proven to have been Wuerl's most vicious hoax and which rocketed Wuerl
to a fraudulently gained stardom appears here:
However, posted herein is a piece of Jpeg evidence which show that Don-
ald Wuerl has NO EVIDENCE against Anthony Cipolla, when he was de-
fying a Vatican order to reinstate Cipolla.
In re: The Anthony Cipolla case which was presented in a false light by the
media. It was the one which rocketed Wuerl to stardom, due to the fact that
it was hideously misrepresented. Ann Rodgers in particular made it look like
an Alfred Hitchcock movie, claiming that Cipolla was arrested, when the truth
is that he never was. This was followed by the same Ann Rodgers claiming
that the accusing mother of 1978 was harassed into dropping criminal charges
which were never filed in the first place. The fact checking on the woman's
newspaper testimony resulted in the immediate discovery of falsehoods on her
part. That fact that she, Diane Thompson, or a Post Gazette writer pretending
to be quoting Diane Thompson, lied is shown in detail in other Wuerlgate articles.
Concerning the leaked letter below, if Donald Wuerl possessed damning evidence
against Cipolla on the day Wuerl refused to follow the Vatican order to reinstate
Cipolla, then the letter below would never have existed. Certain journalists made
it sound as if Wuerl had long-since possessed evidence against Cipolla that the
Vatican never saw. The truth was that Wuerl was desperately seeking any ex-
cuse he would to keep Cipolla out of ministry, because, if Wuerl were to rein-
state Cipolla, then law enforcement personnel would have dedicated themselves
to deeper investigation of the Diocese of Pittsburgh.
Of course, they would have NOT found anything that would incriminate Cipol-
la. They would only find a trail of corruption and cover-up which lead to Wuerl.
Remember, Wuerl had been caught performing a triple cover-up which lead to
the indictment of three of Wuerl's own priests. Plus, Wuerl was covering up
Father Edward Huff, while presenting Cipolla as the molester no one in any of
Cipolla's youth groups ever claimed him to be. Wuerl targets Cipolla, the one
accused by the notorious liar Tim Bendig whom Wuerl originally called a liar.
Yet, he covers up an actual molester. For the record, such a cover-up is only
a summary offense, pursuant to the Child Protective Services Act of PA.
For a background thereof, continuing reading:
A background to the Cipolla case appears more than once at this site. This
is because each Wuerlgate article has a stand-alone webpage, meaning that
a newcomer's orientation to the Cipolla case could be any one of a number
of stand-alone pages. I wouldn't want that person to start cluelessly in the
middle. This was the reason for the redundancy.
At the end of this article is a copy of the same Jpeg that is posted directly
above. It's done so, for the convenience of the reader/vierwer. It's proof
that Donald Wuerl had no evidence against Cipolla when Wuerl refused to
comply with a Vatican order to reinstate Anthony Cipolla. Rather, Wuerl
was scampering for evidence against Cipolla, as soon as the Vatican order-
ed the priest reinstated.
Wuerl literally lied while trying to find anything he could use against the man
formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla. Wuerl's excuse for removing
Cipolla from priesthood ministry was the St, Luke Psychiatric Institute's di-
agnosis of Depression & Suicidal Tendencies. That diagnosis was declared
invalid by St. Michael's of NYC. This fact I have mentioned 6 to 12 times
One Interesting Point about the Cipolla Case
I met a few of those who had always believed in Cipolla's innocence, and
there appeared a common trait in Cipolla's supporters. The pertinent fea-
ture of those people is that they were all a part of professional families, and
some of them were the professionals, themselves. This included a nun who
was accomplished in music, an insurance broker, an electrical engineer, a
retired construction contractor, an editor, etc. Cipolla's supporters are
managers in mainstream civilization. His following is NOT that of back-
woods illiterates, to say the least.
Also keep in mind the plaques of appreciations that were given to Cipolla,
for his management of youth groups. Even after 42 years, no one from any
youth group managed by Cipolla ever accused him of anything wrongful.
I previously mentioned this 4 to 8 times elsewhere.
Now, there was a blatant observation which indicates the Wuerl didn't think
that Cipolla was a molester ... that Wuerl was only using the Cipolla case as
a diversionary tactic to deflect attention away from Wuerl's then-current cover-
up of an Edward Huff who was reported to Wuerl for a third time, by a third
group of concerned parishioners, during the exact same month when the Vati-
can ordered Cipolla back into ministry. The observation is this:
Wuerl NEVER sent out a letter to people in Cipolla's youth groups or former
parishes, as he did in the case of John S. Hoehl ... and as Bishop David Zubik
did in the cases of Fr Wellinger ... Fr LeDoux ... Br. Ghastin ... etc. In as
much, if Wuerl thought that Anthony Cipolla were a molester, then he would
have sent letters to the people located where Cipolla was stationed.
