July 31, 2014

Postcard from Torquato to his Eventual Accuser

This has been the most viewed post at this site and the previous Wuerlgate site, in the
 long-term.

A postcard from Torquato while he was in Rome, sent to the individual who, in 1998,
reported him for graphically physical sexual harassment, so done under the guise of
spiritual direction sessions.  The last name of the accuser and the name of the street
where he once lived were both deleted from the Jpeg.

The narration of this topic is located at:

http://www.donaldwuerl.com/2013/08/wuerl-ratified-retaliations.html

    Here it is in color

July 30, 2014

My security clearance history includes my security clearance present.

The following is here, should someone need to familiarize himself/herself with me
ASAP.  It's limited to my three 2014 security clearance certificates.  I've had slight-
ly more than a half dozen security clearances in my life.  So, if you need to know
about me and make a quick assessment, this is where you start.

Something got back to me that made me realize that these Jpegs should go up front
and on top for a little while.  Let's face it, I have enemies in high places.  However,
there is one amazing irony to this whole thing.  It goes as follows:

It's pretty ironic that I'm the one who knows what it is to be admitted into govern-
ment complexes cordoned off with security clearance requirements for entrance,
while my detractors would be turned away instantly if they tried to make their en-
trance in those same places.  Yet, made themselves my judges.  I don't think so.

One caveat at this point in time (to whom it may concern):  You slander me at
your  own risk, be it in the form of libel or false light.  It can get expensive and time
consuming for you and/or your umbrella insurance provider.  No matter what you
attempt in the near future, you will be met with resistance.  A lot of sacrifice went
into gathering the information here which needs to be conveyed to the sheep im-
periled by wolves who should never has been ordained in the first place.  As far
back as during the Torquato Retaliations, I quickly learned that the Wuerl People
consist in some of the more vicious individuals you can encounter, while Wuerl
let the viciousness flourish, making him the most vicious of them all, being that
he profited from their viciousness.

The 2014 FBI Clearance below literally states: "A search of the fingerprints on
the above individual has revealed no prior arrest data."  The source is marked
as CJIS Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, July 2, 2014.  CJIS stands
for Criminal Justice Information Services, and the security clearance was issued out
of Pasadena, California.
FBI Clearance, July 2014
Needless to say, above is the Pennsylvania State Police background check security clearance
This is the Act 151 child abuse background check security clearance certificate
which scours more than one data base.   It's not printed on white paper.

July 29, 2014

The leaked proof that Donald Wuerl had no evidence against Anthony Cipolla while defying the Vatican's order to reinstate him

In re:  The Anthony Cipolla case which was presented in a false light by the
media.  It was the one which rocketed Wuerl to stardom, due to the fact that
it was hideously misrepresented.  Ann Rodgers in particular made it look like
an Alfred Hitchcock movie, claiming that Cipolla was arrested, when the truth
is that he never was.  This was followed by the same Ann Rodgers claiming
that the accusing mother of 1978 was harassed into dropping criminal charges
which were never filed in the first place.  The fact checking on the woman's
newspaper testimony resulted in the immediate discovery of falsehoods on her
part.  That fact that she, Diane Thompson, or a Post Gazette writer pretending
to be quoting Diane Thompson, lied is shown in detail in other Wuerlgate articles.

Concerning the leaked letter below, if Donald Wuerl possessed damning evidence
against Cipolla on the day Wuerl refused to follow the Vatican order to reinstate
Cipolla, then the letter below would never have existed.  Certain journalists made
it sound as if Wuerl had long-since possessed evidence against Cipolla that the
Vatican never saw.  The truth was that Wuerl was desperately seeking any ex-
cuse he would to keep Cipolla out of ministry, because, if Wuerl were to rein-
state Cipolla, then law enforcement personnel would have dedicated themselves
to deeper investigation of the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

Of course, they would have NOT found anything that would incriminate Cipol-
la.  They would only find a trail of corruption and cover-up which lead to Wuerl.
Remember, Wuerl had been caught performing a triple cover-up which lead to
the indictment of three of Wuerl's own priests.  Plus, Wuerl was covering up
Father Edward Huff, while presenting Cipolla as the molester no one in any of
Cipolla's youth groups ever claimed him to be.  Wuerl targets Cipolla, the one
accused by the notorious liar Tim Bendig whom Wuerl originally called a liar.
Yet, he covers up an actual molester.  For the record, such a cover-up is only
a summary offense, pursuant to the Child Protective Services Act of PA.


A background to the Cipolla case appears more than once at this site.  This
is because each Wuerlgate article has a stand-alone webpage, meaning that
a newcomer's orientation to the Cipolla case  could be any one of a number
of stand-alone pages.  Thus, a novice might possibly start in the middle of
the narration of the case and would need an introductory background, so
as to not leave him/her completely clueless about the case.  This was the
reason for the redundancy.

At the end of this article is a copy of the same Jpeg that is posted directly
above.  It's done so, for the convenience of the reader/vierwer.  It's proof
that Donald Wuerl had no evidence against Cipolla when Wuerl refused to
comply with a Vatican order to reinstate Anthony Cipolla.   Rather, Wuerl
was scampering for evidence against Cipolla, as soon as the Vatican ordered
the priest reinstated.

Wuerl literally lied while trying to find anything he could use against the man
formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla.  Wuerl's excuse for removing
Cipolla from priesthood ministry was the St, Luke Psychiatric Institute's di-
agnosis of Depression & Suicidal Tendencies.  That diagnosis was declared
invalid by St. Michael's of NYC.  This fact I have mentioned 6 to 12 times
previously. 

One Interesting Point about the Cipolla Case

I met a few of those who had always believed in Cipolla's innocence, and
there appeared a common trait in Cipolla's supporters.  The pertinent fea-
ture of those people is that they were all a part of professional families, and
some of them were the professionals, themselves.  This included a nun who
was accomplished in music, an insurance broker, an electrical engineer, a
retired construction contractor, an editor, etc.  Cipolla's supporters are
managers in mainstream civilization.  His following is NOT that of back-
woods illiterates, to say the least.

