Part 1: Cipolla's 1978 accuser LIED about being forced to "drop the charges."

This is a supplement to the original post which addressed the fact that Diane Thompson LIED when claiming to have been "pressured" by D.A. Bob Colville into dropping criminal charges in 1978 ... against a Father Anthony Cipolla who never had any charges filed against him, in the first place.  

It's ironic how a pushy & feisty in-your-face internet bully claims that she was a gutless & spineless coward who succumbed to the sight of D.A. Bob Colville and an ink pen, in 1978.

The outrage is that Donald Wuerl, his lawyers, and his de facto media puppet did NOT come forth and tell the Public that lies were being told about the Cipolla Case, per se.  Wuerl consented in We the People being completely deceived for decades.  I was one of those deceived people.  But, I learned from experience and detailed research to NOT trust anything produced by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.  Period. 

Above:  The  newspaper whose subscriber base was so low that its management ... after a strike & an unfavorable US Supreme Court ruling ... designated it for end-of-operations, as of May 3rd, 2026.  Then, a non-profit group purchased it and its potentially huge liability, in terms of long-term defamation.

Below are three previews of the original post which inspired the need to produce this educational supplement you are viewing.  Of course, the need for this comes from the observation that Americans, on average, know very little about American legal procedure.  Let us begin.  Shall we?

 Preview #1   ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

Preview #2, a quote from the original post  ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

"Very simply, no civilian anywhere in the United States has the power to "drop the charges" in any criminal case.  This included the Diane Thompson of 1978, especially concerning an Anthony Cipolla who was NOT charged for any crime in the same year of 1978.

This is because the power to drop criminal charges is reserved solely to the sovereign-governing-authority which is referred to as "the State."  This includes the federal governing authority in federal jurisdiction cases, being that the federal government is also regarded as "the State."  After all, the United States has a live human functioning as an administrative authority called the Secretary of STATE.

Every criminal case in America begins with "The State of Such-and-Such vs defendant-of-the-case."  Even federal criminal cases begin with "the United States vs defendant-of-the-case."  

As far as goes Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Massachusetts, their criminal complaints begin with "the Commonwealth of ..." 

All in all, only the court officers of the prosecuting State or the United States have the power to dismiss charges that have already been filed in the name of a prosecuting State or in the name of the United States.  Diane Thompson did NOT have this power, in 1978.  

If Diane Thompson did sign something under duress in Bob Colville's office on August 28th, 1978, then it was pointless, because Bob Colville would have had nowhere to have taken that sheet of paper.  It would have been a very useless sheet of paper."  

Moreover, any other procedural matter concerning Anthony Cipolla would have occurred at the CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE, and not in the office of DA Bob Colville."

Preview #3  ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

Moreover, there is a decisive difference between a citizen filing a private criminal complaint and a government authority filing criminal charges.  

A private citizen's complaint is NOT the filing of charges  It's a request for the government to file charges.  Thus, if charges have not yet been filed, then a private citizen may withdraw his/her private citizen's complaint.  If charges have already been filed, then the private citizen CANNOT withdraw his/her private citizen's complaint."

"HOWEVER, in order for a "complainant" to withdraw her Private Citizen's Criminal Complaint in the 1970s, the "COMPLAINANT" had to ...

... appear AT THE CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE in person, to get the paperwork done, and NOT in any county District Attorney's office.  This included Bob Colville's office, in 1978.  

Let us continue: 

As far back as the 1990s, the Post-Gazette joined forces with the woman formerly known as Diane Thompson and reported that Anthony Cipolla was found to be as guilty as sin through 1978 DNA testing.  It also reported that Cipolla was then arrested, and was then rescued by the county D.A. who forced this Diane Thompson to drop the charges.

There was no DNA evidence of any kind involved with the Anthony Cipolla Case which only lasted for 35 days.  This is because it took an average of 52 days for DNA testing to produce results, in 1978.  

The Cipolla Case only lasted from July 25 to August 28th, 1978.  Meanwhile, 52 days after July 25th is/was September 15th.  Thus, even if there were DNA testing which was started on the first day of the Cipolla Case, it was not enough time for there to have been DNA test results presented to Judge Laffey, on August 28th ... or even to the DA's office prior to August 28th.

Plus, there was no mention of any presence of semen anywhere on Tucker Thompson, in the July 25th, 1978 Offense/Incident Report signed by the Officer Mark Ninehouser with whom I personally spoke at length.  

That report's medical section reported zero harm done to the young nine-year-old Tucker whose name appears on the report as "Thomas Thompson."  It was therefore reported that there existed no medical evidence that any crime had been committed against Tucker, on July 25th, 1978.  Period.

The supportive facts of a flagrantly misrepresented case

Always remember that the Cipolla case is what rocketed Donald Wuerl to his undeserved stardom.  It was a case presented by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as nothing more than an outlay of falsehoods that Donald Wuerl let go uncorrected.  Thus, Wuerl rose to power & influence through LIES that he let stay intact.

The problem is that this entire story is an easily provable lie.  Firstly, in 1978, there were no "Detectives Nehouser & Fogle."  Now, there was a Mark NINEHOUSER who was an uniformed officer, and I did speak with him at length.  He was the one who went to the Thompson domicile and jotted down Diane Thompson's and Tucker Thompson's "allegations." 

 

Moreover, I located Mark through the Pittsburgh Steeler organization.  None the less, Mark Ninehouser clearly made it known to me that neither he nor his patrol partner ever arrested Anthony Cipolla, at any time, in any way, and in any how.    

 

Unlike the many other internet voices who wrote on this case, I got my info from the DIRECT SOURCE; a living human being who was there, on July 25th, 1978.  In fact, I was surprised as to how polite, clear, and well-mannered Mark was, in his conversation with me.

 

Moreover, as is proven by referring to the July 25th, 1978 O/I Report, Allegheny General Hospital did NOT mention the presence of semen on Tucker Thompson or on his clothing or on his property.  All that was mentioned was that Tucker's medical condition was "GOOD."  That professional medical assessment, alone, exonerates Cipolla, at least in the case of the nine-year-old Tucker.  

1] Concerning Diane Thompson's very defamatory DNA claim of Allegheny General Hospital's lab identifying incriminating evidence against Cipolla in a very short period of time:

2a] Below is posted more confirmation that there actually was NO MENTION of semen being found on Tucker in the July 25th, 1978 Offense/Incidence Report.  In fact, the only statement from Allegheny General Hospital which was recorded in the July 25th O/I Report was that "Thomas Thompson's" medical condition was GOOD.  

2b] There were two blank spaces after the word, GOOD.  If an injury or abnormality or evidence of criminal conduct had been found, then it would have been stated in that blank space.

Above is the top part ... about a third of ... the one-page July 25th, 1978 Offense/Incident Report, signed by Officer Mark Ninehouser with whom I personally spoke at length.

Look at the bottom line, right-hand side of the photo above.  The 9 year old Thomas Thompson's medical condition was GOOD.  Below that line are two lines reserved for medical exam comments.  There were no medical exam notes made on those two lines, meaning that it was a very unremarkable exam with no injuries or abnormalities found.  This means that there was found by the licensed & board-certified examiner:

1] NO BLEEDING,  2] NO BRUISES,  3] NO SCRAPES,  4] NO LACERATIONS,  5] NO SEMEN,  6] NO RECTAL OR GENITAL ABNORMALITIES,  7] NO BROKEN BONES, 8] NO VASELINE or other lubricant on or near the rectal area ... and as time proceeded,  9] NO EVIDENCE OF ANY STD.  

