The Fr Leo Burchianti who died in 2013 was accused of sexual misconduct, from 1967 to 1993, by eight youths. He was even accused of textbook-defined rape. Moreover, two financial settlements were made for two of Burchianti's accusers. One settlement was for $15,000, in 1994, and the other one was for $25,000, in 2008.
In conclusion, Burchianti was alleged to have molested and/or graphically harassed eight young boys, in one degree or another. He was also accused of giving these youths or other youths alcohol, and even allowed some youths of some kind to take some kind of recreational drug in the rectory.
Now, Cipolla was cut-off completely by Wuerl, dating back to the early 1990s. Wuerl disregarded the volume of exculpatory evidence Cipolla had. Furthermore, Cipolla was never indicted or arrested or arraigned in any criminal court anywhere. This includes the fabricated tale of 1978 told by Randy Engel which described arraignment which NEVER happened.
The 1978 detective confirmed this in his 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury testimony. He mentioned that the Private Citizen's Complaint filed against Cipolla by Diane Thompson was withdrawn by her in August of 1978.
Thus, there were not "two detectives" in that case, and there were no arraignments and no preliminary hearings. It was all one big lie fabricated by Diane Thompson who had a very financial Conflict of Interest, when telling Randy Engel the story she told.
I covered the 2016 defamatory Randy Engel article in detail. It's posted at the Blue Marble Album. It's free for the reading. No charge. There is no $45 fee to read all about it.
At the same BM Album, you can also read about Tim Bendig's accusations which never resulted in Cipolla being indicted, even though Bendig tried to make it happen. However, in order to get such a thing done, you need evidence and/or corroborating witnesses. Bendig had neither, concerning his accusations against Cipolla.
In fact, Wuerl gave convicted felon, Fr Richard Zula, a retirement package.
Moreover, Wuerl gave convicted felon, Fr Bob Wolk, a monthly stipend of $1,500. He did the same with convicted felon, Fr Edward Huff.
Then came Francis Pucci whom Wuerl allowed to say Mass for the local province of the Sisters of the Holy Spirit religious order, while providing for Pucci a $1,500 per month stipend.
A more full review of John Wellinger
The majority of the alleged sexual abuse committed by Wellinger was said to have not been reported until the 2010s. HOWEVER, there was a June 1991 incident which was reported. This resulted in Wellinger being sent to a Missouri clinic for evaluation, in 1991.
Now, Wellinger went to St. Luke's Institute, for drug and alcohol abuse, as well as undisclosed issues, in 1986. None the less, in 1992 Wuerl gave Wellinger the greenlight of returning to ministry ... to Saint George Parish.
No longer a parish, it was located near Beltzhoover and Knoxville, as well as near Mount Washington and even somewhat near Route 837. Now, this is the leadership quality of the so-called "Bishop of Zero Tolerance," in his performing the stereotypical & predictable mode of sex abuse cover-ups.
Q: And why did Wuerl readmit Wellinger, after his serious infraction? The known 1991 victim was 24 years old. Meanwhile, the underaged alleged victim of the same year did not come forth in 1991 or 1992 or 1993, etc.
Ironically enough, shortly after Wuerl readmitted Wellinger to the clerical state, it's was on July 30, 1994 when Wellinger got arrested for drunken driving. He was given another leave of absence, so that he could go back to St. Luke's in Maryland. However, he left there early and did not get official clearance. So, he was given an added leave of absence, until December 1995.
None the less, when the 21st Century came, two males did formally accuse Wellinger of having molested them in the 20th Century. One claimed that he was molested between 1981 and 1985, while the other one claimed to have been molested in 1991.
Moreover, Wellinger was said to have been reported in 1995, by parents, but the Diocese of Pittsburgh denied this. He was not removed from the clerical state until 2003 or 2004. He then died in April of 2011.
Cipolla was used as a diversionary tactic, for Wuerl to successfully cover Wuerl's multiple cover-ups. This is the case whether Cipolla committed any type of sex abuse activity or not. Whether guilty or innocent, Cipolla WAS the designated scapegoat. Period.
