January 09, 2018

Am Back from Coyote Country: Unfinished Business Remains

The voices of coyotes was a nightly occurrence and were
literally heard here.  As time went on, the voices got closer
and closer.   At first, they were heard every night at 11pm.
As they got closer, the voices were heard every night at 3 am. 
Beautiful red tint to their coats.  They were too sneaky to enjoy. 
You never knew what they were going to do.
There is unfinished business to which to attend, concerning the ongoing corruption
and overall deceptiveness of one of the more highly ranking cardinals in the provenly
corrupted Vatican II Church which repeatedly sought to overthrow and eliminate that
which was taught and supported by the only church ever founded by Jesus Christ and
which literally can trace itself back to the original apostles of Christ.

Being in coyote country makes you automatically alert ... like a light bulb which stays
on all night.  You suddenly start realizing things about life that evades the perception
of the pampered.  None the less, I defended my local/club title and became a national
finalist.  It's reasonably assume that the winner was heavily tanked up on testerstone
that would make Arnold Schwarzenegger envious.  None the less, I'll be training a
Wisconsin body builder for competition in St. Louis, and am supposed to be com-
peting in the master's division, as well.  Okay then . . .

I made a promise to take care of certain business.  Good enough.  Being that it's the
Heart of Winter, I should have the time to do what needs to be done to procure a
measure of justice from a crew of provenly fraudulent individuals who apparently
didn't realize that I haven't even begun to fight.  Even at that, I had a number of
defamatory-abusive-derisive weblogs attacking me deleted.  I stopped counting
at defamatory-derisive weblog #9.  Thus, you need to keep in minde that:

I forbid all to copy and paste any writing of mine, any photograph of mine, any
chart of mine, any intellectual property on mine without first contacting me di-
rectly and asking me for my copyright permission .  Ironically, 100% of the time
when I was asked for my copyright permission ... to post elsewhere intellectual
property of mine ... I granted permission.  Of course, there are two people whom
I will never grant my copyright permissions, and those are the two who copied
and pasted my works more than the others.

They is a lot to address ... to take care of ... to achieve ... concerning the quest
for justice.  Let me collect my thoughts and documents and notes and facts, etc.
Stayed tuned assured that I haven't faded into the sunset yet.



January 08, 2018

Wuerl's Triple Cover-up: In newspapers from coast to coast. Yet, Pittsburghers are CLUELESS about this piece of history.

A case-in-point on how a liar's localized propaganda machine can create
smoke screens that hide the power mongering liar's evils from the public.
Pittsburghers were clueless about Wolk, Zula, Pucci and others of evil intent.

In re: The Wolk, Zula, Pucci Cover-up and resultant indictments, along with DA
John C Pettits bitter complaint about Wuerl's degree of uncooperativeness with
law enforcement officials :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I literally could not find anyone in Pittsburgh who knew about it.  This is how
intense the Wuerl Propaganda Machine worked ... in covering up something al-
ready uncovered.

Keep in mind that the Year 2002 was the year when the sex abuse scandal went
international.  It was also the year when Cardinal Wuerl stole the spotlight from
the deeply suffering sex abuse casualties and then had certain media people toot
his horn, by claiming accomplishments that never transpired.  No one in the media
mentioned Wuerl's UNcooperativeness with law enforcement officials during his
cover-up of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In like fashion, no one in the media admitted that Wuerl reinstated into ministry
a fourth criminal priest, namely John Hoehl, a former Catholic high school head-
master.

Plus, no one in the 2002 media revealed that U.S. Supreme Court briefs were in
Washington DC  with Wuerl's name throughout them, as aggressor, on account
of Wuerl's cover-up of the intrusive homosexual Fr. James Torquato, a retaliator
who literally almost got someone either seriously injured or killed.  Literally.

The following internet post was a mind-blowing revelation when it was originally
posted, because, until that time, America was deceived into thinking that Donald
Wuerl was a heroic zero tolerance bishop with a perfectly clean sex abuse hand-
ling record.  No one knew that Wuerl was the SECOND American bishop to get
caught covering-up criminal priests and the first one accused of being uncooper-
ative with police during a criminal investigation.

All in all, this post is here to show how insufferably dishonest is and was Wuerl's
propaganda machine.  Through surrogates, he incessantly lied to the public, de-
ceiving people into thinking that he was a holy, caring man.  Then came the truth
about Wuerl.  And the Vatican seemed not to care about the damage, deprivation,
and even jeopardization (the Torquato Retaliations) that Wuerl caused.  The Vati-
can has become Wuerl's accessory as much as it was the accessory of internation-
al molester Marcial Maciel Degollado.  Thus, this is an Evidence Webpage.

A reflection of the Pittsburgh Roman Catholic cathedral in plate glass.
Intro:  It's amazing how Vatican officials, Americans, Pennsylvanians, and
Pittsburgh residents in particular were clueless to the fact that Cardinal Wuerl
was caught in a triple cover-up which resulted in three of his Pittsburgh priests
being multiply indicted in more than one Pennsylvania county.  This is because
news of the criminal indictments and the reports of Wuerl being uncooperative
with law enforcement officials rang out in the newspapers from Lewiston Maine
to New Hampshire to NYC to Northwestern Ohio to Chicago to California ... and
from Cleveland to Saint Petersburg to San Antonio.  The reports were even in the
now-defunct Pittsburgh Press, as well as the Pgh Post Gazette.


The fourth simultaneous priest under Wuerl's covers:

The fourth priest was a high school headmaster who caused a lot of students
to become emotionally traumatized later in life.  The headmaster was my head-
master and the rumors about him abounded after high school.  Yet, during the
school years, the rumors were sparse, and I refused to believe them at the time.

Yours truly receiving his diploma from the John Hoehl whom Wuerl  put back
into ministry, thereby showing that Wuerl was  NO zero tolerance bishop.  I heard
rumors about Hoehl during high school, but they weren't frequent and  not detailed.
I simply didn't think that any priest would be what the rumors accused him of being.
Well, one of the young men to spend time living in the headmaster's home took
a shot gun, affixed it to his head, and pulled the trigger, shortly after he was sent
home for punching the headmaster.  I was the last person who was not a family
member to ever see him alive, and it was assumed that he punched Hoehl, in the
effort to fend off a physical intrusion.

In the final moment, the young man looked at me with a facial expression which
said,  "It's okay.  It doesn't matter anymore."  Two hours later, he was dead.

Years later, I was told of yet another football teammate allegedly committing
suicide, on account of mental trauma.  I couldn't confirm or dispel the allegation.

After that came my conversation with someone I once coached in basketball who
was psychologically damaged by the exact same headmaster.  Incidentally, I was
a basketball coach when I was a teenager, going up against coaches in their 30s,
40s, and 50s, ending up with a record of nine wins and five losses.  I mention this
to show that I was in high school during that priest's rampage with my teammates
and fellow students.  Yet, those youth were willing participants, after a seduction
phase, of course.

Next came a class reunion and the face of yet another former football teammate
who also was allegedly one of Hoehl's play toys.  He was a linebacker and I re-
member him giving me the cheapest shot on the football field, during a scrim-
mage.  In fact, there was a notable distance and aloofness between the two of
us during high school, meaning that an act of goodwill or compassion from me
at the school reunion would have had a tremendous effect.

Anyway, his look was the look of emotional devastation and shame, as well as
remorse.  And of course, I remained completely diplomatic, so as to not increase
the guy's existing pain.  I should have walked up to him and said, "Hey man, it's
okay.  Don't worry about it."  I didn't want to open any emotional wounds.  Plus,
my girlfriend at the time was raised in an entirely different part of Pittsburgh, and
she was clueless as to what was going on at the reunion, as she went about being
exremely pleasant and cordial to all of my classmates.  She was superb that night.
I didn't want to disturb her.  I never told her, being that I was never molested by
the molesting headmaster,  So, I remained silent at the reunion when I should have
gone up to talk to the guy.

