Tom Hamilton: a McQuire Home Administrator; not a youth who followed Cipolla

This is why "Tom Hamilton" was the FIRST NAME on the Beaver County district attorney office's interview list, concerning the investigation of Tim Bendig's private criminal complaint.  

 

Look at that list.  All the people there are authorities, and not young Padre Pio youth group attendees.  Randy should have realized this. 

 

An instance of Randy Engel not having the full documents, in her trashing of Cipolla

 

Engel stated that the Beaver County DA's office was wrong, because it stated that Tim Bendig was an adult at the time described by Bendig as the time he was said to have been molested by Cipolla at the McGuire Home.  According to Engel, Bendig said that Cipolla was molesting him since he was thirteen.  Got it?

 

Here is the response:  Tim Bendig literally "averred" ... "stated" ... "testified" ... that Cipolla molested him at the Knoxville parish from 1982 and 1986.  He was alleged to have never mentioned any timeline of molestation at the McGuire Home.  So, he alleged that he was molested as a minor outside of the Beaver County DA's jurisdiction.  

Now, the Beaver County DA was ONLY investigating alleged crimes that might have occurred in BEAVER COUNTY ONLY.  The claim of Bendig  being molested by Cipolla from 1982 to 1986 was in ALLEGHENY COUNTY.  The DA investigators were judging the case according to Bendig's testimony.  Incidentally, Bendig was born in October of 1970. 

 

Now, Cipolla was transferred to New Brighton's McGuire Home in 1983.  He left Knoxville's St Canice Parish at that time.  Yet, Bendig claimed to have been molested by Cipolla where Cipolla was not.  None the less, according to the Beaver County DA report, Bendig only mentioned one incident ... one when he was the age of majority.

 

What does this indicate?  It indicates that Bendig was making up a story for lots and lots of lawsuit dollars, not keeping track of a timeline, for credibility purposes.  

 

Plus, he realized that all he needed was to get Cipolla indicted for one offense, done one time only.  The DA's report mentioned one and only one alleged offense only.  Was it a misprint?  Well, misprint or not, I know from personal experience that Tim Bendig is ... or at least was ... a lying con artist.

 

From my personal experience, Bendig's success in being a con artist was in his voice inflections.  They sure had me fooled, until Bendig got a little too confident and rattled off 4 lies in a row to me, making me realize that he was nothing but a con artist, and therefore, Cipolla was innocent, after all.  Moreover, Bendig had a very effective feel-sorry-for-me voice.  It sure tricked me for a short while. 

 

Bendig also tried try to get Cipolla indicted by the Allegheny County DA.  That DA's office also concluded that there was not the corroborating witnesses nor the physical evidence needed to warrant an indictment of Cipolla.  Everyone aware of Bendig's lawsuit concluded that he was simply trying to get a higher sum of lawsuit money, by getting Cipolla indicted.  Bendig went 0 for 2.

 

There were far more obvious lies that Engel fell for: 

 

In looking back, Randy Engel also should have instantly realized that there is no school in session in Pennsylvania on July 30, 1978, and therefore, young Tucker was NOT sitting at the kitchen table doing his homework, while being harassed by an Anthony Cipolla said to have been wearing a cassock in the middle of Summer.  

 

Engel was like a wolf in nice-grandma-clothing, seething to tear apart Cipolla.  I was surprised to find that Engel never contacted Anthony Cipolla's only brother ... or Cipolla's twin sister ... and I was surprised that ... 

... Engel never made contact with either one of the two police officers whom she claimed were detectives arresting Anthony Cipolla, in 1978.  Well, the truth is that the honorably retired Officer Mark Ninehouser expressly told me that he NEVER arrested Cipolla --- 

 

--- and that he merely went to Diane Thompson's residence, to take a statement from her, followed by him transposing it on a standard form, via hand-printing ... and NOT cursive writing ... followed by him handing over the notes to the detective desk.  

And that was it.  No theatrical events.  Ninehouser had nothing to do with the case from the moment he handed his hand-printed report to the detective sector, in July of 1978.  Thus, he was NOT a detective as Engle very erroneously claimed, in her self-assured smugness.  Thus, he did NOT drive Diane Thompson, Tucker, and Frank Labiaux to a hearing, saying en route that he and his partner were confident that they were going to get Cipolla convicted.  None of that happened.

______________________________________________________

 

Once again, I categorically state that I am more than willing to categorically declare Anthony Cipolla a vile molester who was rocketed into the blast furnaces of Hell for all eternity.  The problem is that the fact-checking on all of the damning accusations against Cipolla categorically turned out to be sophomoric lies.

One example is the 100% proven lie about Frank Labiaux committing fire extinguisher vandalism upon a church near his home in August of 1977 at the age of twelve (out of revenge for being molested.)   

 

The fact is that the vandals were a 14 year old and a 15 year old duo of thugs who also slashed the tires in the church's parking lot, on another occasion.  

That church was the African Methodist Church, located down the street.  The motivation for those acts of vandalism was RACISM and not resentment from being molested.

__________________________________________________

Concerning Randy Engel's slur against Pope Benedict XVI for having worn red Medieval shoes, in her stating that it was an obvious sign of Benedict being a homosexual, know that those were the historically famous SHOES OF THE FISHERMAN.