After all, the spotlight of horror was inordinately put on Cipolla, even after Tim Bendig was found to be a con artist, aka a "Whiplash Charlie Type" who attempted to get Cipolla indicted twice without having any physical evidence or corroborating witnesses to any of his claims made to police. By the way, the 2004 John Jay Report found that there definitively were 83 cases of falsely accused priests.
1978 Accusation came only after mother was denied her request to have Cipolla's pastor pay her monthly rent
Concerning Cipolla, the claim that he molested a nine year old lad in 1978 in the specific way he was claimed to have done was physically impossible. I already cover this in another post or two ... or three.
Now, writer Randy Engel apparently never interviewed a pedophile ... or never got a pedophile to admit a thing or two about a pedophile's lust-induced preferences.
I know what it is to talk at length with a pedophile, during more than one day. This means that I know a pedophile's number 1 physical pleasure with an 8, 9, or 10 year old child. That specific pleasure was NEVER mentioned ashaving been done by Cipolla, in any of the accusations against him.
That desired pleasure is NOT outrageously dirty. This is because it has nothing to do with the genitalia section of the human body ... neither front nor back ... in as so far as concerns the focal point of attention ... the focal point of attack.
Plus, this "pleasure" that pedophiles love has nothing to do with caressing, in any capacity. And it doesn't involve kissing. But, it is definitiely out of bounds. It's something that will make any person say, "Hey! Cut that out!" when a person sees it.
I keep that specific desired pleasure of the typical pedophile a secret, so that con artists trying to scam a diocese for money don't learn of it and then say that it happened to them too. In fact, if you ever learn of what that desired pleasure actually is, you will end up saying, "Oh. But of course. Why didn't I think of that?" Well, "you" didn't think of it, because you're not a pedophile.
The Accuser of a Bishop testified to that type of thing
That specific pleasure was publicly alleged by the accuser of a certain bishop. When the accuser mentioned that one type of action in his accusation against that one bishop, I knew immediately that he was telling the truth. It was bingo, for that accuser, in as so far as went discerning his credibility.
So, remember. Cipolla was NEVER accused of doing that specific act, by either the Diane Thompson Settlement Money Seekers or by Tim Bendig ... or by anyone else on Planet Earth.
Wuerl's Motive in publicly lynching Anthony Cipolla repeatedly
Wuerl gave the proven con artist, Tim Bendig, a relatively hefty settlement in the 1990's. This was mostly done, in an attempt to deceive local law enforcement authorities to assume that "Wuerl was now on top of things." This would prevent another criminal investigation like the one in 1988 which resulted in the simultaneous criminal indictments of Frs. Robert Wolk, Richard Zula, and Francis Pucci.
Then came the campaign bumper sticker slogan constantly being harped by the Pgh Post Gazette religion writer, Ann Rodgers-Melnick ====> "the bishop of zero tolerance." Today, her name is minus the "Melnick" and that bumper sticker slogan has been changed to "the bishop of zero tolerance --- NOT."
And for the record, Francis Pucci's case was dismissed, on account of the Statue of Limitations. Wuerl stonewalled law enforcement for a long enough period of time to get Pucci to be unaccountable. Wuerl strung-out local law enforcement until the clock ran out on Pucci.
More pertinent is the fact that this 1988 triple indictment occurred while Wuerl was covering-up John Hoehl and then George Zirwas, for sure. Ironically, George Zirwas was involved with that Gang of Three who got indicted in 1988.
Plus, during the famous 1993 Vatican Rehearing on the Cipolla Case, Wuerl was covering-up Fr Edward Huff, using him as a ping-pong ball between St Louis and Pittsburgh. Then Huff unexpectedly got arrested in 1994. So, Wuerl had even more of a motive to use the Cipolla Case as a diversionary tactic.
Wuerl would get the media to amplify the Cipolla Case, so as to get the Huff, Hoehl, Wolk, Zula, Pucci, Zirwas, and Wellinger cases to fade-away in the mind of the public. This meant that Wuerl and the Pgh Post Gazette People had motive to make Cipolla look like even more of a monster. It was all a diversionary tactic.