This means that there was NO EVIDENCE that any crime had been committed on July 25th, 1978 against Tucker Thompson, in the first place.  

Tucker said it happened only twice, in all the time narrated by Randy Engel in her defamatory article 

Even at that, Tucker claimed that he was molested only TWICE by Cipolla; once near the July 4th holiday season and once on September 25, 1978, shortly after Diane Thompson's request for apartment rent money from & through Anthony Cipolla's parish was denied.

More specifically, Diane Thompson first asked Cipolla if he could get the ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY to donate the rent money on a monthly basis.  Then came the speech from Cipolla's superior mentioning how the parish was not a charity organization.  

Now, the St Vincent de Paul Society was a charity organization.  But, its currency came from "current donations" in the 1970s, as opposed to endowment accounts and retained dollars.  

In the 1970s, there was a decline in the Faith, and people were not as charity-minded to religion as much as to sociological justice groups and political organizations, as well as fundraising drives for specific terminally ill neighbors and youth sports' organizations.  Also in the late 1970s was a priest shortage.

Moreover, in the general history of the Catholic Church, its predominant wealth comprised =====> real estate ... land holdings ... more than currency.  Simultaneously came invaluable art, such as that which the Byzantine Empire produced.  Its art was literally made of gold, from time to time.  

Plus, castle interiors were lined with artistic tapestries.  They were basically a layer of insulation, literally.  And let us not forget about the Italian Renaissance's contribution to the world of art.  European museums surely haven't.  Include mosaic art in the Catholic World, also.

2c] Concerning the July 1978 timeline, why didn't Diane Thompson have the wisdom "to drag out of Tucker" the deep, dark secret of the alleged July 4th holiday season molestation, as quickly as she did on July 25th?  

ANS:  The only answer would be that she ALLEGEDLY lied to police on July 25th, desperate over the fact that Cipolla told her that his parish ... or the St Vincent de Paul Society ... could not afford to pay her apartment rent. 

Randy Engel came up with a backward conclusion; a conclusion in reverse 

Concerning Randy Engel's claim that Cipolla hunted down the two lads, for a time of "grooming," Diane Thompson ALLEGEDLY approached Cipolla and his pastor first.  It was NOT visa-versa.  

She was undoubtedly "hard-up for money" and she gravitated toward the parish where Cipolla was stationed.  She was looking for charity dollars.  Moreover, she ALLEGEDLY sought to be spared of the destiny of being a single white mom living in the projects, under a HUD voucher.

Concerning Diane Thompson asking Cipolla to get his pastor to have the St Vincent de Paul Society pay her monthly apartment rent, below is a very important note:

Keep in mind that Cipolla did confer Diane Thompson's request for rent money with his parish pastor.  Cipolla would have instantly known that Diane Thompson was soon to be evicted from her apartment, after a 60 to 90 day eviction process.  

This meant that, IF Cipolla wanted to molest Frank Labiaux and Tucker Thompson on a long-term basis ...  with "free rein" ... then Cipolla would have gone out of his way to make sure that Diane Thompson's rent would have gotten paid monthly.

Cipolla did NOT do that.  Cipolla showed that he was more than willing to let Diane Thompson, Tucker Thompson, and Frank Labiaux go far far away from him, to another domicile.

In as much, the fact that Cipolla did NOT go out of his way to make sure that Labiaux and Tucker would continue living nearby him shows that Cipolla WAS NOT grooming the two youths for long-term sexual abuse, as Randy Engel claimed.  

Reality Check on Randy Engel's Absence of Credibility 

Remember, this was/is the Randy Engel who confidently claimed:   1] that a 1965 special forces training accident occurred on a South Carolina military base that had completely closed-down & ceased operations in 1947 ... eighteen years prior.  

This is the same Randy Engel who claimed:  2] that preliminary hearings, in 1978, were held at "Police Station Number 9."

 

This is also the Randy Engel who claimed:  3] that Diane Thompson had the authority to "drop the charges" in 1978,  4] that Cipolla was arrested by detectives name Nehouser & Fogle,  5] that DNA lab testing took a few days at Allegheny General Hospital, when all such testing took 49 to 63 days at an NIH lab ... 

... 6] and that Frank Labiaux committed vandalism upon a Protestant church in 1977, when the infamous double vandalism ... which occurred on two different nights and which was committed against a black Methodist church ... was reported in a major newspaper as having been done by older delinquents much later, in November of 1978.  

In fact, it is surmised that Diane Thompson purposely stole that November 1978 news report and put Frank's face on it, to deceive common-sensed researchers into believing that Frank's vandalism story was real ... and was backed-up by the media.  Well, in this case, the media archive proved that Diane Thompson ... AND FRANK LABIAUX ... lied.

Oh, and let us not forget Randy Engel claiming:  7] that Cipolla was wearing a cassock in the middle of summer, while harassing Diane Thompson into "dropping the charges" that [A] were NEVER FILED, in the first place, so done in an American jurisdiction where  [B] no civilian has the power to "drop the charges" unilaterally, in any type of criminal case. 

Also keep in mind:   8] that, during the 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury Inquest ... when archive files could easily be accessed by a PA constable with a search warrant ... and when previously hidden accusers could come forth and be heard on record ... there were ZERO hidden files on Cipolla found and/or presented, and there were ZERO new faces who came forth to accuse Cipolla as having molested them in the past.

Plus, it's equally important to keep in mind:   9] that a detective of the 1978 Cipolla Case testified in 2018 that the only reason why he believed everything Frank Labiaux told him in 1978 was because he believed that no 12-year-old youth would ever lie to a police officer.  In as much:

Next comes a response to Warren Bud Broz commenting on the moment four men in suits showed-up near the August 28th, 1978, courtroom of Judge Laffey.  Broz said, "I knew the fix was in."

 

If Broz were so sure that 12-yr-old Frank Labiaux was telling the truth about Cipolla, then why was Broz incapable of producing evidence and then composing a Police Affidavit that would have gotten get Cipolla indicted with a judge's warrant long before the need of an August 28th Probable Cause Hearing arrived on the calendar?

 

Was it because Broz was lazy?  Was it because Broz was incompetent?  Was Broz already burnt-out in his police work?  Or is it that there wasn't any evidence to support Labiaux's claims?

 

One more thing:  The fact the Broz did NOT recognize those four suited men in the August 28th hallway shows that none of them were from the D.A.'s department.  Thus, the concept of the DA bullying Diane Thompson into submission was a liar's theatrics.  

 

Those four unidentified men had to have come from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, and you can be assured that at least one of them was empowered to handover bail money ASAP, as well as being there to plead for a night court arraignment, if circumstances got to that point.  You can think of them as the Just-in-case Men, and you can regard the bail money manager as the Extractor.

 

Also keep in mind that the July 25th Offense/Incident Report was NOT a Police Report and it was NOT a Police Affidavit.  It simply showed how weak the case against Cipolla was, in there having been no physical harm or intrusion done to a Tucker Thompson who claimed that he was molested for no more than two times, in all that time he knew Cipolla.   And there was not the burden of proof requirement met in Frank Labiaux's accusations, to ensue a warrant for Cipolla's arrest.

 

And as far as goes Tim Bendig, he is a repeatedly ALLEGED LIAR.  I personally witnessed his lying, myself.  Even his baseline accusation against Cipolla erased his credibility.  This is because Cipolla was not stationed at St Canice after December 1983, meaning that he wasn't there, in Knoxville, to molest Bendig, in 1984, 1985, or 1986.  

