December 26, 2016

New Randy Engel Article: Fact-checked falsehoods w/ many contradictions of Accuser Diane Thompson's past testimony

Pittsburgh:  Where Wuerl severely abused his position.
I was alerted to the existence of a November 2016 article by Randy Engel
where within she claimed to have interviewed one of Diane Thompson's
two sons.  It would sound like a trustworthy article consisting of true alle-
gations.  However, the article is filled with many contradictions of Diane
Thompson's past accusations, and it contained new allegations which were
fact-checked and proven false.  The allegations of criminal procedure do
NOT correlate with the actual Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.

In order to cut to the chase and give examples of the falsehoods which appear
in the November 2016 Engel article, it was alleged by Diane Thompson that
she had to pay a $45 admission fee, in order for her eldest son, Frank, to go
to the Michigan summer camp that was held on the seminary grounds of the
Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions.  She made herself out to be the har-
rowed and heavily burdened martyr who had to sacrifice greatly, to pay the
$45 admittance fee.

NEWSFLASH:  I am in contact with a family who has two sons who were 
in Cipolla's company very often.  One of the two gentlemen attended the 
exact same Michigan seminary summer camp as did Diane Thompson's
eldest son, though in a different year.  This particular youth traveled to
Michigan with the Tim Bendig who claimed to have been molested by Ci-
polla for consecutive years.   According to that gentlemen and his mom,  
they did NOT have to pay any $45 fee.  Diane Thompson lied yet again.

Furthermore, the gentleman said that NOTHING suspicious between
Cipolla and Bendig was ever observed by him.  However, he did say,
"Tim was weird.   Really weird."

Incidentally, it was easy to tell that the heavily damning Engel article of Nov-
ember 2016 was extremely negligent in fact-checking and proof-reading, be-
cause, in the article, mention is made of "Jim Bendig" and NOT Tim Bendig.
Yet, she said that she interviewed Frank, one of Diane Thompson's sons, mak-
ing the article sound like the end-all of all Cipolla articles.

This is my question:  Why would Frank never telephone me and talk?  My
phone number has been well posted in a number of places and I kept asking
to be put into contact with Tucker and Frank.  What actually was spoken be-
tween the two people.

Plus:  Why did not Engel post a transcript of the interview?

As an example of how the Engel article contradicts the allegations of Diane
Thompson in the October 13, 1995 Pittsburgh Post Gazette article that at-
tacks Cipolla's character to the depths:

IN the October 1995 Pittsburgh Post Gazette article, Thompson stated that
she had TWO daughters in a "first marriage" and TWO sons in a "second
marriage."  IN the Nov 2016 Engel article, Thompson claimed to have three
sons and one daughter, and that Tucker Thompson and Frank Labieaux had
different dads.  According to her in 1995, Frank and tucker had the same

More Fact-checked lies:

Engel stated that Cipolla was taken to Police Station #9, in the North Side
of Pittsburgh, thereby being officially arrested and then released by the
police on his own cognizance, where he was to wait for his arraignment.

Firstly, a person is only released on his own cognizance by a judge at the
person's arraignment.  The arraignment is simply the bail hearing where
it's surmised if the defendant is 1} a flight risk, 2} a danger, 3} no physical
threat, etc.  When you are officially arrested, you are held overnight, and
then sent to your arraignment, pronto.   You don't go home and wait for
arraignment, BECAUSE the arraignment is the official assessment that
sees if you are going to go home after you are formerly charged with a
crime, in the first place.

Secondly, there are only SIX police zones in Pittsburgh.  The North Side
of Pittsburgh is Zone #1 ... not #9. 

Now, in Pittsburgh Police history,  Police Station #9 was/is located on Mount
Washington, in the South Side of Pittsburgh, and NOT on the North Side of
Pittsburgh, as Randy Engel claimed.

PLUS, PLUS, PLUS:  Engel stated that there was one piece of evidence that
remained in the Diane Thompson case.  It was the Offense/Incidence Report,
signed by a couple detectives.  Uhhhhm,  ladies and gentlemen, that is NOT
evidence.  That is the PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FORM as was
used in the 1970s.  

It was NOT the police officer's or detective's affidavit.  Proof consists in the 
fact that, at the bottom of the form, there is a block subheaded with the words, 
"approved by," followed by the words, "badge no."  This means that however
signed it interviewed the person who made the private complaint and that the
complainant described behavior that is recognized as criminal in the state of
Pennsylvania.  Keep in mind that, some wrongs are regarded as "tort offenses"
and belong in civil court.  Plus, other accusations are petty.  All in all, the pri-
vate crminal complaint filing has a screening feature to it.  I know this to be
true, because I went through the process and couple of times.

Once again, the thing which Randy Engel falsely called evidence was nothing
more than the private criminal complaint form.  In fact, it contains blocks
were the private citizen writes in the witnesses to the wrongs done.

Cipolla was NEVER arrested or charged.  He was merely served a Summary 
Notice signed by Diane Thompson which instructed him to show up in City 
Court for a MOTIONS HEARING ... aka "Probable Cause Hearing" as part 
of a private citizen's private criminal complaint, where Thompson was requir-
ed to show due cause as to why the presiding judge was to "Issue Process" 
and have Cipolla officially indicted and then arraigned.  Diane Thompson 
withdrew her private criminal complaint shortly before the Motions Hearing.  
Anthony Cipolla was NEVER in handcuffs.

The falsehoods and contradictions go on and on and on and on, in the November
2016 Engel article.  It severely contradicted the 1995 article that the Pittsburgh
Post Gazette published on the subject.  It was the article where Diane Thompson
was quoted as having alleged overly-theatrical things, while keeping Thompson's
name confidential.

The November 2016 article attributed to Randy Engel was at variance, in pertinent
part, with Diane Thompson's own 2015 & 2016 web log posts, as well.  It was also
different, in specific part, from the narration that Thompson gave to a certain per-
son who asked to be kept in anonymity.

The article was also at variance, in part, with the contents of the harassing, rude, and
derisive emails that Thompson sent to me in 2015.  I was compelled to block her in
short order, being that she was so podunk-trash-crass and intrusive.  The woman has
no temperance, to say the least.

Now, every time Thompson speaks to someone new, she tells a new and amended
story about Cipolla and her family.  Cipolla, on the other hand, told the same story,
inserting the same names, over and over.  It had gotten to the point where Cipolla
would tell me the same story, and I would start reciting it word-for-word.  He re-
sponded once by saying, "I'm trying to talk here," upon which I realized that he
kept telling me the same set of stories for the sake of emotional release.


Thompson said to a Pittsburgh Post Gazette journalist in 1995 that then-Bishop
Vincent Leonard instilled a sense of guilt in Diane Thompson for filing what
the Post Gazette in 1978 stated was a Summary Notice and what the 1995 Post
Gazette stated was the "filing of criminal charges."  Thompson said that Vincent
Leonard said that the Church had just lost two popes and her suffering greatly.
Well, the second pope to die in 1978 wasn't even elected pope yet.  This proved
Diane Thompson to be a liar.

Well, in the 2016 Randy Engel article, it is alleged that Bishop Leonard only
pointed out the one death of Paul VI.  Thus, Thompson changed her story yet

In addition, it was proven that the Vatican Case against Cipolla only dealt
with his diagnosis of Depression & Suicidal Tendencies, given by a doctor
of St. Luke's in Maryland.  It was a Psychic Defect case and did NOT cover

Plus, Ann Rodgers of the Post Gazette stated that Wuerl went to Rome with
a Police Arrest Report in his brief case.  In fact, Diane Thompson said that
Attorney Douglas Yauger showed up at her Florida home within 24 hours
of having been contacted by her to take the report.  Well, no such thing
exists and Cipolla was not arrested, as his 2014 security clearance shows.

Then, in the 2016 Engel article, it was stated that Thompson was given a
Department of Police Offense/Incidence Report.  Oh finally.  Such a thing
IS the private criminal complaint and that one does contain the badge num-
ber of the approving officer who received it.  It also contains the names
and addresses of witnesses.  This is what I was talking about, all along.
Such a thing is NOT an indictment.  It is NOT a police arrest report.