There undoubtedly was need to cover-up Fr John Wellinger, in the mind of Wuerl. Now, the Pgh Diocese spokesman claimed that no one reported Wellinger until the Year 2011. This is assumed to have been another lie told for the sake of Donald Wuerl's rise in power which did lead to the College of Cardinals.
Wellinger was reported in 1986 for drugs ... which won him a trip to St Luke's in Maryland. Wellinger was also accused of the abuse of a 24 year old in 1991 ... which won for Wellinger a trip to St. Louis.
There was also the 1988 letter and a 1989 letter to Wuerl, warning him of Wellinger. In fact, an attempt to get in touch with Wuerl was made by a deeply outraged parent in 1987. Thus, this "not until 2011" claim made by Wuerl's spokesman was a spoken lie.
Then came the murder of "Father" George Zirwas in Cuba
His case most certainly was a full-blown cover-up by Donald Wuerl. He received a handsome sum of currency from Wuerl, while in Cuba, and he continued to live a stereotypically immoral life in Cuba. His death was accompanied by the appearance of a mystery male assumed to have been the typical rent-boy.
Wuerl added to his cover-up by officiating at George Zirwas' funeral, making it sound as if Zirwas had been in Cuba doing missionary work, instead of employing the occasional rent-boy, for the purpose of consummating unnatural lust. Wuerl literally made Zirwas sound like a saint who would eventually get a statue placed in some church yard somewhere in his honor. However, Zirwas was a part of the Wolk-Zula-Pucci Sex Abuse Ring.
So, Cipolla was completely cut-off by Wuerl ... and later by Zubik ... even though his case was had accusers who were found to be unconscionable liars, after detailed fact-checking occurred. Those false accusations and "inaccuracies" were detailed in other Blue Marble Album posts.
Keep in mind that Cipolla was officially investigated in 1989, by the DA offices of two Pennsylvania counties, resulting in the conclusion that there were no corrobborating witnesses and no other type of evidence to warrant Cipolla's arrest and indictment. But, he was only investigated, because Tim Bendig went to both DA offices, to file a "private citizen's complaint" against him.
This means that Tim Bendig should have been indicted and prosecuted TWICE, for filing a false police report and/or lying to the police. In as much, for the third, fourth, or fifth time, here's your reminder:
Meanwhile, also remember that Bendig had me completely fooled to the point where I was going to join his side and go after Cipolla ... until Bendig told me four lies in a row. These were lies that I didn't have to fact-check, because I knew the elements of his case against Cipolla and I immediately knew that Bendig was lying to me.
If Bendig would have shut up at that point in time, he would have had me convinced. However, while I was listening to him tell me four lies in a row, I thought to myself, in the silence of my mind, "Wow. Cipolla really is innocent, after all."
This is so, at least in the Bendig Case which was obviously the Bendig Farce. This is so, in that Bendig took a lot of settlement money given to him through Wuerl, and instead of spending it on severe and advanced psychiatric treatment, Bendig purchased the Two Step Lounge which became a failed business very quickly. He apparently had no need of urgent psychiatric care, even though he claimed he did.
NO Arrest in 1978. A Probable Cause Hearing is NOT an arrest.
A Probable Cause Hearing in the 1970s sought to discover IF there were cause to arrest someone, under the auspicious of the DA Dept. It was basically a proverbial pre-arrest prelim hearing. It was a type of 1970s hearing which occurred before any arrests were made, in the first place. That's what Cipolla was summoned to attend, in August of 1978.
In addition, the detective involved in the 1978 case testified to the 2018 PA grand jury that he simply believed the story told to him by a 12 year child in 1978, because the detective ... like most Americans in the 1970s ... didn't believe that 12 year old children would dare to lie to a police officer.
Then came the 1980's McMartin Preschool Case, where the children claimed to have seen flying witches, in addition to heinous crimes, resulting in court-ordered excavation with nothing found buried in the school grounds.
In the Cipolla Case, the detective had no forensic evidence against Cipolla, at all. Yet, he did have a suspicious item found in Cipolla's residence ... a stethoscope. But, it would have resulted in "reasonable doubt" to the collective mind of a reasonable jury, if it were used in a trial. None the less, it made me suspious of Cipolla. So, I did more homework on the case.
