second husband of Diane
Thompson getting seriously injured in any 1965 special forces training
"explosion" in North or South Carolina. This
shows that Diane Thompson ... and and and Randy Engel's "good good New
Jersey friend" ... intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon heart
patient, Anthony Cipolla, with the help of their asinine dupe, Mrs
Randy Engel. There is a Huge Credibility Problem with the Year 1965 She
is allegedly married to a guy named Tom Thompson in 1965, until 1977 or
so, upon which he allegedly committed suicide by an overdose of
barbiturates. And then, according to Randy Engel, Cipolla pops-in and
starts molesting Diane Thompson's two sons. Now, for the big
credibility problem: Diane
Thompson's eldest son's name in 1978 was Frank Labiaux. According to
the record, Frank Labiaux was 12 years old in 1978. This would mean
that he was born in 1966. Well, in 1966, a Tom Thompson was allegedly
the husband of Diane Thompsons. So,
why does Frank have a different last name, if he is Tom Thompson's
son? Who was his real father of Frank? Who was real father of Tucker? And who was
the father of Diane Thompson's alleged third son ... as opposed to it
being her nephew or step-son ... who actually did die young? There
is even a bigger time problem with the tale of Tom Thompson going from master
printer ... in the age of automated printing ... to special forces
trainee in 1965 which meant that he at least had to have started his
military service in 1962. Plus, Diane
Thompson ... according to Randy Engel ... said that Tom Thompson's
trade was that of a printer and that he was one of the finest printing
trade craftsmen in the land. At
this point, there is a time problem here. Firstly, how old was Tom Thompson
in 1965 that he could gain the experience of being a master printer and
yet end up in America's elite forces with the required three years of previous military experience? Uhhhhm, there is one thing you
need to know about Special Forces recruitment. That is this: In
order to be recruited and then sent to Special Forces training, you "usually" needed to already have had three years
of military experience. THUS,
according to Randy Engel, the master civilian tradesman husband of Diane
Thompson started in the military in 1962, even though Engel stated that
Diane Thompson married young, indicating that she married one or two
equally young men. This would mean that Tom Thompson was too young
and/or inexperienced to have been in the U.S. special forces in 1965 ... or too young to be master printer during the age of automation where master printers were rarely in demand.
Therefore, how did Tom Thompson get the time to become a master printer during an era when the
printing trade long since turned "push-button" as far back as in the
1940s. That is to ask, how did the young Tom Thompson get the time to
become a master craftsmen, when there was only the need for only button
pushers and engineers? Below: Concerning the claim that Tom Thompson was both a master tradesman and a special forces recruit with three years prior military experience, how does a master craftsman in his mere 20's become a master craftsman
in the printing trade in 1961, when printing turned automated and became
a push-button industry? Central Pertinent Point, to show the malice of the 2016 Randy Engel & Renew America article which made Anthony Cipolla look like the Anti-Christ & the Son of Satan In 2016, Randy Engel assured us, with great confidence ... amidst the undertone of a novelist's suspicion ... that the evidence of Anthony Cipolla being a serial molester was blatant. She stated that the evidence existed in the fact that Cipolla was "moved around" a lot of times, in a five-year period. He was given multiple parish assignments in as many years. According to Engel, this is unheard-of, and is the tell-tale sign of a molester. According to reality, however, the multiple parish assignments given to a newly ordained priest was something quite common. Engel erroneously concluded that:
Of course, Randy Engel was making it look as if Anthony Cipolla kept getting caught molesting youth after youth, followed by him being assigned to a different parish, as a cover-up, over and over again. This is why multi-million dollar defamation lawsuits exist and why I personally believe that Randy Engel needed to be indicted for Homicide by Fright, as soon as Cipolla died in 2016. In her claiming that it was "unusual" for a newly ordained priest to be frequently shifted from parish to parish, Engel LIED. It was and is very common for a newly ordained priest to be shifted-around, simply for the sake of gaining experience. Plus, these are the guys who are young enough have the energy to reach out, move around, and cover distances that an aging priest is too tired to cover. Observe the reality of a newly ordained diocesan priest ... even in the 1970s, according to Archdio of D.C, Archdio of Denver, EWTN, and other Catholic sources:
ABOVE: Get into reality and take note that the 'TYPICAL NUMBER OF MOVES" made by "NEWLY ORDAINED PRIESTS" are usually "UP TO 5 IN 5 YEARS." Now, Anthony Cipolla became a NEWLY ORDAINED PRIEST on May 27th, 1972. Thus, it was expected for him to have been assigned to as many as five parishes in his first five years.
