Before all else, let's view a preview: It's pertinent sections of what is known as an Offense/Incident Report. It's subject matter comes from an officer's "pocket book" or "pocket notebook."
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆ The same 1978 Offense/Incident Report marked Tucker Thompson's "victim's condition" as "GOOD." There was ZERO MENTION OF SEMEN ever having been found on Tucker's body and/or clothing.
Plus, no injury to the private bodily section was recorded. Neither
front nor back of his private area had tearing, bruising, bleeding, etc.
In
the same 1978 report, there was ZERO MENTION OF CIPOLLA GETTING
ARRESTED, thereby showing the outright incompetency of local journalists
in the late 1970s who did NOT know the difference between a post-arrest
prelim hearing and a pending-arrest Probable Cause Hearing.
It
was a probable cause hearing which was scheduled for Aug 28, 1978.
The newspapers falsely reported it as a post-arrest hearing. In
reality, the hearing was see if Cipolla were going to get arrested or
not.
In the illustration below ... at the top right-hand corner ... look for "victim's condition." Below it is "GOOD." And the AGH there means, Allegheny General Hospital.
Most important is that, in the original police notes and in the July 25, 1978 O/I Report, Diane Thompson and Tucker Thompson asserted that Cipolla only molested Tucker two times ... once around the 4th of July and once on July 25th.
Two times was it. Yet, the media insinuated for decades that Cipolla probably molested Tucker dozens of times for years.
As far as went the actual, physical, alleged molesting, Tucker claimed that it only involved Cipolla playing proctologist and inserting one finger where proctologists do their inserting. This was said to have been followed by Cipolla allegedly taking one adult hand and applying it to a nine year old's very small you-know-what.
And of course, that one adult hand upon a very small nine year old's you-know-what would have resulted in nothing more than Cipolla getting a cramped hand.
Now, Tucker claimed that he had to keep it all a secret, even to the point of signing an NDA. Moreover, he claimed that the molesting occurred during two first holy communion prep classes ... in JULY ... when no such thing is usually done. This is because First Holy Communion is usually done in May or in June ... when it came to the 1960s & 1970s.
Also take note that the first molestation event that Cipolla was said to have done was during the general time span of 4th of July festivities, give or take a day or two.
Now, Cipolla was from Beaver County ... close to Joe Namath country, Tony Dorsett country, and the home of NFL Hall of Famer, Jimbo Covert. Thus, why would Cipolla be in the Northside of Pittsburgh at that time, when his holiday venue was close to the Ohio State Line, in Beaver County?
You know Diane Thompson is a liar, but she has not been a very good one, especially when it came to her claim of a 1965 Spartanburg special forces training accident on a military base that completely closed in 1947. In fact, it became a State Park in 1949, and no USA special forces training is ever allowed to occur near vacationing Americans.
BELOW IS PART OF THE JULY 25, 1978 O/I REPORT
End of Preview
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
The Great Wuerl Lie ... within a continuum of deceit
Let us quickly be reminded of the big lie of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette and Ann Rodgers Melnick who coined the phrase, "Bishop of Zero Tolerance." The truth is that Wuerl was anything but that campaign bumper sticker slogan.
Furthermore, while Wuerl was approving the transfer of abusive priests, he was showing his disapproval of whistle blowers such as .... yours truly ... your favorite unknown nobody who did the opposite of worship the ground that Wuerl walked-on:
Due to his cover-ups, Wuerl needed a diversionary tactic. He got one shortly after Wolk, Zula, and Pucci were simultaneously arrested, and while Zirwas and Hoehl literally got away, going to other jurisdictions ... all in 1988.
Perhaps by now, you know whom was targeted by Wuerl, to be the diversionary tactic ... that scapegoat accused by a woman repeatedly caught lying, as well as a drop-out who was caught being a liar and con artist, after having quickly squandered a six-figure lawsuit settlement, during a time when it was a lot of money.
BTW, that hefty settlement money did not go to intense psychiatric treatment, as Tim Bendig promised it would. It went to the Levitske Brothers, for the purchase of the Two Step Lounge, aka Bar & Grill. It became a failed business venture very rapidly. Quite frankly, the incompetency of Slanderer Tim Bendig traveled the speed of light.
Double BTW, I know Bendig to be a liar, because he lied to me four times in a row, immediately after he conned me into believing him. If he would have just shut up then & there, I would have gone over to his side ... at least temporarily ... until pivotal documents emerged which did tell the true tale of the tape.
For the record, it was his "feel sorry for me" voice patterns, along with his "I'm just a poor soul" cadence which made his con effective ... until he lied to me four times in a row.