They were red, to symbolize that the pope was willing to shed his blood for Christ, as did Saint Peter, Saint Linus, Saint Anacletus, Pope Evaristus, Pope Pius I, Pope Soter, Pope Eleuterus, Pope Victor, Pope Urban I, Pope Calixtus, Pope Anterus, Pope Cornelius, Pope Lucius I, Pope Felix I, Pope Marcellinus, and a number of other ones.  

There is a lot of blood on the Chair of St. Peter.  So, Engel better quit mocking the papacy.  She is apparently jealous that she never got to have the power and influence of a pope . . . or else she is merely the stereotypical overly domineering hag who damns people, because she thinks that it gives her power.

      Q:   And what is the indication of this?
ANS:   She goes by a man's name, hypocritically enough.

The Lie about a military base in Spartansburg in 1965

You know, there was no military base in operation, in Spartansburg, in 1965.  It was once known as Camp Croft, and Camp Croft was closed in 1946.  Since 1949, it has been known as Croft State Park.

In addition, Vince Cipolla told me in person that he NEVER saw his brother Anthony wear a cassock.  In fact, a close friend of Cipolla, (the 6'6" one who was invited to join the Penn State Nittany Lion football team and who majored in electrical engineering), said that he NEVER saw Anthony in a cassock, either.  Engel was very non-factual in her 2016 horror story.

She wrote those damning things, because she wanted to believe them ... and because she is soooooo gullible to con artists and their voice inflections.  But now, we have proof that Frank Labiaux is a liar, just like his mother or step mother, Diane Thompson.  After all, the fruit does NOT fall far from the tree.

Well, Engel proved that she has no respect for the dead, as
well as no respect for the Shoes of the Fisherman

Now for the matter at hand:   In her three-part article, Randy Engel addressed the Beaver DA office's 1989 report on the investigation of Tim Bendig's private criminal complaint against Anthony Cipolla.

Now, ladies & gentlemen, Bendig only filed that complaint, in the hope of getting a large sum of lawsuit money from the Diocese of Pittsburgh.   It was an obvious ploy and farce for Bendig to have filed that private criminal complaint, based on one very simple and obvious observation:

The observation is that Tim Bendig filed his notice of pending lawsuit (through his attorney) before filing the private criminal complaint.  If you are criminally wronged, you call the police first.

 

Bendig did NOT accuse Cipolla until he was flat broke, and after Cipolla told the Padre Pio Group people to stop sending money to Bendig at his former Pittsburgh seminary address. 

 

 Bendig had many years to report Cipolla.  He was NOT chained in a Cleveland basement.  Throughout those years, he showed no signs of distress.  

 

Now, I went through a suicide, concerning a teenager who lived at Father John Hoehl's Baden house.  Therefore,  I KNOW the look of .... of .... giving up on life, shortly before a guy commits suicide.  Bendig did NOT show signs of being an imprisoned sex slave in any capacity.

In addition, Bendig didn't accuse Cipolla until after he had no more money and after Cipolla told the Padre Pio Prayer Group members to stop sending Bendig money to the Pittsburgh Seminary.  

Once again, I was the one who went through a suicide, and NOT the hag, Randy Engel.  I literally had to take the accuser of Father James Torquato to safety and I saw the look of fear on his face.  Randy Engel did NOT.

Engel's followers act as if she is all things to all people and that she has been everywhere.  No way.  Engel, as old as she is, didn't come close to experiencing what I had to experience in life ... simply by default.  

 

All those situations walked up to me. They even came-a banging on my door, as when two young ladies were frantically telling me that their dad was beating their mom, imposing on me the duty of conscience to go and physically rescue her.  

 

I had zero seconds to think things out.  I had to walk into a scene where police had died, in similar "domestic violence" scenarios throughout America.  Does Randy Engel know what it is to walk into a wife-beating-in-progress?  Well, I sure do.

 

Does she know what it is to endure sexual harassment?  I do.  Does she know what a person's face looks like while he is attempting to murder you?  Well, I sure as Hell.  The facial expression is that of an emotionless Frankenstein.  None the less, did Engel ever take to safety a woman being repeatedly beaten by her live-in boyfriend guy?  I sure as Hell did.

Did she know what it was to be in TWO major industrial accidents and live to tell about both?  So, why do you follow her as if she is the infallible Man of all Seasons?  In following Engel, you are following a pretender and libelous hag.

Tim Bendig IS a strategic liar, and a number of people contacted me, confirming what I personally witnessed of Bendig.  Plus, after all these years of me calling Bendig a liar, he never sued me for defamation.

None the less, the Beaver County DA, as well as the Allegheny County DA, stated that there were no grounds upon which to indict and prosecute Anthony Cipolla.  In the Beaver County report, mention was made that FOUR people were interviewed by law enforcement personnel.  They were:

          TOM HAMILTON

          SISTER MARY ALICE

         MONSIGNOR SHULTZ

         ANTHONY CIPOLLA

In her libelous three-part article, Engel stated that she asked Tim Bendig who Tom Hamilton was ... if memory serves me correctly.  Well, Bendig said that Hamilton was a Padre Pio Group youth who used to frequent the McGuire Home.  Do you believe Bendig?  Well, his answer was obvious bull crap.  Take a closer look:

What are the caliber of people named in the above witness list?  ANS: People of some measure of authority.   Observe:

Cipolla was the official chaplain of the McGuire Home.  Monsignor Shultz was the head of the Pittsburgh Diocesan Beaver County Deanery.  This means that he he was the most powerful Pittsburgh diocesan priest in all of Beaver County.