Cipolla responded to the suspicious item's existence, by saying that he used to belong to a missionary religious order ... as a seminarian ... and he claimed that he occasionally collected medical equipment for the missions.
We need to know if other medical equipment items were found, as well. Where did the 1978 investigation inventory list go? And why did the investigation get halted at the end of August 1978?
Well, it was discovered that Cipolla really was in contact with that mission's religious order, even to the point of visiting its Michigan location, yearly. At least that part was true. And that missionary religious order still does collect medical instruments.
A direct Witness said that Dianne Thompson did NOT have to pay any $45 fee per child, for that Michigan trip.
I encountered testimony from another person who went on that Michigan trip with Bendig, and he said that Cipolla and Bendig did nothing suspicious with each other in this witness's sight, at any time in the 1980s. That witness was one of Cipolla's altar servers.
Also remember that my former neighbor, Attorney John Conte lined up DOZENS of character witnesses for Cipolla, for the Bendig Lawsuit trial which Donald Wuerl made sure would not transpire. Wuerl settled that case shortly before its trial was set to begin.
And concerning that Michigan youth camp trip, a witness who did go on that trip ... during a different year than did the Thompson sons ... said that nobody had to pay any $45 fee, in order to go. So, it appears that Dianne Thompson lied yet again, in her theatrical presentation of a fictional horror movie.
And and and and and and and ... the other blatant sign that Dianne Thompson fabricated the harrowing 1978 tale was that she never made mention of the Number 1 government employee involved in any "private citizen's criminal complaint." She NEVER mentioned the involvement of an assistant district attorney. That fact, alone, made a person who studied law instantly realize that Dianne Thompson was fabricating a fictional tale.
In such cases, the asst DA is the monitor ... the mentor ... the advisor ... the editor ... and the tutor of private citizen complaints. Such a person does not appear in Dianne Thompson's 1978 story.
Numerous other allegations made by Bendig and the Diane Thompson Gang which were proven false are addressed in other posts at the Blue Marble Album. I'm tired of repeating them. Go to the Search Box up top, and look them up. Go explore. This is America. It's still free to read that stuff. Go be free ... free of lies and free of the bullies who spread the lies.
A Tale of Two Worlds: Burchianti and Cipolla
Burchianti was helped by Wuerl. Cipolla attacked by Wuerl, in manipulative ways. Such ways included Ann Rodgers and her Pittsburgh Post Gazette employer defaming Cipolla, while not allowing him to defend himself.
Another such way was Wuerl giving John Paul II a brief cameo appearance in 2002, to make Cipolla look like the monster of the year. John Paul II literally signed-off on Cipolla's official laicization ... on Cipolla's "defrocking."
Wuerl had that done, solely for melodramatic effect ... to create a diversionary tactic to hide his multiple sex abuse cover-ups. And then he got Ann Rodgers to be his dupe and repeatedly call him "the Bishop of Zero Tolerance." Well, the only thing that Wuerl could not tolerate was honesty and fairness.
In the Year 2002, Cipolla was tailored to look like the Monster, while the Monster McCarrick was tailored to look like the saint.
Also remember that the Year 2002 was the year of the Dallas Meeting of the US Conference of American Bishops which resulted in the ultimate farce. That farce was called the DALLAS CHARTER, co-drafted by the ultimate abusive priest who had a lot of power to abuse throughout the years. His name was Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, molester extraordinaire.
He was presented as the leader who was going to curb and harness the molestation going on in the Catholic Church, when he was one of the molesters there, since 1969. Even though Cipolla was made out to be the monster in 2002, it turned out that McCarrick was the Real Monster, dating long before 2002. If Cipolla were some kind of a monster, then McCarrick was a monster in a higher grade. And McCarrick did NOT have accusers proven to be pathological liars. Cipolla did.
Okay then: Back to Fr Leo Burchianti.
The following is a link to one web page only, even though it looks like multiple links to multiple web pages.
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★














