Anthony Cipolla was NOT arrested in 1978 or ever
As a super quick review ... and for the eighth, ninth, or tenth time ... according to the 2018 Pennsylvania
Grand Jury report ... within the testimony of the sole detective of the 1978 case ... Cipolla was NOT arrested in 1978, as was falsely claimed for years.
And of course, the 1993 Vatican Rehearing had nothing to do with Tim Bendig's sexual abuse accusations, as well as Diane Thompson's accusations which numbered a grand total of two ... one around July 4th, 1978, and or on July 25th of the same year.
That Vatican hearing had to do with the fact that Wuerl defrocked Cipolla solely because the St Luke Institute, in Silver Spring Maryland, diagnosed Cipolla as having had Clinical Depression & Suicidal Tendencies. Ironically, the founder of that institute ... Father Michael Peterson ... died from AIDS, in 1987.
It was very falsely claimed that Cipolla was arrested in 1978. This long-term falsehood was due to the incompetency of media personnel who should never have been hired by any newspaper anywhere, in the first place. Even back then, the sheet of paper served to Cipolla was known as a "summary notice" and NOT a warrant for an arrest.
He was to appear at "a probable cause hearing," on August 28. He was accused by then-32 year old Diane Thompson, on July 25, 1978.
Moreover, the pertinence of this case, ten years after Anthony Cipolla's violent death, exists in the fact that publicly posted DEFAMATION remains online, and the legal doctrine of Ongoing Wrong does exist. Moreover, God actually does exist and this God has a way of leveling-out the universe.
In fact, causing someone's death, via the Eggshell Skull Rule, as such applies to a heart patient undergoing the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, is something that calls for a response. In fact, it cries to Heaven for Vengeance.
Meanwhile, on Planet Earth, there is Voluntary Manslaughter and then there is Negligent Homicide. In some jurisdictions there is even Homicide by Fright. Such crimes have no statute of limitations. Oh by the way, I do know someone who went to prison for literally scaring a heart patient to death, while playing bully. That person was a living hell in many things.
All in all, Randy Engel's 2016 three-part article was beyond obscene, as has already been illustrated in line item after line item. Telling a story composed of wall-to-wall falsehoods, while not allowing the accused to defend himself, is obscene ... especially when the accused had a severe heart condition.
One more thing: Hell does exist and Hell is filled with people who never thought that they would go there. This includes the stereotypical over-domineering, self-righteous, gossipy hag church lady who basically spent a lifetime turning people off to even the idea of Church.
The July 25, 1978 Offense/Incident Report:
The 1978 Cipolla case began on July 25th, 1978, when Diane Thompson called the police and accused Anthony Cipolla of having molested her son, Tucker, without Diane Thompson ever seeing it done. Concerning her specific accusations against Cipolla, she claimed she had to "drag it out of Tucker."
Then came two uniformed police officers. She spoke her narrative to them and one of the officers transposed the notes he took to a form called an Offense/Incident Report.
That sheet of paper only started-off an investigation. It provided no conclusion to the accusations made by Diane Thompson, back in 1978. It did NOT confirm what Diane Thompson alleged. It merely stated what Diane Thompson alleged. This was only Stage 1.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
Moreover, Tucker Thompson said that he was molested only two times, and NOT for two years of time, as the media insinuated.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
Yet, the way Tucker claimed to have been molested by Cipolla was highly improbable and not very credible. After all, an adult's hand ... upon a nine year old child's very small you-know-what ... doesn't have any space to do anything. If Cipolla did do that physical action, then the most he got was a cramped hand ... twice.
And remember, child molesters do that which gives them pleasure. A cramped hand in cramped space doesn't give them pleasure. Being that I know what it is to talk at length with a pedophile, I know a pedophile's Number 1 pleasure. That Number 1 does NOT involve penetration or putting an adult's hand on a nine year old child's very small you-know-what.
Well, that Number 1 pleasure is something that neither the Thompson People nor Tim Bendig ever accused Cipolla of having done. Yet, if either one of those accusers would have accused Cipolla of having done that one thing, then I would have believed them instantly, at least in generality.
Back to the July 25, 1978 O/I Report
As a very important reminder, the white sheet of hand-printing on a police form that the Thompson People made sure would get put online was NOT an arrest report. It was NOT an arrest warrant. It was NOT even a police affidavit. And it certainly was NOT a case report.
It's the allegations of Diane & Tucker Thompson only, and not any assessment of any law enforcement officer. It's their side of the story without any cross-examination having first been performed on them.
