In
the event you're keeping score on the case which Donald Wuerl used as a
diversionary tactic ... done in order to misdirect attention away from Wuerl's multiple & undisputed abusive priests ... the magistrate in charge of the Cipolla Case's Aug 28, 1978 Probable Cause Hearing was Stephen Laffey. He was a local magistrate.
In
law, a magistrate is basically "a screener," to see if a case should
continue onward or be dismissed. A local magistrate can also serve as a
motions judge, if need be. In fact, a magistrate is a preliminary
judge with a judge's power.
The Instant Give-away that Engel's narration of an arrest which never occurred in the first place was a fictional tale
It was so obvious that even a rowdy college student arrested during Spring Break could have detected it. Even a fan of Jack Reacher films could have easily seen through Randy Engel's ridiculously elaborate tale of the Anthony Cipolla arrest which never occurred in the first place.
It was all so simple. In all of her wind-bagging, with Police Station #1 this and Police Station #9 that ... along with pre-arraignment here and "released on his own cognizance" there ... Randy Engel never mentioned the #1 thing that happens to all people arrested and charged under any state criminal code statute involving a felony or a misdemeanor.
In all of her wind-bagging and uppity church lady verbiage, done in the attempt to make Diane Thompson sound all so credible, Randy Engel failed to mention the magic words which make an American arrest story sound credible. She left out:
"AND THEY TOOK HIM TO COUNTY."
Ladies and gentlemen, if you are arrested and charged on a state charge in the United States of America, you will be taken to the COUNTY JAIL and spend at least one night there. The fact that Randy Engel failed to add the "county jail feature" to her 2016 narration showed that the whole Cipolla story was made-up, and Randy Engel didn't realize it.
Identifying the True Detectives
The Confusion Factor went beyond Randy Engel giving the entirely wrong names of the detectives in her defamatory 2016 Cipolla article. It came from the next-to-last line on the July 25th, 1978 Offense/Incident Report. It stated whom was notified of Diane Thompson's complaint. One of the two names was Broz.
On the Northside of Pittsburgh, the name Broz was associated with the desk sergeant of Unit 9 ... of the police station somewhat near the Andy Warhol Museum. Warren Broz was the desk sergeant there, for years ... about twenty of them.
Therefore, when an O/I Report mentions Broz, it's assumed that a police officer gave the report to Desk Sergeant Broz It was then discovered that Warren Broz actually was a detective before becoming a desk sergeant. In fact, his partner was a Leo Marchetti.
On that form it looked as if the July 25th O/I report was submitted to the desk sergeant and an assistant DA. The reality is that it was Detectives Broz & Marchetti who were notified of the accusations in the July 25th O/I Report.
August 28th, 1978 is a date held in confusion as to what really did happen on that day, before Judge Stephen Laffey
That August 28th hearing was cancelled via Diane Thompson, herself, during a time when
"charges" were NOT YET FILED. This means that Diane Thompson IS A LIAR for
claiming that her signature was written under duress according to her, thereby "dropping criminal
charges" against Cipolla. She dropped a case which did not yet have criminal charges attached to it.
As a reminder for the seventh or eighth time, in every jurisdiction in
the United States and in its 50 sovereign states, once criminal charges
are filed against anyone, the only two persons who can "drop the
charges" in every case are 1] either the prosecutor 2] and/or the judge.
Thus,
the whole newspaper narrative of the Drop-the-Charges Nightmare
scenario of Diane Thompson, when she was
unable-to-see-the-paper-to-sign-because-of-tears-in-the-eyes, was theatrical bull crap.
When you have tears in your eyes and need to
write something, what do you instinctively do? ANS: You wipe them away
with one hand and maybe even a Kleenex. Then you sign your name.
Moreover,
Hollywood repeatedly had movies which claimed that only the victim can
file charges ... for dramatic effect and story-line flexibility only. Well, a
murdered man is incapable of filing criminal charges against his
murderer. Yet, numerous murder charges have been filed throughout
American history. Therefore, persons other than the victim have repeatedly filed criminal charges in the USA.
They Ignored the Concept of the Statute of Limitations
Well,
in 1978, child molestation charges in the State of Pennsylvania had a
TWO YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, and the US Constitution's Double
Jeopardy Law was not in effect, in the July 1978 Cipolla Case. It wasn't in effect, because there was
no jury verdict, or judge's directed verdict, or a bench trial judge's
"finding." Thus, there was no "stare decisis" to observe.
Diane
Thompson most definitely could have pursued the case. She had time,
all the way until July 24, 1980. If she wanted two counts of charges
filed, then she had until June 30th, 1980, to have had an uncontested
"timely" filing. Thus, she had 22 months or approximately 660 days to
get Cipolla in handcuffs, IF he actually did molest Tucker and/or Frank.
