I NEVER google my name, and therefore, I NEVER seek to read anything written
by Diane Thompson, aka Diana Mangum, aka the mother of one Frank Labiaux.
However, I get an email here and an email there, informing me that a close friend
here or an aloof acquaintance there was contacted by the same Diane Thompson,
aka Mangum, on the subject of me. Thompson took my posts and instantly post-
ed on her blogs. She obsessively scoured through my sites and even photography.
It renders me in a very creepy feeling. I literally feel the feeling of being stalked.
After all, stalking if the act to hunt someone down with the purpose of harming
that person, and Thompson has repeatedly been trying to have me destroyed.
None the less, I only discovered on the weekend of September 23/24 that a public
offer dated July 29, 2017 and which was not posted until September 10, 2017, was
made by Diane Thompson/Mangum. The offer was for me to finally speak with
her sons, Frank and Tucker, after all of my years of publicly asking their where-
abouts. Thompson also mentioned that there are lawyers ready to file a lawsuit
against me. Yet, I have yet to get a demand letter from any law firm. Such a
thing comes before a lawsuit, in the attempt to prevent a lawsuit.
None the less, concerning this public offer, IF there really does exist the pages
(122 of them) of a February 1993 deposition of Diane Thompson in the Timothy
Bendig lawsuit against Anthony Cipolla, et. al., then I demand to read a copy of
the 122 pages of testimony spoken by Diane Thompson. If she were able to post
the first two intro pages, thereby proving that Mrs. Randy Engel wrote another
falsehood in claiming that the Diane Thompson deposition was video taped, then
why did Thompson not post sample pages of her testimony?
FURTHERMORE, Randy Engel, herself, said that there was only ONE remain-
ing piece of evidence in the case. Thus, she deduced that there was no deposi-
tion of Diane Thompson to be sought, out of inference. Then suddenly, there
existed a Diane Thompson deposition. Now, Bendig's attorney, Douglas Yaug-
er did say to the press that he found the 1978 accuser of Cipolla and would
have liked to have used her, for ever it was worth. Thus, he stated that it did
not have any great value.
Concerning the offer to finally talk to Thompson's sons:
This is curious, being that I located retired officer Mark Ninehouser & was definitive-
ly told by him that he NEVER arrested Cipolla and had nothing to do with the very
short-lived Cipolla case after Mark took Diane Thompson's statement and then hand-
printed his report, followed by him giving the report to the detectives, being that he
was not a detective at the time, as Mrs Randy Engel claimed.
This invitation of me finally talking to Thompson's two sons is additionally curious,
being that Randy Engel's description of Cipolla's post-arrest retaliations and of DA
Bob Colville's strong-arming of Diane Thompson could not have occurred, being
that Mark Ninehouser assured me personally that he NEVER arrested Cipolla, as
Randy Engel's Nov 2016 article claimed.
This is even more curious, being that it was 100% discovered that the Fire Extin-
guisher vandalism committed upon a Pittsburgh Black Methodist was NOT com-
mitted by Frank and a buddy in 1978, but by two juvenile delinquents who would
later slash all of tires of all of the cars in the parking lot of the same Black Metho-
dist Church. Thus, Diane Thompson would know I would know that I would be
talking to a proven liar when talking to Frank Labiaux.
Now, I never contact Diane Thompson, so that she will not get the opportunity to
lie about whatever I will have said. I also refrain from contacting her, so that I will
not come under Florida jurisdiction for any communication sent to Florida. Thus, I
am hereby publicly stating the following in the cybersphere, hypothetically.
In order for me to talk with the sons of Diane Thompson . . . and tomher daughter ...
and to all others who were interviewed by the Mrs Randy Engel who intended to
tell you all that I was a fraud only pretending to be in the construction industry:
I must first be contacted ONLY by those alleged attorneys whom are said to ex-
ist and who are said to be ready to sue me. Again, I will NOT speak with Diane
Thompson, so that she will not have the opportunity to lie about what I will have
said. This is the same reason why I will NOT speak with the Tim Bendig who
telephoned me out of the blue, after a Hollywood person betrayed my telephone
number and who proceeded to lie to me four times in a row, after almost conning
me into believing that Cipolla was a monster.
Now, the two sons, Frank and Tucker, must provide identification proof, so that
I will know that I will be talking to them and not to a frau. Furthermore, I must
talk to each one individually, but during the same session, so that they will NOT
have the opportunity to rig-up a storyline, based on the first son's conversation
The proof of the two gentlemen's existence must be shown to be by any of the
allegedly-existing attorneys whom Thompson claims are ready to file a lawsuit
against me, even though NO ATTORNEY has sent me any pre-lawsuit demand
So, if you attorneys do exist and if you are looking for a mailing address to where
to send your demand letter, call me and I will give you the address. I do NOT pub-
licly give a Chicago address for the sake of others here. I went through enough
Hell in Pittsburgh. I am not going to let people be caught in the crossfire here,
Furthermore, if anyone calls to threaten me . . . yet again in my life ... then
it's game on.
There will be no talking over the phone, being that I will not be sure if I am
talking to a son of Diane Thompson or to an impostor ... or or or if they are
being coached during the conversation.
Moreover, we will NOT speak in the State of Florida. Quite frankly, I do not
know where the two gentlemen are located.
None the less, life being what it is, and God being as providential as God is,
talking to Tucker and Frank and others who spoke with Mrs Randy Engel is
inevitable, unless there comes a severe natural disaster, astrological gamma
ray burst, war, famine, riot, pestilence, etc.
Diane Thompson claims that she has the advice of attorneys who are work-
ing on a lawsuit against, even though I have yet to get a demand letter. So,
have the attorneys contact me NOW. Let's get things underway.
Meanwhile, if Cipolla is such a egregious serial molester, then how do you
explain the following DA report? None the less, if you were molested by
Cipolla, then let me know, provided that you are not related to one Diane
Thompson-Mangum. If you were not molested by him, yet where in private
settings with him, knowledge of this is also invaluable.
If Donald Wuerl really believed that Cipolla were a molester, then he would
have sent a letter to all people in Anthony Cipolla's former parishes and in the
Dormant area youth group, as well as to the Oakland N.J. youth group. Wuerl
did this in the case of John Hoehl, thereby showing that Wuerl knew that Hoehl
was an abuser. He did NOWT do this in the case of Anthony Cipolla. Wuerl
let Cipolla be made into a monster in the press/media. Yet, Wuerl did NOT
send out the letters that he did in the case of John Hoehl.
Let's get everything in the open, including Wuerl's alleged personal relationship
with the late congressman, Bill "abortion" Coyne. If Wuerl is a lover of truth,
then he will comply. None the less, where are these Diane Thompson lawyers?
Let's communicate NOW.