Engel then wrote that the detectives drove to the home of Diane Thompson
and gave her a copy of it, saying that she might need it one day.  That is
possible.  Why did the Post Gazette and Diane Thompson go for decades
never mentioning the existence of this thing.  This is filed at a magistrate's
office.  I filed such a thing.

In my personal experience, shortly after filing it, two detectives interview
you.  Now, police officers without the need of the civilian complainant
can file on the accused.

In addition, Engel wrote that the DA, in coaxing Diane Thompson to drop
charges which were NOT yet filed, had her sign a sheet of paper which
would help Cipolla expunge the case.  The accuser has nothing to do with
an expungement.  The DA does ... the prosecutor does.  If she did sign a
sheet of paper enabling an expungement, then it was because she was in
the place of the prosecutor ... and that means that she filed a private crim-
inal complaint.  Most arrests consist if police officers filing complaints or
affidavit.  Prosecution via private complaint is very rare.

Engel said that Frank only said that he felt remorse for not telling his mom
that he was molested in Michigan.  How was he molested?  Why is it that
I have a witness who went to the same Michigan seminary for a summer-
time retreat and he was not harassed or abused by Cipolla, n any capacity? 

Why did Diane Thompson repeatedly change her story and spend most of
her time mocking and belittling me?  None the less, a lot of her testimony
contradicts the Rules of PA Criminal Procedure and known fact at the time.

What did Frank say?  Where is Tucker?  Why did Bendig lie to me four
times in a row?  Why did Bendig not accuse Cipolla until Cipolla said to
Padre Pio Prayer Group members to stop sending Bendig money?
Why wasn't Diane Thompson mature enough to show her private crimi-
nal complaint, aka Offense/Incidence Report?  I said long ago that she
only filed a private criminal complaint, and not charges.  But, she had
to be so bratty about it, in her writings.  Plus, she did not say that Tuck-
er and Frank gave video taped depositions.  None the less, there were
no depositions of the two males in the Bendig deposition package that
I know of.  Which Conte lawyer went to the Florida depositions? 

Why was there no clarity and why is there still no clarity.  There still are
many contradictions and fact-checked falsehoods present.  After all, ever
since 1939, Police Station #9 was on Mount Washington and NOT in the
North Side where jurisdiction would exist in the Cipolla Case.  What is
going-on here?

All in all,  concerning the four main Thompson Stories (the one told to the
Pittsburgh Post Gazette --- the one told in Thompson's own web log posts ---
--- the one that she told to the anonymous person who sent me digital evidence
of that which she alleged --- and the story told to the person presenting herself
as Randy Engel:

Either all four accounts are falsehoods or three of the four accounts are falsehoods.
Plus, there were new allegations in the Engel article that were never mentioned by
Thompson before, and which necessitated me to call Pittsburgh witnesses pronto.

Likewise, allegations made by her via web log and via the Pittsburgh Post Gazette
did NOT appear in Engel's article.  Thus, Thompson continues to change her story,
adding some allegations while leaving-out other ones.  In as much, the first sign of
a liar is habitual story-changing.
It's a sin to bear false witness.
Incidentally:  According to the new Engel article that damns Anthony Cipolla
to the depths of Hell. young Frank called Diane Thompson from Florida, after
the Cipolla/Bendig news hit the papers and radio airwaves.  Diane claimed to
Engel that Frank told her from Florida that Cipolla performed certain graphic
obscenities upon him that sound grotesque and which are NOT common inter-
ests for pedophiles.  She claimed that Frank took flight to Florida before the
news hit the papers.   HOWEVER:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Diane Thompson alleged to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette journalist who inter-
viewed her that, when she was on the telephone getting an operator to connect
her to the Pittsbuirgh police,  she called out to Frank  in the Pittsburgh home
where she was staying, and shouted, "Did he do anything to you?"  She then
claimed that Frank said that Cipolla fondled him.   Got it?   Different stories.
Thompson told one person that Frank was home with her.  She told a differ-
ent person that Frank was in Florida.  Two stories mean one liar.

PLUS PLUS PLUS:  Diane Thompson told Randy Engel that she had three
sons and one daughter.  She stated that Frank was the eldest and had a dad
different than did Tucker.  HOWEVER::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The same Diane Thompson told the Pittsburgh Post Gazette journalist that
she had TWO daughters in her "first marriage," and TWO sons in her "se-
cond marriage."  Got it?  Two different stories.  She said that Frank and
Tucker had the same dad.  I then pointed out that Frank and Tucker have
two different last names and therefore two different dads.  So, Thompson
then changed her story.

NOT TO MENTION:  The writer identifying herself as Randy Engel stated
that Thompson alleged that, after Cipolla was "criminally charged,"  (he was
never charged) he showed-up at the back door  of her home, while Tucker was
doing his homework, followed by Tucker running away, screaming, "Mom!"

Thompson told the Pittsburgh Post Gazette that, after Cipolla was "arrested,"
(he never was) he appeared at the front door, upon which Tucker ran up stairs,
saying, "Ooooooh no.  We are all going to Hell, now."

Pertinent Point:  If Cipolla were arrested and let free on bond or on his own
cognizance, there would have been a "condition for bail" where he would
have been ordered to stay away from Tucker.  If Cipolla did what Thomp-
son claimed, then Cipolla would have had his bond revoked and he would
have been thrown in jail to stay throughout the duration of the case.

For the record:  Cipolla was only served with a SUMMARY NOTICE that
was only signed by Diane Thompson, telling him to appear in city at a fu-
ture date of exactly or approximately 28 days hence.  He was NEVER tak-
en down to any police station in handcuffs, as the Engel article falsely

HOWEVER:  Engel stated that Cipolla was arraigned at Police Station #1.
That kind of thing does happen, and the North Side is #1 in city nomencla-
ture.  But, Cipolla was only told to appear at city court on August 28, as
a part of a private criminal complaint.

That which happens today is that a private citizen files a private complaint
at a magistrate's office and the DA assigns an assistant DA to investigate it.
The DA investigates to see if there is any merit in "issuing process" against
the accused which consists in fingerprinting, mugshotting, arraignment, etc.
The assistant DA send approval or non-approval back to the magistrate's of-
fice.  If the assistant Da approves the complaint, the accused goes through
due process of the law.  If not, then the filer of the private criminal complaint
has the option of filing in the Court of Common Pleas, petitioning the court
to review the petition.

In the Diane Thompson case, Cipolla was to appear in city court ... not Police
Station #1, for a motions hearing.  Thompson withdrew her complaint before
the August 28 date.  Randy Engel's article does NOT concur with the Pennsyl-
vania Rules of Criminal Procedure.  Plus, she did not post a transcript with the
person whom she interviewed whom she identified as Frank Labieaux.

The Engel article made it sound as if the only person who can file charges against
a wrongdoer is the victim.  This only exists in civil court where lawsuits are filed,
and such a rule is known as Article III Standing.  This is in the United States con-
stitution and pertains to "redressing grievances," aka civil complaints.  No matter
how convincing the Engel article appears, its description of the procedure of law
is very much at variance with actual Pennsylvania law.

Did she actually contact Detectives Fogl and Nehouser 38 years after the fact?
Are they still alive?  There are many things decisively wrong with the Engel
LET US NOT FORGOT THAT:  Diane Thompson told the Pittsburgh Post
Gazette that she took her two sons with her to Cleveland immediately after the
"arrest" and retaliation against her  (Cipolla was never arrested).  HOWEVER:

Thompson told Randy Engel that her eldest son (Frank) took refuge in Florida,
while young Tucker and her stayed in Pittsburgh.  Got it?  Different stories.

IN ADDITION:  Thompson claimed in her web log posts that Attorney Doug-
las Yauger flew to Florida and knocked on her door within 24 hours of having
been contacted by her, and then took from her "a police arrest report."  Well,
no such thing exists.  Plus, it is 100% proven that Cipolla was never arrested,
evidenced by the Summary Notice served upon him.
None the less, Thompson then stated that her two sons gave depositions on
Merritt's Island, for the Bendig lawsuit, as if they were too young to travel
with her to Pittsburgh.  They were full-grown adults at the time.

