The Fr Leo Burchianti who died in 2013 was accused of sexual misconduct, from 1967 to 1993, by eight youths. He was even accused of text-book defined rape. Moreover, two financial settlements were made for two of Burchianti's accusers. One was for $15,000, in 1994, and the other settlement was for $25,000, in 2008.
In conclusion, Burchianti was alleged to have molested and/or graphically harassed eight young boys, in one degree or another. He was also accused of giving these youths alcohol, and even allowed some youths of some kind to take some kind of recreational drug in the rectory.
Now, Cipolla was cut-off completely by Wuerl, dating back to the early 1990s, while Wuerl disregarded the volume of exculpatory evidence Cipolla had ... and even though Cipolla was never indicted or arrested or arraigned in any criminal court.
And of course, the 1978 claim of Cipolla being arrest was completely wrong, showing that local journalists in the 1970s were basically mediocre ... or even lazy ... and couldn't get real jobs elsewhere.
In contrast, Burchianti was allowed to live at Saint John Vianney Manor for eleven or so years, under Wuerl's permission, and then for an additional six or so years under David Zubik's permission ... from 1995 or '96 until his death, in 2013.
And yes, I personally knew and spoke with Dave Zubik ... while he was a private academy chaplain, called "Father Dave." I spoke with Fr Leo Burchianti once, even to the point of having had an appointment with him at his West Aliquippa rectory.
Concerning my appointment with Fr Leo, he was boisterious. He was basically a showman who acted a lot like a born-again "praise the Lord" TV preacher. All in all, Fr Leo was obnoxious. But, I had a rave commendation that people should go see him. Uhhhm, no. He was a waste of time.
At this point, keep in mind that Cipolla died a violent death in 2016. Thus, the two priests were current to each other, timewise. Yet, they were treated totally differently by Wuerl. Cipolla simply was used as a diversionary tactic, for Wuerl to successfully cover his multiple cover-ups.
After all, the attention was inordinately put on Cipolla, even after Tim Bendig was found to be a con artist, aka "confidence man," aka "Whiplash Charlie Type." By the way, the 2004 John Jay Report found that there definitively were 83 cases of falsely accused priests.
And keep in mind that TWO county DA offices investigated Bendig's accusations against Cipolla and found ZERO CAUSE for indictment, due to the absence of corroborating witnesses and physical evidence.
Wuerl gave Bendig a settlement to hide Wuerl's several cover-ups and to prevent a DA office investigation like the one in 1988 which resulted in the criminal indictments and convictions of Frs. Robert Wolk, Richard Zula, and Francis Pucci. This trip,le indictment occurred while Wuerl was covering-up John Hoehl, for sure.
Plus, during the famous 1993 Vatican Rehearing on the Cipolla Case, Wuerl was covering-up Fr Edward Huff, using him as a ping-pong ball between St Louis and Pittsburgh. Then Huff unexpectedly got arrested in 1994. So, Wuerl had even more of a motive to use the Cipolla Case as a diversionary tactic are make Cipolla look like a monster in the media's neon lights.
And then there was need to cover-up Fr John Wellinger. The Pgh Diocese spokesman claimed that no one reported Wellinger until the Year 2011. Well, there were claims that Wellinger was reported in 1986 for drugs, as well as being reported for the sex abuse of a 24 year old in 1991, resulting in him being sent to St. Louis as having at least provided drugs to youth, while being a take of some kind of drug or drugs, himself.
Cipolla was completely cut-off, while Burchianti, Wolk, Zula, Huff, & Pucci were completely attached to and accommodated by Wuerl's diocese.
So, Cipolla was completely cut-off by Wuerl ... and later by Zubik ... even though his case was found to have accusers who were found to be unconscionable liars, after detailed fact-checking occurred. Those false accusations and "inaccuracies" were detailed in other Blue Marble Album posts.
In fact, Cipolla was officially investigated in 1989, by the DA offices of two Pennsylvania counties, resulting in the conclusion that there were no corrobborating witnesses and no other type of evidence to warrant Cipolla's arrest and indictment. But, he was only investigated, because Tim Bendig went to both DA offices, to file a "private citizen's complaint" against him.