In comparison,  Ann Rodgers' snow job on the Pittsburgh people was worse.
Wuerl couldn't have gotten the idolatrous image that he did without Rodgers'
connection to the press.  Wuerl was merely using Rodgers for selfish gain.
However, the gig is now up ... expired ... deflated ... unveiled ...
... just like the man behind the curtain in  the Wizard of Oz.
Okay then.  You now know why I reached out to help those who were the play toys
of predatory priests, even though all of my labor and expense in the effort was for
naught, due to the manipulative corruption of Donald Wuerl.  You now know why
I went to lengths to do this Wuerlgate site, despite the threats and very unfriendly
visitation.  It was one of those moral obligation things.  If I were to remain silent,
I would have sinned.  You must let people know when a wolf is in their midst, no
matter how flamingly effeminate and tiny the wolf is, being that the ferociousness
is not in any physical stature.  Rather, it's in the person's abuse of power and his
manipulation of others to do his violence toward yet others.

My reason was very simple and it permeated throughout the marrow of my soul.
Therefore, it wasn't a matter me being a brooding malcontent jealous of Donald
Wuerl.  It wasn't a matter of me trying to one-up-it on the tinsel town narcissistic
who was found living in a Narie Antoinette setting.  Nor was it a matter of trying
to promote another bishop over Wuerl:

It was a matter of me wanting to never go through another suicide, ever again.

Let us proceed:

In the Vatican II church's sex abuse scandal, Cardinal Donald Wuerl became the
second American bishop to get caught performing a cover-up which resulted in
criminal prosecution for the priest(s) being covered.  It all started in Abbeyville
Louisiana with Father Gilbert Gauthe, in 1985.  Then came the indictments of
Pittsburgh diocesan priests, Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci ... during Wuerl's watch.

Being that Wuerl was one of the first bishops in America to get caught cover-
ing up criminal priests, he was one of the first bishops in America to announce
a zero tolerance policy.  He struck the pose of a strick disciplinarian, only be-
cause he was in a huge law-enforcement spotlight, and quite frankly, it had
gotten to the point where the next priest to be convicted of wrongdoing, if
Wuerl were to keep playing his unconscionable games, was Wuerl, himself.
However, he would have been found guilty of a Summary Offense only, and
forced to do no more than pay fine.  However, his strive for high Vatican
power would have ended then and there.

All in all, Wuerl announced NO zero tolerance policy until Wolk, Zula, and
Pucci were indicted.  Plus, Wuerl did NOT enforce the policy when it came
to Fr Edward Huff who would come to be criminally indicted and convicted.
Plus, no zero tolerance policy applied to the retaliatory James Torquato.

Wuerl was no caring man looking out for the underdog, while in possession of
this so-called caring smile.  Those of us who did meet Wuerl in person could
not but help notice his conceitedly curt dismissiveness and his flaming homo-
sexuality.  Yet, it wasn't the flaming homosexuality that was the shocker.  His
mean spirited conceit was.  You could tell that he was thoroughly vicious and
would destroy any human life he could get away with destroying, while having
no remorse ... while experiencing no haunting in his apparently stone cold con-
science.  He was as cold as a demon right before the initial start of an exorcism.

I've met great men in life, ranging from a national book award winner here, a
Walt Whitman award winner there, a Super Bowl champion yet elsewhere, and
a share of full-blown war heroes.  Each one had a personality.  Wuerl had none.
Ann  Rodgers, to legacy of disgrace, set out to make Wuerl look like a great man.
But, Wuerl was nothing more than a Great Lie, especially in what Wuerl did to
Anthony Cipolla, his diversionary tactic.  For those of you easily deceived by
sound bytes and Christopher Dickey articles, the Jpeg evidence is here at the
Wuerlgate which convincingly defends an Anthony Cipolla whom I assumed
was guilty as publicly accused, being that I did no fact checking until the Year
2013,

For the record, the catalyst in finding the proof that Cipolla actually was inno-
cent of the allegations stated by the liar Tim Bendig was Chicago's own Mike
Volpe.  Mike is underrated, to say the least.  He's literally one of my heroes.
Impressive in the proper way for me to describe.  That's for sure.  How did
Mike know?  ANS:  Experience with whistle blower retaliation cases.

Concerning Wolk, Zula, Pucci, and even John S. Hoehl

These priests were not reported to authorities by Wuerl, as was required in the
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Act.  Attorney F. Peter Dixon did the
reporting.  He was the friend of the molested family.  Technically, only one
of the two molested youths were an altar boy; so stated for the record.

In addition, Wuerl publicly stated that his cover-up of Robert Wolk was not
covering-up.  Wuerl was a liar from Day 1.

Here are the newspaper reports on Donald Wuerl's triple cover-up, shortly after
it was uncovered.  The fourth simultaneous cover-up of Donald Wuerl was that
of former high school headmaster, John Hoehl.  Being that Wuerl put Hoehl
back into ministry, declining to remove him until Robert Wolk was indicted.
When Wolk was indicted, Hoehl became a hot potato.  Only at that point in
time did Wuerl remove Hoehl.  Thus, Ann Rodgers deceived the public in
what she wrote about Wuerl dismissing Hoehl.  If it were for Mr. Dixon,
Hoehl would never have been removed from ministry.

Concerning the Triple Cover-up and the two molested youths:

There was also the matter of a fourth alleged molester of the two youth who
happened to have been a layman.  This was reported in a Cleveland Plain
Dealer article, as well as in a couple other American newspapers.

There was also the matter of the tragic Father George Zirwas being at the
scene of one of the three priest's crimes, remaining entirely silent while it
was transpiring.  It transpired in a sky lodge suite.  Father Zirwas remained
silent and complicit, while the priest and his young prey were in a bedroom.
Zirwas was strangled to death in Cuba, years later.

The Wuerl People, including former Pgh Post Gazette writer Ann Rodgers,
continue to cover up Wuerl's Triple Cover-up by means of revising history
to the point of making Wuerl sound like the presiding hero in it.  Proof that
Wuerl was far from the hero of the hour is blatant, evidenced by the fact
that:

District Attorney John C. Pettit publicly announced that Wuerl & his staff
were uncooperative throughout the criminal investigation.  Case Closed.
Wuerl, therefore, is still engaged in a cover-up, doing what he and his
minions can, in keeping the facts of the triple indictment away from as
many members of the public as he and they can.  This is ongoing deceit.

No matter what, keep in mind that my thesis statement in the court of pub-
lic opinion is that, during his Pittsburgh days, Donald Wuerl was a vicious
conniver.  He was a liar, a pretender, a retaliator, and a conceited narcissist
who showed disdain for 99% of the population,

Wuerl most certainly did use diversionary tactics and sleight of hand decep-
tions.   Plus, his nexus to the Sodomite Wuerl was ascertained with empirical
evidence.  Yet, as far as goes the allegations of his private where he allegedly
violated a principle vow of the priesthood as a part of his lifestyle, that is bas-
ed on eye witness accounts, as well as compelling circumstantial evidence.
Due to the lack of smoking gun evidence, I refrained from line-itemizing
what certain individuals from Europe to America alleged to me about
Wuerl's private life.  What if all those people between 1999 and 2012
were wrong in what they told me about Wuerl's alleged private life.

Below is one Jpeg and several links that uncovered Wuerl's triple cover-up
at the time when it was uncovered.  Compare them to what Ann Rodgers &
her fellow propagandists say about Wuerl today, concerning that time span.

Read them.  You will see that no one in any of those news reports is calling
Wuerl a hero of any sorts.  Just the opposite occurred.  You don't have to
take my word for it.  Look for yourself.   In fact, Look, Identify, and Per-
ceive.  The Wuerl People are liars and Donald Wuerl is a living lie.  This
site has the Jpegs and newspaper archive links to prove it.


See also:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4ARlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2XcNAAAAIBAJ&pg=4517,3545671&dq=zula+diocese+wuerl&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9eYpAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7WQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4475,2371591&dq=zula+barn+parked+car+pettit+resort&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GvglAAAAIBAJ&sjid=E_wFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5495,3148582&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=tQYLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=jlEDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5427,4088961&dq=wolk+arrested+pittsburgh+zula+pucci

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ZOMhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fmMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6901,53612&dq=diocese+pittsburgh+1987+seminary+molested&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FwUOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3W0DAAAAIBAJ&pg=1919,3932976&dq=3+priests+investigated+wolk

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mYMcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=b2MEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2329,10275422&hl=en

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/13/us/3-pennsylvania-priests-accused-of-molesting.html 

January 07, 2018

Proof that Wuerl ignored the Child Protective Services Act ... in his cover-up of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, not to mention Hoehl & Huff

Keep in mind that the Donald Wuerl who retaliated against the children of the
Risen Lord Parish adults who protested against Wuerl on TV was praised as a
loving and caring man who only cared about the welfare of children.  Evidence
proves that the picture of Wuerl-the-fatherly-protector was a complete lie.  In
fact, below is a photocopy of the evidence that Wuerl only cared about himself.

