of it go as follows, pursuant to the keywords, "Did Donald Wuerl ever have
Each of the first THIRTY search engine results were articles found at the new
edition of the Wuerlgate site ... at www.donaldwuerl.com. Twenty-nine of
those articles were written by yours truly. The Wuerlgate site had a monopoly
on the first three Google pages.
Snapshots of the first three Google pages of June 16, 2014 are posted below.
Consuming the first three pages of Google, of course, is like bowling a 300 or
evenpitching a perfect game; especially after having been threatened with the
usual forms of punishment known to civil society, for not removing said Wuerl-
gate articles from the internet. Well, none of the Wuerlgate articles have ever
been banned from the internet. Thus, those threats were as empty as are the
Wuerl People. Meanwhile, the Wuerl People continue to bumble and mumble.
The conflict of interest on the part of the Wuerl People, as in who signs
Concerning this, keep in mind that there's a conflict of interest, and therefore
dishonest bias, when one of today's so-called Catholic newspapers presents
an article about Cardinal Wuerl which makes him sound more immaculate than
the Virgin Mary, more miraculous than Christ, more chosen than Saint Peter,
and more divine than Bette Midler.
The fatal error in today's Catholic newspaper staffs is that they obsessively de-
fend a bishop here and another one there, instead of defending the office of
bishop, per se. Sometimes, you have to defend the office of bishop from a
corrupt bishop who needs to be removed from the power he is abusing.
Wuerl is a sign of our times ... of the evil times of the Catholic Church ... of
Dignity Mass Don ... the pillow mint cardinal who even green-lighted even a
retaliation against school children, on account of their parents protesting against
Wuerl on a local TV newscast.
Those who want Cardinal Donald Wuerl removed are like baseball fans
of a last place team
Simply because a baseball expert wants his favorite team's manager fired, it does
NOT make him anti-baseball. It simply makes him a man who wants better base-
ball in his locale. In a similar fashion, simply because there are a number of people
who want Wuerl removed from office, it does NOT make them anti-Catholic. It
makes them people who want much better Catholicism in the United States.
These people would only be anti-Catholic is they wanted to destroy the office of
bishop, per se. They want the office kept. They simply don't want any Donald
Wuerl type in any bishop's office. These people simply want a decent man in the
seat that was given to Wuerl by the former Hitler Youth known for his papacy of
chronyism, where corruption ran rampant. Keep in mind that Wuerl was placed
into power by the German pope who caused an alarming number of Germans to
leave the Catholic Church, because of his corruption.
Why be an accomplice to the Donald Wuerl Liar's Club?
I received word in late May of 2014 that pivotal witnesses involved in a certain
private investigator's pro bono work are allegedly reluctant to come forth and
reveal pertinent things about Donald Wuerl, in fear of being sued for Libel or
even False Light (which is the act of taking things out of context to the point
of defamation.) Actually, the first thing that will be done is the attempt to de-
stroy the credibility of the newly emerged witnesses. None the less, take note
In the past seven years, after all of the things I stated about 1} Cardinal Wuerl,
2} the reputed liar Tim Bendig who attempted his intimidation tactic con game
upon me, 3} the Diane Thompson who was repeatedly caught lying via fact
checking, 4} the Fr. James Torquato who literally endangered people during
his first series of whistle-blower retaliations, 5}, the pathetically sophomoric
Ann Rodgers, 6} and the Bishop Edward Burns who was in charge of the
Torquato investigation while I was undergoing the Torquato Retaliations ...
... nobody ever sued me. In fact, none of the aforementioned persons even
sent pit bull attorneys after me. As the snapshot evidence below shows, if
the Wuerl People ... and/or the liar Tim Bendig ... tried to get my writings
and Jpeg evidence removed, they hideously failed in the attempt to do so.
So, why should you fear, if you are one of the witnesses holding us done
like lead weights, by remaining silent?
Now, how often does one website consume the first three pages of Google,
pursuant to the same one set of keywords ... and how often does one do so
without spending as much as a dollar in promoting it? It was put online and
left to be. No money was spent to flash the site in anyone's face, as is the case
with the ads pertaining to the sale of Donald Wuerl products. Yet, this Wuerl-
gate site was brought front & center to the Google, Yahoo, Bing, Lycos, and
Hotbot surface, as well as almost every other general search engine.
Whereas Ann Rodgers was paid for writing things found to have been false
via fact checking, those people who contributed to this site's contents, in all
of its displayed evidence, in all of its timeline chronicling, in all of its archive
research, and in all of its witness corroboration, was done entirely for free,
by yours truly.
Without further ado, here are the June 16, 2014 Google results pursuant to,
Did Donald Wuerl ever have a cover-up?
About 10,900 results