This means that Tim Bendig should have been indicted and prosecuted TWICE, for filing a false police report and/or lying to the police. In as much, for the third, fourth, or fifth time, here's your reminder:
Meanwhile, also remember that Bendig had me completely fooled to the point where I was going to join his side and go after Cipolla ... until Bendig told me four lies in a row. These were lies that I didn't have to fact-check, because I knew the elements of his case against Cipolla and I immediately knew that Bendig was lying to me.
If Bendig would have shut up at that point in time, he would have had me convinced. However, while I was listening to him tell me four lies in a row, I thought to myself, in the silence of my mind, "Wow. Cipolla really is innocent, after all" because Bendig is nothing but a liar.
This is so, at least in the Bendig Case which was obviously the Bendig Farce. This is so, in that Bendig took a lot of settlement money given to him through Wuerl, and instead of spending it on severe and advanced psychiatric treatment, Bendig purchased the Two Step Lounge which became a failed business very quickly. He apparently had no need of urgent psychiatric care, even though he claimed he did.
NO Arrest in 1978. A Probable Cause Hearing is NOT an arrest.
A Probable Cause Hearing in the 1970s sought to discover IF there were cause to arrest someone, under the auspicious of the DA Dept. It was basically a proverbial pre-arrest prelim hearing. It was a type of 1970s hearing which occurred before any arrests were made, in the first place. That's what Cipolla was summoned to attend, in August of 1978.
And of course, contrary to misinformative journalists, Cipolla was NOT arrested in 1978. He only reached the stage of a "probable cause hearing." And of course, this was to see if there were "due cause" to indict and arraign him. I explained the process previously. Look it up. That's why there is a search box at the top righthand corner of every Blue Marble Album page.
In addition, the detective involved in the 1978 case testified to the 2018 PA grand jury that he simply believed the story told to him by a 12 year child in 1978, because the detective ... like most Americans in the 1970s ... didn't believe that 12 year old children would dare to lie to a police officer.
Then came the McMartin Preschool Case, where the children claimed to have seen flying witches, in addition to heinous crimes, resulting in court-ordered excavation with nothing buried in the school grounds.
In the Cipolla Case, the detective had no forensic evidence against Cipolla, at all. Yet, he did have a suspicious item found in Cipolla's residence ... a stethoscope. But, it would have resulted in "reasonable doubt" to the collective mind of a reasonable jury, if it were used in a trial. None the less, it made me suspious of Cipolla. So, I did more homework on the case.
Cipolla responded to the suspicious item's existence, by saying that he used to belong to a missionary religious order ... as a seminarian ... and he claimed that he occasionally collected medical equipment for the missions.
We need to know if other medical equipment items were found, as well. Where did the 1978 investigation inventory list go? And why did the investigation get halted at the end of August 1978?
Well, it was discovered that Cipolla really was in contact with that mission's religious order, even to the point of visiting its Michigan location, yearly. At least that part was true. And they still do collect medical instruments.
None the less, when it came to Tim Bendig and his case, in my private citizen's personal opinion of a "public figure," protected under NY Times v Sullivan (1964), Bendig is a liar from A to Z.
A direct Witness said that Dianne Thompson did NOT have to pay any $45 fee per child, for that Michigan trip.
I encountered testimony from another person who went on that Michigan trip, and he said that Cipolla and Bendig did nothing suspicious with each other in this witness's sight, at any time in the 1980s. That witness was one of Cipolla's altar servers.
And concerning that Michigan youth camp trip, a witness who did go on that trip ... during a different year than did the Thompson sons ... said that nobody had to pay any $45 fee, in order to go. So, it appears that Dianne Thompson lied yet again, in her theatrical presentation of a fictional horror movie.
And and and and and and and ... the other blatant sign that Dianne Thompson fabricated the harrowing 1978 tale was that she never made mention of the Number 1 government employee involved in any "private citizen's criminal complaint." She NEVER mentioned the involvement of an assistant district attorney. That fact, alone, made a person who studied law instantly realize that Dianne Thompson was fabricating a fictional tale.