A photocopy of a newspaper article reporting Phase I of Wuerl's uncovered Triple
Cover-up at the time it was uncovered is posted several paragraphs below here.
Be patient and scroll down to it, so that you will learn how dishonest Wuerl's
propaganda machine always was and is.   This proves that Wuerl was not the
caring and protective bishop that his embedded propagandist, Ann Rodgers,
(formerly of the Pgh Post Gazette) made him out to be.  Tiny Donald Wuerl ...
the Elevator Shoes Kid ... is one big lie.  I personally learned of Wuerl's ruth-
lessness and manipulative modus operandi during both phrases of the James
Torquato Retaliations.  To this day, Wuerl was NEVER man enough to have
apologized for those whistleblower retaliations.  Actually, Wuerl wasn't and
isn't man enough to do anything that requires manhood, except ... perhaps ...
getting a prescription of Androgel ... for those deficient of testosterone.

Plus, if Wuerl ... or his then-diocese ... would have been indicted and convicted
for the offense of having concealed Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, it (or Wuerl)
would have convicted of nothing more than a Summary Offense.; in having
violated the Child Services Protection Act.   This means that he ... or his then-
diocese ... would have been required to do no more than pay a fine.  However,
this would have made Wuerl look bad  on record, during Vatican paper reviews.
He probably wouldn't have become a cardinal,  if he or his then-diocese would
have been found guilty of violating the Child's Protective Services Act.

Contradiction Time:  
Wuerl was made out to be a non-compromising disciplinarian, 
but after the Wolk indictiment ... the opposite was illustrated.

"To say he will not be reassigned is a devastating thing," said Wuerl to the
press shortly after he was caught performing his triple cover-up which was
headlined with Father Robert Wolk's indictment.  The same Donald Wuerl
also said to the media, "It is NOT covering up to embrace man who is
suffering."  Yet, Ann Rodgers, (formerly known as Rodgers-Melnick) of
the Pittsburgh Post Gazette had the audacity to deceive the public into be-
lieving Wuerl to be the bishop of zero tolerance that he never was.


Add to this the fact that Wuerl already reassigned the notorious John Hoehl
months prior.  Wuerl had no intention of getting rid of Hoehl until the indict-
ment of Wolk.  Yet, the pathologically bland Ann Rodgers had the audacity
to make it look as if Wuerl were the instant disciplinarian from Day 1.  You
now see how far away from zero tolerance Wuerl was.  After all, he made a
criminal sound like a victim.  You can now also see how much of a liar was
Ann Rodgers of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.  You need to keep in mind that
a faction who praises Wuerl seeks to have him to get the 2,000 year old Ro-
man Catholic Church to declare the repeatedly condemned Sin of Sodom
a holy act of God.  Apparently, such people have strong stomaches.

Now, in the Year 2002, when Donald W. Wuerl was being made out to be
the holiest male on Earth --- next to the molester Marcial Maciel who was
also lauded as a saint --- would you have been praising Wuerl if you knew
about his triple cover-up?  Would writers have been calling that fraud "one
of the good guys, if you they knew about DA John C. Pettit announcing to
the press that Wuerl was uncooperative during the investigation which re-
sulted in the indictments of Wolk, Richard "Sade" Zula, and Francis Pucci?

Would he have been made the Master of Ceremonies in a St. Patrick's Day
parade, if Pittsburghers knew about Wuerl's public excuse for covering-up
the crimes of three of his priests, followed by Wuerl publicly denying that
it was the act of covering-up at all?   Or would you have categorized him
with Bernard Law & Roger Mahoney?

Would you have been praising Wuerl that year, if Ann Rodgers and the
Pgh Post Gazette were honest enough to report on the James Torquato
case?  It's the case of a former personal secretary of Wuerl spending con-
secutive years not keeping his hands to himself and then retaliating the
moment he was reported.  You know, the Torquato case has dozens of
pieces of evidence attached to it.  It is the single most evidence support-
ed cover-up of Donald Wuerl.

Wuerl was headlined as the bishop who fought the Vatican to remove  "a
molester priest," when the fact is that he only attempted to have the priest
removed from ministry for what was later called a misdiagnosis of Depress-
ion and Suicidal Tendencies.  The priest was never arrested, yet Wuerl let
the papers claim that the priest was.  In fact, that priest, Anthony Cipolla,
received a favorable Pennsylvania State Police background check security
clearance in the Summer of 2014, where within it was stated that Cipolla
has NO ARREST RECORD in the State of Pennsylvania.  For those of
you who are brain dead, Cipolla's 2014 security clearance of a huge deal.

This triple cover-up also shows Wuerl's motive in letting Anthony Cipolla
be the public scapegoat whose reputation was completely annihilated, de-
spite the overwhelming evidence of Cipolla being the opposite of the media
smear campaign launched against him.  You see, DA John C. Pettit publicly
stated, (and I am going by memory on this quote, meaning that it is to be re-
garded as paraphrased:  "I don't want to make this look like a witch hunt, but
we would be sticking our heads in the sands to think that this is an isolated
incident."  This meant that there would be more investigating . . . there was
to be more "snooping around," "looking around," "scrutinizing."  So, Wuerl
needed a diversionary tactic, to pursuade the law enforcement personnel in
more than one sovereign state involved to be deceived into thinking that
Wuerl was a staunch "zero tolerance" leader.  Wuerl was proven to be
no such person.

Wuerl was in a law enforcement spotlight.  This meant that Wuerl needed
a smokescreen, to deceive the public into thinking that he was a holy and
all so caring saint.   Wuerl did nothing more than masquerade himself as
an angel of light, at the expense of others such as an Anthony Cipolla who,
unlike the effeminate Donald Wuerl, was found to have zero nexus with the
homosexual subculture.  Wuerl, on the other hand, had a definitive nexus
with the neo-Sodomite world.


The newspaper jpegs above prove that the slightly built Donald Wuerl
thrived on a propaganda machine filled with sleight of hand deceptions
and direct falsehoods.

In addition, don't forget that he rode the coattails of John Cardinal Wright,
and without the help of the allegedly homosexual John Wright, the Donald
Wuerl who accommodated banned Dignity Masses for eight consecutive
years would have been nothing.

It was the court system that prompted Wuerl to strike the pose of a strict
disciplinarian.  It was all a fraud to have claimed that Wuerl would come
to the rescue of the victims of predatory priests such as the Edward Huff
whom he kept hiding out in mental institutions and the Father James Tor-
quato whom he sent to Rome while federal court papers had Torquato's
name mentioned throughout them.  Wuerl's artificial pose did not occur
until three simultaneous indictments of three Pittsburgh priests occured
under Wuerl's watch, coupled with a DA John Pettit's public accusation
that Wuerl's diocese performed uncooperative conduct with police inves-
tigators.

Keep in mind that there was no criminal investigation of Wolk, Zula,
and Pucci until an attorney friend-of-the-family of the two young play
toys reported the matter to the police.  The attorney did not do so until
after Wuerl visited the family. Despite visiting the family, Wuerl still
refused to report Wolk, Zula, and Pucci to the police, as was required
in the Child Protective Services Act.  Now you can see more clearly
that everything about Wuerl is either an outright lie and or sleight of
hand deception.

In addition, Wuerl only went to the home of the traumatized family af-
ter their parish pastor was told by them that they were going to report
the three molester priests to law enforcement authorities.  The pastor
then informed Wuerl.

Do not be deceived.  Ann Rodgers made it sound as if Wuerl were a
strict disciplinarian who ousted Hoehl, as soon as he learned of him.
No, Wuerl placed Hoehl into chaplaincy ministry, as he did with Huff.
Wuerl did NOT read Hoehl the riot act until Wolk, Zula, and Pucci
were criminally indicted.  Then, Hoehl became a hot potato.  Wuerl
got rid of Hoehl, so that Wuerl would not get into trouble.  There was
no loving and caring bishop involved.  I tell you solemnly, Wuerl was
absolutely vicious and heartless while in Pittsburgh.  He was the per-
sonification of lies and retaliation.