I pointed out that the entire package of deposition transcripts in the Tim Bendig
Lawsuit were located and that there was no Diane Thompson deposition in the
docket.  This fact was not acknowledged by Randy who actually reported that
Yauger showed up at Diane Thompson's home in haste, to take something other
than the very fictitious police arrest report.  None the less, Randy added a twist
to the story.  She claimed that Thompson's deposition was videotaped and that
this is why there was no deposition transcript in the Bendig package.  There is
one confounding feature to this claim which invalidates Thompson's claim.
And that is this::::::::::::::::::::

All depositions MUST have present an attorney for the defendant, so that the
attorney can be given a chance to "impeach the witness' testimony."  So, who
from the Conte law firm went to Florida on short notice?  Thompson made it
sound of if the two lads were alone with a Merrit's Island lawyer.  A Conte
law team lawyer was required to be there. 

PLUS ... according to the rules of discovery, a copy of the video tape had to be
given to the defense attorneys. None were.  Thompson lied.
Liar, liar.  Your soul in on fire.  

Concerning Thompson's claim of a police arrest report and something now obsolete
which was called

I do legal work for a construction company & am familiar with the court system

I am very much familiar with the aforesaid things, because I am in construction and
we get robbed from time to time.  We were even the victims of check forgery, aka
bank fraud in 2016.  I am the one in the company who had to go downtown to get a
copy of this type of thing.  I am the one in the company who files all legal proceed-
ings, including the mechanics' lien that we put on a Wyndham Hotel, various writs
of execution, civil complaints, etc.  I have even authored a handful of United States
Supreme Court briefs.  I can assure you that whoever wrote that November 2016
article knows NOTHING about American law.  Diane Thompson lied from A to Z
in her narration of an arrest which never occurred and the various acts of the DA's
office, the police, detectives, etc.  It was ALL bull crap.

In continuing, the article attributed to the writing skills of Randy Engel declared
that Diane Thompson called the detective at "Police Station #9."  Ladies and Gen-
tlemen, the detectives are NOT located at the police stations.  They were recognize-
ed as a bureau in itself.  They have their own office and processing area.  I was there.
I know this personally, being that I am in construction, we get robbed from time to
time, and I am the one instructed to contact the one detective assigned to each case.
It appears that Diane Thompson watched too many Barney Miller Episodes.

You might also find detectives at a magistrate's office interviewing a person who
filed a private criminal complaint.

One more thing, Thompson declared to Randy Engel and to the Post Gazette that
two detectives were involved.  Uhhhm, from my personal experience with police
investigations, only ONE detective is assigned to a case.  It appears that Diane
Thompson watched too many episodes of Starsky & Hutch.

The only way two detectives will approach you is right after you file a private
criminal complaint at a magistrate's office.  The two detectives do a screening
of the complainant.  I know this from person experience.  I was interviewed by
two detectives immediately after I filed a private criminal complaint.

I can go on and on and on, enumerating blatant falsehood after blatant falsehood
in the Nov 2016 article attributed to Randy Engel.  But remember, I'm in construc-
tion and I am in Chicago, starting a new life, all the while heavily impeded by an
allergic asthma condition.  Therefore, time is NOT a luxury for me.  

Plus, I became significantly injured on Nov 30 when my ladder slid out from under
me and a square metal tube rudely introduced itself to the right side of my body, fol-
lowed by my left hand reaching out in a reflex action, to hold on to that same tube,
lest the bodily damage become paramount at the hands of gravity, making the acci-
dent and film-at-eleven newsworthy.  This means during and after work, as well as
when I wake-up, I'll be negotiating pain for the next six to eight weeks  In fact, I
typed this post in a noteable amount of physical pain.  None the less:
I will add example after example, to show you what a farce the November 2016
article is.  I will also seek to talk to the Cipolla family about a libel lawsuit.  At
present, I gave you perhaps enough examples to assure you that Randy Engel now
has no more credibility than a raving psychotic trying to ram her square mind into
a very round hole.  Plus plus plus, I have already posted a number of writings on
the falsehoods and contradictions and story-changes in Diane Thompson's public
accusation against Cipolla.  It's amazing how people in Pennsylvania who present
themselves as alert, enlightened, and studious know NOTHING about the Penn-
sylvania rules of criminal procedure.   I will be adding more when time allows.

For now, when and if you reading Engel's damning account, say the following:
"Okay.  Where is the evidence?  Where are the documents?  Police Station #9
is a blatant falsehood.  Cipolla being taken to Police Station #9 in handcuffs
and being charged, followed by him being released on his own cognizance
is a proven falsehood due to the Summary Notice which was NOT an arrest
warrant and the fact that only a judge at arraignment can have a defendant
released on his own cognizance.

FURTHERMORE:  No one arrested for a violent crime inflicted on a human
get released on his own cognizance.

MOREOVER:  You, the reader, would find it expected that I know what it is
to interview for consecutive hours a pedophile, learning about his preferences
in sexually abusively behavior.  Well, I most certain know what it is to talk to
a non-priest (non-clergy-member) pedophile for hours at a time, as well as sex
abuse victims for shortly durations of  time.  In as much, there is only one of
two things that a pedophile yearns to first do to a victim.   Randy Engel failed
to mention either one of the two things.  Diane Thompson failed to mention
one of the two things.  For someone who has the experience that I have in this
tragic topic, that fact was a huge give-away that Engel was writing a script of
lies.  All things are in a pattern.

Incidentally, I will not tell anyone what those two things are, so that I can test
a person who claims to have been a sex abuse victim.  If that person does not
mention one of those two things as the first thing that happened to him, and if
two certain other features are missing, then I know that the person is lying.
It's still a sin to lie ... to bear fale witness.
That' why there exists eternal damnation.
PLUS, two individuals who personally knew Cipolla promised to finish detailed
affidavits (eyewitness accounts) in defense of Cipolla.  One of the witnesses did
go to Michigan with Cipolla and Bendig, to the exact same retreat place where
Diane Thompson claimed her son, Frank, was molested.  This witness stated
that he saw no offensive, predatory, or suggestive behavior coming from the
many formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla.

Ironically enough, the other witness spent decades involved with helping Downs
Syndrome children and she was outraged at Randy Engel.

For those unfamiliar, Engel founded an organization for Down Syndrome's pa-
tients.  That second witness does NOT feel solidarity with Engel, even though
they both were in the same medical field of endeavor for years.

Part III

In Part III, Engel damned former bishop, Vincent Leonard, claiming that he did
NOT petition for the laicization (the defrocking) of the sodomite priest Richard
Ginder.  Wooooo.  Time out here.  Bishop Vincent Leonard revoked all priestly
faculties from Richard Ginder.  Vincent Leonard kicked Ginder out of the priest-
hood ministry.  Period.  Richard Ginder was already ousted, when he was arrest-
ed in 1978.  In 1978, Ginder was arrested as a private citizen and NOT as a Pitts-
burgh diocesan priest.  He was fired from that job by Leonard.  Therefore, Engel
owes Vincent Leonard restitution for damning him.

Part III is Engel's outline of corrupted and protected priests in the diocese of Pitts-
burgh.  The ultimate hypocrisy of that woman is that she ignored the Father James
Torquato Retaliations.  That case has the most hard-copy evidence of them all.
Dozen of pieces of Torquato evidence can be posted online in minutes.  Yet, she
acted as if Torquato never performed any invasive homosexual harassment and
whistle-blower retaliations.  Engel writes selectively.  That is the sign of a per-
son not seeking truth for the sake of the God of Truth.

Libel in Pennsylvania

That whole article was in-your-face hatred in its syntax and ambiance.  It was very
hateful and embarrassingly non-factual.  No evidence means no Free Card.  Randy
Engel committed libel against the religious order known as the Pontifical Institute
of Foreign Missions.  She committed easily provable libel against the then-DA of
Allegheny County, as well as the one in Beaver County during the Bendig years,
and the Cipolla family name, in addition to the administrators of the McGuire
Home. and the Pittsburgh diocesan seminary.

Oh, by the way, did you ever wonder if a deceased man's estate can sue someone
for publicly defaming that person after his death?  Stay tuned and find out.

In addition, I personally knew some of the Pittsburgh diocesan seminarians and
can assure you that they were NOT Sodomites looking for sexy sex action at the
seminary.  As I stated long ago, the sex scandal comprises an inner circle within
a seminary and which is supported by the top of the chain of command.  It's a mat-
ter of an inner-circle and NOT something inclusive.