Concerning Grand Juries
BTW, there is no cross-examination ... and no defense attorney ... at grand jury hearings. Until cross-examination is availed in a court of law, there is no verdict allowed to be "deliberated."
Grand jury testimony is literally one-sided. This is why a trial must follow ... for all of the "cross-examining" needed to be done, so that a defense attorney gets the chance to "impeach the testimony" of a hostile witness or two or three or as many as were impeached in the McMartin Sexual Abuse case, where children even claimed that they saw witches flying.
The Offense/Incident Report of July 1978
In addition to an outline of the accusations of the complainants in an O/I Report, an "after the fact" event or two are also mentioned. Often mentioned is a trip to the hospital.
Within the July 25, 1978 O/I Report, mention was made of nine year old Tucker Thompson ... aka Thomas Thompson ... having been taken to Allegheny General Hospital, for an "exam for sexual molested."
Note: The word, molested, in that text was a noun; a person. Now, it wasn't the conclusion of the uniformed officer that Tucker was molested. Rather, the complainants, Diane & Tucker, alleged that Tucker was molested.
Plus, in Pittsburgh police reports, AGH is Allegheny General Hospital.
The same 1978 Offense/Incident Report marked Tucker Thompson's "victim's condition" as "GOOD." There was ZERO MENTION OF SEMEN ever having been found on Tucker's body and/or clothing. Plus, no injury to the private bodily section was recorded. Neither front nor back of his private area had tearing, bruising, bleeding, etc.
In the same 1978 report, there was ZERO MENTION OF CIPOLLA GETTING ARRESTED, thereby showing the outright incompetency of local journalists in the late 1970s who did NOT know the difference between a post-arrest prelim hearing and a pending-arrest Probable Cause Hearing.
It was a probable cause hearing which was scheduled for Aug 28, 1978. The newspapers falsely reported it as a post-arrest hearing. In reality, the hearing was see if Cipolla were going to get arrested or not.
In the illustration below ... at the top right-hand corner ... look for "victim's condition." Below it is "GOOD."
Proof that there was no immediate arrest came in the fact that, after Mark Ninehouser submitted his Offense/Incident Report, the sole detective of the case later had a chat with 12 year old Frank Labiaux, as a witness. The investigation had just begun.
In addition, proof that there was no arrest at all came from the detective's 2018 grand jury testimony, when he described the transpiration in the hallway, shortly before the Aug 28 Probable Cause Hearing was cancelled. It was cancelled by cause of Diane Thompson withdrawing her private citizen's criminal complaint.
She dropped the case. Being that charges were not yet filed, she didn't drop the charges, as she falsely claimed. She simply stopped the due process, by withdrawing her complaint. It was equivalent to saying "Never mind." But, I've already mentioned this in other posts six to eight to ten or so times.
Cipolla's Pattern of NOT being accused by a number of his youth groups and altar boys
Now, Cipolla had youth groups for years, along with numerous altar servers. Yet, concerning the two times when Cipolla was accused of abuse, both accusing parties were dirt poor and in desperate need for money. And of course, accusing a priest of sexual abuse could get for you a huge chunk of change.
For the Tim Bendig lawsuit trial, my former neighbor, Attorney John Alan Conte, arranged for DOZENS of character witnesses for the defense. Most were lined-up to simply say that they never saw Cipolla and Bendig doing anything suspicious with each other, as well as to say that Cipolla never tried to molest them.
Being that I was alone with Cipolla one night and one afternoon, I literally walked up to an elder gentleman at a Padre Pio Prayer Group reception and offered to be one of those character witnesses, will to say that I was even alone with him at night, and he didn't do a damned thing to me.
He didn't even accidentally rub elbows or shoulders with me. Plus, I was in his McGuire Home residence. Proof comes in the fact that I can name that unexpected wooden and metal thing sitting very near the place you would enter. You can ask Tim Bendig what it was, being that he was apparently there. It was a common thing, but it was entirely out of place.
Now, a certain individual alleged to me that an associate lawyer of John Conte coached him on what to say, when Yauger (Bendig's attorney) would ask about some kind of a blotch of Cipolla's arm. I'm aware of two of Conte's associates. I even saw one in action once, during a fender bender accident ... in the Northern Lights Shopping Ctr.
Of course, it was anticipated that Bendig's attorney, Douglas Yauger, would mention it, to make Cipolla look as if he had sexually transmitted infections on his arms. That one Cipolla witness alleged to me that Conte's assistant attorney told him to say that Anthony Cipolla's blotch was from a spider bite ... which was really stupid advice.
Now, I didn't ask Conte's assistant attorney if this were true. And from my personal experience, never believe anything said by anyone without a corroborating witness ... or physical evidence ... to back it up.
So, where is this Arrest Warrant of 1978, if Cipolla were arrested? Or where is the police pocket book entry?
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with how arrests really work in the United States, so that you'll know that Randy Engel's 2016 Cipolla Condemnation actually is a wall-to-wall lie:
Randy Engel's narration of post-arrest hearings and detectives driving Diane Thompson to a courtroom was one big lie. Randy Engel was NOT a server of the Truth. She was a spreader of lies.
Moreover,
there certainly was an Offense/Incident Report in the 1978 Cipolla Case posted
online. So, where is the arrest report, if there actually were an
arrest of Cipolla in 1978? Why is it not online?
In
fact, being that Diane Thompson claimed that a hospital tested actual semen
said to have been found on Tucker, followed by it quickly declaring that it belonged to Cipolla within in a few short days, it means that there would have been an
actual warrant for Cipolla's arrest, describing the DNA findings.
Okay then, where is a copy of the
warrant for Cipolla's 1978 arrest, if he were arrested? Why was it not posted online? In fact, what was the docket number given to the 1978 case, if it went beyond the investigation stage, into full blown indictment & arrest?
Timeline Problems, aka head-scratcher mysteries
Diane Thompson was allegedly married to a guy named Tom Thompson in 1965, until 1977 or
so, upon which he allegedly committed suicide by an overdose of
barbiturates. And then, according to Randy Engel, Anthony Cipolla simply popped-in and
started molesting Diane Thompson's two sons.
Of course, Randy Engel made it sound as if Cipolla were grooming and then molesting Tucker for a long time and many times. In fact, an occasional website would state that that the molesting of Tucker AND Frank was done by Cipolla in 1977 and in 1978. The Pgh Post Gazette made it look as if Cipolla molested Tucker 20, 40, 60, or even 80 times.
TWO TIMES ONLY went the accusation, as was told to the police, on July 25th, 1978
Well,
the alleged claim ... that was stated on record ... was that Anthony Cipolla
molested Tucker Thompson a total of TWO TIMES ONLY. Concerning the molestation technique described, it is NOT the usual way molesters molested the young.
In fact, even though it's a brief description stated in the O/I report, it's a gross-out description. It alleges the Cipolla was pretending to be giving Tucker a medical exam, for Holy Communion, followed by him sticking one finger where it should NOT have been. It then alleged that Cipolla took one adult-sized hand and invaded the small private sector of Tucker.
In true molestation cases not narrated by mothers in desperate need of apartment rent money, it's the child's hand that gets in great demand by the molester. The molester doesn't affix his adult-sized hand to a nine year old male child's insignificantly small you-know-what.
More specifically, we are talking about an Anthony Cipolla who literally did have pretend masses as a child, where he actually did get neighborhood kids to attend. A play altar was even built for him by a neighbor versed in carpentry.
All of this means that Anthony Cipolla had an intense belief in every consecrated host, so much so that he would NEVER defile his hands and then hold a consecrated host.
And of course, The Thompson Side of the 1978 case claimed that Cipolla told Tucker that he had to give Tucker an exam, in order for Tucker to be approved for the reception of first holy communion. The Thompson Side definitively said that Cipolla played the role of proctologist with one finger.
The description is in Officer Mark
Ninehouser's Offense/Incident Report of July 25, 1978. In that report, Mark
stated that Tucker expressly claimed that he was first molested by Anthony
Cipolla around the 4th of July, 1978 ... and then on July 25, 1978. That was a case which spanned no longer than 3 to 4 weeks. It was NOT the eight, twelve, or sixteen weeks that the mainstream media and Randy Engel insinuated or declared.
Cipolla's response to me ... concerning that accusation ... was that he told Tucker that he had to give him an oral exam ... a scholastic exam ... a tutorial exam, to see if Tucker understood the doctrine of Holy Communion sufficiently enough to be granted his first holy communion.
A Three Week Time Span was too small an amount for effect
Concerning the three week span of time originally alleged by the Thompson People as the time span where Cipolla committed his allegedly two acts of molestation, it was such a small amount of time that Diane needed to bring Frank Labiaux into the narrative, to make Cipolla look like a monster.
Well, one of the things that Frank claimed was that Cipolla actually taught Frank how to molest himself. This is why, in America, there is a phrase of non-credibility which states, "You've got to be kidding."
And of course, Diane Thompson claimed that she had to drag the information out of Tucker. And quite frankly, I don't know what story she gave, in her claim about getting info from Frank. None the less, the July 25th, 1978 O/I Report only mentioned Tucker, under the name Thomas.
At the center-bottom of the illustration above, Mark Ninehouser's printed name clearly legible. How did Randy Engel end up calling him "Nehouser?" This is the sign of an incompetent ... yet self-righteously arrogant & presumptive ... buffoon, not paying attention to the case.
This is also the sign of a buffoon who doesn't know how to tell who the uniformed officers are and who the detectives are, by their individual badges. After all, Randy claimed that "Nehouser" was a detective, when he was a uniformed office, instead. For the record, next to the Ninehouser name is the number 46. That was his badge number.
And speaking of numbers, Diane Thompson was 32 years old, in the Summer of '78. In fact, her phone number at the time was 1-412-766-4563. None the less, it was a land-line, like every other civilian phone of the 1970s.
And of course, she stopped living there in 1978, shortly after she was denied her request of having Cipolla get his pastor to start paying Diane Thompson's apartment rent for her. The pastor was willing to pay zero dollars of her monthly rent.
If the pastor agreed to pay her rent in 1978, then Cipolla would not have been accused of molestation at a time when the apartment rent was due. Oh, and it was for Apt 16, on 3616 Mexico St, Pgh, PA 15227. I drove through and walked through that entire neighborhood. I took photos, too.
Moreover, Tucker ... and/or Diane Thompson ... told uniformed police officer Ninehouser that Cipolla only molested Tucker with his hand ... and a stethoscope via some sort of medical exam. The insinuation was that Cipolla was using ye olde medical exam as a ploy to molest Tucker ... firstly, by imitating a proctologists, and then by the use of one adult hand on a nine year old's very small you-know-what. Such a thing would induce little more than a hand cramp, as was previously stated.
Now, Randy Engel claimed that Tucker was taken to the hospital and semen was found on him, followed by a positive DNA identification of Cipolla being quickly made in the hospital laboratory. HOWEVER, in 1978, it took at least 7 weeks for a DNA test result to be ascertained, and hospitals didn't do the testing. NIH government labs did.
HOWEVER, the contradiction and hypocrisy of the accusation against Cipolla existed in the fact that Tucker said that Cipolla only used his hand to molest him, and the male hand is NOT the body part that ejaculates semen.
If Cipolla kept his pants on ... and if Cipolla's private section had not been involved in the molestation of Tucker ... as the Offense/Incident Report claimed ... then how did semen get on Tucker's clothes?
The only answer is that Diane Thompson lied yet again to Randy, and Randy Engel once again fell for it. There was no semen anywhere ... according to police report. Remember, the "victim's condition" was officially stated as "GOOD."
Now, for the big
credibility problem concerning ages:
Diane
Thompson's eldest son or step-son in 1978 was Frank Labiaux. According to
the record, Frank Labiaux was 12 years old in 1978. This would mean
that he was born in 1966. Well, in 1966, a Tom Thompson was allegedly
the husband of Diane Thompson.
So,
why does Frank have a different last name, if he is Tom Thompson's
son? Who was the real father of Frank? If he were adopted, then how did a court grant custody of a minor of no relation to a financially impoverished woman who didn't even have readily available rent money? Plus, if he were adopted back in 1966, how did he get assigned to a severely injured special forces soldier?
And who was
the father of Diane Thompson's alleged third son ... who actually did die young, somewhere around his late teens or early twenties or even early thirties or whatever? Or was he instead a nephew or something similar?
Also in the 1978 scene was a ten year old girl whose last name was different than Tucker's and Frank's. She was supposedly Diane Thompson's daughter. Mark Ninehouser's report stated that the young girl was Kathy Kennealy. Who are/were that child's parents and who were her legal guardians?
So, in the same "household" ... at 3616 Mexico Street, Pittsburgh, PA, Apartment 16 ... there was a nine year old named Thompson, a 10 year old named Kenealy, and a 12 year old named Labiaux. Diane Thompson was said to have been the mother and/or guardian of those children. Who were the fathers of these children?
In fact, if you know anything about this Tom Thompson, assuming he did exist at one time on Planet Earth, could you fill me in, as to date of birth, place of birth, place of death, cause of death, educational background, work background, any military service, any civilian administrative records, and even past hobbies? Please? Anything about him will do.
Remember, the defamation is still online. Thus, this case is NOT closed.