Also keep in mind the plaques of appreciations that were given to Cipolla,
for his management of youth groups.  Even after 42 years, no one from any
youth group managed by Cipolla ever accused him of anything wrongful.
I previously mentioned this 4 to 8 times elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, there was a blatant observation which indicates the Wuerl didn't think
that Cipolla was a molester ... that Wuerl was only using the Cipolla case as
a diversionary tactic to deflect attention away from Wuerl's then-current cover-
up of an Edward Huff who was reported to Wuerl for a third time, by a third
group of concerned parishioners, during the exact same month when the Vati-
can ordered Cipolla back into ministry.  The observation is this:

Wuerl NEVER sent out a letter to people in Cipolla's youth groups or former
parishes, as he did in the case of John S. Hoehl ... and as Bishop David Zubik
did in the cases of Fr Wellinger  ...  Fr LeDoux  ...  Br. Ghastin  ...  etc.   In as
much, if Wuerl thought that Anthony Cipolla were a molester, then he would
have sent letters to the people located where Cipolla was stationed.

Moreover, the leaked document below shows that Wuerl didn't have anything
on Anthony Cipolla when he was claiming that there "might" have been major
factual inaccuracies attached to the Vatican's findings on Cipolla.

Keep in mind that the evidence posted here was leaked by two different em-
ployees of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, on two different occasions.  This means
that one didn't know that the other one was leaking the exact same document.

For those new here, Tim Bendig (Cipolla's celebrated accuser)  turned out to be
nothing but liar and con artist who, as a matter of habit, threatens to sue and de-
stroy people.  Bendig threatened me, doing so by deceptive means, intended to
intimidate me into deleting all the articles I wrote about him.  Well, the articles
remain online and  I keep calling him a liar.  Yet he ... Mr. Lawsuit ... never
sued me.

Of course, if Bendig does sue me for Libel or False Light, then I get to open
Pandora's Box, and have further evidence make its way to the public, includ-
ing certain things about Donald Wuerl not yet disclosed.  As I previously wrote,
there are things I can not divulge, because it will instantly betray the source.

None the less, take as a message the fact that Bendig never sued me for calling
him a  liar.  It should occur to you that he never sued me for calling him a liar,
because he actually is a liar.

Of course, when a lawsuit occurs, other writers' sources become subpoenaed
witnesses, attached to summons.  Now, if you were ever my source, then I have
a code of honor to keep, concerning confidentiality and you.  However, if you
were never my source, then you are fair game come lawsuit time.

All in all, the evidence gathered in the past five years shows that Wuerl con-
veniently used Cipolla as a diversionary tactic, to get law enforcement off of
Wuerl's back.  Let's go back into time, to 1993.

March 1993:  The Vatican Signatura acknowledged as a matter of course that
no incriminating evidence against Anthony Cipolla existed, for any type of
wrongdoing, whatsoever.  It then judged that Donald Wuerl was out of line
for keeping Cipolla out of ministry pursuant to the excuse that Cipolla was
diagnosed with Depression and Suicidal Tendencies by a Maryland psychi-
atric institute founded by a renegade priest and practicing Sodomite who
died from AIDS, on account of him living out his doctrine of pan-sexuality
which, when translated into the vernacular, means any-way-you-want "it."

This judgment was especially poignant, in light of the fact that St. Michael's
of NYC refuted the Maryland clinic's diagnosis, declaring Anthony Cipolla
psychologically healthy.  Doubly poignant was that Wuerl refused to accept
the professional assessment of the board-certified and licensed psychiatric
facility.  He literally call St. Michael's assessment "scantily."  Quite frankly,
it simply didn't say what the manipulative Wuerl wanted it to say,  much like
a brat who kicks over the game board when he is losing. 

As a response to the Vatican mandate, the 5'4" Donald Wuerl who obsessively
spent decades deceiving people into thinking that he was much taller than he
actually is refused to place Anthony Cipolla back into ministry.  His grounds
for defying the Vatican's high court was based on his unsubstantiated claim
that:

1} The case was judged according to "major factual inaccuracies."

2} The Bendig lawsuit, which was in progress, would yield new
     evidence against Cipolla.

Now, Wuerl, his spokesperson, and media writers friendly to Wuerl made it
sound as if ... as if ... as if Wuerl had long since been in possession of damn-
ing evidence against Cipolla and just had to show it to the Vatican.  They made
it sound as if ... as if ... as if Wuerl knew that the priest who humiliated him at
the Vatican was ever-so-coincidentally going to go out and molest child after
child, as soon as Wuerl would reinstate him.  Okay then,  you would assume
that all the evidence against Cipolla that Wuerl was going to present during
his rehearing at the Vatican already existed in a poignant and damning degree.

The truth is the Wuerl had no new evidence in his possession.  When April
1993 arrived, Wuerl still had no new evidence against Cipolla.  So, he got
an auxiliary bishop to sent out, on April 6, a letter to each priest who pre-
viously served with Anthony Cipolla in the various parishes where Cipolla
was assigned.  The letter shows that what Wuerl was so desperate for evi-
dence against Cipolla that he sought for even petty observations about Ci-
polla's.  Wuerl was stooping to the use of human personality traits as his
excuse to have Cipolla officially banned from ministry.  Wuerl was nit-
picking.  This was power abuse, squared and cubed.

In addition, the Bendig lawsuit did NOT produce any new evidence.

Now, March of 1993 was also when Edward Huff's third set of accusers
sent a package of accusations to Wuerl.  Wuerl had already put Huff back
into ministry in Pittsburgh.  So, Wuerl extended his cover-up of Huff and
sent him back to a St. Louis psychiatric facility.  So, this was the scenario:

If Wuerl would have placed Cipolla back into ministry, someone in law
enforcement someone who have commenced a more thorough investiga-
tion of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, being that District Attorney already
announced to the public, in a polite way, that Wuerl and his staff were
uncooperative during the investigation which resulted in the indictment
of three of Wuerl's priests.  Huff would have been uncovered while he
was stationed in Pittsburgh.

Perhaps the allegations of Wuerl's own homosexual lifestyle would have
emerged, along with the allegations of John Cardinal Wright's lifestyle of
Sodomy with under-aged males.  The other things which might have sur-
faced was the fact that a few Boston-era Franciscans and a few Marists
stationed in Pittsburgh were attached to molestation accusations, out of
court settlements, and reassignments.  Plus, the case involving the at-
tempted murder of Adam Ference was still fresh in the police records
and local court docket sheet.  And let us not forgot that Wuerl hosted
the banned Dignity Masses for eight consecutive years in two Pitts-
burgh parishes, making Wuerl look like a sympathizer who would
cover-up homosexuals the way in which he covered-up the antics of
Father James Torquato.

All in all, if Wuerl did reassign Anthony Cipolla, his rise to the top
would have been in jeopardy.  Ironically, Wuerl used the Cipolla
case, in having it completely misrepresented in public, to rise to
the top.  Wuerl rose through the ranks on a series of lies.