MOREOVER, instead of getting arrested in 1972 or 1973 or 1974, he received COMMENDATIONS which were known as "a recognition" & "an expression of appreciation" ... even from POLICE!!!! Therefore, according to Randy Engel and her "good good New Jersey friend," the police were engaged in the cover-up of a molester priest. To normal people, however, the police were acknowledging a priest who found a way to keep kids "off the streets" and "out of trouble." So, were the police the accomplices of a molester or is Randy Engel the stereotypical & predictable gossipy hag of absolutely worthless value? Another Example of the outright LIES in the 2016 Randy Engel article. According to Engel's 2016 article: Response: Firstly, once criminal charges are filed anywhere in the USA, a civilian CANNOT "drop the charges." This includes Diane Thompson. I repeatedly explained this in prior posts. Only a judge ... or magistrate ... as well as a DA ... or solicitor ... can drop criminal charges once they are filed. Thus, it was IMPOSSIBLE for the diocese to intimidate Diane Thompson into "dropping charges against Cipolla" WHICH WERE NEVER FILED IN THE FIRST PLACE. And there was ZERO semen found on Tucker Thompson, and there was NO DNA testing of any kind performed in the 1978 case. It was already explained in detail in other posts. ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★Secondly, the name was NOT "Nehouser." It was Mark Ninehouser and he was NOT a detective. In fact, I spoke with Mark at length, person to person, and Mark came off as a Most Excellent Gentleman, in the Keanu Reeves definition of the phrase. Randy Engel did NOT speak with Mark. I did. She wouldn't have even known how to get in touch with him. In 1978, Mark Ninehouser and Robert Fogle were uniformed police officers ... men in blue ... who were sent to Diane Thompson's apartment, on July 25th, 1978. They did nothing more than jot down her story, transposed it on an official form, and then handed it over to the detective's desk, never to speak with Diane Thompson again. Ninehouser & Fogle did NOT drive her or Tucker or Frank to any court venue, talking to her while driving. They talked to her once only, on July 25, 1978. They gave her no sheet of paper, saying that she was going to need it in the future. Oh, and as a general and non-specific fact concerning any sheet of paper being proven as an authentic one from 1978, and NOT a newly forged one in 2016, such a sheet paper needs to be slightly yellowed ... and NOT jet white. Even at that, I am only stating a general, at-large fact. Now, Fogle did do "undercover" & "plain clothes" police duty. But, this is different than being a detective. Cases have one detective only who does the mental work. The problem is that Diane Thompson watched too many episodes of the fictional TV series, Starsky & Hutch. Cipolla was never criminally indicted and/or arrested in the first place, and in order to be arraigned and then to schedule a preliminary hearing, you have to first be arrested. As I stated a half dozen times previously, I personally spoke at length, in a polite and informative conversation, with Mark Ninehouser. Moreover, I located him through the Pittsburgh Steeler Organization. Mark clearly explained what I ... and what you ... needed to know about Diane Thompson's very false assertion of him and his partner being detectives assigned to the Cipolla Case, as if they were Starsky & Hutch. In fact, Mark explained how Randy Engel LIED in her descriptions of where a defendant in Pittsburgh gets arraigned, in the first place. In 1978, no one got arraigned at Police Station #9, near Bidwell St. Defendants got arraigned at GRANT STREET, in a courtroom and NOT in a police station. Or they got arraigned at the night court venue. Engel mentioned, in her defamatory 2016 article that hearings in the Cipolla case ... in a couple of instances ... occurred at police stations. The proper response to that assertion is:
The whole "Nehouser" & Fogle detective duo story was a lie. It was another one of Diane Thompson's many falsehoods, and Randy Engel fell for it as she fell for a catalogue of Diane Thompson's MANY LIES which were easy to prove as LIES. We adjourn to the Cassock in the Heat of July Lie, in re 1978 In 2016, Randy Engel was either 76 or 78 years old. After all, she graduated from the State Univ of New York, at Cortland, in 1961. Thus, unless if she were a child genius who graduated college at the age of 12, Randy Engel was at least born in 1940. My source stated that Randy was born in 1938. The bottom line is that, in Randy Engel, we were not dealing with a master genius from the collegiate National Honors Society or an inductee of the Phi Sigma Iota International Foreign Language Society or a member of the International High IQ Society or someone who actually was published along side noted laureates such as Walt Whitman Award winners and National Book Award winners. According
to the aging female writer, Randy Engel, it was in the Heat of Late July (in 1978), when the
man formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla was wearing a CASSOCK,
while intruding on a single mom who, five days earlier, called the police and accused Cipolla of molesting a child
or two of hers. As a reminder, Diane Thompson said that she had to "pry the information " out of Tucker ... after talking and talking and talking to him, finally getting the answer she sought, almost immediately after After Cipolla told her that his parish did not have the money to pay her monthly apartment and therefore could not do so. This 1978 claim of having to "pry for information" from the young Tucker was the same type of thing said by the occasional social worker who pried outrageously ridiculous accusations from the mouths of the McMartin PreSchool children of the 1980s. There are a number of cases where a mother or a social worker claimed to have finally "pried out incriminating information" from youths who accused certain adults of outrageous crimes. Each one of those cases turned out to be a hoax prompted by ... instigated by ... a relentless mother or social worker who kept badgering the children being interrogated for the answer that the mother or social worker wanted to hear. Cassocks-in-July is a fictional tale Concerning Randy Engel stating that Anthony Cipolla appeared on the porch of Diane Thompson's apartment in the Heat of July, while Tucker was diligently doing his homework in the middle of Summer Vacation, take note: Cassocks are for cold-weather months, and are NOT typically
worn in late July ... in the Northern Hemisphere ... in case you didn't know. BTW,
I asked a few former followers of Anthony Cipolla if anyone of them
ever saw Cipolla dressed in a cassock. The answer was always, "No." All of the Cipolla followers with whom I spoke said that they never saw Anthony Cipolla in a cassock. So
stated for the record. |