As a  review, so that it will be clearly understood:

Now, Pgh Post Gazette reporter Ann Rodgers claimed that Wuerl had
an epiphany while visiting the traumatized family and then became the
"model of zero tolerance" thereafter.  This claim is easily proven false
by the fact that District Attorney John Pettit publicly announced that
Wuerl's then Diocese of Pittsburgh did NOT provide the cooperation
that the district attorney sought during the criminal investigation.  It
was a criminal investigation which didn't commence until someone
other than Wuerl notified the police.

If Donald Wuerl were the model of zero tolerance, he would have been
the one who reported Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Plus, Wuerl would NOT
have allowed the 'foot dragging' that a Western Pennsylvanian DA said
was being committed by Wuerl's diocese.  Neither would Wuerl have
reinstated Hoehl and Huff.  That which was told to you by former
Post Gazette writer, Ann Rodgers, and FoxNews are proven false-
hoods.

January 05, 2018

Cardinal Wuerl did NOT write the The Teachings of Christ, as the Wikipedia article falsely claimed.

... and the Library of Congress always stated it that way.

Everything about Cardinal Wuerl is either an
outright lie or a very underhanded sleight of
hand deception.  He is heralded as the author
of a book he never wrote.  He is praised as
the bishop of zero tolerance, despite being
among  the first ones caught  covering-up
criminal priests.  He is then hailed as John
Wright's protege, as if such a thing is good.

Step 1:  Look at the Title Page of the original edition of the book, and look at
the nameS of the authors.  The plural in authors is a good tip-off that Wuerl
did NOT write that Catechism single-handedly.  He was one of three editors.
Yet, he presented that book as if he wrote it solo.
*************************************************************

During college, I used three catechism books for my introductory Catholicism
course,  thee years before I would enter the Thomistic Philosophy level of study.
One  catechism book that I used was John Hardon's Catholic Catechism.  It was
published in the vicinity of 1975.

Another one was the Teachings of Christ,  and the third one was a book that
was later declared heretical, where the author was  "invited" by the Holy See
to amend the contents within it.

On a metal-frame desk purchased with S&H Green Stamps, as I first looked at
the the authorship page of the Teachings of Christ, the name "Donald Wuerl"
did NOT register in my mind.  This shows how much of a minor contributor
to the book he was.

None the less, after college I would read the cultic Ann Rodgers and a few
other people state that Donald Wuerl single-handedly wrote the Teachings
of Christ that I held in my hands during my college days.  It was a surprise
to have read this.  I wondered how I could have been so unobservant that I
didn't notice that which Ann Rodgers and a few others claimed.  If Wuerl
were the sole author that book, then what were those other names doing in
the authorship page, aka Title Page?

Well, after I looked into the authorship of the book, I saw that the Library
of Congress NEVER declared Wuerl the author or co-author of the book.
Ann Rodgers once again lied, and it was affirmed to me that I wasn't los-
ing my mind, after all.

Furthermore, Wuerl had a photo session of himself, where he was seated in
front of the camera while holding a copy of the Teachings of Christ.  This
created the illusion that he was the sole author of the book he never wrote.
Civilized protocol is that you never have a photo taken of yourself while
holding a book that you never wrote.  Wuerl was deliberately creating
the illusion.  I never had the audacity to be photographed while hold-
ing the anthologies which carried my writings, being that there were
more authors involved in those publications than me.  Who else
would do such a thing other than a narcissistic or manipulator,
in the quest to make himself look elite?

Ann Rodgers, under the name, Ann Rodgers-Melnick, was Wuerl's embedded
propagandist here.  She was never Catholic and she doesn't even observe
the Church's moral code as it applies to the indissolubility of marriage.
A non-Catholic living an anti-Catholic life is the best Wuerl could do.

The most notable feature about the compilation and editing of the Teachings 
of Christ was that there were so many writers involved in the writing of the
book's manuscript that there was a notable difference in writing styles among
the book's co-authors.  Therefore, the prime objective in editing that book was
COHESION in its writing style.

Now, the Library of Congress and a source of mine acknowledged that there
were THREE editors of the book, with Wuerl being only one of them.  The
task of the day, concerning the Teachings of  Christ, was to blend the many
authors' writing styles into one cohesive syntactical style.

The bottom line is that Wuerl takes much more credit than what he deserves
in a lot of things, and he never admits wrongdoing in the outrages which he
orchestrated and/or ratified.  Such is the way of any peacock throne bishop.
Such a person always has to have the spotlight shining on him and he always
has to be the center of attention.

The Ann Rodgers articles which make Wuerl sound like a divine god who
does everything are nothing more than very impish and gauche pieces of
propaganda written by one who thinks that you are stupid and gullible.
Feel free to break out of Ann Rodgers' hypnotic trance, as she describes
Wuerl as Beowulf, Version 2.0.
Communications equipment was not created to spread lies.
and a person does not have to shout, "Fire!" in a crowded theater.
Whereas "buyer beware" as an American policy, long ago,
it's now a matter of "Reader Beware & Listener Beware."
The Actual Game

Now, the game being played is this:  Wuerl is being made out to be the ultimate
 teacher of Catholicism who cannot be questioned by anyone anywhere.  Com-
ment boards and Rodgers used phrases to describe Wuerl such as, "magnificent
obsession," "great teacher," etc.

So, the game plan has been to make it look as if anything that Wuerl says has to
be instantaneously believed as the Truth of God by every Catholic everywhere.
Then, after this goal gets accomplished, you'll suddenly hear Wuerl (or someone
in the name of Wuerl --- or some conference headed by Wuerl) state that the Sin
of Sodom and Sodomite attraction is a good and holy thing ... even to the point
of being regarded as the Eighth Sacrament of the Church..  Very predictable.

The Sodomites will shove this down your throat, saying,  "Yeah!  Yeah!  See?
See?   Wuerl said it.  So, you gotta believe it.  He's the ultimate teacher.  You
have to let all the homos smear Vaseline all over church furniture  ...  because
Wuerl said it was holy."  In other words, Cardinal Donald Wuerl is seen as the
gatekeeper by the homosexual world who waits for him to use his influence and
declare homosexuality acceptable ... in the wait for him to accommodate the
Sin of Sodom in the Catholic Church.

Q:  And why Wuerl?   ANS:  Because he promoted Dignity Masses for eight
consecutive years, in complete defiance toward the Vatican who banned that
type of Mass.  For years, Wuerl, by his actions, was saying, "Up yours," to
the Vatican in a blatant display of contempt toward the Chair of St. Peter.
He then has people go about acting as if he is as infallible as St. Peter.
Wuerl follows suit in changing doctrine as his convenience, even to
the point of calling someone as doctrinally basic as Cardinal Ray-
mond Burke the dissenter.

Of course, Wuerl does NOT possess papal infallibility.  He is NOT a one-
man Magisterium, and he has been cited speaking heresy.  He makes up a
doctrine in the image and likeness of himself.  Yet, he doesn't go out and
start his own religion, presumably because he won't get much of a follow-
ing and because he will no longer be able to live in the Marie Antoinette
type of comfort.

Being that there is a push (by one faction) to have Wuerl regarded as the
ultimate teacher of all Catholicism, you need to accentuate the fact that
Wuerl did NOT write the Teachings of Christ whenever someone says he
did.  Counter the deifying of tiny Donald Wuerl, the Elevator Shoes Kid.

All in all, anyone can write a catechism book.  In fact, no one ever writes a
catechism book.  A person simply passes on the teachings of the Apostles
which were handed down to him/her.  The writing of Catholic catechism
had long since been done.  No one has the power or the right to change
Catholic doctrine as much as no one has the right to change the books
which comprise that Old and New Testaments, as the admittedly con-
stipated and flatulent-afflicted Martin Luther did.

To think, Luther was supposed to be the new enlightenment, yet he was
clueless about the existence of fiber, probiotics, ketogenics, displacing
uric acid, adaptogens, isolates,  etc.  Anyway . . .

When you finally break out of the Ann Rodgers hypnotic trance that makes
a person assume that Wuerl is the greatest thing since sliced bread, you'll
notice the wolves prowling among the sheep, all the while noticing that
each of them are either masquerading as angels of light or pretending
that they have a new discovery about Catholicism that requires the
2,000 year old doctrine to be changed.  Such males who do so are
simply not man enough to live Catholicism.  As a result, they end
up making Catholicism look like a buffoonish joke.
There's a construction supply building across the street from here where
I regularly go.  The Church Brew Works is regarded as One Big Joke.
When I was photographing this place, you should have seen the look on
people's faces who were coming here for lunch or drinks or whatever.
Coming here was a novelty to them.  It was a disrespectful joke to them.