A specific source assured me that he/she scoured the prothonotary's
office and found nothing incriminating about Cipolla.  Yet, it was 
reported the Tim Bendig's attorney, Douglas Yauger (attorney for
the masons) presented Wuerl with evidence that Cipolla was ac-
cused of molestation in 1978.  In as much, who leaked him the
information which ended up being exaggerated to the point of
defamation.

Now, in the deposition, Bendig alleged that he went to others at-
torneys, before securing Douglas Yauger's services.  Why didn't
the other attorney's take Bendig's case?  People already filed law-
suits against Wuerl, in Pittsburgh.  Therefore, attorneys weren't
afraid of Wuerl, especially since that lawsuits were filed by
Catholic people and/or entities.

The court records indicated this, when Yauger was granted extra
time to find witnesses.  I know of ZERO witnesses for Bendig's
side.Cipolla had 70+, for a lawsuit trial which never came to be.
It was surmised that Wuerl settled out of court, so the public
would not hear or read Bendig stating the Wuerl was a prac-
ticing homosexual.

In fact, it was conjectured that Donald Wuerl made sure that the lawsuit
would not to go to trial, so that wrongdoinrgs on his part would not be
made public.    Now remember,  Wuerl, Ron Lengwin (the official Pgh
diocesan spokesman) and media members stated that there was or might
have been "major factual inaccuracie," in the Cipolla case.  This made
it sound as if Wuerl already had the evidence to prove it.

Well, when April arrived, Wuerl started scurrying about, looking for evi-
dence against Cipolla.  If he had the evidence to prove Anthony Cipolla
a molesting monster, he wouldn't have wasted his time sending out a let-
ter (through a surrogate) looking for petty informaion.

Let's go one step further:  One year prior to the Vatican's 1993 mandate,
Donald Wuerl wrote the preface of the book of the greatest molestation
in the known history of the Catholic Church, namely Marcial Maciel
Degollado; the founder of the Legionaries of Christ.

Now, it was later found that Maciel's corrupt protector was none other
than Angelo Sodano, secretary of state from 1991 to 2006.  Sodano was
there, when Cipolla was being railroaded out of ministry.  In as much,
the reasonable person can assume that Sodano sided with Wuerl, for the
sake of Maciel.  After all, Wuerl's name was in Maciel's priestly forma-
tion book.  So, Wuerl's name couldn't be tainted by a harassment accu-
sation filed by Anthony Cipolla.  Quite frankly, ladies and gentlemen,
Wuerl WAS harassing Cipolla.  I can get into details later.

Ironically, a dossier against Donald Wuerl was hand delivered to Car-
dinal Ratzinger the same year when a damning dossier against Maciel
was sent to the Vatican.  In fact, my report on the Torquato Retaliations
and copies of the accuser's evidence was in the package.  Ratzinger ne0
glected the Maciel dossier for six years.  He neglected the Wuerl dossier
forever.  The effeminate German Ratzinger never disciplined the effemi-
nate German Wuerl.  Instead, the former Hitler Youth, as the notorious
cronyism pope, would later place Wuerl in DC.

Once again, here is the letter which proves that Wuerl had zero evidence
against Cipolla when he had it announced that there "might" have been
major factual inaccuracies involved in the Signatura judgment of the Ci-
polla.


July 27, 2014

Wuerl: A Dirty Sex Abuse Handling Record from Year 1.

Donald Wuerl was installed bishop of Pittsburgh on February 12, 1988.  It only
took eight months thereafter for the Diocese of Pittsburgh to become one of the  
first dioceses in America to be 'scathed' in what was to become a nationwide 
Watergate of perversity.  Wuerl was caught performing a triple cover-up, and
the practice of sadomasochism was one of the acts which transpired within a
trio of clergy members whom Wuerl unsuccessfully concealed from law en-
forcement authorities.  

A member of the criminal trio was an assistant chancellor of Wuerl's diocese, as 
well as a canon lawyer.  This factor alone showed motive for proceeding with an 
intentional cover-up.  In light of this, when does a bishop ever proceed with an
accidental one?

The Sex Abuse Casualties


The casualties were two altar boys of the same family.  They were brothers. The 
years of molestation occurred from 1981 to 1987.  In addition to the three indict-
ed priests, there was a fourth alleged assailant reported to one of the three prose-
cuting district attorneys.  He was a layman.  Furthermore, there was a fourth dio-
cesan priest implicated, but only in his capacity as a probable accomplice; as a 
silent person who reported nothing to anyone.

Concerning this priest, he either allowed criminal conduct to transpire in a ski 

lodge suite where he was staying or else he was clueless to what was transpir-
ing there.  Nothing was established other than he was at the scene of the crime, 
going into his room, while a criminal priest was taking his altar boy into anoth-
er one.  

This fourth Pittsburgh diocesan priest, incidentally, was strangled to  death in 
Havana Cuba in 2001, after having been on administrative leave since 1996.  
A source informed me that Wuerl, himself, officiated as his funeral ... so stat-
ed the source.

While in Cuba, this priest was openly homosexual and was said to have "helped 

his visiting friends find sexual partners while they stayed in Havana."  He was 
the tragic Fr. George Zirwas, and at this point in the narration you should be at
the first stage in realizing that Lord Byron was more correct than he was mistak-
en when he stated that the truth is always strange; stranger than fiction.

Wuerl's unholy trinity


The indicted priests were Robert Wolk, Francis Pucci, and Richard "Sade" Zula.   

Wolk was the assistant chancellor and Zula was nicknamed after the Marquis de 
Sade.  All three priests were charged and arraigned in Washington County, PA.  
It's a county which touches the southwestern border of the Allegheny County 
where within sits Pittsburgh.  

Furthermore, Richard Zula was also arraigned east of Pittsburgh, in Somerset 
County.  Robert Wolk was indicted in Allegheny County, as well as in Wash-
ington County.   In fact, he was the first one to surrender himself to the police.  
Incidentally, the Diocese of Pittsburgh comprises the six most Southwestern 
counties of Pennsylvania.  Pennsylvania, at last count, has sixty-seven counties.

The front page of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette's November 11 edition of that

year gives light on how involved the criminal investigation was:  

        "Moreover, authorities said their investigation had uncovered
          evidence of similar offenses involving one of the priests that
          occurred elsewhere in southwestern Pennsylvania and Florida,
         Ohio, Virginia, and Canada.  Authorities in the jurisdictions
         have been contacted."


This shows that the matter was not taken lightly by law enforcement officials. 
 