Moreover, the leaked document below shows that Wuerl didn't have anything
on Anthony Cipolla when he was claiming that there "might" have been major
factual inaccuracies attached to the Vatican's findings on Cipolla.
Keep in mind that the evidence posted here was leaked by two different em-
ployees of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, on two different occasions. This means
that one didn't know that the other one was leaking the exact same document.
For those new here, Tim Bendig (Cipolla's celebrated accuser) turned out to be
nothing but liar and con artist who, as a matter of habit, threatens to sue and de-
stroy people. Bendig threatened me, doing so by deceptive means, intended to
intimidate me into deleting all the articles I wrote about him. Well, the articles
remain online and I keep calling him a liar. Yet he ... Mr. Lawsuit ... never
Of course, if Bendig does sue me for Libel or False Light, then I get to open
Pandora's Box, and have further evidence make its way to the public, includ-
ing certain things about Donald Wuerl not yet disclosed. As I previously wrote,
there are things I can not divulge, because it will instantly betray the source.
None the less, take as a message the fact that Bendig never sued me for calling
him a liar. It should occur to you that he never sued me for calling him a liar,
because he actually is a liar.
Of course, when a lawsuit occurs, other writers' sources become subpoenaed
witnesses, attached to summons. Now, if you were ever my source, then I have
a code of honor to keep, concerning confidentiality and you. However, if you
were never my source, then you are fair game come lawsuit time.
All in all, the evidence gathered in the past five years shows that Wuerl con-
veniently used Cipolla as a diversionary tactic, to get law enforcement off of
Wuerl's back. Let's go back into time, to 1993.
March 1993: The Vatican Signatura acknowledged as a matter of course that
no incriminating evidence against Anthony Cipolla existed, for any type of
wrongdoing, whatsoever. It then judged that Donald Wuerl was out of line
for keeping Cipolla out of ministry pursuant to the excuse that Cipolla was
diagnosed with Depression and Suicidal Tendencies by a Maryland psychi-
atric institute founded by a renegade priest and practicing Sodomite who
died from AIDS, on account of him living out his doctrine of pan-sexuality
which, when translated into the vernacular, means any-way-you-want "it."
This judgment was especially poignant, in light of the fact that St. Michael's
of NYC refuted the Maryland clinic's diagnosis, declaring Anthony Cipolla
psychologically healthy. Doubly poignant was that Wuerl refused to accept
the professional assessment of the board-certified and licensed psychiatric
facility. He literally call St. Michael's assessment "scantily." Quite frankly,
it simply didn't say what the manipulative Wuerl wanted it to say, much like
a brat who kicks over the game board when he is losing.
As a response to the Vatican mandate, the 5'4" Donald Wuerl who obsessively
spent decades deceiving people into thinking that he was much taller than he
actually is refused to place Anthony Cipolla back into ministry. His grounds
for defying the Vatican's high court was based on his unsubstantiated claim
1} The case was judged according to "major factual inaccuracies."
2} The Bendig lawsuit, which was in progress, would yield new
evidence against Cipolla.
Now, Wuerl, his spokesperson, and media writers friendly to Wuerl made it
sound as if ... as if ... as if Wuerl had long since been in possession of damn-
ing evidence against Cipolla and just had to show it to the Vatican. They made
it sound as if ... as if ... as if Wuerl knew that the priest who humiliated him at
the Vatican was ever-so-coincidentally going to go out and molest child after
child, as soon as Wuerl would reinstate him. Okay then, you would assume
that all the evidence against Cipolla that Wuerl was going to present during
his rehearing at the Vatican already existed in a poignant and damning degree.
The truth is the Wuerl had no new evidence in his possession. When April
1993 arrived, Wuerl still had no new evidence against Cipolla. So, he got
an auxiliary bishop to sent out, on April 6, a letter to each priest who pre-
viously served with Anthony Cipolla in the various parishes where Cipolla
was assigned. The letter shows that what Wuerl was so desperate for evi-
dence against Cipolla that he sought for even petty observations about Ci-
polla's. Wuerl was stooping to the use of human personality traits as his
excuse to have Cipolla officially banned from ministry. Wuerl was nit-
picking. This was power abuse, squared and cubed.
In addition, the Bendig lawsuit did NOT produce any new evidence.