Randy Engel made it sound as if all seminarians were "getting it on" between
classes.  Well, I do know for a fact that there was one seminarian knocking on
dormitory doors, looking for Sodomy encounters and he was kicked-out of the
Pittsburgh seminary for doing so.  That kind of behavior was NOT protected at
the Pittsburgh seminary.  It was punished.  Randy Engel goes overboard with her
damning accusations.  she needs to be put in her place.

None the less, the statute of limitations for libel, slander, defamation, and some-
thing known as "Invasion of Privacy in a False Light' is one year.  Someone is in
dire need to make retractions or to consult with attorneys.  The countdown began
in November 2016.

Chicago, My Unexpected Destiny

Now, as I stated, I'm in Chicago, restarting life.  I have a massive agenda up here.
So, it might take some time for me to get the full outline of the true Cipolla case
done for you.    None the less, I will write one step at a time.  Even at that, the
examples above should tremendously help you realize that Donald Wuerl be-
came a star by means of an extreme misrepresentation.  Plus, it shows that
Randy Engel is not at all trustworthy.  She's NOT a viable source.

Take note that there were no interviews of Frank or Tucker in the Engel article.
Talking to the repeatedly proven liar, Diane Thompson, is pointless.  It only
makes her supporters look all the more asinine.  Statements from Frank and
Tucker are what are needed.  Get me in contact with both of them, ASAP.

December 25, 2016

In newspapers from coast to coast. Yet, Pittsburghers are CLUELESS.

A case-in-point on how a liar's localized propaganda machine can create
smoke screens that hide the power mongering liar's evils from the public.
Pittsburghers were clueless about Wolk, Zula, Pucci and others of evil intent.

In re: The Wolk, Zula, Pucci Cover-up and resultant indictments, along with DA
John C Pettits bitter complaint about Wuerl's degree of uncooperativeness with
law enforcement officials :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I literally could not find anyone in Pittsburgh who knew about it.  This is how
intense the Wuerl Propaganda Machine worked ... in covering up something al-
ready uncovered.

Keep in mind that the Year 2002 was the year when the sex abuse scandal went
international.  It was also the year when Cardinal Wuerl stole the spotlight from
the deeply suffering sex abuse casualties and then had certain media people toot
his horn, by claiming accomplishments that never transpired.  No one in the media
mentioned Wuerl's UNcooperativeness with law enforcement officials during his
cover-up of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In like fashion, no one in the media admitted that Wuerl reinstated into ministry
a fourth criminal priest, namely John Hoehl, a former Catholic high school head-

Plus, no one in the 2002 media revealed that U.S. Supreme Court briefs were in
Washington DC  with Wuerl's name throughout them, as aggressor, on account
of Wuerl's cover-up of the intrusive homosexual Fr. James Torquato, a retaliator
who literally almost got someone either seriously injured or killed.  Literally.

The following internet post was a mind-blowing revelation when it was originally
posted, because, until that time, America was deceived into thinking that Donald
Wuerl was a heroic zero tolerance bishop with a perfectly clean sex abuse hand-
ling record.  No one knew that Wuerl was the SECOND American bishop to get
caught covering-up criminal priests and the first one accused of being uncooper-
ative with police during a criminal investigation.

All in all, this post is here to show how insufferably dishonest is and was Wuerl's
propaganda machine.  Through surrogates, he incessantly lied to the public, de-
ceiving people into thinking that he was a holy, caring man.  Then came the truth
about Wuerl.  And the Vatican seemed not to care about the damage, deprivation,
and even jeopardization (the Torquato Retaliations) that Wuerl caused.  The Vati-
can has become Wuerl's accessory as much as it was the accessory of internation-
al molester Marcial Maciel Degollado.  Thus, this is an Evidence Webpage.

A reflection of the Pittsburgh Roman Catholic cathedral in plate glass.
Intro:  It's amazing how Vatican officials, Americans, Pennsylvanians, and
Pittsburgh residents in particular were clueless to the fact that Cardinal Wuerl
was caught in a triple cover-up which resulted in three of his Pittsburgh priests
being multiply indicted in more than one Pennsylvania county.  This is because
news of the criminal indictments and the reports of Wuerl being uncooperative
with law enforcement officials rang out in the newspapers from Lewiston Maine
to New Hampshire to NYC to Northwestern Ohio to Chicago to California ... and
from Cleveland to Saint Petersburg to San Antonio.  The reports were even in the
now-defunct Pittsburgh Press, as well as the Pgh Post Gazette.

The fourth simultaneous priest under Wuerl's covers:

The fourth priest was a high school headmaster who caused a lot of students
to become emotionally traumatized later in life.  The headmaster was my head-
master and the rumors about him abounded after high school.  Yet, during the
school years, the rumors were sparse, and I refused to believe them at the time.

Yours truly receiving his diploma from the John Hoehl whom Wuerl  put back
into ministry, thereby showing that Wuerl was  NO zero tolerance bishop.  I heard
rumors about Hoehl during high school, but they weren't frequent and  not detailed.
I simply didn't think that any priest would be what the rumors accused him of being.
Well, one of the young men to spend time living in the headmaster's home took
a shot gun, affixed it to his head, and pulled the trigger, shortly after he was sent
home for punching the headmaster.  I was the last person who was not a family
member to ever see him alive, and it was assumed that he punched Hoehl, in the
effort to fend off a physical intrusion.

In the final moment, the young man looked at me with a facial expression which
said,  "It's okay.  It doesn't matter anymore."  Two hours later, he was dead.

Years later, I was told of yet another football teammate allegedly committing
suicide, on account of mental trauma.  I couldn't confirm or dispel the allegation.

After that came my conversation with someone I once coached in basketball who
was psychologically damaged by the exact same headmaster.  Incidentally, I was
a basketball coach when I was a teenager, going up against coaches in their 30s,
40s, and 50s, ending up with a record of nine wins and five losses.  I mention this
to show that I was in high school during that priest's rampage with my teammates
and fellow students.  Yet, those youth were willing participants, after a seduction
phase, of course.

Next came a class reunion and the face of yet another former football teammate
who also was allegedly one of Hoehl's play toys.  He was a linebacker and I re-
member him giving me the cheapest shot on the football field, during a scrim-
mage.  In fact, there was a notable distance and aloofness between the two of
us during high school, meaning that an act of goodwill or compassion from me
at the school reunion would have had a tremendous effect.

Anyway, his look was the look of emotional devastation and shame, as well as
remorse.  And of course, I remained completely diplomatic, so as to not increase
the guy's existing pain.  I should have walked up to him and said, "Hey man, it's
okay.  Don't worry about it."  I didn't want to open any emotional wounds.  Plus,
my girlfriend at the time was raised in an entirely different part of Pittsburgh, and
she was clueless as to what was going on at the reunion, as she went about being
exremely pleasant and cordial to all of my classmates.  She was superb that night.
I didn't want to disturb her.  I never told her, being that I was never molested by
the molesting headmaster,  So, I remained silent at the reunion when I should have
gone up to talk to the guy.

In comparison,  Ann Rodgers' snow job on the Pittsburgh people was worse.
Wuerl couldn't have gotten the idolatrous image that he did without Rodgers'
connection to the press.  Wuerl was merely using Rodgers for selfish gain.
However, the gig is now up ... expired ... deflated ... unveiled ...
... just like the man behind the curtain in  the Wizard of Oz.
Okay then.  You now know why I reached out to help those who were the play toys
of predatory priests, even though all of my labor and expense in the effort was for
naught, due to the manipulative corruption of Donald Wuerl.  You now know why
I went to lengths to do this Wuerlgate site, despite the threats and very unfriendly
visitation.  It was one of those moral obligation things.  If I were to remain silent,
I would have sinned.  You must let people know when a wolf is in their midst, no
matter how flamingly effeminate and tiny the wolf is, being that the ferociousness
is not in any physical stature.  Rather, it's in the person's abuse of power and his
manipulation of others to do his violence toward yet others.

My reason was very simple and it permeated throughout the marrow of my soul.
Therefore, it wasn't a matter me being a brooding malcontent jealous of Donald
Wuerl.  It wasn't a matter of me trying to one-up-it on the tinsel town narcissistic
who was found living in a Narie Antoinette setting.  Nor was it a matter of trying
to promote another bishop over Wuerl:

It was a matter of me wanting to never go through another suicide, ever again.