In fact, the district attorney of Washington County prophetically stated,  "We  
would be sticking our heads in the sand to believe these are the only three 
cases."

Zula had 138 criminal counts filed against him in Washington Coun
ty, alone. 
However, a plea bargain reduced the counts to only two.   In sequence, Zula 
also plead guilty in Somerset County.  Now, as far as went Wolk, he plead 
guilty in Allegheny and Washington counties. 

Pucci's case, on the other hand, was dismissed due to the two year statute
of
limitations expiring on two types of criminal charges.   It expired approximate-
ly four months prior to his indictment.   He was indicted under the assumption 
that the time-keeping for the two year limit had frozen during the time Pucci 
was outside of Pennsylvania, in a Maryland psychiatric facility.  None the less,
conspiracy charges remained open for Pucci, and that particular crime had a 
five year limitation.   Despite this, Pucci's case was eventually dismissed.

Take note that, during the nationwide sex abuse scandal, priest after abusive

priest was sent to a psychiatric facility, as if each one were an unaccountable
victim of mental illness.  Now, there is a difference between mental illness
and sin.   If a person is insane, then he is without malice in a materially harm-
ful act, even though each member of society has the right to be made safe from
such a harmful person.   However, deception and manipulation, as much as
scheming and concealing, were committed by priest after abusive priest, and

such acts are elements of malice; not mental illness. 

In addition, these priests were described as having "compulsions" that required 
psychiatric treatment.  In the Catholic vernacular, such compulsions are known 
as temptations.

Wuerl and His Personnel:  Uncooperative During the 1988 Investigation

The Washington County district attorney announced that Wuerl's diocese en-

gaged in "foot dragging" throughout the criminal investigation.   The DA was
either irked or incensed by the Pittsburgh diocese's lack of cooperation, call-
ing it "minimal at best."   His quote on the topic goes as follows: "It was not
the spirit of cooperation we would like to see."  Of course,  "foot dragging"
is a polite way of saying "stonewalling" which, in turn, is a polite way of say-

ing "a step away from obstruction of justice charges."

Wuerl had pushed his luck to the limit.  Being that he was caught performing

a triple cover-up, and being that he was accused of having impeded a crimi-
nal investigation via stonewalling, he had no other choice than to strike the
pose of a strict disciplinarian.  This shows that Wuerl was not not not the
caring and concerned bishop that he was made out to be by the 21st Century
media.  Rather, he was a chameleon, looking out for himself.  He changed
colors according to the changes in the political climate.  In fact, he original-
ly presented himself as a "liberal."  He was then paraded around as a "con-
servative."  Wuerl has shown himself to be out for himself.  The following
mainstream media newspaper links provide the evidence:

Photocopy of Cleveland Plain Dealer Article which mentions the existence 
of a fourth predator in the same Pittsburgh diocesan molestation ring:
Wuerl's Cover-up with Mention of Fourth Assailant

The New York Times Report on the Triple Cover-up:

 http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/13/us/3-pennsylvania-priests-accused-of-molesting.html

Photocopy of the San Antonio Express-News Report:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4118/1032/1600/Wuerl%20San%20Antonio%20Express.jpg

Photocopy of the Report found in the Lewiston Daily Sun:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9eYpAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7WQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4475,2371591&dq=zula+barn+parked +car+pettit+resort&hl=en


Photocopy of the Nashua Telegraph's Report on the Cover-up:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GvglAAAAIBAJ&sjid=E_wFAAAAIBAJ&pg=
5495,3148582&hl=en


The Associated Press News Report on Wuerl's Triple Cover-up: 
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/1988_11_11_AP_ThreePriests_Francis_Pucci_etc_2.htm

Photocopy of the Bryan Times Report, with D.A.'s Additional Statement:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=tQYLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=
jlEDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5427,4088961&dq=wolk+arrested+
pittsburgh+zula+pucci


Donald Wuerl: A Coast to Coast Disgrace

News of Wuerl's triple cover-up made its way from coast to coast, via:

- the New York Times,          - the Saint Petersburg Times,
- the Philadelphia Inquirer,     - the Philadelphia Daily News,
- the Cleveland Plain Dealer,   - the Pittsburgh Post Gazette,
- Maine's Lewiston Daily Sun,    - the San Jose Mercury News,     
- Pennsylvania's Reading Eagle,   -  the San Antonio Express-News,
- California's Lodi News-Sentinel,   - the now defunct Pittsburgh Press,   
- Northwestern Ohio's Bryan Times,    - Oregon's Eugene Register-Guard,
- New Hampshire's Nashua Telegraph,  - South Carolina's Rock Hill Herald.

From as far west as California's San Andreas Fault line, to as far east as the
New York metro area, Donald William Wuerl became an early chapter in the
Vatican II church's sex abuse history.  From as far south as the Florida Gulf
Coast, to as far north as Maine, Wuerl's diocese had already proven itself to
be what best selling author Malachi Martin would later say it was"... one
of the most pathetic dioceses in the United States."

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1988_10_11_Mullan_EditorsNote_Robert_Wolk_1.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mYMcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=
b2MEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2329,10275422&hl=en


http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1989_05_23_UnitedPressInternational_Richard_Zula_3.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4ARlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2XcNAAAAIBAJ&pg=4517,3545671&dq=zula+diocese+wuerl&hl=en

Concerning George Zirwas:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FFAxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=d3ADAAAAIBAJ&pg=5379,202749&dq=george+zirwas+pittsburgh+cuba&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FNBIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XYIMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1312,127061&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=77AaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fjAEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5477,1539593&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bc00AAAAIBAJ&sjid=KSEGAAAAIBAJ&pg=3062,4367236&hl=en
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -

Wuerl's violation of the Child Protective Services Act

The pertinence of this revelation is that Ann Rodgers and other less than
conscionable members of the media made Wuerl out to be the all so car-
ing, loving, and concerned protector of youth.  He was headlined as the
bishop who fought the Vatican to remove "a molester priest," when the
fact was that he only attempted to have the priest removed for what was
later called a misdiagnosis of Depression and Suicidal Tendencies.  The
priest was never arrested, yet Wuerl let the papers claim that the priest
was.

This also shows Wuerl's motive in letting Anthony Cipolla be the public
scapegoat whose reputation was completely annihilating, despite the evi-
dence indicating Cipolla to be opposite of the media smear campaign.
The district attorney mentioned in the article below was the one Wuerl
feared, become the DA contacted a number of other DA's in a number
of other states.  So, Wuerl needed a smokescreen, to deceive the public
into thinking that he was a holy holy and all so caring saint.  Wuerl did
nothing more than masquerade himself as an angel of light, at the expense 
of others.