Now, March of 1993 was also when Edward Huff's third set of accusers
sent a package of accusations to Wuerl. Wuerl had already put Huff back
into ministry in Pittsburgh. So, Wuerl extended his cover-up of Huff and
sent him back to a St. Louis psychiatric facility. So, this was the scenario:
If Wuerl would have placed Cipolla back into ministry, someone in law
enforcement someone who have commenced a more thorough investiga-
tion of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, being that District Attorney already
announced to the public, in a polite way, that Wuerl and his staff were
uncooperative during the investigation which resulted in the indictment
of three of Wuerl's priests. Huff would have been uncovered while he
was stationed in Pittsburgh.
Perhaps the allegations of Wuerl's own homosexual lifestyle would have
emerged, along with the allegations of John Cardinal Wright's lifestyle of
Sodomy with under-aged males. The other things which might have sur-
faced was the fact that a few Boston-era Franciscans and a few Marists
stationed in Pittsburgh were attached to molestation accusations, out of
court settlements, and reassignments. Plus, the case involving the at-
tempted murder of Adam Ference was still fresh in the police records
and local court docket sheet. And let us not forgot that Wuerl hosted
the banned Dignity Masses for eight consecutive years in two Pitts-
burgh parishes, making Wuerl look like a sympathizer who would
cover-up homosexuals the way in which he covered-up the antics of
Father James Torquato.
All in all, if Wuerl did reassign Anthony Cipolla, his rise to the top
would have been in jeopardy. Ironically, Wuerl used the Cipolla
case, in having it completely misrepresented in public, to rise to
the top. Wuerl rose through the ranks on a series of lies.
A specific source assured me that he/she scoured the prothonotary's
office and found nothing incriminating about Cipolla. Yet, it was
reported the Tim Bendig's attorney, Douglas Yauger (attorney for
the masons) presented Wuerl with evidence that Cipolla was ac-
cused of molestation in 1978. In as much, who leaked him the
information which ended up being exaggerated to the point of
Now, in the deposition, Bendig alleged that he went to others at-
torneys, before securing Douglas Yauger's services. Why didn't
the other attorney's take Bendig's case? People already filed law-
suits against Wuerl, in Pittsburgh. Therefore, attorneys weren't
afraid of Wuerl, especially since that lawsuits were filed by
Catholic people and/or entities.
The court records indicated this, when Yauger was granted extra
time to find witnesses. I know of ZERO witnesses for Bendig's
side.Cipolla had 70+, for a lawsuit trial which never came to be.
It was surmised that Wuerl settled out of court, so the public
would not hear or read Bendig stating the Wuerl was a prac-
In fact, it was conjectured that Donald Wuerl made sure that the lawsuit
would not to go to trial, so that wrongdoinrgs on his part would not be
made public. Now remember, Wuerl, Ron Lengwin (the official Pgh
diocesan spokesman) and media members stated that there was or might
have been "major factual inaccuracie," in the Cipolla case. This made
it sound as if Wuerl already had the evidence to prove it.
Well, when April arrived, Wuerl started scurrying about, looking for evi-
dence against Cipolla. If he had the evidence to prove Anthony Cipolla
a molesting monster, he wouldn't have wasted his time sending out a let-
ter (through a surrogate) looking for petty informaion.
Let's go one step further: One year prior to the Vatican's 1993 mandate,
Donald Wuerl wrote the preface of the book of the greatest molestation
in the known history of the Catholic Church, namely Marcial Maciel
Degollado; the founder of the Legionaries of Christ.
Now, it was later found that Maciel's corrupt protector was none other
than Angelo Sodano, secretary of state from 1991 to 2006. Sodano was
there, when Cipolla was being railroaded out of ministry. In as much,
the reasonable person can assume that Sodano sided with Wuerl, for the
sake of Maciel. After all, Wuerl's name was in Maciel's priestly forma-
tion book. So, Wuerl's name couldn't be tainted by a harassment accu-
sation filed by Anthony Cipolla. Quite frankly, ladies and gentlemen,
Wuerl WAS harassing Cipolla. I can get into details later.
Ironically, a dossier against Donald Wuerl was hand delivered to Car-
dinal Ratzinger the same year when a damning dossier against Maciel
was sent to the Vatican. In fact, my report on the Torquato Retaliations
and copies of the accuser's evidence was in the package. Ratzinger ne0
glected the Maciel dossier for six years. He neglected the Wuerl dossier
forever. The effeminate German Ratzinger never disciplined the effemi-
nate German Wuerl. Instead, the former Hitler Youth, as the notorious
cronyism pope, would later place Wuerl in DC.
Once again, here is the letter which proves that Wuerl had zero evidence
against Cipolla when he had it announced that there "might" have been
major factual inaccuracies involved in the Signatura judgment of the Ci-