Let us proceed:

In the Vatican II church's sex abuse scandal, Cardinal Donald Wuerl became the
second American bishop to get caught performing a cover-up which resulted in
criminal prosecution for the priest(s) being covered.  It all started in Abbeyville
Louisiana with Father Gilbert Gauthe, in 1985.  Then came the indictments of
Pittsburgh diocesan priests, Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci ... during Wuerl's watch.

Being that Wuerl was one of the first bishops in America to get caught cover-
ing up criminal priests, he was one of the first bishops in America to announce
a zero tolerance policy.  He struck the pose of a strick disciplinarian, only be-
cause he was in a huge law-enforcement spotlight, and quite frankly, it had
gotten to the point where the next priest to be convicted of wrongdoing, if
Wuerl were to keep playing his unconscionable games, was Wuerl, himself.
However, he would have been found guilty of a Summary Offense only, and
forced to do no more than pay fine.  However, his strive for high Vatican
power would have ended then and there.

All in all, Wuerl announced NO zero tolerance policy until Wolk, Zula, and
Pucci were indicted.  Plus, Wuerl did NOT enforce the policy when it came
to Fr Edward Huff who would come to be criminally indicted and convicted.
Plus, no zero tolerance policy applied to the retaliatory James Torquato.

Wuerl was no caring man looking out for the underdog, while in possession of
this so-called caring smile.  Those of us who did meet Wuerl in person could
not but help notice his conceitedly curt dismissiveness and his flaming homo-
sexuality.  Yet, it wasn't the flaming homosexuality that was the shocker.  His
mean spirited conceit was.  You could tell that he was thoroughly vicious and
would destroy any human life he could get away with destroying, while having
no remorse ... while experiencing no haunting in his apparently stone cold con-
science.  He was as cold as a demon right before the initial start of an exorcism.

I've met great men in life, ranging from a national book award winner here, a
Walt Whitman award winner there, a Super Bowl champion yet elsewhere, and
a share of full-blown war heroes.  Each one had a personality.  Wuerl had none.
Ann  Rodgers, to legacy of disgrace, set out to make Wuerl look like a great man.
But, Wuerl was nothing more than a Great Lie, especially in what Wuerl did to
Anthony Cipolla, his diversionary tactic.  For those of you easily deceived by
sound bytes and Christopher Dickey articles, the Jpeg evidence is here at the
Wuerlgate which convincingly defends an Anthony Cipolla whom I assumed
was guilty as publicly accused, being that I did no fact checking until the Year

For the record, the catalyst in finding the proof that Cipolla actually was inno-
cent of the allegations stated by the liar Tim Bendig was Chicago's own Mike
Volpe.  Mike is underrated, to say the least.  He's literally one of my heroes.
Impressive in the proper way for me to describe.  That's for sure.  How did
Mike know?  ANS:  Experience with whistle blower retaliation cases.

Concerning Wolk, Zula, Pucci, and even John S. Hoehl

These priests were not reported to authorities by Wuerl, as was required in the
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Act.  Attorney F. Peter Dixon did the
reporting.  He was the friend of the molested family.  Technically, only one
of the two molested youths were an altar boy; so stated for the record.

In addition, Wuerl publicly stated that his cover-up of Robert Wolk was not
covering-up.  Wuerl was a liar from Day 1.

Here are the newspaper reports on Donald Wuerl's triple cover-up, shortly after
it was uncovered.  The fourth simultaneous cover-up of Donald Wuerl was that
of former high school headmaster, John Hoehl.  Being that Wuerl put Hoehl
back into ministry, declining to remove him until Robert Wolk was indicted.
When Wolk was indicted, Hoehl became a hot potato.  Only at that point in
time did Wuerl remove Hoehl.  Thus, Ann Rodgers deceived the public in
what she wrote about Wuerl dismissing Hoehl.  If it were for Mr. Dixon,
Hoehl would never have been removed from ministry.

Concerning the Triple Cover-up and the two molested youths:

There was also the matter of a fourth alleged molester of the two youth who
happened to have been a layman.  This was reported in a Cleveland Plain
Dealer article, as well as in a couple other American newspapers.

There was also the matter of the tragic Father George Zirwas being at the
scene of one of the three priest's crimes, remaining entirely silent while it
was transpiring.  It transpired in a sky lodge suite.  Father Zirwas remained
silent and complicit, while the priest and his young prey were in a bedroom.
Zirwas was strangled to death in Cuba, years later.

The Wuerl People, including former Pgh Post Gazette writer Ann Rodgers,
continue to cover up Wuerl's Triple Cover-up by means of revising history
to the point of making Wuerl sound like the presiding hero in it.  Proof that
Wuerl was far from the hero of the hour is blatant, evidenced by the fact

District Attorney John C. Pettit publicly announced that Wuerl & his staff
were uncooperative throughout the criminal investigation.  Case Closed.
Wuerl, therefore, is still engaged in a cover-up, doing what he and his
minions can, in keeping the facts of the triple indictment away from as
many members of the public as he and they can.  This is ongoing deceit.

No matter what, keep in mind that my thesis statement in the court of pub-
lic opinion is that, during his Pittsburgh days, Donald Wuerl was a vicious
conniver.  He was a liar, a pretender, a retaliator, and a conceited narcissist
who showed disdain for 99% of the population,

Wuerl most certainly did use diversionary tactics and sleight of hand decep-
tions.   Plus, his nexus to the Sodomite Wuerl was ascertained with empirical
evidence.  Yet, as far as goes the allegations of his private where he allegedly
violated a principle vow of the priesthood as a part of his lifestyle, that is bas-
ed on eye witness accounts, as well as compelling circumstantial evidence.
Due to the lack of smoking gun evidence, I refrained from line-itemizing
what certain individuals from Europe to America alleged to me about
Wuerl's private life.  What if all those people between 1999 and 2012
were wrong in what they told me about Wuerl's alleged private life.

Below is one Jpeg and several links that uncovered Wuerl's triple cover-up
at the time when it was uncovered.  Compare them to what Ann Rodgers &
her fellow propagandists say about Wuerl today, concerning that time span.

Read them.  You will see that no one in any of those news reports is calling
Wuerl a hero of any sorts.  Just the opposite occurred.  You don't have to
take my word for it.  Look for yourself.   In fact, Look, Identify, and Per-
ceive.  The Wuerl People are liars and Donald Wuerl is a living lie.  This
site has the Jpegs and newspaper archive links to prove it.

See also:,3545671&dq=zula+diocese+wuerl&hl=en,2371591&dq=zula+barn+parked+car+pettit+resort&hl=en,3148582&hl=en,4088961&dq=wolk+arrested+pittsburgh+zula+pucci,53612&dq=diocese+pittsburgh+1987+seminary+molested&hl=en,3932976&dq=3+priests+investigated+wolk,10275422&hl=en 

December 24, 2016

Wuerl kept the notorious Father Hoehl in ministry, even after the "life-changing epiphany" dinner mentioned by Ann Rodgers.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where Cardinal Donald Wuerl's web of corruption was spun,
with the help the Ann Rodgers who was repeatedly caught lying in print, via fact checking.
Nor did he report Wolk, Zula, and Pucci to the police.  Attorney F. Peter
Dixon did.  He was a friend of the victimized family.

For those unaware, John Hoehl was put on administrative leave by then-
Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua.  Hoehl WAS removed from the priesthood
ministry.  Wuerl reinstated him.

Then there was Wellinger, not to mention Wuerl reinstating Huff.  All in
all, know that Ann Rodgers IS a liar.  She was a non-Catholic Pittsburgh
Post Gazette writer who was appointed Pittsburgh Roman Catholic Dio-
cesan director of communications.  She still is a Protestant.  Her appoint-
ment is a case study in cronyism and Vatican II corruption.  Read onward,
because you need to know what liars comprise the Wuerl propaganda
machine.  Incidentally, he did NOT write the Teachings of Christ.  He
was merely one of three editors of the catechism book which had a
multiplicity of authors.  Wuerl, himself, begane the lie which claimed
that he wrote that catechism book single-handedly, doing so in 1979,

Concerning the two lads corrupted by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, know that
each priest performed his antics at different times, on different occasions.
It wasn't one of those "all-three-at-once" scenarios, to state it politely.