The newspaper jpegs above prove that the slightly built Donald Wuerl
thrived on a propaganda machine filled with sleight of hand deceptions
and direct falsehoods.

In addition, don't forget that he rode the coattails of John Cardinal Wright,
and without allegedly homosexual John Wright, the Donald Wuerl who
accommodated banned Dignity Masses for eight consecutive years would
have been  nothing more than a person sitting in the middle row of the typ-
ical Dignity Mass, if and only if the allegations conveyed to me between
1999 and 2002, as well as between 2009 and 2012 (concerning Wuerl) are
true.  If those allegations are not true, then Wuerl would have been nothing
more than commoner frequenting other venues.

It was the court system that prompted Wuerl to strike the pose of a strict
disciplinarian who would come to the rescue of the victims of predatory
priests ... but not as it applied to any victim over the age of 18.  None the
less, Wuerl's artificial pose did not occur until three simultaneous indict-
ments of three Pittsburgh priests occured under Wuerl's watch, coupled
with a DA John Pettit's public accusation that Wuerl's diocese performed
foot dragging.  Even in the Torquato Retaliations, we see Wuerl's willing-
ness to let justice be obstructed.

Keep in mind that there was no criminal investigation of Wolk, Zula,
and Pucci until the family of the two former altar servers reported the
matter to the police.  They did not do so until after Wuerl visited them.

In addition, Wuerl only went to the home of the traumatized family af-
ter their parish pastor was told by them that they were going to report
the three molester priests to law enforcement authorities.  Wuerl did
NOT report the molester trio.  He let them go about their ways.  Even
though Fr. Zula was sure to never return to ministry, on account of his
masochistic actions, Wolk and Pucci were in a position to eventually
ease back into ministry, in the spirit of John Hoehl and Edward Huff.

Do not be deceived.  Ann Rodgers made it sound as if Wuerl were a
strict disciplinarian who ousted Hoehl, as soon as he learned of him.
No, Wuerl placed Hoehl in chaplaincy ministry, as he did with Huff.

Now, Pgh Post Gazette reporter Ann Rodgers claimed that Wuerl had
an epiphany while visiting the traumatized family and then became the
"model of zero tolerance" thereafter.  This claim is easily proven false
by the fact that District Attorney John Pettit publicly announced that
Wuerl's then Diocese of Pittsburgh did NOT provide the cooperation
that the district attorney sought during the criminal investigation.  It
was a criminal investigation which didn't commence until someone
other than Wuerl notified the police.

If Donald Wuerl were the model of zero tolerance, he would have been
the one who reported Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Plus, Wuerl would NOT
have allowed the 'foot dragging' that a Western Pennsylvanian DA said
was being committed by Wuerl's diocese.

July 26, 2014

Wuerl neither had a change of heart nor an inspired sense of resolve, after having dinner with the family stung by Wolk, Zula, & Pucci

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where Wuerl's web of corruption was spun,
with the help of the pathetic Florida native, Ann Rodgers.
For those unfamiliar, Ann Rodgers was a writer for the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.
Even though she was never any type of Catholic, she was assigned to be head
of the Communications Dept of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.
On multiple fact-checking occasions, Ann Rodgers was caught lying in print.

Now, the propaganda is that the family of a molested altar boy and his broth-
er invited Wuerl to their home, upon which Wuerl became enlightened in an
"awe inspiring" godlike fashion so divine that Wuerl deserves to be pope ...
... heck ... the New Divinity to whom all must bow, in worshipful reverence,
according to the super hero comic book hype of an exceptionally gauche
Ann Rodgers.  However, the reality of the 5'4" Donald Wuerl is the polar
opposite of Ann Rodgers fairy tales about him.

To start, Wuerl had a Father Arnott go to the violated family, to see if they
would be willing to meet with Wuerl.  The Donald Wuerl who was sued many
times by Pittsburgh area residents sought to get his foot into the door.  Wuerl
invited himself.  Do NOT be deceived into thinking that Wuerl was a revered
presence in Pittsburgh.  The number of lawsuits filed against him proves other-
wise.

Secondly, if Wuerl were all so enlightened, then why did District Attorney
John C Pettit accuse Wuerl's administration of uncooperativeness and foot
dragging during the investigation which resulted in three indictments?

Why did Wuerl not observe the Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Act
and report the priests?  In fact, when it came time to process the indictment
of Richard Zula, no one at the diocesan building knew where Zula was. 

If Wuerl's meeting with the family were similar to other people's encounters
with Wuerl, then I can assure you that he left the family feeling violated and
outraged.  I can assure you that he triggered a sense of insult so intense that
they went forth and gave the greenlight to Attorney F. Peter Dixon who end-
ed up reporting the three priests to law enforcement officials.

Keep in mind that the lying propaganda is that Wuerl's meeting with the vio-
lated family instantly affected Wuerl into changing his policy.  If so, then why
did the notorious John S. Hoehl remain in ministry until Robert Wolk was in-
dicted?  Why did Wuerl and his staff perform foot dragging that aggravated
DA Pettit to the point of announcing his frustration to the public?

As soon as the indictment was filed, Wuerl got rid of Hoehl like a sand bag in
a hot air balloon losing altitude.  But, not until then.  This is extremely interest-
ing, in that it indicates that Wuerl seemingly assumed that the violated family
would not report the three molester priests to the police.  If Wuerl anticipated
the reporting thereof, he would have gotten rid of John Hoehl immediately.
Wuerl let Hoehl remain in ministry, as if Wuerl arrogantly assumed that he
controlled the violated family on a set of puppet strings.

Wuerl keeping Fr. John Hoehl in ministry after the meeting with
the family of two molested altar boys proves that  Wuerl had no
change of heart or policy that resulted from the meeting/dinner.
The claim that the meeting changed Wuerl is lying propaganda.

During the journalists' 2013 papal conjecture phrase, shortly before Francis I
ascended to the Chair of Saint Peter, the Daily Beast's Paris bureau chief con-
jectured that Cardinal Wuerl was America's candidate for pope, in light of the
newspaper articles that glorified Wuerl, especially in the heavily misrepresent-
ed Anthony Cipolla case that starred a seminary flunk-out who was described
as a perpetual and pathological liar by multiple persons who knew him.  In fact,
the Cipolla case starred an individual who was even declared NOT credible by
Donald Wuerl, at one time.