Sister Mary Alice had a superior's post at the McGuire Home.  Therefore,  it would be obvious that Tom Hamilton was some type of authority at the same McGuire Home.  

People, please test damning accusations for cracks.  In as much, Hamilton wasn't a teenage kid coming and going as he pleased.  Please quit being so gullible, People.

In 1978, the Cipolla Case was NOT irrevocably closed ... and surely not due to one August 1978 signature

 The 1978 Cipolla Case was presented for over 33 consecutive years as one where Diane Thompson was harassed into "dropping the criminal charges."  But, there never were criminal charges filed against Cipolla in 1978, and Cipolla was never in handcuffs.  In as much, there is a difference between a private criminal complaint and "the issuing of process."  There is a difference between a private criminal complaint and an indictment .. an arrest.

Furthermore, no magistrate would tell a recently arrested defendant to go home and come back tomorrow for the arraignment, as Mrs Randy Engel claimed in her 2016 fictional horror story of Anthony Cipolla.  Arraignments are designed to see IF the defendant gets to go home.  The two main questions addressed in any arraignment is 1] Is the defendant a flight risk? and 2] Is the defendant a danger to anyone in society by which he needs to be confined, to keep people safe from harm?  

The Media's subsequent sensationalism of the Cipolla Case 

The 1978 Anthony Cipolla Case was a case presented by the media as one where the prosecuting of Cipolla was solely dependent on Diane Thompson keeping the charges filed.  And it was claimed that she was confronted by a squad of "suits" who forced her into signing a sheet of paper which officially dropped criminal charges which were never filed in the first place.  Very simply, the 1978 case didn't even get to the stage of filing charges or dismissing the case as lacking evidence.

Moreover, according to the media, once Diane Thompson "dropped the charges" that no prosecutor ever filed, then no one anywhere on Earth had the power to criminally indict Cipolla ever again, concerning her 1978 accusations.  So, Cipolla got to run free, according to journalists who either don't know a thing about American law or who are avowed liars who additionally think that you are gullible.

There is one known legal procedure which makes the thesis statement of the 1978 case 100,000 percent FALSE.  It's known as the:

PRIVATE PROSECUTION, and Diane Thompson could have prosecuted Cipolla herself, under the complete monitoring of an assistant DA, as a private prosecutor.  But, she needed evidence.  And contrary to what Randy Engel stated, there was no DNA evidence test results that were even possible in such a short span of time.  Moreover, if you were to gloss over the 2018 PA Grand Jury Findings, there was no mention on any record of semen being found on Tucker Thompson's clothes.  

Thus, even concerning the false way in which Randy Engel described the 1978 Cipolla Case, if Diane Thompson would not have withdrawn her private citizen's criminal complaint, and even if the judge would have declined to issue process against Cipolla, thereby refusing to put Cipolla in handcuffs, Diane Thompson still could have kept the case alive.  

The sheet of paper she signed on August 28, 1978 did NOT irrevocably & permanently close the case.  The Law of Double Jeopardy closes a case.  THEREFORE, Until a jury issues a verdict ... or until a Judge takes the case away from the jury and simultaneously issues a directed verdict ... or until the judge presiding in a "bench trial" officially issues "a finding" ... Double Jeopardy is not yet activated, and case can get re-opened. 

The Success of the Case was NOT dependent on Thompson. PERIOD.

 Even if Thompson refused to sign the withdraw of her July 1978 private citizen's criminal complaint, and even if she were to have boldly walked into the hearing room, it didn't mean that the Cipolla would continue.  It didn't mean that the Cipolla would not be dismissed by a judge who LATER expressed his suspicion over Diane Thompson's accusations. 

No matter what, the case would not have ended on August 28th, 1978, IF Diane Thompson responded by petitioning the court to become the private prosecutor of that one case.  Diane Thompson still could have had her day in court, concerning her damning 1978 accusations against Cipolla.  It might have been one or two years later, but she would have had her presentation heard by those in power.

 Let us review for the eighth, ninth, or tenth time, so that maybe a few people will suddenly understand how the Pennsylvania Rules for Criminal Procedure worked in the late 1970s.  But first ...

... one more quick educational note.  In 1974, the was the Pennsylvania Grand Jury Act.  There was also the 1976 Grand Jury Act.  In 1974, something known as an "indicting grand jury" was abolished, leaving only "investigating grand juries" in Pennsylvania.  

This meant that even after Diane Thompson withdrew her private criminal complaint, if there really were someone in the PA State Justice Dept who believed in Diane Thompson, that person could have persuaded a member of the Allegheny County DA's office to finally get a real indictment filed, even a year or two later.

The bottom line is this:  The 1978 Cipolla Case was NOT permanently closed with no hope of legal recourse, on August 28, 1978.  All of that stuff that Randy Engel wrote in 1978 was complete fiction.  

In fact, her narration of a 1978 arrest which NEVER happened, and of 1978 prelim trials which NEVER happened ... and of a 1978 arraignment which NEVER happened was the description of procedural anarchy.  That 2016 article proved that Randy Engel did NOT know the first thing about the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.