January 04, 2018

Wuerl kept the notorious Father Hoehl in ministry, even after the "life-changing epiphany" dinner proclaimed by Propagandist Ann Rodgers.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where Cardinal Donald Wuerl's web of corruption was spun,
with the help the Ann Rodgers who was repeatedly caught lying in print, via fact checking.
Nor did he report Wolk, Zula, and Pucci to the police.  Attorney F. Peter
Dixon did.  Attn Dixon was a friend of the victimized family.

For those unaware, John Hoehl was put on administrative leave by then-
Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua.  Hoehl WAS removed from the priesthood
ministry.  Wuerl reinstated him.  THEREFORE, if Wuerl had the life-
changing epiphany that the deceptive, non-Catholic, and pathologically
bland Ann Rodgers claimed, then Donald Wuerl would have reported 
Wolk, Zula, Pucci, Huff, and Hoehl to the law enforcement authorities.  
He did not do so.  Thus, Ann Rodgers is once again found to be a liar, 
predictably enough.  

Then there was Wellinger, not to mention Wuerl reinstating Huff.  All in
all, know that Ann Rodgers IS a liar.  She was a non-Catholic Pittsburgh
Post Gazette writer who was appointed Pittsburgh Roman Catholic Dio-
cesan director of communications.  She still is a Protestant.  Her appoint-
ment is a case study in cronyism and Vatican II corruption.  Read onward,
because you need to know what liars comprise the Wuerl propaganda
machine.  Incidentally, he did NOT write the Teachings of Christ.  He
was merely one of three editors of the catechism book which had a
multiplicity of authors.  Wuerl, himself, begane the lie which claimed
that he wrote that catechism book single-handedly, doing so in 1979,

Concerning the two lads corrupted by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, know that
each priest performed his antics at different times, on different occasions.
It wasn't one of those "all-three-at-once" scenarios, to state it politely.

The Pittsburgh Post Gazette story which was easy to prove false was that
Wuerl had a life-changing enlightenment when he went to the home of the
two lads sodomized by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, and then instantly became
the champion of zero tolerance.  That scenario did NOT happen.  Ann
Rodgers (formerly of the Pgh Post Gazette) was and is a liar, and she
never sued me for calling her a liar.

Proof that the Ann Rodgers story is a fairy tale exists in the fact that District
Attorney John C. Pettit issued a press release which stated that Donald Wuerl,
as well as staff members of his then-diocese of Pittsburgh, were uncooperative
with law enforcement officials throughout the investigation that resulted in the
indictments of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In addition, if Wuerl were the heroic bishop of zero tolerance that Ann Rodgers
said he was, then Wuerl would have immediately suspended the notorious John
Hoehl whom Wuerl personally put back into ministry, shortly before that dinner
transpired.  For the record, it was Donald Wuerl's predecessor, the destined-to-be-
disgraced Anthony Bevilacqua, who ordered Hoehl on administrative leave.

Now, if the 5'4" Donald Wuerl whom Ann Rodgers falsely described in print as
an ascetic 5'11" were the model of zero tolerance, then Donald Wuerl would also
not have reinstated into ministry the Fr Edward Huff who would eventually be-
come criminally indicted and convicted.  Wuerl was covering-up Huff while he
was being lauded as a bishop of zero tolerance in the Anthony Cipolla Case.

And of course, after the fact-checking, and after Bendig multiply lied to me,
and after the spiritually grotesque Diane Thompson repeatedly lied about me
and changed her story about Anthony Cipolla, it was confirmed that Anthony
Cipolla was 95 to 98% innocent as accused.  After all, Cipolla never was in-
dicted, and a DA can file an indictment without Diane Thompson's permis-
sion to do so.  Of course, this refers to my future defendant, Diane Thomp-
son, who harassed me and repeatedly committed libel against me.  She is
quite arrogant, as well as erratic in her writings which were fact-checked
and found to be bullet-riddled with easily provable falsehoods, as is ex-
plained in a few Wuerlgate articles.

Wolk, Zula, & Pucci

The first of the three to be indicted was Wolk, and after Wolk was indicted,
Wuerl gave an excuse for his cover-up of him.  Only afterward did Wuerl
do the artificial grandstanding, with sleight of hand semantics involved.
Wuerl was no champion of Zero Tolerance.  Wuerl was caught and then
had to quickly construct a facade.

The other proof is that Wuerl reinstated the suspended Father John Hoehl.
After that dinner, Wuerl kept Hoehl in ministry, thereby very much tolerat-
ing a priest who caused a lot of lingering psychological damage to a num-
ber of individuals.  Wuerl stubbornly kept Hoehl in ministry until Father
Robert Wolk was indicted.  Then Wuerl treated Hoehl as a hot potato and
showed him the exit door.

Now, do you see what a liar Ann Rodgers and the other Wuerl People are?
Concerning Rodgers, she meddled in influencing the Catholic mind.  Yet,
she refuses to be a Catholic.

An added scandal  is in the fact that David Zubik, a secretary of John Hoehl,
never reported Hoehl for his well-noted sex crimes.  However, my opinion is
that David Zubik had no idea of what Hoehl was doing in his private life.  I
personally knew Fr. Dave.  Dave didn't buddy around with the athletes whom
Hoehl targeted.  Dave wasn't in the inner circle.  In my opinion David Zubik
isn't an accomplice.  The problem is that he wasn't alert to his surroundings.
He needed to reach-out more.  If he did, he could have spared someone of
the grief that comes with being a high school headmaster's prey.

As was previously stated and ignored by the Vatican . . .

Added proof that Wuerl was NO hero of zero tolerance exists in the fact that
Wuerl  also reinstated the Edward Huff who ended up being indicted and con-
victed.  Thus, as you can see, the story of Wuerl being a crystal clear saint of
zero tolerance is a complete falsehood.  Wuerl IS as corrupt as they come, and
the stories were a part of that criminal corruption.

Concerning Hoehl and the time of the Wolk indictment, if Wuerl were found
to have a criminal in ministry, law enforcement would have scoured the Pitts-
burgh diocese and Wuerl in investigative detail.  Wuerl's private life, even
when he was the long-term secretary under John Cardinal Wright, would
have been revealed to law enforcement authorities.  Wuerl stubbornly kept
John Hoehl in  diocesan ministry for as long as he could do so, without hav-
ing the Diocese of Pittsburgh become a magnetized target of a detialed law
enforcement investigation.

Added proof that Wuerl had NO change of heart after the dinner evening
with the family victimized by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci was that he did NOT
report those three priests.  An attorney who was a friend of the victimized
family did the reporting thereof.  So, as you can see, Ann Rodgers, former-
ly of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, is a liar.  Rocco Palmo and Christopher
Dickey were fools to have used her as a source in their articles about Don-
ald Wuerl which were basically two plagiarisms of Rodgers; falsehoods.
They lost credibility with anyone familiar with the Wuerlgate Jpegs, news
archives, and witness accounts.  They lost credible with anyone who was
there in Pittsburgh during the 1990s.

IN AS MUCH,  contrary to what Christopher Dickey wrote, the truth is that
the only reason why Wuerl and his former Diocese of Pittsburgh had one of
the first no-tolerance sex abuse policies in America was because:

Wuerl was one of the very first bishops in the United States who got 
caught concealing criminal priests from law enforcement authorities.

So, he had to strike the disciplinarian pose while the law enforcement
spotlight was on him.  Wuerl was caught being uncooperative with
DA John C. Pettit.  So, Wuerl fabricated a new image of himself.
It included him announcing a zero tolerance sex abuse policy.

HOWEVER ...

Wuerl's sex abuse policy did NOT apply to 1} the case of  Edward Huff
who would eventually be criminally indicted, 2} the credible seminarian
Wuerl prevented from being ordained, 3} the  case of Fr. James Torquato,
4} the case of Fr. John Wellinger,  Plus, the policy was NOT implement-
ed until after Wuerl put the notorious John S. Hoehl back into ministry.
Even more hypocritical was the fact that Wuerl put back into ministry
the previously mentioned Edward Huff who was reported to Wuerl
three different times, by the differing sets of concerned Catholics.
The Zero-Tolerance label placed on Wuerl was a fraudulent claim.
_____________________________________________________________

For those unfamiliar, Ann Rodgers was a writer for the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.
Even though she was never any type of Catholic, she was assigned to be head
of the Communications Dept of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.
On multiple fact-checking occasions, Ann Rodgers was caught lying in print.