Federal Jurisdiction too
Moreover, she could have brought in the feds. This is because, if Cipolla really did molest Frank, then the Michigan State Police or the Feds needed to indict him ... at least for what he was accused of doing in Michigan. None the less, many youths went to Michigan with Cipolla, and none of those ever accused Cipolla of any wrong-doing.
Even
at that, there was no case in the first place, being that CIPOLLA WAS
NOT YET ARRESTED in 1978 or ever. He was NOT indicted. The case literally didn't even
begin. Things were only at the investigation phase.
And concerning Broz wanting Cipolla indicted, he jumped the gun and failed to gather any evidence that would fulfill the strict burden of proof in a criminal trial. A criminal case's allegations have to be "beyond a reasonable doubt."
The big lie about this whole August 28, 1978
This
has been held back from the public for years. Not revealing it enabled
numerous opinionated know-it-all types to make fools out of themselves,
thereby showing them to be total frauds & fakes who don't know the
first thing about the law.
Concerning
that August 28, 1978 Probable Cause Hearing, Randy Engel made it sound
as if Diane Thompson absolutely had to be there, in order for the case
to proceed.
Newsflash: Diane Thompson was not an officer of
the court. Outside of being a witness to be questioned at the hearing,
no private citizen is required to be at a Probable Cause Hearing.
In
1978, IF and only if there were evidence against Cipolla already in
existence, Diane Thompson had no need to attend the hearing. Plus, if
she had no evidence, then her attendance would have been a waste of
time, anyway.
Of
course, there was NO DNA EVIDENCE in the 1978 case. Moreover, in 1978 it took over 7
weeks for any DNA test results to be produced. In 1978, you did not get DNA
results in three days, or even within 3 weeks.
The
DNA evidence claim
of the 1978 case was yet another Diane Thompson lie. After all, August
28th minus July 25th equals 34 days. That is not enough time for there to have been any DNA test results presented to a judge.
There was no $45 fee, either. Diane Thompson lied ... as usual
Furthermore,
that was as blatant a lie when Diane Thompson told Randy
Engel that she had to laboriously raise, at great sacrifice, a $45 fee,
for Frank Labiaux to go to the annual convention in Michigan, at the
grounds of the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions. Entrance was
FREE.
Firstly,
it was vocations weekend and it was 100% for free, because it was
designed to inspire young lads into seeking a priesthood vocation.
Therefore, Cipolla didn't go there to molest Tucker or Frank. He went
there to get the religious order to recruit young lads into a
pre-seminary curriculum. It was a typical recruiting weekend, and the
cost of it was already in the religious order's budget.
Then came Diane Thompson claiming that this Wuerl-of-Hurt site was operated by Anthony Cipolla who was operating a child molestation ring. Firstly, this site condemns and reveals child molesters.
AND AND AND, the Number 1 Piece of Evidence which proves that Diane Thompson knew
that she was lying all along about this site, consisted in the fact that she never
called the police on the guy operating this website. The guy operating this site would be yours truly, and I am still operating it, ten years after Cipolla's violent death.
If Diane Thompson really
believed that this site was being run by a child molestation ring
operator, she would have called someone in law enforcement to
investigate it. This includes the Pittsburgh Police, the Pennsylvania State Police, the FBI, etc.
Being that she did NOT do so, it proves that she knew that she was lying to you. Yet, the vast majority of my viewers at the time believed Diane Thompson, showing how incredibly stupid were Americans in the 2010s. I lost 90% of my viewers, because of her, and this includes all of my websites; not merely this one.
BELOW: Now remember, if you have money and you commit defamation against me in any way similar to the way that Diane Thompson did ... in costing me 90% of my viewers ... then I will sue you for millions and then go out of my way to have you criminally prosecuted ... in some novel prosecution ... unless you are in a State where defamation is already a crime. In one way or another I WILL put you out of business.
Of course, it has been ten years since Cipolla's death, and this site
is still in operation, proving that Cipolla was not running it. Plus, out of MY DEBIT CARD came the yearly
payment for me to use the www.donaldwuerl.com domain name & web
address. This proves 100% that Cipolla never ran this site and that
Diane Thompson was lying all along.
If you were one of those people who were conned by Thompson ...
Now,
if you were one of those people who instantly believed Diane Thompson
and stopped viewing my sites, please write to me and tell why you were
so gullible to have believed her.
That 1978 Investigation ran at a lynch mob speed
The
investigation should have continued beyond August 1978, just to make
sure that a molester didn't go free ... and just to make sure that the
accusing mother wasn't a con artist who literally committed the crime of
having filed a false police report.