Tom Thompson was alleged to have committed suicide some time around 1977. You can use my cell phone number ... which receives texts. It's stated in each post about an interpreter for the UN converting St Wenceslaus' Church into a theater or convention center or whatever. I am NOT going to post here any numbers not related to the 1978 Cipolla Case. To do so is to cause confusion. This includes my cell phone number.
There
is even a bigger time problem with the tale of Tom Thompson going from master
printer ... in the age of automated printing ... to special forces
trainee in 1965 which meant that he had to have started his
military service in 1962
Diane
Thompson ... according to Randy Engel ... said that Tom Thompson's
trade was that of a printer and that he was one of the finest printing craftsmen in the land.
At
this point, there is a time problem here. Firstly, how old was Tom
Thompson
in 1965 that he could gain the experience of a master printer and
yet end up in America's elite forces with the required three years of
previous military experience? Uhhhhm, there is one thing you
need to know about Special Forces recruitment. That is this:
In
order to be recruited and then sent to Special Forces training, you "usually" needed to already have had three years
of military experience. THUS,
according to Randy Engel, the master civilian tradesman husband of Diane
Thompson started his military service in 1962. And of course, I don't even know if this Tom Thompson guy ever existed.
Guess
how old Diane Thompson was in 1962. Chances are the you guessed
wrongly. She was 16. Then, 16 years later, in 1978, she accused
Cipolla of molesting Tucker ... and Tucker only, originally.
By
the way, she was 19 in 1965, the year when her husband, Tom, was said
to have been in a devastating special forces training accident at the
Spartanburg military base which was permanently closed 19 years prior, in 1946. It was then turned into a State Park, in 1949. But, according to Diane Thompson, for some magic reason, Tom was training there in 1965 ... perhaps in a parallel universe.
Therefore, how did Tom Thompson get the time to become a master printer during an era when the
printing trade had long since turned "push-button" ... as far back as the
1940s? That is to ask, how did the young Tom Thompson get the time to
become a master craftsmen, when there was only the need for button
pushers? Or is it that Randy explained this poorly, in her defamatory 2016 article which demonized Cipolla from A to Z.
Below:
Concerning the DE FACTO claim that Tom Thompson was both a master tradesman and a
special forces recruit with three years prior military experience, how
does a man in his mere 20's become a master craftsman
in the printing trade by 1961, when printing turned automated and became
a push-button industry?
In
the event you're keeping score on the case which Donald Wuerl used as a
diversionary tactic ... done in order to misdirect attention away from Wuerl's undisputed abusive priests ... the magistrate in charge of the Cipolla Case's Aug 28, 1978 Probable Cause Hearing was Stephen Laffey. He was a local magistrate.
In law, a magistrate is basically "a screener," to see if a case should continue onward or be dismissed. A local magistrate can also serve as a motions judge, if need be. In fact, a magistrate is a preliminary judge with a judge's power.
That August 28th hearing was cancelled via Diane Thompson, herself, during a time when
"charges" were NOT YET FILED, meaning that Diane Thompson IS A LIAR for
claiming that her signature, written under duress according to her, "dropped criminal
charges" against Cipolla.
As a reminder for the seventh or eighth time, in every jurisdiction in
the United States and in its 50 sovereign states, once criminal charges
are filed against anyone, the only two persons who can "drop the
charges" in every case are 1] either the prosecutor 2] and/or the judge, including a magistrate involved in the case.
Thus,
the whole newspaper narrative of the Drop-the-Charges Nightmare
scenario of Diane Thompson, when she was
unable-to-see-the-paper-she-was-signing-because-of-tears-in-the-eyes, it was theatrical bull crap. When you have tears in your eyes and need to write something, what do you instinctively do? ANS: You wipe them away with one hand and maybe even a Kleenex. Then you sign your name.
Moreover,
Hollywood repeatedly had movies which claimed that only the victim can
file charges ... for dramatic effect and story-line flexibility only. Well, a
murdered man is incapable of filing criminal charges against his
murderer. Yet, numerous murder charges have been filed throughout
American history. Therefore, persons other than the victim have repeatedly filed criminal charges in the USA.
Did anyone in the media mention the asst DA of the 1978 Case?
Moreover, the assistant DA who was notified of Diane Thompson's accusations against Anthony Cipolla was John Marchetti.
The
point to mentioning this is that Marchetti is the one who eventually
received (uniformed) Officer Mark Ninehouser's Offense/Incident Report.
Yet, Diane Thompson NEVER mentioned this name, when she gave her first
interview with the Pgh Post Gazette, back in the 1990s.
She
kept mentioning the DA in a very defamatory way, as if he were the one
front & center. It would have been Marchetti who personally spoke
with her and conducted things. Perhaps she was too stupid to know the
difference between the DA and an assistant DA.