A Review of Wuerl's Triple Cover-up

To start, Wuerl had a Father Arnott go to the violated family, to see if they
would be willing to meet with Wuerl.  But, this only occurred when Wuerl
learned that the family was going to report the priests to law enforcement
authorities.  The Donald Wuerl who was sued many times by Pittsburgh
area residents sought to get his foot into the door.  Wuerl basically invited
himself.

Do NOT ever be deceived into thinking that Wuerl was a revered presence
in Pittsburgh.  The number of lawsuits filed against him proves  otherwise.
Wuerl had contrived press and media coverage, as well as the pit bull Ron
Lengwin who actually is very tall and who allegedly sought to intimidate
people in the mode of a big bully.  Me seeing how tall Lengwin is was as
shocking to me as having seen how tiny Wuerl is.  All that Lengwin ever
did to me was smile at me with gritted teeth and a snarl.  He kept moving
and I never saw him again.  This was at the diocesan building.

If Wuerl's meeting with the family were similar to other people's encounters
with Wuerl, then I can assure you that he left the family feeling violated and
outraged.  I can assure you that he triggered a sense of insult so intense that
they went forth and gave the greenlight to Attorney F. Peter Dixon who end-
ed up reporting the three priests to law enforcement officials.

As soon as the indictment was filed, Wuerl got rid of Hoehl like a sand bag in
a hot air balloon losing altitude.  But, not until then.  This is extremely interest-
ing, in that it indicates that Wuerl seemingly assumed that the violated family
would not report the three molester priests to the police.  If Wuerl anticipated
the reporting thereof, he would have gotten rid of John Hoehl immediately.
Wuerl let Hoehl remain in ministry, as if Wuerl arrogantly assumed that he
controlled the violated family on a set of puppet strings.

Wuerl keeping Fr. John Hoehl in ministry after the meeting with
the family of two molested altar boys proves that  Wuerl had no
change of heart or policy that resulted from the meeting/dinner.
The claim that the meeting changed Wuerl is lying propaganda.

During the journalists' 2013 papal conjecture phrase, shortly before Francis I
ascended to the Chair of Saint Peter, the Daily Beast's Paris bureau chief con-
jectured that Cardinal Wuerl was America's candidate for pope, in light of the
newspaper articles that glorified Wuerl, especially in the heavily misrepresent-
ed Anthony Cipolla case that starred a seminary flunk-out who was described
as a perpetual and pathological liar by multiple persons who knew him.  In fact,
the Cipolla case starred an individual who was even declared NOT credible by
Donald Wuerl, at one time.  His name is Tim Bendig and he lied to me four
times in a row in the Year 2014, during a telephone conversation that he
initiated with me during work hours.  I conducted that conversation in a
construction trailer office, next to a drawing board.

The Paris bureau chief then stated that Wuerl apparently became too tired to
fight the good fight that the media described Wuerl as having fought.  Dickey
then referred to one of Ann Rodgers' Pgh Post Gazette articles, stating:

     But a few weeks after that decision Wuerl met with the devout, deeply
     disillusioned, and increasingly litigious family of one victim.  They in-
     vited Wuerl to dinner and, according to a lengthy and laudatory report
     in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in 2003, when Wuerl left that table his
     views of the issue had changed.  Before, his actions had been closely
     aligned church policies, which were basically a CYA masquerading
     as piety.

     Now Wuerl told his staff it had to get its priorities straight: the first
    concern was the injured party, the second was for the person’s family,
    the third—and only the third—was the potential harm to the church
    and its reputation.   He’s on the record declaring zero tolerance for
    priests accused of sexual abuse 14 years before that became official
   policy.
__________________________________________________________
The decision to which Dickey referred was Wuerl's decision to put back
into ministry the notorious John S. Hoehl, former headmaster of Quigley
H.S., in Baden Pennsylvania.  I attended that school for four years.  And
yes, I heard the rumors while in school.

Furthermore, Wuerl did NOT observe the policy he announced in the case
of Edward Huff.  Plus, his policy did NOT apply to Torquato's prey or to
the credible deacon whistle blower Wuerl trapped and refused to ordain
into the priesthood.  Yet, Wuerl ordained the homosexual predator, James
Torquato, and covered up Torquato's wrongs, thereby approving of them
in deed.





The source of this letter is self-evident.

January 03, 2018

Yes, I Spoke with Mark Ninehouser and he said that he never arrested Cipolla and never filled-out any police report in cursive handwriting.



However, he did say that his badge number was 46, as Randy Engel
claimed, and that his partner's badge number was 37.  However, he
was NOT a detective, as the same Randy Engel claimed.  Therefore,
Engel got everything wrong except for the two badge numbers, in
her nightmarish narration of an arrest which has now been 100%
proven to never have existed.

Quick March 2017 note:  More information of the Edward Huff case is
forthcoming.  The Huff Coverup, alone, proved former Pittsburgh Post
Gazette writer, Ann Rodgers (formerly Ann Rodgers-Melnick), to have
been nothing but Wuerl's propagandist.   That was an abuse of the press.

It is now Liberation Day for all of those who believed in the good character
of the man formerly known as Father Anthony Cipolla.  In late February of
2017, I finally made contact with ... and conversed at will with ... one of the
two police officers who responded to Diane Thompson's phone call to the po-
lice, in 1978.  Randy Engel stated that they arrested Cipolla.  In fact, Engel
stated that they were detectives.  No, there weren't.  None the less, one of
the two police officers who Engel claimed to have arrested Anthony Cipol-
la categorically stated that he did NOT do so.  Engel is now dangling at
the edge of a business-destroying lawsuit which has a statute of limitations
a lot longer than the average American attention span.

Randy Engel's didn't merely accuse Anthony Cipolla of molestation.  She
accused him of harassment and terrorism, all the while stating that the Bish-
op of Pittsburgh at the time and the Allegheny County DA at the time were
accomplices to such criminal conduct.

It has now been proven to be a lie that a young Frank Labiaux ... eldest son
of a Diane Thompson whose timeline identifies her as a teenage pregnancy
queen .... vandalized a church out of sheer frustration for having been mo-
lested.  Being that this Frank Labiaux is a proven liar, one can plausibly
conclude that he also lied about being molested.

Whatever be the case, Frank Labiaux made his debut instantly destroying his
credibility.  This will especially be the case in the eyes of an entire jury who is
given the time to assess a case that now qualifies as actionable libel.  Then comes
the Eggshell Skull Rule, where Anthony Cipolla was forced to endure the stress
heaped upon him by libel and defamation.

As I stated perhaps twenty times previously ... and which never sunk into Randy
Engel's mind, Donald Wuerl used the Cipolla Case to finally get out of the spot-
light placed on him by Washington County DA John C Pettit.  This case also
made the Edward Huff indictment largely unknown by the Pittsburgh people,
even though it did make the mainstream media newspaper, at the time.


For those unaware, Diane Thompson and Randy Engel made elaborate and
damning accusations against Anthony Cipolla, former DA Bob Colville, and
the late Bishop Vincent Leonard, concerning the assertion that Cipolla mo-
lested her son, Tucker, in 1978.  The added assertion, never prefixed with
the lawsuit-prevention word, ALLEGED, was that massive and violent re-
taliation occurred after Thompson "filed charges."  No civilian has the
power to "file charges."

You see, Engel asserted that an M.N. Nehouser, Badge #46, and an R. Fogle,
Badge #37 arrested Cipolla for molestation, filled out an Incidence Report,
and hung by Diane Thompson's side, telling her to not "drop charges, de-
spite all of the harassment she was going to get.   The narration all turned
out to be a fraudulent misrepresentation, except for the officer's badge
numbers.

In fact, in 1995, Thompson narrated a harrowing tale to a Pittsburgh Post
Gazette writer on how disappointed the two detectives looked when she
"dropped charges," with tears in her eyes, in the DA's office, signing a
paper that she couldn't read, due to the tears in the eyes.  That story
... and the story of her youngest son vandalizing a church out of the
frustration of having been molested ... have all now been proven to
be libel.  Provable lies.  Orchestrated falsehoods conjured by one of
the my incompetent liars you can encounter.