One more time, for Randy Engel followers too stubborn to believe that she is actually human and not the infallible & divinely chosen reporter of God   

Firstly, Diane Thompson did NOT file criminal charges in 1978.  She filed a PRIVATE CITIZEN'S CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.   All such complaints required the approval of the local DA's office or a local judge, concerning state jurisdiction crimes.  They still do, today. 

Moreover, law tutorials report that prosecutions initiated by private citizen criminal complaints have been, as a trend, extremely low in percentage, compared to all the prosecutions transpiring in the USA.

Now, there was an August 28th, 1978 Probable Cause Hearing scheduled which was too see IF there were any just cause to file criminal charges against Anthony Cipolla, in the first place.

The existence of that hearing being scheduled was proof that the DA's office did NOT elect to indict Cipolla.  Thus, the determination of whether or not Cipolla was going to be indicted, arrested, arraigned, and processed was now dependent upon a judge.

The big lie of Randy Engel was in her NOT describing the scheduled probable cause hearing as a hearing which was to transpire before any arrest was made.  Engel very FALSELY made it sound as if Cipolla was already charged, arrested, and arraigned, and was going to a post-arrest prelim hearing, in August of 1978.  Randy Engel LIED in her description. 

Here's a quick lesson:  The difference between a preliminary hearing and a probable cause hearing used to be this:  The probable cause hearing occurred before any arrest was performed.  The preliminary hearing occurred after an arrest & arraignment was made.  Then after the 1974 & 1976 Grand Jury Acts, a probable cause hearing and a preliminary hearing became synonymous. 

The point to such a hearing is to show the magistrate that there does exist substantial enough evidence and/or corroborating witnesses to legitimize a prosecution of the accused.  If no evidence or concurring witnesses are produced, then the hearing ends with the entire case being dismissed.  Such a case can only get re-opened, if someone shows-up with evidence never-before-presented.

Back to the 1978 Case which was severely misinterpreted by Engel

Okay now, the media and Randy Engel made it sound as if no one anywhere could get Cipolla arrested, arraigned, and put on trial, after Diane Thompson dropped the case in 1978.  That was and is one BIG LIE.  Someone in the local justice department could have gotten the case re-opened without the help of Diane Thompson.  

For example, the sole detective assigned to the case could have persuaded the DA's office a year or two later, to officially ask a judge to order the creation and convocation of a grand jury, for the sole purpose of investigating Anthony Cipolla ... without a single signature from Diane Thompson.  

But, the detective needed to present some kind of newly emerged evidence or corroborative witness to re-open the case.  He did NOT do so.  None the less, observe:

 

Randy Engel's Two Detective LIE, showing how incompetently written that defamatory 2016 article was 

For the record, Randy Engel FALSELY stated that two detectives were assigned to the 1978 Cipolla case, named Nehouser and Fogle.  She furthermore stated that those two fictional detectives supported Thompson through and through, begging her to not let herself be intimidated into "dropping the charges," being that Engel claimed that she was the only person on Earth who could get Cipolla sent to trial and then to prison.

The truth is that Detective Nehouser was Uniformed Police Officer Mark NINEHOUSER, and Detective Fogle was Uniformed Police Officer Bob Fogle.  Those were the two officers who responded to Diane Thompson's July 25th call to the police.  They went to Thompson's apartment and spoke with Diane Thompson only once ... and then never again.  There was a sole detective in the 1978 Cipolla case;  Detective McG...

All in all, the fate of the world was NOT in the sole hands of Diane Thompson, in 1978.  

Reminder of Engel's DNA falsehood ... with NEW expert tutorials 

As well, Diane Thompson completely lied when she said that Tucker was taken to the hospital in July of 1978, and at the hospital DNA test results identified Cipolla as a molester of Tucker within a couple of days, followed by Cipolla being in handcuffs.  

Well, proof that this is another big lie consists in the fact that DNA testing in 1978 was NOT conducted in hospitals, as Randy Engel falsely claimed.  It was conducted in NIH labs.  And test results took longer than an average of 52 days to produce, according to the latest professional sources.  The tutorial below show without a doubt that Randy Engel's claim that Tucker's semen being tested in hospital and then being quickly identified as belonging the Anthony Cipolla was and is one big lie.

Between July 25th, when Thompson called the police, and August 28th, when Thompson withdrew her private citizen's criminal complaint, only 35 days transpired.   That was NOT enough time to get a positive DNA test result.

The 2016 Engel article is so egregious that those involved in its writing, editing, publishing, and maintenance online should be sued literally for millions of American dollars.  They should be subjected to other legal repercussions of their digital version of crying wolf, emotionally traumatizing a heart patient, and being the blatant cause of his cardiac arrhythmia death, being that he read the specific accusations long before November 30, 2016.  He read it shortly before his August 2016 death.

Even at that, it was beyond pathetic that Engel added the most disrespectful comments about Cipolla after his death.  Even in death, Engel will not allow you to be at peace.

BTW, back in the 2010s, whenever Randy had an online article that just wasn't getting enough views, she would have me post it on my Marian website, to see if it would get a higher number of hits.  

And I mentioned previously that she, Mike Ference, and I were once interviewed simultaneously on some kind of internet radio talk show.

And she did edit one of my Wuerl-of-Hurt posts.  This is mentioned to show that Randy and I were not strangers to each other.  We are now, though.