 

Plus, my former neighbor, John Conte, along with his law firm, lined-up dozens of character witnesses for Cipolla, concerning the 1993 Bendig lawsuit trial which never happened, due to an out-of-court settlement which involves money that Bendig quickly squandered.  

 

Some of those character witnesses were taken to Michigan, too.  Each one of them said that Cipolla did nothing to them.  They also said that they saw no monkey business being performed by Cipolla on anyone.

 

By the way, Diane Thompson LIED YET AGAIN, when she claimed that she had to pay a $45 entrance fee, for Frank to go to Michigan and visit the P.I.M.E grounds.  It was all for free, because its purpose was to inspire the desire of youths to pursue a priesthood vocation.  Those were literally Priest Recruiting Weekends.

 

This post is basically an introductory tutorial, being that Americans know very little about American law.  This includes people out there, such as Randy Engel, who present themselves as experts in legal procedure, when they are babbling buffoons who don't know the first thing about it.  The original article which inspired this tutorial can be found by clicking here:

 

https://www.donaldwuerl.com/2026/09/clerk-of-courts-at-your-service.html

Part 2: Cipolla's 1978 accuser LIED about being forced to "drop the charges."

At the outset of this tutorial, regarding the Case of the man formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla, the block of information below needed to be posted.  The need of cutting to the chase and posting this specific information is due to decades of false & defamatory newspaper reporting against Cipolla.

The defamatory reporting is mostly due to the newspaper which recently had such a low number of subscribers that it couldn't economically survive the effects of a recent strike and a recent US Supreme Court decision.  

Concerning this defamatory newspaper, it was scheduled for closure, on May 3rd, 2026.  In the past 20 years of operation, it reportedly lost $350 million in operating costs.

So, take note of the information below and absorb it into your memory bank.

 

The OHIO LIE of none other than Diane You-Know-Whom 

For the record, as was previously mentioned in another post, that the most recent defamation against Cipolla was the claim that people in Ohio were coming out of the proverbial woodwork, accusing him of molestation and filing lawsuits against him ... four and five years AFTER his death, in 2020, 2021 or 2022.  

Well, in the entire history of Ohio, from the first day when the first white man walked on its terrain, all the way to August 31, 2026, not a single person in Ohio or originally from Ohio ever accused Anthony Cipolla of molestation.  This was yet another Diane Thompson LIE. 

Well, the fact-checking, which was the result of extensive work, showed that the Cipolla Case, as it was presented to the public, was one continuous string of falsehoods ... an absolute insult to the intelligence of any reasonable person who is even slightly familiar with American legal procedure.  

The presentation of that case was one sick joke.  Those falsehoods are addressed in sufficient detail, at the Wuerl-of-Hurt site.  Go see for yourself, line-item by line-item ... in the August & September 2026 archives. 

The 1990s, when cover-up artist, Wuerl, artificially became a star 

The 1990s newspaper narration of Diane Thompson being coerced into signing a 1978 sheet of paper in Bob Colville's office that was needed to "drop the charges" against Anthony Cipolla ... which were never filed in the first place ... shows how much of a liar she was and how much of a bunch of liars were the editors of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.  

This also showed how much of a team of liars Wuerl & his attorneys were, in not correcting the falsehoods being reported as fact.  After all, this is the lying newspaper whose people spent over a decade very falsely calling the blatantly manipulative and even vengeful Donald Wuerl the Bishop of Zero Tolerance ... as well as the Model of Zero Tolerance.  

And of course, Wuerl displayed much tolerance toward Wolk, Zula, Pucci, Zirwas, Hoehl, Burchianti, Huff, and other priests of a criminal nature.

None the less, this is also the newspaper whose subscriber numbers were so low ... in the newspaper's unpopularity ... that management decided to close down all operations of it, by May of 2026.  Then, a non-profit organization purchased it, designating it to release publications two days a week, on Thursdays and Saturdays. 

The Bob Colville Coercion Tale proved that the Thompson Clan and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editors were clueless as to basic procedural law in the United States 

In review, for those of you who are exceptionally stubborn, exceptionally bigoted, and/or exceptionally brainwashed by either the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette or writer Randy Engel or any Wuerl-influenced entity: 

The entire narration of the August 1978 Bob Colville Coercion Tale was was a harrowing one, where Diane Thompson was brought into Bob Colville's office and was then illegally detained there ... until she signed a sheet of paper that was needed "to drop the charges" filed against Anthony Cipolla.  

Yet, as of August 28th, 1978, Cipolla had neither been put in handcuffs nor put behind county jail bars, simply because no charges were filed against him.  The entire "filing of charges" tale was a deliberate lie.  Meanwhile, the "dropping the charges" tale was a much bigger lie.

In as much,  here is a re-Reality Check for you people out there who never studied law and who are still in denial that Randy Engel, Renew America, and others LIED about the 1978 Cipolla Case ... in your belief that Colville forced Diane Thompson to "drop the charges" ... which were never filed, in the first place:

 

Very simply, no civilian anywhere in the United States has the power to "drop the charges" in any criminal case.  This included the Diane Thompson of 1978, especially concerning an Anthony Cipolla who was NOT charged for any crime in the same year of 1978.

This is because the power to drop criminal charges is reserved solely to the sovereign-governing-authority which is referred to as "the State."  This includes the federal governing authority in federal jurisdiction cases, being that the federal government is also regarded as "the State."  After all, the United States has an administrative authority called the Secretary of STATE.

Every criminal case in America begins with "The State of Such-and-Such vs defendant-of-the-case."  Even federal criminal cases begin with "the United States vs defendant-of-the-case."  

Therefore, only the court officers of the prosecuting State or the United States have the power to dismiss charges that have already been filed in the name of a prosecuting State or in the name of the United States.  

And of course, this means "dismiss the charges," "withdraw the charges," "drop the charges," and "Nolle Prosequi."  Each phrase means the same thing.  

Doubly important is the fact that, in the 35-day-long Cipolla Case of 1978, there were NO CHARGES to be dismissed in the first place, being that no charges were ever filed.

If Diane Thompson did sign something under duress in Bob Colville's office on August 28th, 1978, it was pointless, because Bob Colville would have had nowhere to have taken that sheet of paper.  It would have been a very useless sheet of paper," especially in light of the fact that Cipolla was NOT arrested in 1978, in the first place.  

Moreover, any other procedural matter concerning Anthony Cipolla would have occurred at the CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE, and not in the office of DA Bob Colville.

 

So, what did she do on August 28th ... 1978? 

Well, ladies & gentlemen, the only procedural thing that Diane Thompson could have done on Monday, August 28th, 1978 was "withdraw her private criminal complaint."

Now, a private criminal complaint is a petition to the "court of jurisdiction" to file charges.  It is NOT the act of filing charges.  

Then, there is the matter of withdrawing a private criminal complaint.  Firstly, if the DA acts upon the private criminal complaint and does file charges, then the complainant cannot file a withdrawal.  A complainant can only withdraw her criminal complaint IF neither the DA nor a presiding judge filed charges against the accused.

This is because, as soon as criminal charges are filed anywhere in the United States, the case is put solely in the hands of the prosecutor and the judge.  

No civilian anywhere on Earth can "drop the charges" against any defendant anywhere in United States jurisdiction, in criminal law. NOT even Diane Thompson could have done this in Bob Colville's office, in 1978.