Let us proceed:

Mark Ninehouser was one of the two police officers who responded to Di-
ane Thompson's call in 1978, concerning her claim that her son, Tucker,
was molested by the man formerly known as Anthony Cipolla.

In her three-part article, Randy Engel referred to him as M.N. Nehouser.
None the less, he remembers the case and said the following:

      All that he did was take a report from Thompson, and then filled
      out a form by means of hand-printing it, and NOT handwriting it
      with cursive hand writing.  He said that he simply handed the re-
      port to the detectives, and that was it.  Nothing more was done
      by him.  Thus:::::

      1} He did NOT arrest Cipolla.  2} He was not called back to Diane
      Thompson's home, to respond to a call that she made, reporting that
      Cipolla was at her kitchen door.  3}  Plus, Mark was not called to
       the scene of any face-slapping of nine year old Tucker by a 70 year
       old man, and therefore, that account also turned-out to be a lie told
       by Diane Thompson. 4} Mark was also NOT called to respond to
       Diane Thompson's home, on account of any rock throwing incident
       which broke one of her windows,

All in all:

That which happened was NOT the way described by Randy Engel or by
the media in their 1990s reports about Cipolla.

Let's Review:   Concerning police officer, Mark Ninehouser, who respond
to Diane Thompson's original phone call to the police:

1}  He categorically stated that he NEVER put any Catholic priest in hand
cuffs in 1978, including Anthony Cipolla.  Neither he nor his partner Robert
W. Fogle arrested Cipolla.

1b}  Ninehouser was NOT a detective.  He said that he took the report of
Diane Thompson's accusations and handed it to the detectives.

1c}  At this point, the following must absolutely be remembered:

Randy Engel wrote that Diane Thompson started getting harassed by Cipolla
on July 30, 1978, upon which she called Ninehouser (misspelled as Nehouser
by Engel) and Officer Fogle.  Former Officer Ninehouser categorically stated
to me that, after he handed his hand-printed report to the detectives, he walked
away from the Diane Thompson case.  Thus, she did NOT call him, saying that
Cipolla was in the house.  He did NOT say to her, "Diane, they are going to try
to harass you into dropping charges.  So, be strong and stand your ground." Etc.

And and and he most certainly did NOT go to her home after "she was forced to
drop charges" and give her a copy of the Incidence Report which apparently was
a counterfeited one filled out by a non-police officer under the guise that it was
done by a police officer.  He did not walk up to her and say, "You're going to
need this one day."

The whole account about the detectives was a complete fraudulent misrepresen-
tation, and the detectives mentioned by Engel weren't even detectives.

2}  Keep in mind that I stated that the Incidence Report mentioned by Randy
Engel, part of which was photographed and put online, looked like a forgery.
For those unaware, the online photo which was purported to be the Incidence
Report of 1978 was handwritten with crowded handwriting and the letter "l"
always being looped widely.   The reason why that photograph was the photo
of a forgery ... of a fraud ... is very simple:

         Honorably retired Mark Ninehouser said that he and his fellow
         police officers were required to print (hand-print) all police re-
         ports.  No cursive handwriting was permitted.  The fact that the
         photo purported to be the actual Incidence Report of 1978 is
         handwritten with cursive writing, and not hand-printed, proves
         that the sheet of paper called "the one remaining piece of evi-
         dence" by Randy Engel is a very counterfeited fraud.  No po-
         lice officer of the 1970s would have filled-out the report in
         that fashion.

3}  Randy Engel stated that Cipolla was arraigned "at City Court" in a
      Pittsburgh Police Station.  This is a complete lie, because no arraign-
      ment ever took place in a police station.  ALL arraignments took
      place in one of two places:

              1} At the Public Safety Building which was located at First and
                   Grant Street, at one time.

               or

               2} At City NIGHT COURT.

Cipolla was never arraigned, because he was NEVER arrested.  He was
accused in a private criminal complaint and served with a SUMMARY
NOTICE only signed by Diane Thompson.  She was to appear in city
court ... at the Public Safety Building ... and state due cause as to why
Cipolla should be arrested.  It was a hearing equal to a preliminary
hearing, but without the accuser having been first arrested.  It was
a hearing that would judge if Cipolla were to be arrested or not.

4}  There is NOT any mistaken identity of police officers in this case,
being that Mark Ninehouser remembers the case in outline form, and
being that Randy Engel did get his badge number and Robert Fogle's
number completely correct.  Mark's badge number actually was 46,
and Robert's actually was 37, as Engel stated.  BUT, they were NOT
detectives.

In addition, there was ... at the time ... a #9 Police Station in the Northside,
located on Federal Street.  So, that part was gotten correct by Engel.  But,
there were NEVER arraignments taking place at any police station.

In addition, Engel stated that the incidence report was signed M.N.
Nehouser.  So, I asked Mark what the N stood for.  He said that he
did NOT have a middle name.

Once again, for those who are incredibly prejudiced against Cipolla:

5}  Rest assured that there was NO CALL to the police that a 70 year old
man working at any kind of a store slapped Tucker in the face, for having
accused Anthony Cipolla of wrong-doing.

6} Rest assured that no one called the police and reported a rock smashing
through any window at the residence of Diane Thompson and her children.



Take note that Mark was very articulate, talkative, and easy-going in his
conversation with me.  He did not stop to think of what he was going to
say.  He did not have time lapses of  momentary silence.  He simply spoke
spontaneously, hiding nothing.  He and I were literally shooting the breeze,
it was that easy-going of a conversation.

There is more to convey to you.  The bottom line is that two parts of the
three-part Randy Engel article that damns Anthony Cipolla and the late
Bishop Vincent Leonard to the Depths of Hell is complete libel.  If you
are a fan or friend of Randy, tell her that she better start talking to an
attorney.  There still is ample time before the statute of limitations ex-
pires.

I'll eventually have to notify Stephen Stone of Renew America that many
editor retractions and corrections need be made.  Moreover, if you pasted
that Engel article on your own website and you refuse to remove it once
notified, expect a summons to appear in court as a defendant, somewhere
down the road.

There WILL be other defendants, too.  I'll continue this at a later time.
For now, you have enough substantive information that it should easily
break the hypnotic trance that Engel has on the weak-minded & gullible.
She is NOT a guardian of Truth, Justice, and the American Way.  She's
a gossipy and libelous hag who actually thinks that the historic red
Shoes of the Fisherman are homosexual shoes.

I give you your freedom from Randy Engel's influence and her pretense
of being the deliverer of truth and her hatred of the Shoes of the Fisher-
man.  Be free.

Till the next time,

Patrick Anthony Pontillo

In America, Truth ends up prevailing.

January 02, 2018

Cardinal Wuerl started out in the mode of Cardinal Law, but no one in the media was ever honest enough to admit it.

 © Patrick Anthony Pontillo
There was a time when Cardinal Wuerl operated in a mode of conduct that 
would become synonymous with the way of Boston's Cardinal Bernard Law.
In fact, the original handling of lone wolf molester, John Hoehl, proved this 
to be true, along with Wuerl's handling of Edward Huff, individually, and
Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci collectively . . . minus Zula.  

Due to Richard Zula's Sadism, Wuerl was not going to let him go back into 
ministry.  None the less, Wuerl did allow Pucci to return to ministry on a  
limited "dog leash" basis, where he performed the Novus Ordo Mass for 
a province of sisters.  Wuerl did not financially cut-off Pucci.

On the contrary, Wuerl cut-off Anthony Cipolla, even though Cipolla was
NEVER indicted and/or arrested for anything.  And and and ... There is NO
SUCH THING as a police arrest report as Diane Thompson and the Pitts-
burgh Post Gazette claimed.  Furthermore, Wuerl stated that he would let
every future employer of Anthony Cipolla know that he was "accused" of
molestation.  Wuerl did NOT do this in the case of a true molester named
John S. Hoehl.  A clear difference between Cipolla and Hoehl was that
Cipolla was accused by two proven liars.  Hoehl was accused by a multi-
plicity of credible witnesses.