Perhaps we should cover one Randy Engel LIE against Anthony Cipolla at a time

 

She was so positively assured, in her smug arrogance

In 2016, Randy Engel assured us, with great confidence that the evidence of Anthony Cipolla being a serial molester was blatant.  She stated that the evidence existed in the fact that Cipolla was "moved around" a lot of times, in a five-year period.  He was given multiple parish assignments in as many years.  

Engel forgot about the PRIEST SHORTAGE of the late 1970s, when priests were in a pea & shell shuffle game. 

According to Engel, this is unheard-of, and is the tell-tale sign of a molester.  According to reality, however, the multiple parish assignments given to a newly ordained DIOCESAN priest was something quite common.  Engel erroneously concluded that:

Of course, Randy Engel was making it look as if Anthony Cipolla kept getting caught molesting youth after youth, followed by him being assigned to a different parish, as a cover-up, over and over again.  This is why multi-million dollar defamation lawsuits exist.  

In her claiming that it was "unusual" for a newly ordained priest to be frequently shifted from parish to parish, Engel LIED.  It was and is very common for a newly ordained DIOCESAN priests to be shifted-around, simply for the sake of gaining experience.  

Newly ordained priests of a religious order were limited to the parishes run by that religious order, as well as the affiliated schools.  So, their assignments were far more limited than that of a diocesan priest, for the most part.  Diocesan priests were in a different set of circumstances, with much wider boundaries.  By the way, a diocesan priest is also known as a "secular priest."

Observe the reality of a newly ordained diocesan priest ... even in the 1970s, according to the Archdio of D.C, the Denver Catholic, the Jersey Catholic, EWTN, and other sources: 

 ABOVE: Get into reality and take note that the 'TYPICAL NUMBER OF MOVES" made by "NEWLY ORDAINED PRIESTS" are usually "UP TO 5 IN 5 YEARS." 

 

Now, Anthony Cipolla became a NEWLY ORDAINED DIOCESAN PRIEST on May 27th, 1972.  Thus, it was expected for him to have been  assigned to as many as five parishes in his first five years, during a priest shortage.  

MOREOVER, instead of getting arrested in 1972 or 1973 or 1974, he received COMMENDATIONS which were known as "a recognition" & "an expression of appreciation" ... even from POLICE!!!!

 

Therefore, according to Randy Engel and her "good good New Jersey friend," the police were engaged in the cover-up of a molester priest, making the police accomplices in molestation.  To normal people, however, the police were acknowledging a 1970s priest who found a way to keep kids "off the streets" and "out of trouble."  

 

Q:  So, were the police the accomplices of a molester or is Randy Engel the stereotypical & predictable gossipy hag of absolutely worthless value, clinging to her defamation? 

      

Concerning Cipolla's assignments, I do know that there was one specific pastor Cipolla could not stand.  This is because, he specifically told me.  So, he requested a transfer.  But, Randy Engel insinuated that each parish assignment equaled one molestation accusation each.  

No, Engel simply succumbed to the influence of her pushy and emotionally disturbed "good good New Jersey friend" who wanted Cipolla gone forever.  Engel did NOT think things out.  She trusted her very pushy and hate-filled friend who did leave the Catholic Church ... which was ironic for Catholic-Doctrine-Supporter, Randy Engel.  She was basically a groupie following a New Jersey cult leader, at least in 2016. 

That New Jersey woman freaked out when Cipolla tried to get a home-schooling job as some kind of religion teacher.  The New Jersey woman didn't know that Anthony Cipolla:

1] ... was NEVER arrested even in 1978, but was rather defamed by a single mom who claimed that DNA evidence was taken from young Tucker's clothes and was positively matched to Cipolla in a hospital lab within three days time, when 1978 DNA matches took an average of 52 days to complete and the testing thereof never occurred in hospitals.

2] ... was officially cleared by TWO DA offices who found that Tim Bendig's accusations against Cipolla were unfounded.  There was zero physical evidence and no corroborating witnesses.  

By the way, concerning the Mark Hamill mentioned by Engel in 2016, he was in the administration of McQuire Home, in New Brighton, PA ... and NOT a teenager who frequented the McQuire Home, as if he were a sex groupie ... as Tim Bendig falsely claimed.  This is explained elsewhere at this site.  

Observe below how Tim Bendig was NOT regarded as the teller of truth.  In 1989, Bendig should have been indicted, arrested, and arraigned for filing a false police report.  Actually, he filed two; one in Beaver County and one in Allegheny County. 

None the less, the list of four people in the center of the dispatch below are all PEOPLE IN AUTHORITY, and not sex groupies.  The names of authorities include Mark Hamill.  So, Randy Engel's good good New Jersey friend got it entirely wrong.  Her New Jersey friend should be sued for defamation, at a very high price.

Such a thing would have ended Cipolla's nightmare and would have began a new nightmare for ever-so-nightmaric Donald Wuerl who actually supported the sacrilege of Dignity Masses, where a certain mortal sin was honored as a holy act of God.  

Meanwhile, it's a sin that 87% of American males have no interest in committing, and this comprises about 55 million adult males born in the USA who don't care about honoring the Dignity Masses Wuerl made sure to operate in the Pittsburgh Diocese. 

 None the less, Anthony Cipolla also ... 