In such cases, the asst DA is the monitor ... the advisor ... the editor ... the tutor of private citizen complaints. Such a character does not appear in Dianne Thompson's 1978 story.
Numerous other allegations made by Bendig and the Diane Thompson Gang which were proven false are addressed in other posts at the Blue Marble Album. I'm tired of repeating them. Go to the Search Box up top, and look them up. Go explore.
A Tale of Two Worlds: Burchianti and Cipolla
Burchianti was helped by Wuerl. Cipolla attacked by Wuerl, in manipulative ways. Such ways included Ann Rodgers and her Pittsburgh Post Gazette employer defaming Cipolla, while not allowing him to defend himself.
Another such way was Wuerl giving John Paul II a brief cameo appearance in 2002, to make Cipolla look like the monster of the year. John Paul II literally signed-off on Cipolla's official laicization ... on Cipolla's "defrocking."
Wuerl had that done, solely for melodramatic effect ... to create a diversionary tactic to hide his multiple sex abuse cover-ups. And then he got Ann Rodgers to be his dupe and repeatedly call him "the Bishop of Zero Tolerance." Well, the only thing that Wuerl could not tolerate was honesty and fairness.
In the Year 2002, Cipolla was tailored to look like the Monster, while the Monster McCarrick was tailored to look like the saint.
Also remember that the Year 2002 was the year of the Dallas Meeting of the US Conference of American Bishops which resulted in the ultimate farce. That farce was called the DALLAS CHARTER, co-drafted by the ultimate abusive priest who had a lot of power to abuse throughout the years. His name was Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, molester extraordinaire.
He was presented as the leader who was going to curb and harness the molestation going on in the Catholic Church, when he was one of the molesters there, since 1969. Even though Cipolla was made out to be the monster in 2002, it turned out that McCarrick was the Real Monster, dating long before 2002. If Cipolla were some kind of a monster, then McCarrick was a monster in a higher grade. And McCarrick did NOT have accusers proven to be pathological liars. Cipolla did.
In fact, Wuerl gave convicted felon, Fr Richard Zula, a retirement package.
Moreover, Wuerl gave convicted felon, Fr Bob Wolk, a monthly stipend of $1,500. He did the same with convicted felon, Fr Edward Huff.
A more full review of John Wellinger
The majority of the alleged sexual abuse committed by Wellinger was said to have not been reported until the 2010s. HOWEVER, there was a June 1991 incident which was reported. This resulted in Wellinger being sent to a Missouri clinic for evaluation, in 1991.
Now, Wellinger went to St. Luke's Institute, for drug and alcohol abuse, as well as undisclosed issues, in 1986. None the less, in 1992 Wuerl gave Wellinger the greenlight of returning to ministry ... to Saint George Parish.
No longer a parish, it was located near Beltzhoover and Knoxville, as well as near Mount Washington and even somewhat near Route 837. Now, this is the leadership quality of the so-called "Bishop of Zero Tolerance," in his performing the stereotypical & predictable mode of sex abuse cover-ups.
Q: And why did Wuerl readmit Wellinger, after his serious infraction? The known 1991 victim was 24 years old. Meanwhile, the underaged alleged victim of the same year did not come forth in 1991 or 1992 or 1993, etc.
Ironically enough, shortly after Wuerl readmitted Wellinger to the clerical state, it's was on July 30, 1994 when Wellinger got arrested for drunken driving. He was given another leave of absence, so that he could go back to St. Luke's in Maryland. However, he left there early and did not get official clearance. So, he was given an added leave of absence, until December 1995.
None the less, when the 21st Century came, two males did formally accuse Wellinger of having molested them in the 20th Century. One claimed that he was molested between 1981 and 1985, while the other one claimed to have been molested in 1991.
Moreover, Wellinger was said to have been reported in 1995, by parents, but the Diocese of Pittsburgh denied this. He was not removed from the clerical state until 2003 or 2004. He then died in April of 2011.
Okay then: Back to Fr Leo Burchianti.
The following is a link to one web page only, even though it looks like multiple links to multiple web pages.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★








