Meanwhile, Wuerl was 100% preparing to eventually reinstate Father Robert
Wolk until DA John Pettit indicted Wolk and notified 
the American media that 
Wuerl was UNCOOPERATIVE with law enforcement officials throughout the
investigation which resulted in the triple indictment of the Pittsburgh diocesan 
priests whom Wuerl was hiding from law enforcement officials.   


A person cannot have two masters.  Wuerl proved his master
to be money, and and and allegedly Vaseline.  The money
part would easily accommodate the alleged Vaseline part.
Wuerl's original way of handling sex abuse cases was to position a molester 
priest toward non-parish ministry, if and only if a psychiatric facility would 
give that priest a favorable prognosis.  In as much, Richard Zula wasn't be-
ing positioned back into any form of ministry, on account of his sadistic acts.   
The same could not be said for Wolk, Pucci, the Edward Huff whom Wuerl 
placed in chaplaincy minister, and the John Hoehl to whom Wuerl did the
same ... even though Anthony Bevilacqua, Wuerl's predecessor, suspended
Hoehl and had him go on administrative leave.

Assigning a priest to non-parish duties places such a priest one step away

from parish ministry.   Whether Wuerl would have eventually placed back
into ministry priests who abused minors will be unknown only because he
was shut down before the opportunity to do so presented itself.  The simul-
taneous indictments of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci shut down's Wuerl's way of
handling sex abuse cases, at least for a short while.  They prompted him to
immediately oust from ministry the John S. Hoehl whom he reassigned four
months prior.  However, priests who did wrong to youths over the age of
eighteen have been kept in ministry by Wuerl. 

Then came the Father Edward Huff case, where a third complaint against
the priest finally put Wuerl on the spot, thereby shutting down his opportun-
ity to do anything more than take Huff out of ministry and shuttle him back
to a St Louis psychiatric facility from whence he came.  By all indications,
Wuerl was on his way to becoming a bishop in the image and likeness of
Bernard Cardinal Law.   In fact, the Huff cover-up shows that Wuerl was
still toying with law enforcement authorities even after having been in law
enforcement's spotlight four years prior.

One thing is certain.  Wuerl has proven his willingness to reassign to parish

ministry the type of priest who commits physically invasive homosexual ha-
rassment and then engages in retaliatory conduct upon being reported for the
conduct.  As was previously mentioned, such a priest was a personal secre-
tary of Donald Wuerl.   What was not yet mentioned is that Wuerl assigned
that priest to the pastor's post of St Basil's Parish, in Carrick, Pennsylvania. 
The assignment was effective January 1, 2004.

Add to this the credible allegations against one Father Donald Sotak who
was accused of attacking a youth over the age of 18, to the point of alleged-
ly knocking the young man unconscious, while the youth allegedly resisted
Sotak's alleged advances.

The Diocese Denied Any Wrongdoing,
as History Was Revised Years Later

Concerning his triple cover-up, Wuerl publicly denied that his diocese stone-

walled the investigation of the Pittsburgh diocese's molestation clique.  How-
ever, he didn't deny that he materially concealed a trio of abusive priests from
law enforcement authorities.  He simply denied that those actions constituted
cover-ups.   For example, it was after Fr. Robbert Wolk was charged by Alle-
gheny County authorities, Wuerl made the following statement:  "We can't
condemn him and throw him out and away."  
Wuerl also stated, "It is not
covering up to embrace a man who is suffering, just as we will not walk
away from the family."

Wuerl claimed that it is not covering-up to hide a priest in either a psychia-

tric facility or at a relative's home, all the while telling no one how danger-
ous he is.  It's not covering up, according to Wuerl, to treat the criminal as
the suffering victim.  

Incidentally, when it came time to process the indictment of Richard Zula,
his whereabouts were unknown.  Wuerl's diocese was not keeping track
of him.  The official diocesan spokesman, as well as the Allegheny County
DA, claimed that the Diocese of Pittsburgh had no obligation to notify Child
Youth Services about any molester priests, as was prescribed in the Child
Protective Services Act.   

In direct contrast was James A. Esler, the head of the human service section
of Allegheny County's Law Department.  He stated that there was no question
in his mind that the Diocese of Pittsburgh had the obligation to report priests
who molest youths.   Today, it's understood that anyone who learned of a mo-
lester has the obligation to report him, for the sake of those who would other-
wise become future sex abuse casualties.

Wuerl Sought to Change the Subject and Have Catholics Ignore It

Wuerl completed a four page letter addressed to every Pittsburgh diocesan

member, two weeks after Robert Wolk's October 11 indictment.  While tak-
ing zero blame for the cover-up, Wuerl tried to persuade each reader to ig-
nore the indictment and to place the attention one other things.  Then, seven-
teen days after the release date of Wuerl's change-the-subject letter, Wolk,
Zula, and Pucci were indicted in Washington County.  The following link
reported on the letter:

Newspaper Article that Reported on Wuerl's Change-the-subject Letter

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4118/1032/1600/wuerl3.0.jpg

Revisionist History Made Wuerl Look
Like a Hero in his Own Triple Cover-up

A number of the 2002, 2003, 2004+ news articles which mentioned Wuerl's
triple cover-up explained it so poorly that it constituted fiction.   At times, the
cover-up was explained with slight of hand deception, while at other times it
was explained with blatant falsehood.   Some of the articles went as far as to
claim that Wuerl was a stern yet discrete hero in handling of the three molest-
er priests.   In fact, of all the news outlets who alluded to Wuerl's triple cover-
up in revisionist terms, CBS was the one who lied the most.  The Pittsburgh
Post Gazette came in second place.

CBS made it look as if  Wuerl suspended those three priests immed
iately af-
ter having learned of their perversity and then went swiftly to the  home of the
molested altar boys, as a gesture of compassionate concern.   He didn't.  Other
21st Century articles made it look as if Wuerl quickly went to the home of the
molested altar boys, as if to be on a fact finding mission, only to gain the reali-
zation that he had to oust the three priests immediately thereafter.   This, too, 
was a lie.   Other articles stated that Wuerl discretely suspended three priests,
as if he had reviewed a filing cabinet of diocesan priest dossiers and then de-
cided to cut three unrelated players from a team roster.  Needless to say, this
didn't happen, either.   In fact, Wuerl was not the one who suspended those
priests.

Moreover, in 1988, Wuerl deceived the public by stating that he visited the

victimized family after he "became bishop in February."   The wording of
Wuerl's claim made a reasonably minded person assume that he diligently
visited the family in the month of February, the first month of his tenure in
Pittsburgh.  No such visitation by Wuerl or any other Pittsburgh diocesan
member occurred that February, that March, that April, May, June, July, or
even August.  The following is what actually happened:

Bevilacqua suspended the priests during the Autumn of 1987.  Wuerl then re-

placed Bevilacqua in February 1988.   He kept his distance from the family
of the two sex abuse casualties and did no more than see to it that the two
molested youths would continue to have their psychiatric sessions free of
charge.   The criminal priests would stay on sick leave, spending some time
in a psychiatric facility, while living under the radar of law enforcement.

From the view of the logical mind, the venues of the abusive priests were

likened to resorts and hideouts.  It were as if they would get away with what
they did and be able to snag other sexual prey down the road.   This triggered
within the family of the sex abuse casualties the resolve to go to the police and
sue the diocese.   This resolve occurred in the vicinity of September.  In fact,
the October 13, 1988 edition of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette explained it in the
following manner:

    "...they were worried that the priests might try to molest someone else."

In the October 21st edition of the same Post Gazette, at the City/Area Section,

on Page A-4, it was reported that the family decided to go to the law enforce-
ment authorities when they discovered that at least one member of the molester
trio "were not in an institution on a daily basis."

The pastor of the family's parish, John Arnott, informed Wuerl what the fam-

ily decided to do.  In response, Wuerl asked Arnott to see if a meeting with
the family could be arranged.  It was then and only then when Wuerl closed
the distance and went to the victimized family's home.  The reasonable per-
son would deduce this to be the act  of a self-seeking Wuerl, attempting to
persuade a family into changing its mind about reporting criminal priests to
the police.  This would be consistent with a bishop wanting to perpetuate an
ongoing cover-up. 

Now, Wuerl's visit to the home of sex abuse casualties was in September. 
The family filed its notice of intent to sue at the end of that month, in Alle-
gheny County Common Pleas Court.  For those unfamiliar, Allegheny is 
the county were Pittsburgh is located.