3]  NEVER had to register as a sex offender, being that he was never even arrested for a sex offense, in the first place.  He was NOT arrested in 1978.  And remember, I'm the one who authored briefs that were filed at the United States Supreme;  NOT Randy Engel.

In continuing, Cipolla also ... 

4] Had dozens of character witnesses lined-up to testify at the Tim Bendig lawsuit trial which Wuerl made sure would never happen, by giving Tim an out of court settlement shortly before the trial date.

5] Was only accused by a Diane Thompson who was proven to be an outright wall-to-wall liar. 

 6]  Had no one else accuse him of molestation, even though he had youth groups dating back to 1972, proving that he was no serial molester.

7]  Plus, in the thirteen years since I was first handed the box of documents pertaining to the Cipolla Case, not a single person ever contacted me, to tell me that Cipolla molested him or anyone else.

8]  The 1993 Vatican Case had nothing to do with Tim Bendig's or Diane Thompson's accusations.  

9] Moreover, Randy Engel's New Jersey friend refused to accept that  Diane Thompson was repeatedly caught lying.  And it was Diane Thompson who, after sending me emails and knowing that I exist, publicly stated that I didn't exist, but rather Anthony Cipolla was running this site under my name which Diane Thompson claimed was a fictional name.  

None the less, Cipolla's fatal error was walking into that interview as a priest-with-faculties and not as a suspended priest forbidden to present himself as a priest.  That was stupid of him.  

None the less, Cipolla was cut off by Wuerl, even though Wolk, Zula, Pucci, and Leo Burchianti, as well as Huff & Zirwas were NOT cut off.  None the less, Cipolla needed money.  His reputation was ruined in Western Pennsylvania.  

And as far as goes work experience for Cipolla, it was limited to managing youth groups and prayer groups.  He needed to take with him the docs which proved that he was repeatedly CLEARED by LAW ENFORCEMENT and never arrested in 1978.  And he needed to dress as a layman  Even at that, no home schooler would have hired him as a layman, unless that home schooler knew him for decades.

Most importantly, applying for a youth chaplain type of job was only attempted by Cipolla once.  If he would have kept trying, then that would have been the sure sign of a molester, on the hunt for children.  But, he didn't keep doing so.

The Cipolla Case ... free from the lies of Diane Thompson, Randy Engel & Engel's vicious New Jersey friend with whom spoke for hours at a time ... still has its doubts.  But, it is certain that he was not the Son of Satan Randy Engel made him out to be. 

Then came the 2016 article which concentrated the lies in one spot.  Those accusations were posted online before they were posted at its final November 30th, 2016 destination.  I see it in detail months before November 2016.

All in all, that New Jersey woman who was obsessed with home schooling and obsessed with avoiding all Catholic schools was too emotionally immature to understand this about Cipolla.  

She was also asininely wrong in other things, time after time.  After all, she claimed that there was no way I was in construction ... and then claimed that I was a fraud only pretending to be in construction, while fronting criminal activity.  HOWEVER ... 

... there have been about a thousand construction company paychecks addressed to me, as well as ...

... hundreds of times I signed vouchers, deliver tickets, and purchase orders for construction material, as well as me writing-out employee checks in my handwriting and then signing them in 2014, 2015, and 2016 ... as well as me having numerous witnesses see me perform construction activity, including the inspectors, fellow construction workers, subcontractors, home owners, school security guards, delivery men, concrete truck operators, curious neighbors, traffic control flagmen, warehouse employees, building material lot workers, building material store managers, etc.  

In the end, the New Jersey conspiracy theory woman merely didn't avoid all Catholic schools.  She left the Catholic Church for a religion that does not believe in the Immaculate Conception nor the indissolubility of Marriage nor the primacy of Saint Peter.  Her rejection of Catholicism went from A to Z, and she was the predictable pushy, shovey, over-domineering hag. 

She was so annoying and out-of-touch that I had to write to her and tell her to never contract me again.  Only after that did she start defaming me, requiring me to post counter-measures such as my security clearances, including the one below.  

Keep in mind that feeble hags have no power, yet they lust for power.  They get their power from slandering others, to make others appear lower than them:

 So, for the fourth, fifth, or sixth time, if you state about me what she did and Diane Thompson did ... and if you have money ... you and I ARE going to court.  Plus, if you are outside of Pennsylvania, then you and I are going to federal court.  Such a case is known as a Diversity Action.  If you want a war, you've got one.  

I simply wanted Wuerl to grant me and anti-sweatshop, slave labor apostolate, being that defrauding laborers of their wages is one of the four sins which cry to Heaven for Vengeance.  Wuerl did NOT care to stop human suffering.  He only increased it wherever he could.  But, such a thing is typical for a narcissist.

------ 

BTW, do you want to know why Diane Thompson accused Cipolla of molestation in 1978 and then quickly withdrew her private citizen criminal complaint, in my private citizen's personal opinion which is protected under New York Times Co v Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)?  Well here it is:

Diane Thompson, in my private citizen's opinion, was desperate for rent money.  So, she accused Cipolla of molestation, hoping that she would get a quick out-of-court settlement.  This means that, according to my private citizen's opinion:

Thompson didn't know the difference between civil court and criminal court.  When she found out that there was no money in it for her, in her having filed paperwork in criminal court, she withdrew her private criminal complaint against Cipolla, thereby dropping the whole case in August of 1978.  She knew that she wasn't going to get money in time to pay apartment rent. 