Procedural Review 

As a quick lesson, if the DA's office has not yet acted on the private criminal complaint, and if the judge did not yet "issue process" and have the accused person arrested, then a private citizen can withdraw his/her complaint.  IN order to do so, the COMPLAINANT had to ...

... appear AT THE CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE in person, to get the paperwork done, and NOT in any county District Attorney's office.  This included Bob Colville's office, in 1978.  

As a reminder for the stubborn, there is a decisive difference between a citizen filing a private criminal complaint and a government authority filing criminal charges.  A private citizen's complaint is NOT the filing of charges  It's a request for the government to file charges.  

Thus, if charges have not yet been filed, then a private citizen may withdraw his/her private citizen's complaint.  If charges have already been filed, then the private citizen CANNOT withdraw his/her private citizen's complaint.  If he/she could do so, it would be pointless.  The charges would still stand."

 

In some jurisdictions, a judge requires a probable cause hearing to be concluded first, before accepting the complainant's private  citizen's complaint and then having it filed.  The act of a judge ordering the arrest of an accused person is known as "issuing process."

 

Therefore, in such cases where a judge finds "no fair probability that any crime was committed and that the accused was likely involved," the case is dismissed without the need of any complainant signature.

 

Therefore, it's possible that, on August 28th, 1978, Diane Thompson signed nothing.  In such a case, what she would have done, therefore, was ... "defaulted" and then proverbially disappeared.  

 

 

Diane Thompson's Lie at First Sight, in this harrowing 1978 tale

 

 In legal documentation & procedural law there is no such thing as "pressing charges."  That is a colloquial phrase used for those who have no legal educational background.  Moreover, there is a difference between 1] filing a private criminal complaint and 2] filing criminal charges.  

In review, being that Americans can be really stupid when it comes to understanding legal procedure, when you file a private criminal complaint, you are asking the court to file the charges for you.  The court you are asking is the one who has jurisdiction over your case.  

It is never a matter of you filing charges.  Thus, when you file a private criminal complaint, you are not filing charges.  When you file such a complaint, charges are only "pending" and charges in your personal case may never get filed, if the Burden of Proof standard is NOT satisfied.

In a Probable Cause Hearing the Burden of Proof Standard is lower than the standard for a "full hearing based on the merits."  None the less, one requirement for a judge to approve the issuing of an indictment is that the complainant has to "show reasonable grounds that a violation has probably occurred."  

Now, according to the July 25th, 1978, Offense/Incident Report signed by Officer Mark Ninehouser, there was no evidence that Tucker Thompson, aka Thomas Thompson, was violated.  After all, the Allegheny General Hospital finding of Tucker's condition was classified as "GOOD."

No mention of bruises, blood stains, cut marks, scratch marks, red marks, semen, or anything similar.  

And of course, being that the average amount of time it took for DNA test results to be produced in 1978 was 52 days, there wasn't the time for any DNA test result to be submitted into evidence, even if there were semen found on Tucker.  This is because the 1978 Cipolla Case lasted for only 35 days. 

The O/I Report was NOT the conclusion of the police officer.  It was literally quotes of what the Thompson Clan alleged.  There was no cross-examination done at that time.  Therefore, that which was printed by the officer on the O/I Report was NOT the officer agreeing with Diane Thompson and the young "Thomas Thompson."  It was simply Officer Ninehouser stating the accusations of the Thompson household against Cipolla.  

The fact that the July 25th medical exam report marked Tucker's medical condition was GOOD, when he was supposed to have been recently molested a few hours prior, would be the reason why no police officer submitted a Police Affidavit to any magistrate and why the Allegheny County DA declined to indict Cipolla.  

Very simply, there was no evidence against Cipolla, according to the O/I Report.  There were only unproven accusations.

The rapid time between the "alleged" molestation and the calling of police made the entire accusation look like a premeditated scheme 

Another important feature of the July 25th, 1978, O/I Report is that, according to Diane Thompson and "Thomas 'Tucker' Thompson," Cipolla molested Tucker between 3:10 PM and 4:30 PM.  

Well, Diane Thompson literally called the police at 5:15 PM.  This means that she was supposedly able to "pry out of Tucker" deeply troubling concealed information within 45 minutes to 2 hours after Tucker was molested ... and within one hour after Tucker got home.

The point here is that Diane Thompson claimed that she had to extract a secret from Tucker.  Well, in past cases throughout America, it would not be for weeks or months or even years that a molestation victim would finally reveal the incidents of his molestation to an adult.  Yet, Diane Thompson claimed to have "finally" extracted deeply hidden information within one to two hours after a molestation event.  

Such a thing would have broken some kind of speed record, indeed.  But, such a rapid time span makes the entire thing look like a premeditated con game, especially shortly after Diane Thompson was denied her request to have Cipolla's parish (or the St Vincent de Paul society, through the parish) pay her monthly apartment rent.  

As the past 35 years have illustrated, accusing a priest of molestation can be a very lucrative undertaking in the United States, especially for people who need apartment rent money.   

All in all, on Monday, August 28th, 1978, Diane Thompson was not able to even to show to Judge Laffey that a violation had probably occurred on her son.  Thus, her attendance at an August Probable Cause Hearing was a certain loss for Diane Thompson.  So, she had to make up a harrowing tale of corrupt government officials and church officials sabotaging her case and forcing her to drop the charges which no civilian can drop in any criminal case in the United States, anyway.

The general rule of the private citizen's criminal complaint 

When it comes a private citizen's criminal complaint, it is never a matter of you pressing charges.  If any person in America could file criminal charges, then there would be total chaos in the court system.  Con artists and vengeful people would be filing charges to the point of overloading the legal system and causing it to be unable to operate.

When neither judge nor prosecutor approved of a private citizen's criminal complaint 

If neither a DA nor a judge approved the private criminal complaint, it used to be that the "complainant" was left to do the prosecuting, himself/herself.  But, the civilian did the prosecuting under the watchful eye of an assistant DA.  Technically, such a thing is "an oversight prosecution," with the assistant DA doing the overseeing.

And of course, it has always been a rarity for a private citizen to prosecute a case in America.  Even at that, during such rare cases the civilian prosecutor still had no power to "drop the charges" during the transpiration of the case.  Only the judge had that power.

Concerning judges and/or DA's accepting a private citizen's criminal complaint and then filing charges against the accused, during 1978,  about 10% of the criminal cases in the USA were started by a private criminal complaint ... where the DA took-over and prosecuted the whole case without the help of the private citizen complainant. 

Today, if a private citizen is denied his/her request to have criminal charges filed against the accused, then that private citizen can file in United States District Court, asking for an injunction ordering the DA to file criminal charges.  

Moreover, if a police officer submits a POLICE AFFIDAVIT, then the presiding judge can declare due cause, pursuant solely to the police affidavit,  and indict the accused person(s).  In that case, no private citizen's complaint is needed.    

Here is the pertinent question, concerning the 1978 Cipolla Case:

Q: Which actual persons caused criminal charges to be filed against Anthony Cipolla, according to Diane Thompson's fictional tale?

ANS: According to Diane Thompson and certain writers, the filing of charges against Cipolla in 1978 ... which were never filed in the first place ... was done by "Detectives" Nehouser and Fogle.  

In reality, the detectives were the late Warren Broz who died in 2020 or so, and the Detective Leo Marchetti who died in 2012.  They did NOT arrest Cipolla.  In fact, Broz ended up becoming a desk sergeant for a long period of time, after having been a detective.