The Pittsburgh Post Gazette story which was easy to prove false was that
Wuerl had a life-changing enlightenment when he went to the home of the
two lads sodomized by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, and then instantly became
the champion of zero tolerance.  That scenario did NOT happen.  Ann
Rodgers (formerly of the Pgh Post Gazette) was and is a liar, and she
never sued me for calling her a liar.

Proof that the Ann Rodgers story is a fairy tale exists in the fact that District
Attorney John C. Pettit issued a press release which stated that Donald Wuerl,
as well as staff members of his then-diocese of Pittsburgh, were uncooperative
with law enforcement officials throughout the investigation that resulted in the
indictments of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In addition, if Wuerl were the heroic bishop of zero tolerance that Ann Rodgers
said he was, then Wuerl would have immediately suspended the notorious John
Hoehl whom Wuerl personally put back into ministry, shortly before that dinner
transpired.  For the record, it was Donald Wuerl's predecessor, the destined-to-be-
disgraced Anthony Bevilacqua, who ordered Hoehl on administrative leave.

Now, if the 5'4" Donald Wuerl whom Ann Rodgers falsely described in print as
an ascetic 5'11" were the model of zero tolerance, then Donald Wuerl would also
not have reinstated into ministry the Fr Edward Huff who would eventually be-
come criminally indicted and convicted.  Wuerl was covering-up Huff while he
was being lauded as a bishop of zero tolerance in the Anthony Cipolla Case.

And of course, after the fact-checking, and after Bendig multiply lied to me,
and after the spiritually grotesque Diane Thompson repeatedly lied about me
and changed her story about Anthony Cipolla, it was confirmed that Anthony
Cipolla was 95 to 98% innocent as accused.  After all, Cipolla never was in-
dicted, and a DA can file an indictment without Diane Thompson's permis-
sion to do so.  Of course, this refers to my future defendant, Diane Thomp-
son, who harassed me and repeatedly committed libel against me.  She is
quite arrogant, as well as erratic in her writings which were fact-checked
and found to be bullet-riddled with easily provable falsehoods, as is ex-
plained in a few Wuerlgate articles.

Wolk, Zula, & Pucci

The first of the three to be indicted was Wolk, and after Wolk was indicted,
Wuerl gave an excuse for his cover-up of him.  Only afterward did Wuerl
do the artificial grandstanding, with sleight of hand semantics involved.
Wuerl was no champion of Zero Tolerance.  Wuerl was caught and then
had to quickly construct a facade.

The other proof is that Wuerl reinstated the suspended Father John Hoehl.
After that dinner, Wuerl kept Hoehl in ministry, thereby very much tolerat-
ing a priest who caused a lot of lingering psychological damage to a num-
ber of individuals.  Wuerl stubbornly kept Hoehl in ministry until Father
Robert Wolk was indicted.  Then Wuerl treated Hoehl as a hot potato and
showed him the exit door.

Now, do you see what a liar Ann Rodgers and the other Wuerl People are?
Concerning Rodgers, she meddled in influencing the Catholic mind.  Yet,
she refuses to be a Catholic.

An added scandal  is in the fact that David Zubik, a secretary of John Hoehl,
never reported Hoehl for his well-noted sex crimes.  However, my opinion is
that David Zubik had no idea of what Hoehl was doing in his private life.  I
personally knew Fr. Dave.  Dave didn't buddy around with the athletes whom
Hoehl targeted.  Dave wasn't in the inner circle.  In my opinion David Zubik
isn't an accomplice.  The problem is that he wasn't alert to his surroundings.
He needed to reach-out more.  If he did, he could have spared someone of
the grief that comes with being a high school headmaster's prey.

As was previously stated and ignored by the Vatican . . .

Added proof that Wuerl was NO hero of zero tolerance exists in the fact that
Wuerl  also reinstated the Edward Huff who ended up being indicted and con-
victed.  Thus, as you can see, the story of Wuerl being a crystal clear saint of
zero tolerance is a complete falsehood.  Wuerl IS as corrupt as they come, and
the stories were a part of that criminal corruption.

Concerning Hoehl and the time of the Wolk indictment, if Wuerl were found
to have a criminal in ministry, law enforcement would have scoured the Pitts-
burgh diocese and Wuerl in investigative detail.  Wuerl's private life, even
when he was the long-term secretary under John Cardinal Wright, would
have been revealed to law enforcement authorities.  Wuerl stubbornly kept
John Hoehl in  diocesan ministry for as long as he could do so, without hav-
ing the Diocese of Pittsburgh become a magnetized target of a detialed law
enforcement investigation.

Added proof that Wuerl had NO change of heart after the dinner evening
with the family victimized by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci was that he did NOT
report those three priests.  An attorney who was a friend of the victimized
family did the reporting thereof.  So, as you can see, Ann Rodgers, former-
ly of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, is a liar.  Rocco Palmo and Christopher
Dickey were fools to have used her as a source in their articles about Don-
ald Wuerl which were basically two plagiarisms of Rodgers; falsehoods.
They lost credibility with anyone familiar with the Wuerlgate Jpegs, news
archives, and witness accounts.  They lost credible with anyone who was
there in Pittsburgh during the 1990s.

IN AS MUCH,  contrary to what Christopher Dickey wrote, the truth is that
the only reason why Wuerl and his former Diocese of Pittsburgh had one of
the first no-tolerance sex abuse policies in America was because:

Wuerl was one of the very first bishops in the United States who got 
caught concealing criminal priests from law enforcement authorities.

So, he had to strike the disciplinarian pose while the law enforcement
spotlight was on him.  Wuerl was caught being uncooperative with
DA John C. Pettit.  So, Wuerl fabricated a new image of himself.
It included him announcing a zero tolerance sex abuse policy.


Wuerl's sex abuse policy did NOT apply to 1} the case of  Edward Huff
who would eventually be criminally indicted, 2} the credible seminarian
Wuerl prevented from being ordained, 3} the  case of Fr. James Torquato,
4} the case of Fr. John Wellinger,  Plus, the policy was NOT implement-
ed until after Wuerl put the notorious John S. Hoehl back into ministry.
Even more hypocritical was the fact that Wuerl put back into ministry
the previously mentioned Edward Huff who was reported to Wuerl
three different times, by the differing sets of concerned Catholics.
The Zero-Tolerance label placed on Wuerl was a fraudulent claim.

For those unfamiliar, Ann Rodgers was a writer for the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.
Even though she was never any type of Catholic, she was assigned to be head
of the Communications Dept of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.
On multiple fact-checking occasions, Ann Rodgers was caught lying in print.

A Review of Wuerl's Triple Cover-up

To start, Wuerl had a Father Arnott go to the violated family, to see if they
would be willing to meet with Wuerl.  But, this only occurred when Wuerl
learned that the family was going to report the priests to law enforcement
authorities.  The Donald Wuerl who was sued many times by Pittsburgh
area residents sought to get his foot into the door.  Wuerl basically invited

Do NOT ever be deceived into thinking that Wuerl was a revered presence
in Pittsburgh.  The number of lawsuits filed against him proves  otherwise.
Wuerl had contrived press and media coverage, as well as the pit bull Ron
Lengwin who actually is very tall and who allegedly sought to intimidate
people in the mode of a big bully.  Me seeing how tall Lengwin is was as
shocking to me as having seen how tiny Wuerl is.  All that Lengwin ever
did to me was smile at me with gritted teeth and a snarl.  He kept moving
and I never saw him again.  This was at the diocesan building.

If Wuerl's meeting with the family were similar to other people's encounters
with Wuerl, then I can assure you that he left the family feeling violated and
outraged.  I can assure you that he triggered a sense of insult so intense that
they went forth and gave the greenlight to Attorney F. Peter Dixon who end-
ed up reporting the three priests to law enforcement officials.

As soon as the indictment was filed, Wuerl got rid of Hoehl like a sand bag in
a hot air balloon losing altitude.  But, not until then.  This is extremely interest-
ing, in that it indicates that Wuerl seemingly assumed that the violated family
would not report the three molester priests to the police.  If Wuerl anticipated
the reporting thereof, he would have gotten rid of John Hoehl immediately.
Wuerl let Hoehl remain in ministry, as if Wuerl arrogantly assumed that he
controlled the violated family on a set of puppet strings.