However, Warren Broz jumped the gun, in his fatal error of NOT corroborating a thing
said by then-twelve-year old Frank Labiaux, in an interview with him.
The
detective's fatal error was in him assuming that every 12 year old male
always tells the truth to the police. Of course, junior high school
teachers knew that 12 year old males certainly do lie to teachers. So,
why would they not lie to the police?
Moreover,
a few 1980 cases showed us that there are mothers out there who most
certainly did tell their children to lie to the police.
If
Cipolla were actually guilty of any wrong-doing, a few more months of
police investigation could have resulted in the discovery of actual evidence or
corroborating points of circumstantial evidence ... or a newly emerging
witness ... which could have warranted an indictment & arrest.
Thompson could have had recourse to Harrisburg
If
the Allegheny County DA's office were as corrupt as Diane Thompson claimed, then Diane Thompson could
have brought-in the State Boys from Harrisburg for investigation
purposes ... if and only if she were telling the truth and not playing a con game
designed to quickly get apartment rent money, back in 1978.
Back to Original Motivation
Concerning
Wuerl as bishop, I simply wanted to be granted a church-approved
Catholic action guild by him now called "an apostolate." It would have been
based on opposing ... and "giving awareness to" ... modern-day slave
labor profiting which included foreign sweatshop labor profiting. After
all, it was causing a massive trade balance deficit for the United
States, while literally costing about 5 million jobs.
Even
though the Defraudment of Laborers of their Wages is one of the Four
Sins which Cry to Heaven for Vengeance, Wuerl did NOT care to come to
the rescue of the down-trodden and unprotected workers who made Americans their products ... including their clothing. Wuerl merely wanted to
live his Marie Antoinette Lifestyle.
In
the midst of learning how heartless Wuerl was, concerning workers who
provided a lot of merchandise to the USA as enslaved workers, I
then learned of Torquato and found it to have been a moral obligation to
have Wuerl learn of his sexual antics. Torquato did not care about the
plight of the slave-labor sweatshop workers. He only cared about
putting his hands where they should have not been.
Then
came the retaliations, as well as intelligence-insulting propaganda ...
and games played by police who should have been tossed out of their
police departments.
Now remember, I was NOT
a follower of Anthony Cipolla. After all, he didn't care about ending
the nationwide scandal of foreign sweatshop labor profiteering. So, he
& I were in two drastically different worlds.
Now,
I acknowledge the miraculous power of Padre Pio, but life is a matter
of Ora & Labora. Cipolla only cared about the Ora part, in
sacramental liturgy, without wanting to do the labora part of
championing any cause dedicated to ending nationwide injustice.
It's just that a box of Cipolla documents was
literally placed in front of me to take with me and review. Of course, I was chosen to
do the reviewing, because I was the one caught in the middle of the
Torquato Retaliations that Wuerl could have stopped instantly, but let
continue until I was destroyed. Thus, I personally knew how vicious & unjust Wuerl was.
Yet,
I originally assumed that Anthony Cipolla was as guilty as sin ...
because Ann Rodgers Melnick and the Post Gazette said he was. That
box of docs was followed by my realizing that everything "Ann
Rodger-Melnick" and similar de fact propagandists wrote about the
Cipolla Case was completely non-factual.
The newspaper reports were so
non-factual that the first response which came to mind, after viewing the
doc box was: "Is this a trick question?"
The
entire newspaper reports were askew from the documentation. Then came
witnesses who knew Tim Bendig and Cipolla ... and who went to at least
one of the yearly Michigan vocation weekend events, where no one had to
pay any $45 entrance fee, as Diane Thompson FALSELY claimed.
Now,
I spoke with Cipolla over the phone many a time. I originally did so,
trying to get a confession out of him. Then, after having done the
necessary fact-checking, I found that the Cipolla horror story was one con game, meant to make Wuerl look like a hero.
The purpose of making Wuerl look like a Wuerl was to keep away any D.A. investigation and/or prevent the convocation of a grand jury investigation. It was a diversionary tactic. Donald Wuerl IS a criminal who got away with his crimes ... and the Pittsburgh Post Gazette was front & center keeping the lie going ... even in 2018.
This is why people go to private citizen online reporters and/or break-away reporters who started their own internet channels, to get their information. This includes Joe Rogan, Tim Pool, Chris Chappell, Amala Ekpunobi, Matt Tabaii, Brandon Tatum, Anthony Watts, Goldie Ghamari, Anthony Brian Logan, Brigitte Gabriel, and Michael Schellenberger.
People have to search for the truth in life. The mainstream modern media doesn't deliver truth. It only perpetuates propaganda, just like the Soviet Union & Nazi Germany did, in their lust for the same pieces of land, in the 20th Century.