So, process this contradiction in your mind:  

According to Diane Thompson, two guys named Nehouser and Fogle arrested Cipolla, filing criminal charges against him, in late July 1978.  Then, Diane Thompson magically had the power to drop the charges, by signing a sheet of paper in Bob Colville's office, in late August of 1978.  

If she did not do the filing of charges, then how is it that she got the power to dismiss the charges?  The answer is that her whole Colville Signing Story is a wall-to-wall lie.  Cipolla was never charged, in the first place.  The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette was either too dishonest or too incompetent to fact-check this damning story which defamed Colville as much as it defamed Cipolla.

All in all, Diane Thompson LIED.  The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette repeated her LIE.  And Randy Engel LIED, while acting as if to be a law professor, when she was nothing more than a babbling buffoon. 

Of course, Engel spent a third of her defamatory 2016 article mentioning how the detectives ... which were given the wrong names by Engel ... were telling Thompson how they hoped that she would stand strong and NOT succumb to being pressured into dropping charges by the Diocese of Pittsburgh and Cipolla's lawyer.  

Well, Diane Thompson had zero authority to drop any criminal charges anywhere in the USA at any time, in 1978.  Randy Engel wrote a series of LIES, in 2016.

 

Now, as far as went Diane Thompson withdrawing her private criminal complaint ... or perhaps it was a matter of Judge Laffey not permitting it to have been filed in the first place ... it would only have been because she had not met the Burden of Proof Standard to prosecute Cipolla ... and because she had no idea how to prosecute a case herself ... 

... and allegedly because she didn't want to get in trouble for allegedly filing a false police report and for allegedly lying to the police.  After all, Allegheny General Hospital found zero evidence that any kind of crime had been committed upon "Thomas Thompson," on July 25th, 1978.

None the less, perceive what the Post-Gazette and Thompson ... in the Court of Public Opinion ... were accusing the 1978 DA's office of having done. 

 

This shows that Diane Thompson & the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette personnel ... in the 1990s & in the 2010s ... were nothing but a bunch of liars thinking that Pittsburghers are stupid enough to believe anything stated by the Post-Gazette, as if it were the Infallible Voice of God.  

Well, the Post-Gazette was only the Voice of Annoyance and it was been an Insult to the Intelligence of the Reasonable Pennsylvanian.  It's grand DECLINE in subscribers in the 2010s & 2020s proves this to be so.  

Plus, the Post Gazette management was not very kind to its employees.  Due to low subscriber numbers, the Gazette could NOT afford to be kind to its employees. 

It's no wonder why the Post Gazette underwent a decline in subscriber numbers so significant that its management planned to shut down operations by May of 2026.  Then, a certain non-profit organization purchased it.  Well, that non-profit organization purchased a severe liability.  If you're going to do that, you might as well hire a reckless driver to be your personal chauffeur.  

Part 1: Cipolla's zero criminal charges VS Fr. Zula's 130 counts

 

Wuerl's treatment of Cipolla, in comparison to Richard Zula & Leo Burchianti 

Even after Richard Zula's conviction, Wuerl gave him a monthly stipend ... a monthly check.  Anthony Cipolla had no criminal record.  Yet, he received nothing from Wuerl, despite the fact that Wuerl was the one who defrocked Cipolla without having done so for a criminal reason.  Cipolla was NEVER a convicted molester in secular or church court.  Cipolla was never even indicted.

And of course, Wuerl additionally revenged Cipolla for going over Wuerl's proverbial head, to the Vatican.  This is the action of a childish and immature brat who should never have been given any position of power.  The message from Wuerl was that you don't dare challenge Wuerl without paying for it immeasurably.   

But, the true message is that Wuerl got away with abusing his power and destroying lives ... even during the James Torquato Retaliations ... where some laymen got caught in the middle of it all and could have gotten very physically injured.  

Things were heated in that case, because Wuerl let Torquato do what Torquato wanted to do, to escalate the incitement of violence against his accuser and his accuser's whistle blower advocate.  

Torquato even got a person who rents things at North Park to accuse Torquato's accuser of having stolen a bike.  So, Torquato did try to have someone frame his accuser for a crime he never committed.

In contrast, the Leo Burchianti who molested eight youths got to live at St John Vianney's House, for the rest of his life.  Cipolla didn't get to do so, despite his heart condition & neuropathy, as well as his diabetes.

In fact, Cipolla successfully passed a Pennsylvania State Police security clearance background check in 2014.  I ordered it from my construction trailer office desk and even paid for it myself.  And of course, it was something that was provided at a very affordable price.  Any Pennsylvania peasant could have afforded such a thing. 

 

Below is Anthony Cipolla's July 24th, 2014 Pennsylvania State Police Criminal Record Check.  It officially states, "The Pennsylvania State Police do hereby certify that: Cipolla, Anthony Joseph ... Date of Birth: 08/29/1943 ... Social Security xxx-xx-xxxx, etc," ====> 

 

"*** HAS NO CRIMINAL RECORD IN PENNSYLVANIA, BASED ON A CHECK BASED ON THE ABOVE IDENTIFIERS - REFER TO CONTROL #R12542432 ***"

 

Concerning the 1978 Case, according to the Baltimore Sun & Social Law Library

 

Plus, a concurrence from another source is posted below

 

 Yet, she assured her readers that Cipolla was mentally deranged, even though the Fr John Hardon she honored as a great teacher of Catholicism defended Cipolla's character to the core of his existence.

In 2016, Randy Engel assured us with great confidence that the evidence of Anthony Cipolla being a serial molester was blatant.  She stated that the evidence existed in the fact that Cipolla was "moved around" a lot of times, during his first five years as an active priest.  He was given multiple parish assignments in as many years.  

Engel forgot about the PRIEST SHORTAGE of the late 1970s, when priests were in a pea & shell shuffle game. 

According to Engel, this five parish assignment is unheard-of, and is the tell-tale sign of a molester.  According to reality, however, the multiple parish assignments given to a newly ordained DIOCESAN priest was something quite common in the late 1970s, according to the expert sources quoted below.  None the less, Engel erroneously concluded that:

Of course, Randy Engel was making it look as if Anthony Cipolla kept getting caught molesting youth after youth, followed by him being assigned to a different parish here and a different parish there, as a cover-up.  This is why multi-million dollar defamation lawsuits exist.  After all, my expert sources stated the opposite of what Engel stated in her 2016 article, concerning newly ordained DIOCESAN priests and their parish assignments.   

Now for the major hypocrisy of Randy Engel, in her damning of Cipolla, in his parish assignment record

 

Randy stated that the Pgh Diocesan spokesman, Fr Ron Lengwin, asserted that the average priest's first assignment is about five years in duration.  If a priest's first assignment endured lesser than five years, then there was something wrong with the priest, in terms of discipline and emotional stability.   And of course, my multiple expert sources stated the opposite.

 

None the less, according to Randy Engel, if you are a priest whose first parish assignment was five years long, then you are a good man who was never accused of molestation.  Therefore, you never had to be moved to different parishes, to cover-up your habit of molestation.

 

Newsflash, folks:  Fr Richard Zula's first parish assignment lasted 5 years.  Yet, he was a monster, once charged with 130 criminal counts.  In fact, Zula had a parish assignment that was 4 and a half years long, as well as a parish assignment 4 fours long.  Thus, Richard Zula, by means of his parish assignment record, appeared to be a stable man.  He was anything but that.  Randy Engel, in her assessment about a priest's first five years, was wrong. 