The Paris bureau chief then stated that Wuerl apparently became too tired to
fight the good fight that the media described Wuerl as having fought.  Dickey
then referred to one of Ann Rodgers' Pgh Post Gazette articles, stating:

     But a few weeks after that decision Wuerl met with the devout, deeply
     disillusioned, and increasingly litigious family of one victim.  They in-
     vited Wuerl to dinner and, according to a lengthy and laudatory report
     in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in 2003, when Wuerl left that table his
     views of the issue had changed.  Before, his actions had been closely
     aligned church policies, which were basically a CYA masquerading
     as piety.

     Now Wuerl told his staff it had to get its priorities straight: the first
    concern was the injured party, the second was for the person’s family,
    the third—and only the third—was the potential harm to the church
    and its reputation.   He’s on the record declaring zero tolerance for
    priests accused of sexual abuse 14 years before that became official
   policy.
__________________________________________________________
The decision to which Dickey referred was Wuerl's decision to put back
into ministry the notorious John S. Hoehl, former headmaster of Quigley
H.S., in Baden Pennsylvania.  I attended that school for four years.  And
yes, I heard the rumors while in school.
__________________________________________________________

Anyone familiar with Wuerl's Triple Cover-up and the late district attorney
John C. Pettit, as well as the writings of Chicago journalist Mike Volpe, im-
mediately knows that the aforesaid statement doesn't contain any truth in it.
Dickey trusted that Ann Rodgers was telling the truth.  Therefore, the false-
hoods of Ann Rodgers, as they apply to the 2013 Dickey article, need to be
line-itemized here:

1}  Firstly, the family did NOT invite Wuerl to dinner.  Wuerl had the local
      pastor, John Arnott, go to the family, to see if they would be willing to
      speak with Wuerl in some kind of meeting.  This is because the family
      went to Arnott and told him that it was going to report Frs Wolk, Zula,
      and Pucci to the police.  So, Arnott informed Wuerl of this, as if to be
      nothing more than Wuerl's spy.  Wuerl only sought to meet with the
      family when mention of the police came into play.  Wuerl was NOT
      invited.  He stuck his foot in the door and invited himself.

2}  The indictment of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, along with District Attorney
      John Pettit's bitter public statement about Wuerl's diocese stonewalling
      Pettit's own criminal investigation, proves that Wuerl did NOT have a
      change of heart or a change of policy after having had dinner with the
      family victimized by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Therefore, Wuerl did NOT
      gauge his actions according to the "Injured Party First" policy..

      Even 10 yrs after the dinner, Wuerl proved that the "injured party first"
      precept was not the official policy.  This is because ten years after the
      dinner came the Torquato Retaliations that Wuerl could have ordered
      halted.  Wuerl let them continue.  Let's do a quick timeline:

- Early Summer of Wuerl's first year as bishop of Pittsburgh John Arnott
  let him know that the family of the two altar boys sodomized by Fr. Wolk,
  Zula, and Pucci were going to report the matter to the police.  Specifically,
  an attorney friend of the family was prepared to do so.

-Wuerl was given his meeting with the family.

-The family's attorney friend reported the sex crimes, and an investigation
  began.  If Wuerl had the change of heart that he was claimed to have had,
  he would have reported the crimes, himself.  He did NOT do so.   Thus, he
  was NOT abiding by an "injured party first" policy.  His quote in the news-
  paper at the time showed this to be case, with Wuerl being Orwellian in his
  statement.  Wuerl said that it "is not covering up to embrace a man who is
  suffering.  Thus, Wuerl made Robert Wolk out to be a victim of Wolk's own
  crimes.

 -Furthermore, Wuerl would have cooperated with John C. Pettit, instead of
  having been a typical brat who thinks that he can do what he wants, when he
  wants, as he wants, if he had a change of heart after the immortalized dinner
  the Ann Rodgers falsely narrated.  Wuerl did the OPPOSITE of enacting an
  "injured party first" policy.

One more time, for emphasis


-The John S. Hoehl whom Wuerl returned to ministry remained in ministry
  up and until the time when Wolk was indicted.  If Wuerl had the change of
  heart Ann Rodgers and Christopher Dickey said he had, then Wuerl would
  have removed Hoehl shortly after the dinner which was falsely claimed to
  have changed Wuerl's heart and change diocesan policy.  Thus, the Christo-
  pher Dickey article is absolutely worthless, especially due to the fact that
  Dickey called the act of sending a very aged man home the act of covering
  up; as was mentioned in the utterly worthless article.

  Should Wuerl have put the aging priest to death?  Lock him in the basement
  of a cathedral?  Law enforcement didn't indict the guy at the time, so what
  was Wuerl to do?  ANS: Send him home, due to the frailty which comes
  with advancing years ... aka aging.

3} The other scandal which proved that Wuerl had no change of heart and
     no change of policy was the Fr. Edward Huff case, a few years later.  He
     played musical chairs with Huff, batting him between St. Louis and Pitts-
     burgh, as if Huff were a badminton birdie.  You see, Huff was reported to
     Wuerl by three different sets of concerned parishioners on three different
     occasions.  Upon receiving the third reporting, Wuerl sent Huff back to
     St. Louis.

     Wuerl didn't change after the dinner described by the Ann Rodgers who
     was repeatedly caught lying in print.  The same 5'4" Donald Wuerl didn't
     change his ways during the years when Sotak's credible accuser was being
     bullied by Wuerl's administrative surrogates.  The Donald Wuerl who was
     falsely described by Ann Rodgers as 5'11" didn't even change during the
     second Torquato Retaliation.  Tiny Donald Wuerl's ruthlessness remained
     in tact and in force, as the law of the land, in a place called Wuerlopolis.




The source of this letter is self-evident.

July 25, 2014

According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, there was a fourth Pittsburgh area molester involved in Wuerl's cover-up of Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

    This Cleveland Plain Dealer article mentioned the existence of an
    alleged fourth assailant who was alleged to have been a layman.
    This is in addition to the three-ring circus of Pittsburgh diocesan
     priests Wuerl attempted to cover up.

    Wuerl only had a zero tolerance track record when it came to hav-
     ing zero tolerance toward whistle-blowers who tried to clean-up
     the corruption in Wuerl's own diocese.

     Clicking on the Jpeg below will enlarge to a reasonable size;
     but not to the point of being able to fit on Mount Rushmore.