Wuerl keeping Fr. John Hoehl in ministry after the meeting with
the family of two molested altar boys proves that  Wuerl had no
change of heart or policy that resulted from the meeting/dinner.
The claim that the meeting changed Wuerl is lying propaganda.

During the journalists' 2013 papal conjecture phrase, shortly before Francis I
ascended to the Chair of Saint Peter, the Daily Beast's Paris bureau chief con-
jectured that Cardinal Wuerl was America's candidate for pope, in light of the
newspaper articles that glorified Wuerl, especially in the heavily misrepresent-
ed Anthony Cipolla case that starred a seminary flunk-out who was described
as a perpetual and pathological liar by multiple persons who knew him.  In fact,
the Cipolla case starred an individual who was even declared NOT credible by
Donald Wuerl, at one time.  His name is Tim Bendig and he lied to me four
times in a row in the Year 2014, during a telephone conversation that he
initiated with me during work hours.  I conducted that conversation in a
construction trailer office, next to a drawing board.

The Paris bureau chief then stated that Wuerl apparently became too tired to
fight the good fight that the media described Wuerl as having fought.  Dickey
then referred to one of Ann Rodgers' Pgh Post Gazette articles, stating:

     But a few weeks after that decision Wuerl met with the devout, deeply
     disillusioned, and increasingly litigious family of one victim.  They in-
     vited Wuerl to dinner and, according to a lengthy and laudatory report
     in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in 2003, when Wuerl left that table his
     views of the issue had changed.  Before, his actions had been closely
     aligned church policies, which were basically a CYA masquerading
     as piety.

     Now Wuerl told his staff it had to get its priorities straight: the first
    concern was the injured party, the second was for the person’s family,
    the third—and only the third—was the potential harm to the church
    and its reputation.   He’s on the record declaring zero tolerance for
    priests accused of sexual abuse 14 years before that became official
The decision to which Dickey referred was Wuerl's decision to put back
into ministry the notorious John S. Hoehl, former headmaster of Quigley
H.S., in Baden Pennsylvania.  I attended that school for four years.  And
yes, I heard the rumors while in school.

Furthermore, Wuerl did NOT observe the policy he announced in the case
of Edward Huff.  Plus, his policy did NOT apply to Torquato's prey or to
the credible deacon whistle blower Wuerl trapped and refused to ordain
into the priesthood.  Yet, Wuerl ordained the homosexual predator, James
Torquato, and covered up Torquato's wrongs, thereby approving of them
in deed.

The source of this letter is self-evident.

December 23, 2016

Cardinal Wuerl: FOUR cover-ups in Year 1. Huff followed. Torquato too. Wellinger hovered. Ann Rodgers lied. NO model of zero tolerance here.

The quickest summary is that the FOUR priests were ======>


1} John Hoehl whom Donald Wuerl personally reinstated into ministry
and kept in ministry, even after the so-called "enlightening" dinner that
Wuerl had with the family of two lads molested by the three priests men-
tioned below, 

Wuerl kept Hoehl in ministry until the priest mentioned directly below
was indicted and arraigned.  Then, Wuerl dropped Hoehl like a very hot
potato.  If Wuerl were to have kept Hoehl in ministry --- even "doghouse 
ministry" and/or probationary ministry --- Wuerl would have been invit-
ing a grand jury inquest.

2} Robert Wolk (ordained the same year as was Wuerl, thereby indicat-
ing that he was Wuerl's classmate.)  Ann Rodgers falsely claimed that 
Wolk was removed "just as Wuerl became bishop."  The truth is that 
Anthony Bevilacqua placed Wolk on administrative leave, long before 
Wuerl replaced Bevilacqua.  Donald Wuerl was positioning  to reinstate
Wolk, as he did Hoehl.

3} Richard "Sade" Zula who did practice Sadism on at least one male 
youth,   This was the only known priest Wuerl was NOT going to re-
instate into any type of ministry.  Now, Wuerl has been proven to be 
unjust and vicious, but he drew a line in the proverbial sand when it
came to Sadism.  Wuerl hid the knowledge of Zula's crimes from law
enforcement, despite the Child Protective Services Act.  Hes imply let
Zula go about his life with full intention to never reinstate him, ever,

Now, when DA John C. Pettit was trying to process Zula's indictment, 
no one at the Diocese of Pittsburgh let him know what Zula's address 
was at the time.  Pettit didn't even know where Zula was, and the dio-
cese claimed that its personnel didn't know, either.  The Diocese of 
Pittsburgh personnel were a collective aggravation to Pettit through-
out the criminal investigation, making fact-finding a .

4} Fr. Francis Pucci who was not laicized or removed from ministry.  
Rather, he was allowed to conduct the Mass and perhaps Divine Office 
with a religious order of sisters.  Pucci was indicted, but his indictment 
was dismissed on the statute of limitations defense.  Therefore,  Pucci 
remained on the diocesan payroll.  In fact, even the criminal convict, 
Richard Dorsch, was on the payroll, after his conviction.  In Catholic
Canon Law, even criminal priests, after prison time, must be financial-
ly supported by their bishops.  A bishop does NOT have to reassign
a criminal priest who completed a jail sentence.  But, he does have
to sustain such a priest.

The two lawsuits involved 1} former Catholic school headmaster John 
Hoehl as co-defendant; 2} the two brothers abused (at different times)
by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci as members of the plaintiff family.  Only one
of the two brothers was an altar boy, incidentally.  Let us proceed.

Ann Rodgers"-Melnick" was a Pittsburgh Post Gazette writer originally from
California.  Before going to Pittsburgh she worked in the Southwestern sect-
or of  Florida were major leaguers do their baseball Spring Training.  Even 
though She was never a Roman Catholic (or any other rite of Catholicism.)
Yet, she was given the post of Pittsburgh Roman Catholic Diocese director 
for Communications, as if no Catholic on Earth is good enough for the job.

During the infamous 2002 media rampage on clergy sex abuse, she wrote that 
as far back as Wuerl's very first year as bishop of Pittsburgh, he announced a 
Zero Tolerance Policy, where no priest accused of sexually abusing a minor
could ever go back into ministry.  That was a complete falsehood, supported 
by the evidence of him returning to ministry Frs. John Hoehl and Edward

Concerning her proven lies, the first one which was detected was her claim
that the tiny Donald Wuerl was an ascetic 5'11".  The truth is that Wuerl is as 
short in height as was the late Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua --- between 5'4 
to 5'6".  Concerning this, I received a polite phone call from Washington stat-
ing that Wuerl stands 5'9" to 5'10".  Yes --- with elevator shoes, he does.  

Being that I was in Pittsburgh during Wuerl's tenure, and being that he walked 
up to me, I do know that he is tiny.  He did NOT wear elevator shoes here, in
Pittsburgh.  Others who met him also told me that he stood 5'4" to 5'5".  One
person described Wuerl as "scrawny."   A very polite 5'4" woman said to me
that Wuerl and her stood "head to head," meaning at the same height.

I know of Wuerl's height and Bevilacqua's height from a point-blank range
personal experience (in a public forum.).  In fact, I was surprised to find out
how tiny Wuerl was as he approached me, once upon a time.  This is because
he was made out to be this superior godlike man of masculine stature.  The
Donald Wuerl who approached me was exactly like a certain flaming homo-
sexual theater major who would occasionally buzz around our click and take
with him one of the guys, the son of a certain lieutenant governor's son; not
from Pennsylvania and not from any State that borders on Pennsylvania.

The bottom line is that you cannot instantly trust as true anything written by 
Ann Rodgers.  But, for the most part, Rodgers used sleight of hand semantics,
(as opposed to outright lying) in her deceiving of the common man & woman
via the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.

We adjourn to the original article:

Donald Wuerl was installed bishop of Pittsburgh on February 12, 1988.  It only
took eight months thereafter for the Diocese of Pittsburgh to become one of the  
first dioceses in America to be 'scathed' in what was to become a nationwide 
Watergate of perversity.  Wuerl was caught performing a triple cover-up, and
the practice of sadomasochism was one of the acts which transpired within a
trio of clergy members whom Wuerl unsuccessfully concealed from law en-
forcement authorities.  Incidentally, Pgh is the abbreviation of Pittsburgh

Always keep in mind that the only reason why Wuerl was one of the first bish-
ops to announce a zero tolerance policy was because he was one of the very first
of American bishops caught red-handed in performing multiple and simultaneous 
cover-ups which included John Hoehl as Wuerl's fourth simultaneous cover-up.