 

Father Edward Huff's parish assignment record is that of a non-molester, according to Randy Engel & Ron Lengwin.  But, Huff was a convicted molester, proving Engel & Lengwin to be WRONG.

Fr Huff's first three parish assignments were five years each.  According to Engel & Lengwin, this is surely the sign of a stable non-molester.  But, Huff was quite the molester, proving that Randy Engel & Fr Ron Lengwin did NOT know what they were talking-about. 

Next is Fr John Wellinger.  His parish assignment record makes him look acceptable to Randy Engel and Fr Ron Lengwin.  In fact, his first parish assignment was nine years long.  That would make him look really really stable in the estimation of Randy Engel.  But, he was anything but stable.  And Randy Engel was anything but correct.

And then there was Father William O'Malley who was accused of molesting his first youth in 1980, as well as multiple youths somewhere around 1991.  Then, in 1997, someone accused him of having been a molester even in 1978.  

 

He was then sent to rehab, and then he was reinstated by Wuerl in 1998, in a limited role, only.  O'Malley was placed on a glorified version of "administrative leave."  He was appointed to be a Canonical Consultant, but he was not allowed to dress as a priest or perform public mass.  

 

Yet, after 1998, between April 2002 and January 2006, six more males came forth, claiming that they were molested by O'Malley in years past.  Three of them claimed to have been molested in the mid-1970s, during his second parish assignment.

 

Well, in O'Malley's first five years of priesthood, he was assigned to only one parish.  In fact, the next two assignments were 3 1/2 years each, followed by a parish where he was assigned for almost 7 years.  

 

According to Randy Engel and Fr. Ron Lengwin, O'Malley's parish assignment record was that of a stable and well adjusted non-molester who could be trusted.  Well, O'Malley was anything but well adjusted.  

So, once again, Randy Engel is proven to be completely wrong in her proclamation, and she was malicious in her public defamation of an Anthony Cipolla who actually never was arrested and who had no DNA tests performed on any molecular substance which would have physically come from his body.     

All in all, there exist many more examples of molester priests whose parish assignment records would be declared the sign of a good & holy man, by Randy Engel & Fr Ron Lengwin.  

 

And remember, Ron Lengwin spent many years being Donald Wuerl's propagandist, even stating that there should only be one voice of Catholicism in America and that voice should be Donald Wuerl.   Therefore, Ronald Paul Lengwin was to Donald Wuerl what Paul Joseph Goebbels was to Adolph Hitler.  It's simply that Ron Lengwin was much taller than Goebbels.

Self-proclaimed Psychiatry Expert, Randy Engel 

In the same defamatory 2016 article, Randy Engel concluded that Anthony Cipolla most probably was at least borderline schizophrenic or borderline psychotic.

Big Question: Ladies & gentlemen, what is deadly wrong with Randy Engel's derogatory conclusion about Cipolla's state of mental health?

ANS: Cipolla was analyzed by TWO board-certified and licensed psychiatric facilities, and both facilities OFFICIALLY did NOT diagnose Cipolla as being Schizophrenic or Psychotic.  

In fact, the licensed NYC psychiatric facility gave Anthony Cipolla a clean bill of mental health, through & though.  Yet,  Randy Engel, in her elitist arrogance, placed herself above two mental institutions and their board-certified & licensed professionals.  

Quite frankly, Randy Engel and her "good good New Jersey friend" are the ones who need to be in a psychiatric institute.  Literally.

Engel's claim of unusualness 

In her claiming that it was "unusual" for a newly ordained diocesan priest to have been frequently shifted from parish to parish in the 1970s, Engel LIED.  It was and is very common for a newly ordained DIOCESAN priest to be shifted-around, simply for the sake of gaining experience, according to the published experts. Then came the matter of the late 1970s priest shortage.  

Newly ordained priests of a religious order are a different issue, being that they are limited to only the parishes run by their religious order, as well as their religious order's affiliated Catholic schools.  So, their assignments were far more limited than that of a diocesan priest, for the most part.  So, you expect a religious order priest to spend longer times in a parish assignment ... or else in mission work.

Diocesan priests were in a different set of circumstances, with much wider boundaries.  By the way, a diocesan priest is also known as a "secular priest."

Observe the reality of a newly ordained diocesan priest ... even in the 1970s ... according to the Archdiocese of D.C, the Denver Catholic, the Jersey Catholic, EWTN, and other sources: 

 

 

Did you ever wonder what contributed to the priest shortage of the late 1970s?  Well, the answer is that it was caused by the final phase of the Vietnam War, in March of 1973, and then at the end of the same war, in April of 1975:

ABOVE: Get into reality and take note that the 'TYPICAL NUMBER OF MOVES" made by "NEWLY ORDAINED PRIESTS" were & are usually "UP TO 5 IN 5 YEARS." 

 

Now, Anthony Cipolla became a NEWLY ORDAINED DIOCESAN PRIEST on May 27th, 1972.  Thus, it was expected for him to have been  assigned to as many as five parishes in his first five years, during a priest shortage that basically begin in March of 1973.  

MOREOVER, instead of getting arrested in 1972 or 1973 or 1974, he received COMMENDATIONS which were known as "a recognition" & "an expression of appreciation" ... even from POLICE!!!!

 

AND REMEMBER, the 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury had the power to scour through church archives and documents involving any accusations against any priests.  The record has it that Cipolla was NOT a serial molester being moved from parish to parish, in order to cover-up any molestation activities.  There was found no record of sexual abuse accusations against him in his first five years of ministry.

 

Once again, to assure you that the defamatory, self-righteous, & holier-than-art-thou Randy Engel was 100% WRONG in her assessment of Cipolla's first five years of ministry take note:  

 

During that time span, there was ZERO ACCUSATIONS of any kind of form of sexual abuse leveled against Anthony Cipolla, thereby justifying the plaques of gratitude given to Cipolla during that time span ... even by police.  

 

Plus, during the 2018 PA Grand Jury Inquest, ZERO files of sexual abuse accusations against Cipolla were found and/or presented to the grand jury.  This would mean that zero existed.  

 

That is to say, there apparently was no such secretly hidden molestation file of any kind on Cipolla, showing that Randy Engel is nothing but a defamer who loves calumny and who sees herself as the sterotypical "self-righteous, holier-than-art-thou church lady," when, in reality, she's just a gossipy hag.  

 

However, according to Randy Engel and her "good good New Jersey friend," the police were engaged in the cover-up of a molester priest, thereby making the police accomplices to the crime of molestation.  To reasonable people, however, the police were showing gratitude to a 1970s priest who found a way to keep kids "off the streets" and "out of trouble."  

 

Q:  So, were the police the accomplices of a molester or is Randy Engel the stereotypical & predictable gossipy hag of absolutely worthless value, clinging to her defamation? 

      

The 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury Inquest blew the doors on the Diocese of Pittsburgh wide open.  This included the Pittsburgh diocesan archives.  

If Cipolla were a serial molester, a secret archive file somewhere would have emerged, at the hands of a Pennsylvania State constable, which would have recorded far more accusations than the 1978 ones and those of a Tim Bendig who contradicted himself at the outset, when speaking to a Beaver County PA assistant DA.  

It would have then been entered into the record, if there were more accusers than that of the Bendig and Thompson parties.  That is to say, if he were the molester Randy Engel conjectured him to have been, then two, four, or six more accusers would have emerged, and they would have given testimony to the 2018 PA Grand Jury.  

No new accuser came forth.  

That, alone, proved Engel's defamatory article of 2016 to be a multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit waiting to be filed ... if there is someone out there still alive who has the constitutionally required Article III Standing, in the defamation hurled at Cipolla and which was spread throughout a large spectrum of humanity.  

Cipolla was never charged.  Zula was charged with 130 counts.

Richard Zula received a monthly stipend ... a monthly financial check or a monthly direct deposit ... from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, by order of Donald Wuerl, even after he was convicted of sexual abuse.  Cipolla received nothing from Wuerl, except massive doses of defamation, through Wuerl's surrogates.

And of course, the Richard Zula who received a monthly check from Wuerl was even found to have been in the possession of child pornography.  Yet, Cipolla was the one made out to be Wuerl's greatest monster, by the media and the internet.

 

So, for the record, Cipolla was NEVER found with any child pornography.  Richard Zula was. 

 

Concerning Cipolla's assignments, I do know that there was one specific pastor Cipolla could not stand.  This is because, he specifically told me.  So, Cipolla requested a transfer and got it.  But, Randy Engel insinuated that each parish assignment equaled one molestation accusation each.  

No, Engel simply succumbed to the influence of her pushy and emotionally disturbed "good good New Jersey friend" who wanted Cipolla gone forever.   Engel did NOT think things out.  She trusted her very pushy and hate-filled friend who did leave the Catholic Church ... which was ironic for Catholic-Doctrine-Supporter, Randy Engel.  Randy was basically a groupie following a New Jersey cult leader, at least in 2016.  

That New Jersey woman freaked out when Cipolla tried to get a home-schooling job as some kind of religion teacher ... in New Jersey.  I personally thought that this was the stupidest thing Cipolla ever did, and in the end it would come to cost him everything.  This is because that New Jersey woman wanted Cipolla out of the picture, proverbially & literally.   

That New Jersey woman wanted Cipolla dead, and she got what she wanted.  I call it voluntary manslaughter or negligent homicide or homicide by fright.  Remember, I talked to that New Jersey woman repeatedly, for consecutive hours at a time, and I can assure you that she wanted Anthony Cipolla dead ... literally.

None the less, the New Jersey woman didn't know that Anthony Cipolla:

1] ... was NEVER arrested ... even in 1978 ... but was rather defamed by a single mom who claimed that DNA evidence was taken from young Tucker's clothes and was positively matched to Cipolla in a hospital lab within one, two, or three days time, when 1978 DNA matches took more than 7 weeks to complete ... with the testing thereof never occurring in hospitals ... but rather, occurring at NIH labs, in 1978. 

None the less, Cipolla was ... 

2] ... officially cleared by TWO DA offices who found that Tim Bendig's accusations against Cipolla were unfounded.  Now, the assessment of Bendig's accusations was limited to the specific testimony of Tim Bendig himself, unaltered & unedited.  There was zero physical evidence and no corroborating witnesses, at all.  

BTW, the counties were Allegheny County where sits Pittsburgh and Beaver County, the home of the former largest push button railroad in the World and a number of steel mills, as well as a tin mill and a Valvoline depository.

None the less, the list of four people in the center of the Beaver County DA case report below are all PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY ... or adults in influence, such an advocate and promoter ... and not juvenile sex groupies or under-aged frequenters of the McGuire Home.  

In addition, Anthony Cipolla  ... 

3]  ... NEVER had to register as a sex offender, being that he was never even arrested for a sex offense, in the first place.  He was NOT arrested in 1978, as Randy Engel falsely claimed, and he was never arraigned or summoned to a hearing at Police Station #9.  The writer of that 2016 article obviously knew nothing about American or Pennsylvania legal procedures.

In continuing, Cipolla also ... 

4] ... through his attorney, namely my former neighbor John Alan Conte ... had dozens of character witnesses lined-up to testify at the Tim Bendig lawsuit trial which Wuerl made sure would never happen.  Wuerl simply gave Tim an out of court settlement shortly before the trial date.

And concerning this, Diane Thompson emerged for Attn Douglas Yauger, to be a witness in the Bendig lawsuit.  Wuerl definitely knew this.  

Well, Wuerl gave Bendig a six-figure out-of-court settlement.  If Wuerl believed that Diane Thompson were credible and honest, then why did Wuerl not give Thompson a form of settlement money of some sort?  Or did Wuerl allow money to reach Diane Thompson from under the proverbial table?  From behind the scene, perhaps?

No matter what, no public notice of Wuerl giving any kind of compensation to Diane Thompson was made, meaning that Wuerl did NOT publicly acknowledge that he found Diane Thompson to be credible.

Moreover, Cipolla ... 

5] ... was only accused by a Diane Thompson who was proven to be an outright wall-to-wall liar, and who was hard-up for apartment rent money during the time in 1978 when she accused Cipolla. 

An of course, Cipolla ... 

 6]  ... had no one accuse him of molestation ... outside of financially desperate Tim Benig and the financially desperate Diane Thompson.

7]  Plus, in the thirteen years since I was first handed the box of documents pertaining to the Cipolla Case, not a single person ever contacted me, to tell me that Cipolla molested him or anyone else.

8]  The 1993 Vatican Case had nothing to do with Tim Bendig's or Diane Thompson's accusations.  

9] Moreover, Randy Engel's New Jersey friend refused to accept that  Diane Thompson was repeatedly caught lying.  And it was Diane Thompson who, after sending me emails which proved that she knew I existed, publicly stated that I didn't exist, but rather, Anthony Cipolla was running this site under my name which Diane Thompson claimed was a fictional name.  

None the less, Cipolla's fatal error was walking into that home-schooling interview as a priest-with-faculties and not as a suspended priest forbidden to present himself as a priest.  That was stupid of him.  Yet, Wuerl purposely put Cipolla in a state of desperation.  Wuerl manipulated circumstances.  Wuerl incited thing by playing puppeteer.

None the less, Cipolla was completely cut off by Wuerl, even though Wolk, Zula, Pucci, and Leo Burchianti, as well as Huff & Zirwas, etc, were NOT cut off.  None the less, Cipolla needed money.  His reputation was ruined in Western Pennsylvania.  So, he went to Jersey, for work, and he actually asked a priest for the home-schooling job.  But, the priest told the New Jersey woman to interview Cipolla, instead.

As far as goes work experience for Cipolla, it was limited to managing youth groups and prayer groups.  He needed to take with him the docs which proved that he was repeatedly CLEARED by LAW ENFORCEMENT and was never arrested in 1978.  

And and and, the 2018 PA Grand Jury Inquest showed that there were no other persons who ever accused Cipolla of anything ill.  There was no secret archive file of undisclosed accusers in Cipolla's case.

Cipolla also needed to dress as a layman.  Even at that, no home schooler would have hired him as a layman, unless that home schooler knew him for decades.  Cipolla still had people who believed in him, and concluded that Bendig was just a liar.  This included Jesuit author, Fr. John Hardon.

Most importantly, applying for a youth group chaplain type of a job was only attempted by Anthony Cipolla once.  If he would have kept trying, then that would have been the sure sign of a molester, on the hunt for children.  But, Cipolla didn't keep doing so.  If Cipolla had kept doing that, I would have called the police on him, myself.

The Cipolla Case still has its doubts, but only concerning Frank Labiaux's accusations.  At the least, it is certain that Cipolla was not the Son of Satan whom Randy Engel made him out to be.  Cipolla was NOT the monster that Richard Zula was.  

And remember, I saw the whole 2016 article long before the November 30th, 2016 publishing of it, done by Renew America.  In fact, Randy Engel ... on a few occasions ... asked me to publish writings of her ... on my Marian website.  

And I spoke extensively to her "good good New Jersey friend,"  time after time, hour after hour.  Therefore, I am NOT a stranger showing up with an opinion.  I'm a witness.

All in all, that New Jersey woman who was obsessed with home schooling and obsessed with avoiding all Catholic schools was too emotionally immature to understand Cipolla, in his plight, under a thoroughly corrupt and ruthless Donald Wuerl.  

She was also asininely wrong in other things, time after time.  After all, she claimed that there was no way I was in construction ... and she then claimed that I was a fraud only pretending to be in construction, while fronting criminal activity.  HOWEVER ... 

... there have been hundreds of construction company paychecks addressed to me, as well as ...

... hundreds of times I signed vouchers, deliver tickets, and purchase orders for construction material, as well as me writing-out employee checks in my handwriting and then signing them in 2014, 2015, and 2016 ...

... as well as me having numerous witnesses see me perform construction activity.  This included ~the inspectors, ~fellow construction workers, ~subcontractors, ~home owners, ~school security guards, ~delivery men, ~concrete truck operators, ~curious onlooker neighbors, ~traffic control flagmen, ~warehouse employees, ~building material lot workers, ~building material store managers, etc.  

Plus, in my career, I operated heavy equipment, even in an Army Corps of Engineers project, as well as having done all phases of concrete work through the years.  I also did ironwork, finish carpentry, and metal trim work, as well as the various unskilled labor tasks which are very much needed, in order to get a construction project started and then completed. 

I was in projects paid-for by ~HUD, the ~URA, the ~US Dept of Energy, the ~Beaver County Commissioners, ~a historical society, ~the Allegheny County Commissioners, ~the City of Pittsburgh Engineers, ~various federally funded Councils of Government, ~Penn DOT'S infrastructure mgmt unit, the ~Army Corps, the ~US Postal Service, the ~Veteran's Administration, ~numerous municipalities, ~a few businesses, and ~numerous private home owners, including the owners of mansions.  

Randy Engel's anti-Catholic mentor who wanted Cipolla dead 

In the end, the New Jersey conspiracy theory woman didn't merely avoid all Catholic schools.  She left the entire Catholic Church for a religion that does not believe in the Immaculate Conception nor the indissolubility of Marriage nor the primacy of Saint Peter.  Her rejection of Catholicism went from A to Z, and she was the predictable pushy, feisty, over-domineering hag. 

She was so annoying and out-of-touch that I had to write to her and tell her to never contact me again ... to never call me on the phone and to never write to me.  Only after that did she start defaming me through a surrogate, requiring me to post counter-measures such as my security clearances, including the one below.  

Keep in mind that feeble hags have no power, yet they lust for power.  They get their power from slandering others, to make others appear lower than them:

So, for the fourth, fifth, or sixth time, if you state about me what she stated or what Diane Thompson stated ... and if you have money ... then you and I ARE going to court.  After ten years, you should realize that I'm NOT Anthony Cipolla in disguise operating a criminal ring.  And I definitely am not Anthony Cipolla's ghost.  

In fact, I truly have been in construction since 2014.  Before that time span, I was in heavy construction in 1992.  I was also in government contract construction from March 1995 to September 2001.  In fact, I was in insurance, as a licensed agent, in 1994.  And then, I was also a respiratory invalid for about ten years or so.  

I've been in about 300 construction "venues" ... aka on 300+ construction sites ... and there have been no dead bodies, no missing persons, no missing jewelry, no missing automobiles, and no failed inspections ... as well as NO liability lawsuits or failure of performance lawsuits.

The Bottom Line in Her Denial of Easily Provable Reality

Randy Engel's good good New Jersey friend HATED the idea of Cipolla being associated with men of masculinity and machismo.  So, it outraged her to think that a person in a stereotypical Stud City type of profession would defend Cipolla.  So, she refused to believe that I work on approximately 300 construction projects, some of which were super demanding in terms of endurance and muscular strength.

She had to have Cipolla's reputation attached to adults who were only  pansified, limp-wristed Peter Pan types.  HOWEVER, followers of Cipolla who personally admired him included a ~Blackhawk High School varsity wrestler, ~a dragline excavator operator who spent years in the coal mines, as well as a ~construction contractor, ~two electrical engineers, a ~carpenter, and a ~6'6" man who was officially accepted to be on the roster of a major Top Twenty college football team.  

So, Randy Engel's good good New Jersey friend went psycho ballistic when I mentioned online that my work experience was in construction.  Apparently she missed the photo of me operating heavy equipment at the former J&L Steel complex, as the final heavy equipment operator to remove the final remains of that steel mill.  I jacked it out of there with a 1994 CAT 426's hydraulic hammer.   

So, I had to add online photos of a few of the hundreds orders, vouchers, and receipts I personally signed.  She remained in denial anyway, thusly proving her to actually be the psychotic in the bunch.  She made sure that Engel would get published in 2016 the most defamatory article any person could imagine.  The falsehoods in that three-part article are covered here in specificity, in several posts.  

My Actual Goal   

I simply wanted Wuerl to grant me an anti-sweatshop, anti-slave labor apostolate back in the late 1990s, being that the defraudment of laborers of their wages is one of the four sins which cry to Heaven for Vengeance.  Such a thing is also a Crime against Humanity.  

A worker from Pittsburgh headlining worker's rights in a city known for its workers and their production of steel would have made for the quintessential worker's rights group.  The group could have been named after a papal encyclical that addressed worker's rights and the fair wage.  

But not under narcissist Donald Wuerl and his quest to constantly live the Marie Antoinette Lifestyle.  Wuerl completely ignored me.  Wuerl did NOT care to stop human suffering.  He only increased it wherever he could.  But, such a thing is typical for a narcissist.

------ 

BTW, do you want to know why Diane Thompson accused Cipolla of molestation in 1978 and then quickly withdrew her private citizen criminal complaint, in my private citizen's personal opinion which is protected under New York Times Co v Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)?  Well here it is:

Diane Thompson, in my private citizen's opinion, was desperate for rent money.  So, she accused Cipolla of molestation, hoping that she would get a quick out-of-court settlement.  This means that, according to my private citizen's opinion:

Thompson didn't know the difference between civil court and criminal court.  When she found out that there was no money in it for her, in her having filed paperwork in criminal court, she withdrew her private criminal complaint against Cipolla, thereby dropping the whole case in August of 1978.  She knew that she wasn't going to get money in time to pay apartment rent ... in my opinion. 

 

  

Below are Cipolla's "pastoral assignments."

 

And remember, his personal interest was in prayer group & youth group chaplaincy, as opposed to parish life.  He was more into the liturgical ... and even ritualistic ... aspect of the Faith than shepherding parishioners.  Cipolla saw the youth as possible recruits for the seminary ... or even the priesthood.   

 

If anyone actually comes out with true evidence ... and non-contradictory witness testimony ... then I'll be the first one to say, "guilty!!!"  However, all the fact-checking against Cipolla turned out to be provable falsehoods.  And some of the allegations were ridiculously embarrassing ones too.  This included Diane Thompson's allegation of a 1965 special forces accident at a Spartanburg military base that closed-down in 1947, eighteen years prior.