        

July 24, 2014

Wuerl canonically trapped a credible whisteblower seminarian, not letting him be ordained a priest, anywhere



Donald Wuerl and his administrators mistreated the credible accuser of a certain
priest whose name will be left anonymous, being that he is now deceased.  The in-
tention of this account is to contrast the ways in which Wuerl's predecessors treat-
ed the person with the way in which Wuerl treated him.

Now, Wuerl was the rector of the Pgh seminary, when this gentleman was in the
seminary.  In fact, Torquato was in the seminary at the same time, and the credible
gentleman who should be ordained a priest described Torquato as "a brown-noser,"
as in kissing up to Wuerl.

Wuerl elected to ordain the James Torquato who would quickly become abusive,
while rejecting the good-willed whistleblower.  Wuerl has obsessively chosen the
unnatural ones over the natural ones, throughout the years.  Even in the case of
the Moscow diocese priest who denied Holy Communion to an avowed lesbian
who disowned the Catholic Faith, Wuerl sided with the grotesquely androgynous
and obese female who frighteningly looked like a "nerdy," overweight male office
worker.

The individual highlighted here would have made the quintessential confessional
priest.  The irony is that people, for the most part, abandoned the Sacrament of
Penance ... aka, the Sacrament of Reconciliation ... aka the confessional.  After
all, on Sundays, people are going to communion by the truck load.  But, on Sat-
urdays, the confessionals throughout the modern church are often unoccupied.

The accused priest: 

Anonymous and deceased.  His assignments included having the headmaster
post at two Catholic high schools, as well as the pastor posts of two Catholic
parishes.  This also included an assistant pastor post in the Pittsburgh area.
He died in the Year 2004.

Accusation:  Full blown physical assault, (one time only), to the tune of
either attempted invasive contact or something similar.  The credible accus-
er alleged that he was rendered unconscious during the conflagration which,
according to him, was an intense altercation.  However, the altercation was
more of a Greco Roman wrestling match, with full scale pushing, shoving,
and tight holds, as opposed to any type of knockout punch boxing.  He was
not sure what actually happened while he was unconscious.  

The alleged circumstance surrounding alleged assault:  The credible
accuser alleges that the assault took place after a dinner outing.  The pur-
pose of the dinner was to talk about the young man chances of obtaining
a vocation to the priesthood.  The alleged assault took place after the
priest asked the gentleman very personal preference questions.

In review:

The accuser originally asked Sotak for vocational guidance, in the hope
to receive assistance in entering a seminary, should he finally decide to
pursue a vocation to the priesthood.  They went to dinner, to discuss
the matter.  After dinner came the alleged altercation.

Age of Accuser at the time of the alleged assault:  19, 20, or so.  This
is pertinent, because, if a victim is over 18 years of age, Wuerl will let
that person be abandoned ... if not harassed.
___________________________________________________________

The following is alleged by Fr. Donald Sotak's credible accuser:

- The alleged assault took place during the tenure of Pittsburgh diocesan
   bishop, Vincent Leonard, in the mid 1970s.

- The priest was immediately reported to Pittsburgh diocesan personnel
   and the response was to quickly move him to a new domicile.

- The accuser joined the Pittsburgh seminary in the 1980s, eventually being
   ordained a deacon.  Wuerl was the rector of the diocesan seminary at the
   time.  Then, Wuerl was ordained a bishop, shortly thereafter.  By 1988,
   Wuerl was assigned to Pittsburgh.  Thus, Wuerl was now in charge of the
    anonymous priest's accuser.

- The credible accuser was ordained into the diaconate, a vocation one step
   away from the priesthood.  Yet, he was commanded by a vocations director
   to tell people that he voluntarily delayed his own ordination.  This, of course,
   was a lie.  The gentleman very much wanted to be a priest as soon as reason-
   ably possible.  Donald Wuerl was preventing this from happening.

- The credible accuser stated that the vocation director told him that he was to
   either sign a paper stating that he voluntarily delayed his own ordination or else
 "they" would dig-up some excuse to delay his ordination.  This is an element of
  whistle blower retaliation.

- While at seminary, the credible accuser had a window view to the parking garage,
   where he could allegedly see Wuerl and a certain young man here and a certain
   young man there leave alone, most ly after classes which were held at the nearby
   Catholic college, Duquesne University.

- A note of fact:  Donald Wuerl became an auxiliary bishop in 1986 and was
  eventually sent to Seattle Washington, concerning the Hunthausen Controversy.
  He was next assigned to the Pittsburgh diocese in 1988.

- It was under Wuerl when the credible accuser was allegedly sent to a Philadel-
   phia clinic for a psychological assessment.  The alleged diagnosis was that he
   was credible and suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.   Being diag-
   nosed with PTSD augments an accuser's credibility.

- The Pittsburgh diocesan personnel refused to accept the final assessment of the
   Philadelphia clinic.  They were apparently in search of an official sheet of paper
   which would state something differently about the credible seminarian.  So, they
   demanded that he go for yet another psychological assessment . . . in either
   St. Louis or Maryland.

- The credible accuser assumed that Wuerl was controlling the diocesan admini-
   strators on puppet strings ... that he was the person who ultimately wanted an
   official sheet of paper stating something other than what was stated by the Philly
   clinic.  This would mean that Wuerl was allegedly looking to play a game with
   loaded dice and a stacked deck of cards.

- It was at that point in time when the credible accuser departed from diocesan
   ministry.  Things had become too Orwellian for him.  He stated that he literally
   feared that he was going to be drugged into a catatonic state.  He remembers
   his time of exit being 1994.  This was during the musical chairs cover-up of a
   Fr Edward Huff.  This was also the time when the Cipolla case was underway
   at the highest court of the Vatican.  This was shortly before James Torquato
   became Wuerl's personal secretary.

- Incidentally, credible accuser remembers James Torquato at the seminary.  Ac-
  cording to him, Torquato cow-towed to authority, as if to be seeking promotion
  points.  The actual expression used to describe Torquato was "brown noser."

- This case, being that it was allegedly covered-up from the middle 1970's to the
   end of 2011, would easily qualify as Cardinal Wuerl's sixth simultaneous cover-
   up during the same year; the year being 1988.  Now, this was an inherited cover-
   up, but it can be filed with the Wolk, Zula, Pucci, Hoehl, and Wellinger cases.

  As a brief review:

  The Wolk, Zula, and Pucci cases were the Triple Cover-up.

  The Hoehl case was the Hot Potato Cover-up, where John Hoehl, my former
  high school headmaster, was placed back into ministry in July of 1988, and
  was only dismissed by Wuerl after Fr. Wolk was indicted.