Well,
in 1978, child molestation charges in the State of Pennsylvania had a
TWO YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, and the US Constitution's Double
Jeopardy Law was not in effect. It wasn't in effect, because there was
no jury verdict, or judge's directed verdict, or a bench trial judge's
"finding."
Diane
Thompson most definitely could have pursued the case. She had time,
all the way until July 24, 1980. If she wanted two counts of charges
filed, then she had until June 30th, 1980, to have had an uncontested
"timely" filing. Thus, she had 22 months or approximately 660 days to
get Cipolla in handcuffs, IF he actually did molest Tucker and/or Frank.
Even
at that, there was no case in the first place, being that CIPPOLA WAS
NOT ARRESTED in 1978 or ever. He was NOT indicted. The case literally didn't even
begin. Things were only at the investigation phase.
The big lie about this whole August 28, 1978
This
has been held back from the public for years. Not revealing it enabled
numerous opinionated know-it-all types to make fools out of themselves,
thereby showing them to be total frauds & fakes who don't know the
first thing about the law.
Concerning
that August 28, 1978 Probable Cause Hearing, Randy Engel made it sound
as if Diane Thompson absolutely had to be there, in order for the case
to proceed. Newsflash: Diane Thompson was not an officer of
the court. Outside of being a witness to be questioned at the hearing,
no private citizen is required to be at a Probable Cause Hearing.
In
1978, IF and only if there were evidence against Cipolla already in
existence, Diane Thompson had no need to attend the hearing. Plus, if she had no evidence, then her attendance would have been a waste of time.
It
was one big lie to have claimed that she was needed, in order to
proceed with the prosecution of Cipolla. That which was needed was the
D.A. office's consent. The person whose presence was needed was only
the prosecutor. If
there were any damning evidence against Cipolla at all, then Cipolla
would have been indicted, even with Diane Thompson absent.
Now, there
was that which the 12 year Frank Labiaux said to the sole detective assigned to the case.
In as much, if Frank Labiaux were going to be used as a witness, then
the defense would have had the opportunity to cross-examine him and
impeach his testimony.
Of
course, the media claimed that the local government in 1978 shut down
all possibility of prosecuting a priest claimed to have had DNA evidence
against him.
Of
course, there was NO DNA EVIDENCE in the 1978 case. Moreover, in 1978 it took over 7
weeks for any DNA test results to be produced. In 1978, you did not get DNA
results in three days, or even within 3 weeks.
The DNA evidence claim
of the 1978 case was yet another Diane Thompson lie. After all, August 28th minus July 25th equals 34 days. Even 49 days was too early for there to have been any DNA evidence, for the 1978 Probable Cause Hearing.
There was no $45 fee. Diane Thompson lied ... as usual
Furthermore, that was as blatant a lie as the time when Diane Thompson told Randy Engel that she had to laboriously raise, at great sacrifice, a $45 fee, for Frank Labiaux to go to the annual convention in Michigan, at the grounds of the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions. Entrance was FREE.
Firstly, it was vocations weekend and it was 100% for free, because it was designed to inspire young lads into seeking a priesthood vocation. Therefore, Cipolla didn't go there to molest Tucker or Frank. He went there to get the religious order to recruit young lads into a pre-seminary curriculum. It was a typical recruiting weekend, and the cost of it was already in the religious order's budget.
Once again, in case I wasn't understood ... due to poor writing ... Diane Thompson NEVER had to pay a $45 entrance free for any relative to go to the Michigan seminary recruit weekend. She lied yet another time.
You need to realize that Diane Thompson has proven herself to have been nothing but a wall-to-wall liar. After all, she said that I didn't exist and that my name was a made-up name used by Anthony Cipolla. She claimed that Cipolla was operating this site, while operating some kind of a child molestation ring.
AND AND AND, the Number 1 Piece of Evidence which proves that Diane Thompson knew that she was lying all along, consisted in the fact that she never called the police on the guy operating this website. If she really believe that this site was being run by a child molestation ring operator, she would have called someone in law enforcement to investigate.
But of course, it has been ten years since Cipolla's death, and this site is still in operation. Plus, out of MY DEBIT CARD came the yearly payment for me to use the www.donaldwuerl.com domain name & web address. This proves 100% that Cipolla never ran this site and that Diane Thompson was lying all along.
This also proved that Americans and even Mexicans were really really really stupid for believing Diane Thompson, back in 2015. After all, shortly after she posted her defamatory accusation, I lost 90% of my weekly views. I lost 90% of my viewers on all of my sites ... not just the Wuerl-of-Hurt site.
If you were one of those people who was conned ...
Now, if you were one of those people who instantly believed Diane Thompson and stopped viewing my sites, please write to me and tell why you were so gullible so as to have believed her.
That 1978 Investigation ran at a lynch mob speed
The
investigation should have continued beyond August 1978, just to make sure that a molester didn't go free ... and just to make sure that the accusing mother wasn't a con artist who literally committed the crime of having filed a false police report.
However, the sole detective of
the case jumped the gun, in his fatal error of NOT corroborating a thing
said by then-twelve-year old Frank Labiaux, in an interview with him.
The detective's fatal error was in him assuming that every 12 year old male always tells the truth to the police. Of course, junior high school teachers knew that 12 year old males certainly do lie to teachers. So, why would they not lie to the police?
Moreover, a few 1980 cases showed us that there are mothers out there who most certainly did tell their children to lie to the police.
If
Cipolla were actually guilty of any wrong-doing, a few more months of
police investigation could have resulted in the discovery of actual evidence or
corroborating points of circumstantial evidence ... or a newly emerging
witness ... which could have warranted an indictment & arrest.
If
the Allegheny County DA's office were as corrupt as Diane Thompson claimed, then Diane Thompson could
have brought-in the State Boys from Harrisburg for investigation
purposes ... if and only if she were telling the truth and not playing a con game
designed to quickly get apartment rent money, back in 1978.
Back to Original Motivation
Concerning
Wuerl as bishop, I simply wanted to be granted a church-approved
Catholic action guild now called "an apostolate." It would have been
based on opposing ... and "giving awareness to" ... modern-day slave
labor profiting which included foreign sweatshop labor profiting. After
all, it was causing a massive trade balance deficit for the United
States, while literally costing about 5 million jobs.
Even
though the Defraudment of Laborers of their Wages is one of the Four
Sins which Cry to Heaven for Vengeance, Wuerl did NOT care to come to
the rescue of the down-trodden and unprotected. He merely wanted to
live his Marie Antoinette Lifestyle.
In
the midst of learning how heartless Wuerl was, concerning workers who
provided a lot of merchandise to the USA as enslaved workers, I
then learned of Torquato and found it to have been a moral obligation to
have Wuerl learn of his sexual antics. Torquato did not care about the plight of the slave-labor sweatshop workers. He only cared about putting his hands where they should have not been.
Then
came the retaliations, as well as intelligence-insulting propaganda ...
and games played by police who should have been tossed out of their
police departments.
Now remember, I was NOT
a follower of Anthony Cipolla. After all, he didn't care about ending
the nationwide scandal of foreign sweatshop labor profiteering. So, he
& I were in two drastically different worlds.
Now,
I acknowledge the miraculous power of Padre Pio, but life is a matter
of Ora & Labora. Cipolla only cared about the Ora part, in
sacramental liturgy, without wanting to do the labora part of
championing any cause dedicated to ending nationwide injustice.
It's just that a box of Cipolla documents was
literally placed in front of me to take with me and review. Of course, I was chosen to
do the reviewing, because I was the one caught in the middle of the
Torquato Retaliations that Wuerl could have stopped instantly, but let
continue until I was destroyed. Thus, I personally knew how vicious & unjust Wuerl was.
Yet,
I originally assumed that Anthony Cipolla was as guilty as sin ...
because Ann Rodgers Melnick and the Post Gazette said he was. That
box of docs was followed by my realizing that everything "Ann
Rodger-Melnick" and similar de fact propagandists wrote about the
Cipolla Case was completely non-factual.
The newspaper reports were so
non-factual that the first response which came to mind, after viewing the
doc box was: "Is this a trick question?"
The
entire newspaper reports were askew from the documentation. Then came
witnesses who knew Tim Bendig and Cipolla ... and who went to at least
one of the yearly Michigan vocation weekend events, where no one had to
pay any $45 entrance fee, as Diane Thompson FALSELY claimed.
It then
inspired the second reflex action which consisted in any document reviewer thinking to
himself, in the privacy of his own thoughts: "You've got to be kidding. This Anthony Cipolla horror story is a farce." In as much, if you're gonna condemn someone and string him out, to die, then you better condemn him for the correct reason.
Now,
I spoke with Cipolla over the phone many a time. I originally did so,
trying to get a confession out of him. Then, after having done the
necessary fact-checking, I found that the Cipolla horror story was one
sick joke.
.png){kind=tracking}
.png)