 

  

Below are Cipolla's "pastoral assignments."   

The Next Engel LIE: A 1965 life-changing special forces training accident at a Spartanburg base which closed in 1947

Above: Cardinal Donald William Wuerl's former Warwick Terrace home

Then came the LIE of a 1965 Special Forces training collision & explosion involving Diane Thompson's husband, at a Spartanburg South Carolina military base  ...

                          ...  which completely ceased operations in 1947. 

According to Mrs Randy Engel, some sort of husband of Diane Thompson underwent a special forces training accident that involved a vehicle collision & "an explosion," during 1965, at a military base in Spartanburg, South Carolina.  

 

That 1965 Spartanburg South Carolina military base accident was said to have been the cue ball which caused Diane Thompson ... the 1978 accuser of Anthony Cipolla ... to be forced to fend for herself as a single mother, in the era of food stamps, welfare checks, and federally funded HUD housing.  

 

The special forces training accident made Diane Thompson look like a harrowed victim of circumstances.  It then made Cipolla look like a monster taking advantage of a harrowed victim of circumstances.  

 

Now, in the 2016 Renew America article of Randy Engel, it was claimed that Diane Thompson was once married to a Tom Thompson ... in the mid-1960s ... with everything ending perhaps in 1977 with an alleged barbiturate overdose suicide.  Randy described the Spartanburg vehicle crash & explosion as such:

                          ★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★

The Definitive Responses to Engel's Assertion go as follows:

 

That Spartanburg South Carolina military base actually CLOSED IN 1946, one year after the end of WWII.  It was then officially disbanded in 1947.  It was called, Camp Croft, and there was no Vietnam-era training there.  The place was a tourist sight in 1965.

 

Moreover, Spartanburg is NOT anywhere near the Atlantic Coastline.  It's very inland, toward the northern border of the State, near Greenville. 

 

Perhaps Diane Thompson meant to say, North Carolina base, instead of South Carolina.  Well, the special forces training center in Camp Mackall, North Carolina, was NOT in operation in the 1960s.  Thus, you cannot say that Diane Thompson meant to say, North Carolina, instead of South Carolina.  

 

This means that you can be assured that Randy Engel's Special Forces Crash & Explosion narration was a deliberate lie, designed to make you "feel sorry" for Diane Thompson and hate Anthony Cipolla all the more.  That statement which was easily proven false was also meant to make the vicious Diane Thompson appear to be the All-American sacrifice-making patriot, while simultaneously making the now-dead Anthony Cipolla look like the Enemy of the People who must die.  

 

Well, he died right after that 2016 article was published.  Randy Engel's 2016 three-part article was a murder weapon designed to permanently destroy a heart-surgery patient who was not given the opportunity to defend himself ... even though TWO DA offices cleared Cipolla of all of the accusations of a Tim Bendig who turned out to be quite the con artist, from my own personal experience ... and even though Cipolla was NEVER ARRESTED for any crime and never put on trial for any crime, including molestation.

 

Below:  Look and see what LIARS Randy Engel & Diane Thompson have been, in the claim that a "second husband" ... or the father of the second son of Diane Thompson .... was heroically serving his country, in Spartanburg, South Carolina, where there was no military base in operation.          

 ★☆★☆★☆★☆☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★ 

Now, concerning North Carolina's Camp Mackall, whoever this "second husband" or "father of the second child" of Diane Thompson was, he definitely did NOT do any special forces training there, either.  Thus, he did no special forces training in 1965 in either of the two Carolina states. 

 

To get to Vietnam, you needed to embark from California on the West Coast and NOT from the Carolinas on the East Coast.

 

Plus, you needed to train in a hot jungle environment, and North Carolina did not have that environment.  Meanwhile, South Carolina's Camp Croft had already been closed for 18 years, by the time 1965 arrived. 

 

Those two observations, alone, should have alerted the 2016 readers of the defamatory Randy Engel article that the contents of that article were fiction.  In as much, let us now adjourn to the famous Fort Bragg, also located in the Carolinas.  

 

A Randy Engel defender might come to say that Diane Thompson was mistakenly referring to Fort Bragg as the place of Vietnam special forces training, in Thompson's claim that her "second husband" was severely injured during special forces training.  

 

Well, if Fort Bragg were in California or Hawaii or Guam, the special forces claim in the Engel article might have had some legitimacy.  If Fort Bragg were situated in a heated jungle, then the defamatory Engel article of 2016 might have had an element of credibility to it.  

 

HOWEVER, the reality with Fort Bragg is that there was the 5th Special Forces stationed there and the 10th Special Forces Psychological Warfare unit, also.  However, both special forces units were stationed there, only for the purpose of paperwork and management.  Any physical training maneuvers which involved "explosions" were conducted elsewhere, in a heated jungle environment called Vietnam. 

 

Now, the 5th Special Forces was indeed established in 1961 and assigned to Fort Bragg.  HOWEVER, between 1964 and 1971 its special forces training bases were literally IN VIETNAM, to acclimate soldiers to the hot jungle environment.  Thus, there was no second husband of Diane Thompson ... or father of Diane Thompson's second child ... involved in any 1965 special forces training in either one of the two Carolina states, especially in Spartanburg where there were no military training exercises since 1945. 

Fort Bragg became the center of Psychological Warfare in 1952, and the 10th Special Forces Group was assigned to be stationed there, in the psychological warfare capacity.  Then, in 1962, JFK moved the embarkation point of 10th Special Forces to the West Coast, being that the West Coast was closer to Vietnam than was North Carolina.  

 

The important point here is that the 10th Special Forces was a cerebral military unit of psychological academics and mind games.  The 10th Special Forces was even involved in radio transmission academics, as well as electronics.  It was an Information Operations unit.  

 

Its training was the opposite of the violence seen in the stereotypical Chuck Norris movie.  The 10th Special Forces Unit was not trained to blow you up.  It was trained to take over your radio stations and to intercept enemy messages, as well as disabling enemy electronics.  It was trained to intercept your phone call, instead of blowing up the office where your phone was located.  Thus, there was no way in which 10th Special Forces training resulted in any vehicle crash & explosion.

 

Moreover, there as sure as Hell was no 10th Special Forces training in Spartanburg, South Carolina, in 1965 or ever.

 

This shows that Diane Thompson was NOT honestly mistaken, but rather, she was a deliberate liar in her harrowing special forces training tale which was nothing more fiction.  There was no second husband of Diane Thompson getting seriously injured in any 1965 special forces training "explosion" in North or South Carolina.

 

This shows that Diane Thompson ... and and and Randy Engel's "good good New Jersey friend" ... intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon heart patient, Anthony Cipolla, with the help of their asinine dupe, Mrs Randy Engel.

Engel Lie #3: The claim that the 1978 Cipolla case had DNA evidence

If you are low on brain cells, let me help.  The 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury report ... on Cipolla ... was much different than the 2016 report of Randy Engel.  That 2018 report proved the 2016 Engel article to be a lie.  After all,  the detective in charge expressly spoke of how Cipolla was not arrested and how the "magistrate went along with" not having him indicted.

In the 2018 report, there was no mention of the evidence Engel claimed to have existed.  I already illustrated that it did NOT exist, and the Diane Thompson is a mere liar.  For example, the 1978 case began with a phone call on July 25th, 1978.  It ended 35 days later, with Diane Thompson withdrawing her private criminal complaint.  Well, in 1978, it took 52 days for a forensics lab to produce DNA test results.  

That which Randy Engel claimed to exist as damning evidence in her 2016 article did not exist in the 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report. 

The Cipolla Case had zero physical evidence to present to a magistrate.  Diane Thompson's eldest son had no corroborating witnesses to confirm any of his damning allegations.  And the sole detective of that 1978 case testified to the PA Grand Jury that he only believed that Cipolla was guilty, because the detective believed that no 12 year child would ever lie to a police officer.  

That one 12 year child's words which had NO CORROBORATING witness attached to it and no physical "evidentiary support" to confirm anything spoken by the 12 year old child was the detective's sole case.  The detective could have asked a judge to order a grand jury for investigating Cipolla, but you need evidence for that to be done.

 

Allegation Easy to IMPEACH 

           Before all else, you need to learn the following things through concurrence and confirmation.  The blue blocks of information below are my way of saying, "I told you so."  Those blocks of 2026 confirm as TRUE that which I stated back in 2016, 2017, etc.

More specifically, Cipolla was served with a Summary Notice to appear at a Probable Cause Hearing, on August 28, 1978.  Yet the 1978 journalist described the Summary Notice as an indictment.  The incompetent journalist of 1978 described it as an arrest.  

 

The reason why a Probable Caused Hearing was scheduled was because the police had no evidence against Cipolla, and therefore, the police could not file a police criminal complaint, otherwise known as a Police Affidavit.  

 

If there existed the evidence that Diane Thompson and her then-twelve old son claimed that there was, Cipolla would have been placed in handcuffs without being summoned to an August 28th, 1978 hearing.  Therefore ====>

 

The truth is that the scheduled August 28th hearing was to see if there were due cause to file an indictment against Cipolla, in the first place.  The hearing was to see if he was going to be arrested.  No arrest transpired.  

                                 

Below is a timeline consensus, from AI

 

In review, in order to prevent air-headed misunderstanding:  The 1978 Cipolla Case lasted 34 days, and there was NO ARREST.  There was only a scheduled PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING, and such hearings were designed to discern if whether or not there were cause to file charges in the first place.  

 

Moreover, the Grand Jury Act of 1974 abolished  what is known as Indicting Grand Juries and replaced them with Probable Cause Hearings.  The phrase "preliminary hearing" became synonymous with Probable Cause Hearing.

The August 1978 hearing was cancelled an hour or so before it started, by Diane Thompson, herself.  

 

The 34 day time span is pivotal to note, because, in 1978, it took approximately 52 days for the results of a seminal fluid test to be issued by any lab.  There was NO POSITIVE seminal fluid evidence involved in 1978 Cipolla case, at all. 

 

 

Concerning Diane Thompson's false claim about semen in 1978, even if there were such a thing found on Tucker, the test results would not have come before the August 28th Probable Cause.  And if there were evidence found, then there would have no probable cause hearing needed in August of 1978:

In as much, Diane Thompson lied ... yet again.  Randy Engel was stupid enough to have believed her ... yet again.  There was no seminal fluid report in the 1978 Cipolla Case, and there was none in the 1989 Tim Bendig Case, concerning a Tim Bendig who was repeatedly accused of being a lying con artist throughout the years.