  The Huff case is the Musical Chairs Cover-up involving the priest who was
  reported three times to Wuerl, by more than one person each time.

  The Torquato case had the most evidentiary support attached to it and it re-
  sulted in economic retaliation, as well as the physical pursuit of Torquato's
  credible accuser and .... yours truly.

  The Wellinger case, incidentally, was the one where the original reports about
  Wellinger were allegedly ignored. 

    Additionally alleged by the accuser was that:

 - The diocese's Fr. Charles Bober, STD, sent a letter to the credible seminarian
    & deacon, notifying him that he would get no stipend from the diocese.  The
    seminarian accuser then had recourse to a Fr. Bob Guay whom I once met,
    and according the seminarian, he had been getting his $700 monthly stipend
    (pension) up to the time of my interview with him.  Such checks read, "For
    services rendered."

- The accuser also stated that the letter sounded almost like a damning excom-
   munication letter.  There was no Peace of Christ within it, to say the least  ...
   ...  at least according to seminarian/deacon whom Wuerl trapped and who
   could not be ordained a priest.

- During a meeting, diocesan personnel bragged to the seminarian that
  they had an excellent policy for handling clergy abuse victims.  Yet,
  they said that the policy did NOT apply to Sotak's accuser, because he
  was a deacon.  HOWEVER, the alleged assault took place when he was
  a layman - a civilian - a parishioner.

- Even in 2002, when Wuerl finally suspended several priests who had long since
   been attached to credible sex abuse allegations, he permitted this priest to stay
   at his post.  Keep in mind that Wuerl's observed habit was that of doing nothing
   to any priest whose accuser was over the age of 18 at the time of the alleged
   wrongdoing.

- Years after the credible accuser, seminarian, and deacon departed from Pitts-
   burgh diocesan ministry, he was interviewed by Randy Engel, former editor of
   the Vietnam Journal and author of the Rite of Sodomy.  The interview was to
   be kept from the public, out of fear of retaliation against the credible deacon.
   This is important to note, because it shows that the accusation is not some-
   thing recently conjured.  The accusation has been longstanding.

- In fact, while this deacon was at another seminary, he was allegedly told by one
   of the faculty priests that the priest he accused allegedly had other complaints
   against him.  Then, suddenly, the complaints of other young men were no long-
   er in the record ... allegedly.

The credible accuser furthermore alleged/averred the following:

It seemed to him that Donald Wuerl had a new teacher's pet every semester, while
Wuerl was the rector of the Pittsburgh seminary.  However, none of Wuerl's pets
were never ordained, according to the gentleman.  He even saw one of Wuerl's
seminary pets leave in anger, never to return.  This was generally corroborated by
a specific source who alleged an added thing about Wuerl.

If that added allegation is true, then it confirms the prior allegations of Wuerl having
been a practicing homosexual . . . that Donald Wuerl was engaged in the breaking
of his priesthood vows.  Now, if the allegation is not true, then a number of people
have lied to me about Wuerl allegedly being a practicing homosexual; not merely
one or two.

Now, Randy Engel did establish the fact that Wuerldid have a nexus with Pitts-
burgh's homosexual world, and according to other sources, Wuerl really was
called Donna while in the Pittsburgh area.  It is even alleged that Donna is what
seminarians called him.   In fact, insiders of the Washington archdiocese have
been witnessed calling him Wuerl the Girl.

Now, Wuerl carrying an effeminate demeanor off camera, with stereotypical
effeminate mannerisms, was alleged by more than one person.  For example,
in a church basement, when only church volunteers were in the kitchen, Wuerl
was allegedly seen acting like the stereotypical "flaming fairy" all of a sudden.
The phrase used was "acting girly."

And he is very short, even though he finagles camera shots to make him look
much taller than he is.  Heightwise, he came up to my chest, at best.  Plus, the
Washington Post called him a sleight man, in describing how surprisingly tiny
he is, when comparing the reality of meeting him in person with the fabricated
photo ops which included him standing on a step that was hidden behind a
limo, while he shook hands with people on ground-level.

Biennial Soirees for the Rich and Influential

While he was the bishop of Pittsburgh, Wuerl would hold a soireƩ at his Warwick
Terrace manor house twice a year, where he would play host to the influential and
wealthy.  Seminarians & deacons would dress in green/blue blazers, park the cars
of the influential guests and also serve them hors d'oeuvres.  This means that Wuerl
had men dedicated to the service of God play the role of secular valets and waiters.
It was very worldly, to say the least.  None the less, Wuerl would meet the
influential people at the door, himself.  He would play the role of porter ...
... the door man.  He absolutely needed their protection, to get him through
all of his corruption.  He was in need of accomplices.

The biennial Warwick Terrace event was surmised/presumed as having been
Wuerl's way of getting the rich and powerful to protect him in every aspect of
life.  I personally witnessed how protected Wuerl was when Father Torquato's
accuser and I attempted to file Summary Offense charges against Wuerl and
Torquato.  Shortly after, we found ourselves caught in the midst of the second
wave of the Torquato Retaliations.

http://www.donaldwuerl.com/2013/06/torquato.html

According to Fr. Sotak's accuser, Wuerl would give inordinate attention to the
rich and powerful, while treating the common citizen with dismissive elitist con-
tempt.  That is to say, Wuerl cow-towed to the powerful of society.  I personal-
ly witnessed this haughty elitist contemptuousness.  While it was occurring, Wuerl
resembled a certain theater major at a college I attended.  The theater major, as
tiny as Donald Wuerl, was found to have been engaged in an affair with a certain
lieutenant governor's son ... NOT of the State of Pennsylvania, though.

David Zubik (present bishop of Pittsburgh) was involved in the case, and the
credible accuser/seminarian/deacon alleged that Zubik expressly told him that
he regarded both "the assailed victim and the {predatory} priest as victims."

The credible accuser mentioned that a John Sweeney told him that he "better
not tell anyone" about his accusations against the priest in question or the
diocese in general.

The Sandusky revelations seems to have given a number of abuse victims a
sense of freedom in the State of Pennsylvania.  The sense of intimidation im-
posed upon Pennsylvania victims/accusers departed like wheat chaff in a
wind storm, as soon as the Penn State Scandal came to the fore.
________________________________________________________

Concerning the other two bishops, keep in mind that Vincent Leonard and
Anthony Bevilacqua provided the credible accuser with zero interference.
He was only in emotional turmoil during Wuerl's tenure.  He only left the
ministry, on account of Wuerl's administrators.  There was no other reason.
_________________________________________________________