Wuerl expressly put Hoehl back into ministry and immediately took Hoehl out
of the ministry line-up after DA John C. Pettit publicly announced that Wuerl
and his personnel were uncooperative during the criminal investigation which
resulted in the indictments of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In as much, Wuerl had to put on airs and display a very fake facade, in announc-
ing a zero tolerance policy which he did NOT observe in his subsequent cover-up
of Frs. Edward Huff and James Torquato.  Wuerl is a liar by his actions.  Such
as a person known as a hypocrite.  Wuerl also chooses which Catholic doctrine
to observe and which one to violate.  Such a person is known as a heretic.

Concerning Wolk, Zula, and Pucci:

A member of the criminal trio was an assistant chancellor of Wuerl's diocese, as 
well as a canon lawyer.  This factor alone showed motive for proceeding with an 
intentional cover-up.  In fact, Wuerl vehemently defended his cover-up of Wolk,
in news print, claimed that the cover-up wasn't a cover-up.  Wuerl has been a liar
from the beginning.

The Sex Abuse Casualties

The casualties were two altar boys of the same family.  They were brothers. The 
years of molestation occurred from 1981 to 1987.  In addition to the three indict-
ed priests, there was a fourth alleged assailant reported to one of the three prose-
cuting district attorneys.  He was a layman.  Furthermore, there was a fourth dio-
cesan priest implicated, but only in his capacity as a probable accomplice; as a 
silent person who reported nothing to anyone.

Concerning this priest, he either allowed criminal conduct to transpire in a ski 

lodge suite where he was staying or else he was clueless to what was transpir-
ing there.  Nothing was established other than he was at the scene of the crime, 
going into his room, while a criminal priest was taking his altar boy into anoth-
er one.  

This fourth Pittsburgh diocesan priest, incidentally, was strangled to  death in 
Havana Cuba in 2001, after having been on administrative leave since 1996.  
A source informed me that Wuerl, himself, officiated as his funeral ... so stat-
ed the source.

While in Cuba, this priest was openly homosexual and was said to have "helped 

his visiting friends find sexual partners while they stayed in Havana."  He was 
the tragic Fr. George Zirwas, and at this point in the narration you should be at
the first stage in realizing that Lord Byron was more correct than he was mistak-
en when he stated that the truth is always strange; stranger than fiction.

Wuerl's unholy trinity

The indicted priests were Robert Wolk, Francis Pucci, and Richard "Sade" Zula.   

Wolk was the assistant chancellor and Zula was nicknamed after the Marquis de 
Sade.  All three priests were charged and arraigned in Washington County, PA.  
It's a county which touches the southwestern border of the Allegheny County 
where within sits Pittsburgh.  

Furthermore, Richard Zula was also arraigned east of Pittsburgh, in Somerset 
County.  Robert Wolk was indicted in Allegheny County, as well as in Wash-
ington County.   In fact, he was the first one to surrender himself to the police.  
Incidentally, the Diocese of Pittsburgh comprises the six most Southwestern 
counties of Pennsylvania.  Pennsylvania, at last count, has sixty-seven counties.

The front page of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette's November 11 edition of that

year gives light on how involved the criminal investigation was:  

        "Moreover, authorities said their investigation had uncovered
          evidence of similar offenses involving one of the priests that
          occurred elsewhere in southwestern Pennsylvania and Florida,
         Ohio, Virginia, and Canada.  Authorities in the jurisdictions
         have been contacted."

This shows that the matter was not taken lightly by law enforcement officials. 
In fact, the district attorney of Washington County prophetically stated,  "We  
would be sticking our heads in the sand to believe these are the only three 

Zula had 138 criminal counts filed against him in Washington Coun
ty, alone. 
However, a plea bargain reduced the counts to only two.   In sequence, Zula 
also plead guilty in Somerset County.  Now, as far as went Wolk, he plead 
guilty in Allegheny and Washington counties. 

Pucci's case, on the other hand, was dismissed due to the two year statute
limitations expiring on two types of criminal charges.   It expired approximate-
ly four months prior to his indictment.   He was indicted under the assumption 
that the time-keeping for the two year limit had frozen during the time Pucci 
was outside of Pennsylvania, in a Maryland psychiatric facility.  None the less,
conspiracy charges remained open for Pucci, and that particular crime had a 
five year limitation.   Despite this, Pucci's case was eventually dismissed.

Take note that, during the nationwide sex abuse scandal, priest after abusive

priest was sent to a psychiatric facility, as if each one were an unaccountable
victim of mental illness.  Now, there is a difference between mental illness
and sin.   If a person is insane, then he is without malice in a materially harm-
ful act, even though each member of society has the right to be made safe from
such a harmful person.   However, deception and manipulation, as much as
scheming and concealing, were committed by priest after abusive priest, and

such acts are elements of malice; not mental illness. 

In addition, these priests were described as having "compulsions" that required 
psychiatric treatment.  In the Catholic vernacular, such compulsions are known 
as temptations.

Wuerl and His Personnel:  Uncooperative During the 1988 Investigation

The Washington County district attorney announced that Wuerl's diocese en-

gaged in "foot dragging" throughout the criminal investigation.   The DA was
either irked or incensed by the Pittsburgh diocese's lack of cooperation, call-
ing it "minimal at best."   His quote on the topic goes as follows: "It was not
the spirit of cooperation we would like to see."  Of course,  "foot dragging"
is a polite way of saying "stonewalling" which, in turn, is a polite way of say-

ing "a step away from obstruction of justice charges."

Wuerl had pushed his luck to the limit.  Being that he was caught performing

a triple cover-up, and being that he was accused of having impeded a crimi-
nal investigation via stonewalling, he had no other choice than to strike the
pose of a strict disciplinarian.  This shows that Wuerl was not not not the
caring and concerned bishop that he was made out to be by the 21st Century
media.  Rather, he was a chameleon, looking out for himself.  He changed
colors according to the changes in the political climate.  In fact, he original-
ly presented himself as a "liberal."  He was then paraded around as a "con-
servative."  Wuerl has shown himself to be out for himself.  The following
mainstream media newspaper links provide the evidence:

Photocopy of Cleveland Plain Dealer Article which mentions the existence 
of a fourth predator in the same Pittsburgh diocesan molestation ring:
Wuerl's Cover-up with Mention of Fourth Assailant

The New York Times Report on the Triple Cover-up:

Photocopy of the San Antonio Express-News Report:

Photocopy of the Report found in the Lewiston Daily Sun:,2371591&dq=zula+barn+parked +car+pettit+resort&hl=en

Photocopy of the Nashua Telegraph's Report on the Cover-up:

The Associated Press News Report on Wuerl's Triple Cover-up:

Photocopy of the Bryan Times Report, with D.A.'s Additional Statement:

Donald Wuerl: A Coast to Coast Disgrace

News of Wuerl's triple cover-up made its way from coast to coast, via:

- the New York Times,          - the Saint Petersburg Times,
- the Philadelphia Inquirer,     - the Philadelphia Daily News,
- the Cleveland Plain Dealer,   - the Pittsburgh Post Gazette,
- Maine's Lewiston Daily Sun,    - the San Jose Mercury News,     
- Pennsylvania's Reading Eagle,   -  the San Antonio Express-News,
- California's Lodi News-Sentinel,   - the now defunct Pittsburgh Press,   
- Northwestern Ohio's Bryan Times,    - Oregon's Eugene Register-Guard,
- New Hampshire's Nashua Telegraph,  - South Carolina's Rock Hill Herald.
From as far west as California's San Andreas Fault line, to as far east as the
New York metro area, Donald William Wuerl became an early chapter in the
Vatican II church's sex abuse history.  From as far south as the Florida Gulf
Coast, to as far north as Maine, Wuerl's diocese had already proven itself to
be what best selling author Malachi Martin would later say it was"... one
of the most pathetic dioceses in the United States."

Concerning George Zirwas:,202749&dq=george+zirwas+pittsburgh+cuba&hl=en,127061&hl=en,1539593&hl=en,4367236&hl=en
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -