September 26, 2018

Cardinal Cover-up Unchanged & Unrepetent

The famous & infamous Mundelein Seminary that Wuerl inspected and approved.  This post is being written about a mile away from there, fittingly enough.







Yeah, uhhhm do you recall when I wrote in early August that a lot was transpiring, but I promised to keep all confidentiality on the matter?  Well, the revelations in the 300+ page dossier was one of the upcoming transpirations.  Yet, there are a few more things yet to come that will unveil corruption at the highest seats of the modernized, protestantized, & sodomized Vatican II Church.  Needless to say, they include the underhanded con artistry of a Donald Wuerl who wants to stay in a high rank of power, even if it be in Rome and not in Washington DC.

I have to go, right now.  I'll finish this when I can do so.

September 25, 2018

EWTN LIED, in having stated that Wuerl removed 18 of 19 priests.

Wuerl needs to stay in power, so that he can cut off the power link which
will end up revealing the evils he is still able to keep concealed.

It's elementary, Watson.  One needs to stay in power, so that he can
continue covering up as much of his dark deeds and omissions as he
can.  If Wuerl walks away from power, then wooooosh. Things that
Wuerl have been trying to keep concealed get revealed.   His evil be-
comes magnified.  Thus, Wuerl's clinging to power is another ele-
ment of his mode of cover-up.  He is covering up his own sins.

The only response to Donald Wuerl's ongoing deceit is BOYCOTT
and IGNORE.  Act as if he doesn't exist.  In as much, this is the same
response needed for Wuerl's pit-bull and ringer, Dollar Bill Donohue.
Donohue does nothing for the salvation of anyone.  He's a brawler
who drives people away from the Church, all the while impressing
no one.

For the record, the reason why the Vatican II Church's higher-ups
have been concealing the crimes and tort offenses of the disgraced
Theodore McCarrick was for ---

--- MONEY, MONEY, MONEY.

McCarrick was an effective fund-raiser.  In fact, world class molest-
er Marcial Maciel Degollado, despite his many felonies, was such a
great fund raiser that the Vatican II Church went out of its way to
protect him from the accountability due to a serial molester.  None
the less, Maciel threw money at the Vatican in a fashion called by
Maciel as "Polite Bribery."

Back to the Donald Wuerl:

At this point, keep in mind that the pseudo-Catholic, impostor-Catholic
media outlets continue to lie for Wuerl, in making it appear that Wuerl
only covered-up one priest.  EWTN, for example, spit the face of every-
one harmed by Cardinal Wuerl in falsely claiming that he removed 18
of 19 priests.  Let's go through Wuerl's track record one more time:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Robert Wolk was a cover-up of Wuerl.  Wuerl in no way reported
Wolk to law enforcement authorities.  Wuerl let Wolk continue as an
assistant dean of the South Hills deanery.  That's a local position with
localized prestige.  Wolk ended up getting indicted and then convicted.
Wuerl did what he could to keep the police from knowing about Wolk.

2) Richard "Sade" Zula.  Wuerl did NOT report Zula to law enforce-
ments authorities, either.  Even after Zula got convicted, Wuerl had a
health care professional write to prison authorities, stating that Zula
was a passive player in his sadism --- that he was tempted by the two
lads he was known to have violated.  Zula then got released from pri-
son earlier than expected.  Wuerl also deliberated on giving Zula a
six-figure lump sum retirement package.

3) Francis Pucci.  Wuerl conveniently had Pucci stay at a Maryland
psychiatric facility, and such a thing freed Pucci from criminal pro-
secution.  Pucci's criminal indictment was dismissed, on account of
the statute of limitations expiring before any Pennsylvania law en-
forcement officer could fingerprint Pucci.  Wuerl then let Pucci be
the chaplain of a province of sisters in the Pittsburgh area, after the
disgrace of Pucci.

4) George Zirwas.  Wuerl let Zirwas operate in Pittsburgh, even
though Zirwas was reported to Wuerl's administrators in 1991.

Wuerl then let Zirwas go to Florida in 1995 and next to Cuba for
the rest of his life, while being on the Pittsburgh diocesan payroll.
However, George Zirwas's life was cut short in Cuba, when a male
prostitute injected him with an animal tranquilizer, in the neck.

Before this, however, Zirwas wrote to Wuerl and mentioned that
he was aware of criminal activity being committed by priests in
Pittsburgh and that he needed a raise in his subsidy stipend, in
order for him to stay silent.  In the end, Zirwas sent a letter to
Wuerl, officially stating that he (Zirwas) had NO knowledge
of any criminal conduct occurring in Pittsburgh by any of its
priests.  Wuerl then sent Zirwas a bonus.

5) Ernest Paone.  This is the cover-up which makes anyone think
to himself, "You've gotta be kidding."  It was a 41 year cover-up
of multiple bishops which traces back to the middle 1960s.  As
far as concerns Wuerl's complicity, he greenlighted Paone's trans-
fer to California, and Wuerl as amicably approved Paone's trans-
fer to Nevada.  Wuerl also did not mention to any insurance car-
rier that Paone was attached to multiple molestation accusations
and was therefore a liability risk for any insurance provider.

6) John S. Hoehl.  Hoehl was a high school headmaster who was
placed on administrative leave by Wuerl's predecessor, Anthony
Bevilacqua.  In fact, I was present in a dining hall, when John
Hoehl returned from an Ontario psychiatric facility and gave an
update on his state to everyone present.  I was sitting at Hoehl's
table, assuming that he had a nervous breakdown and was sent
to Ontario for that reason.

Well, shortly after Wuerl became in charge of the Roman Catholic
Diocese of Pittsburgh, he reinstated Hoehl, giving him a hospital
chaplaincy post.  This was done the same year when Wolk, Zula,
and Pucci were indicted.  This was the same year when Wuerl
visited the family molested by the criminal priest trio.

Ann Rodgers-Melnick claimed that the visit caused Wuerl to be-
come a Zero Tolerance Crusader, due to an enlightening epiphany
that Rodgers claimed Wuerl to have experienced.  Proof that this
was a lie consisted in the fact that Wuerl kept Hoehl reinstated,
and only removed him immediately after Wolk was indicted.

If Wuerl had an enlightenment, he would have quickly removed
Hoehl.  In addition, Wuerl never reported Hoehl to the police.
Now, Hoehl made his way to West Virginia and got a position
counseling youth there.  Wuerl never notified anyone in West
Virginia about Hoehl's sexual predator habit.  Thus, Hoehl was
a cover-up of Wuerl and NOT a removal by Wuerl.  Therefore,
the staff of EWTN's news shows should be fired ... literally.

7) William O'Malley.  He was stationed at the northern tip of
the Diocese of Pittsburgh, in Butler County.  Donald Wuerl
kept O'Malley on the payroll with an administrative post.
Then, ten years after Donald Wuerl learned of the accusa-
tions against O'Malley, Wuerl accepted O'Malley's resigna-
tion.   This ten year lapse in time did NOT constitute the re-
moval of a priest.  The tenth year was simply the retirement
of a priest.

During that ten years, Wuerl said nothing.  In fact, Wuerl lent
O'Malley $38,000 to take care of a debt accrued while O'Malley
was not keeping his hands off of male minors.  Then, three years
after O'Malley's retirement, Wuerl finally reported him.

It took Donald Wuerl 13 years to report O'Malley, and the year in
which Wuerl reported him, namely 2006, was the year when Wuerl
shuffled off to Washington DC, outside of Pennsylvania jurisdiction.

 8) Edward Huff.  This was Wuerl's ping-pong cover-up.  Wuerl
sent Huff to a St. Louis psychiatric facility, and then brought him
back to Pittsburgh, reinstating him.  Huff was then sent back to
St. Louis, followed by him being brought back to Pittsburgh.

Like Hoehl, Huff was given a hospital chaplaincy post by Wuerl.
Then, when Huff was reorted for the THIRD time, Donald Wuerl
shuffled him yet again to St. Louis, finally reporting Huff.  Huff
did get indicted and convicted.
------------

Is this enough of a example for you?  If not, there is the matter
of John Wellinger, Krawczyk, & the Fr. James Torquato whose
sexual aggression was a series of tort offenses, being that his ta-
rget was over the age of 18.  However, Torquato's retaliations
got to the point of endangerment, and in Torquato was compli-
cit in the filing of a fraudulent police report ... in lying to the
police.

There is also the matter of Br. Ghastin, Br. Hartmann, Fr. LeDoux,
etc.  Br. Hartmann ended up in the Australian criminal court sys-
tem, and LeDoux was attached to out of court settlements at
Widener University.

Concerning Krawczyk, if Wuerl would have removed him as
Wuerl should have done, then Billy Gaines would still be alive.

Once again, Wuerl is obviously ... apparently ... clinging to power,
so that he will have the power to keep concealed dark sins of com-
mission and omission that have not yet been verified in any con-
vincing degree.  Of course, in order for Wuerl to keep his evils
concealed, Wuerl needs to abuse his power.
Apparently, there is more hide-and-go-seek to play, with cover-up artist Wuerl.

September 24, 2018

Wuerl::: FIVE cover-ups & THREE criminal indictments in opening year of Pittsburgh Tenure. One fled to WV and the other to Cuba

Stanwix & Blvd of the Allies, Pittsburgh Diocesan property, Part 1. 
Behind it is the Glass Castle & the PPG Plaza.
NOW REMEMBER:  The point to this Wuerl-of-Hurt site was to 
inform you that the cult-of-personality, super-hero propaganda pub-
lished about Donald Wuerl was a continuum of falsehoods --- that 
Wuerl's image was a Stalin-like abuse of power & privilege.  Then
came the 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report, twelve years after 
my first reporting of Wuerl's corruption.  If it had come twelve yrs
sooner, this site would have been unnecessary.

This site was meant to keep you from being deceived into thinking 
that you had to follow Wuerl, in his violations of Catholic Moral 
Theology and in him writing-off pivotal element of 2,000 year old 
unchangeable Church doctrine which literally traces itself back to 
Peter & Paul.

This site was set forth, to level the playing field ... to equalize ... to 
free you from the hypnotic trance that media proponents held on you.  

Let's review:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The quickest summary is that the FIVE priests COVERED-UP by Wuerl,
in his first year as bishop of Pittsburgh were ======>

FATHERS:

1} John Hoehl whom Donald Wuerl personally reinstated into ministry
and kept in ministry, even after the so-called "enlightening" dinner that
Wuerl had with the family of two lads molested by the three priests men-
tioned below.

Wuerl reinstated Hoehl and kept him in chaplaincy ministry until the in-
dictments of Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Then, Wuerl dropped Hoehl like 
a very hot potato.  If Wuerl were to have kept Hoehl in ministry --- Wuerl 
would have been inviting a grand jury inquest.  Twenty-eight years later,
that Grand Jury was finally convened.

2} Robert Wolk (ordained the same year as was Wuerl, thereby indicat-
ing that he was Wuerl's classmate.)  Ann Rodgers falsely claimed that 
Wolk was removed "just as Wuerl became bishop."  The truth is that 
Anthony Bevilacqua placed Wolk on administrative leave, long before 
Wuerl replaced Bevilacqua.  Donald Wuerl was positioning  to reinstate
Wolk, as he already reinstated Hoehl.

3} Richard "Sade" Zula who did practice Sadism on at least one male 
youth,   This was the only known priest Wuerl was NOT going to re-
instate into any type of ministry.  Now, Wuerl has been proven to be 
unjust and vicious, but he drew a line in the proverbial sand when it
came to Sadism.  Wuerl hid the knowledge of Zula's crimes from law
enforcement, despite the Child Protective Services Act.  He simply 
let Zula go about his life.  When it came time for DA John C. Pettit
of Washington County PA to process Zula's indictment, no one at
the Diocese of Pittsburgh knew where Zula was ... so they claimed.

4} Fr. Francis Pucci who was not laicized or removed from ministry.  
Rather, he was allowed to conduct the Mass and perhaps Divine Office 
with a religious order of sisters.  Pucci was indicted, but his indictment 
was dismissed on the statute of limitations defense.  Therefore,  Pucci 
remained on the diocesan payroll.  In fact, even the criminal convict, 
Richard Dorsch, was on the payroll, after his conviction.  In Catholic
Canon Law, even criminal priests, after prison time, must be financial-
ly supported by their bishops.  A bishop does NOT have to reassign
a criminal priest who completed a jail sentence.  But, he does have
to sustain such a priest.

5} George Zirwas, accomplice of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Was not in-
dicted with them.  He found his way to Cuba, after a number of sex-
ual aggression accusations were made against him.  While in Cuba,
he informed Wuerl that he knew of criminal priests in Wuerl's dio-
ceses and that he (Zirwas) was willing to keep silent about it for a 
price.  Wuerl informed Zirwas that he was to either send the names 
of the priests or a letter categorically stating that he (Zirwas) knew
of no criminal conduct among Pittsburgh priests.  Zirwas sent the
Sgt Shultz I-Know_Nothing letter.  After that letter was received
by Wuerl, Wuerl gave Zirwas a bonus.

Zirwas lead the Sodom & Gomorrah lifestyle in Cuba to the extreme.
He was killed by a male prostitute who injected animal tranquilizer
into his neck.  In response, Wuerl officiated him at his funeral and
reinstated Zirwas to the level of full clerical investiture, all while
giving Zirwas a saint's eugoly, even though Zirwas died while en-
gaged in mortal sin up and until the point of time when Zirwas re-
ceived his lethal injection.
_________________________________________________________

The two lawsuits involved 1} former Catholic school headmaster John 
Hoehl as co-defendant; 2} the two brothers abused (at different times)
by Wolk, Zula, and Pucci as members of the plaintiff family.  Only one
of the two brothers was an altar boy, incidentally.  Let us proceed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ann Rodgers"-Melnick" was a Pittsburgh Post Gazette writer originally 
from California.  Before going to Pittsburgh she worked in the South-
western sector of  Florida were major leaguers do their baseball Spring 
Training.  Even though She was never a Roman Catholic (or any other 
rite of Catholicism,) she was given the post of Pittsburgh Roman Catho-
lic Diocese director  for Communications, as if no Catholic on Earth is 
good enough for the job.

Rodgers fully knew about the James Torquato Retaliations and remained
silent about them.  In fact, during the infamous 2002 media rampage on 
clergy sex abuse, she wrote that  as far back as Wuerl's very first year as 
bishop of Pittsburgh, he announced a  Zero Tolerance Policy, where no 
priest accused of sexually abusing a minor could ever go back into min-
istry.  That was a complete falsehood, supported by the evidence of him 
returning to ministry Frs. John Hoehl and Edward Huff, as well as Ernest
Paone who Wuerl willingly transferred to California and then Las Vegas.

Concerning her proven lies, the first one which was detected was her claim
that the tiny Donald Wuerl was an ascetic 5'11".  The truth is that Wuerl is as 
short in height as was the late Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua --- between 5'4 
to 5'6".  Concerning this, I received a polite phone call from Washington stat-
ing that Wuerl stands 5'9" to 5'10".  Yes --- with elevator shoes, he does.  

Being that I was in Pittsburgh during Wuerl's tenure, and being that he walked 
up to me, I do know that he is tiny.  He did NOT wear elevator shoes while in
Pittsburgh.  Others who met him also told me that he stood 5'4" to 5'5".  One
person described Wuerl as "scrawny."   A very polite 5'4" woman said to me
that Wuerl and her stood "head to head," meaning at the same height.

I know of Wuerl's height and Bevilacqua's height from a point-blank range
personal experience (in a public forum.).  In fact, I was surprised to find out
how tiny Wuerl was as he approached me, once upon a time.  This is because
he was made out to be this superior godlike man of masculine stature.  The
Donald Wuerl who approached me was exactly like a certain flaming homo-
sexual theater major who would occasionally buzz around our click and take
with him one of the guys, the son of a certain lieutenant governor's son; not
from Pennsylvania and not from any State that borders on Pennsylvania.

The bottom line is that you cannot instantly trust as true anything written by 
Ann Rodgers.  But, for the most part, Rodgers used sleight of hand semantics,
(as opposed to outright lying) in her deceiving of the common man & woman
via the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.

We adjourn to the original article:




Donald Wuerl was installed bishop of Pittsburgh on February 12, 1988.  It only
took eight months thereafter for the Diocese of Pittsburgh to become one of the  
first dioceses in America to be 'scathed' in what was to become a nationwide 
Watergate of perversity.  Wuerl was caught performing a triple cover-up, and
the practice of sadomasochism was one of the acts which transpired within a
trio of clergy members whom Wuerl unsuccessfully concealed from law en-
forcement authorities.  Incidentally, Pgh is the abbreviation of Pittsburgh

Always keep in mind that the only reason why Wuerl was one of the first bish-
ops to announce a zero tolerance policy was because he was one of the very first
of American bishops caught red-handed in performing multiple and simultaneous 
cover-ups which included John Hoehl as Wuerl's fourth simultaneous cover-up.

Wuerl expressly put Hoehl back into ministry and immediately took Hoehl out
of the ministry line-up after DA John C. Pettit publicly announced that Wuerl
and his personnel were uncooperative during the criminal investigation which
resulted in the indictments of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.

In as much, Wuerl had to put on airs and display a very fake facade, in announc-
ing a zero tolerance policy which he did NOT observe in his subsequent cover-up
of Frs. Edward Huff and James Torquato.  Wuerl is a liar by his actions.  Such
as a person known as a hypocrite.  Wuerl also chooses which Catholic doctrine
to observe and which one to violate.  Such a person is known as a heretic.

Concerning Wolk, Zula, and Pucci:

A member of the criminal trio was an assistant chancellor of Wuerl's diocese, as 
well as a canon lawyer.  This factor alone showed motive for proceeding with an 
intentional cover-up.  In fact, Wuerl vehemently defended his cover-up of Wolk,
in news print, claimed that the cover-up wasn't a cover-up.  Wuerl has been a liar
from the beginning.

The Sex Abuse Casualties


The casualties were two altar boys of the same family.  They were brothers. The 
years of molestation occurred from 1981 to 1987.  In addition to the three indict-
ed priests, there was a fourth alleged assailant reported to one of the three prose-
cuting district attorneys.  He was a layman.  Furthermore, there was a fourth dio-
cesan priest implicated, but only in his capacity as a probable accomplice; as a 
silent person who reported nothing to anyone.

Concerning this priest, he either allowed criminal conduct to transpire in a ski 

lodge suite where he was staying or else he was clueless to what was transpir-
ing there.  Nothing was established other than he was at the scene of the crime, 
going into his room, while a criminal priest was taking his altar boy into anoth-
er one.  

This fourth Pittsburgh diocesan priest, incidentally, was strangled to  death in 
Havana Cuba in 2001, after having been on administrative leave since 1996.  
A source informed me that Wuerl, himself, officiated as his funeral ... so stat-
ed the source.

While in Cuba, this priest was openly homosexual and was said to have "helped 

his visiting friends find sexual partners while they stayed in Havana."  He was 
the tragic Fr. George Zirwas, and at this point in the narration you should be at
the first stage in realizing that Lord Byron was more correct than he was mistak-
en when he stated that the truth is always strange; stranger than fiction.

Wuerl's unholy trinity


The indicted priests were Robert Wolk, Francis Pucci, and Richard "Sade" Zula.   

Wolk was the assistant chancellor and Zula was nicknamed after the Marquis de 
Sade.  All three priests were charged and arraigned in Washington County, PA.  
It's a county which touches the southwestern border of the Allegheny County 
where within sits Pittsburgh.  

Furthermore, Richard Zula was also arraigned east of Pittsburgh, in Somerset 
County.  Robert Wolk was indicted in Allegheny County, as well as in Wash-
ington County.   In fact, he was the first one to surrender himself to the police.  
Incidentally, the Diocese of Pittsburgh comprises the six most Southwestern 
counties of Pennsylvania.  Pennsylvania, at last count, has sixty-seven counties.

The front page of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette's November 11 edition of that

year gives light on how involved the criminal investigation was:  

        "Moreover, authorities said their investigation had uncovered
          evidence of similar offenses involving one of the priests that
          occurred elsewhere in southwestern Pennsylvania and Florida,
         Ohio, Virginia, and Canada.  Authorities in the jurisdictions
         have been contacted."


This shows that the matter was not taken lightly by law enforcement officials. 
 
In fact, the district attorney of Washington County prophetically stated,  "We  
would be sticking our heads in the sand to believe these are the only three 
cases."

Zula had 138 criminal counts filed against him in Washington Coun
ty, alone. 
However, a plea bargain reduced the counts to only two.   In sequence, Zula 
also plead guilty in Somerset County.  Now, as far as went Wolk, he plead 
guilty in Allegheny and Washington counties. 

Pucci's case, on the other hand, was dismissed due to the two year statute
of
limitations expiring on two types of criminal charges.   It expired approximate-
ly four months prior to his indictment.   He was indicted under the assumption 
that the time-keeping for the two year limit had frozen during the time Pucci 
was outside of Pennsylvania, in a Maryland psychiatric facility.  None the less,
conspiracy charges remained open for Pucci, and that particular crime had a 
five year limitation.   Despite this, Pucci's case was eventually dismissed.

Take note that, during the nationwide sex abuse scandal, priest after abusive

priest was sent to a psychiatric facility, as if each one were an unaccountable
victim of mental illness.  Now, there is a difference between mental illness
and sin.   If a person is insane, then he is without malice in a materially harm-
ful act, even though each member of society has the right to be made safe from
such a harmful person.   However, deception and manipulation, as much as
scheming and concealing, were committed by priest after abusive priest, and

such acts are elements of malice; not mental illness. 

In addition, these priests were described as having "compulsions" that required 
psychiatric treatment.  In the Catholic vernacular, such compulsions are known 
as temptations.

Wuerl and His Personnel:  Uncooperative During the 1988 Investigation

The Washington County district attorney announced that Wuerl's diocese en-

gaged in "foot dragging" throughout the criminal investigation.   The DA was
either irked or incensed by the Pittsburgh diocese's lack of cooperation, call-
ing it "minimal at best."   His quote on the topic goes as follows: "It was not
the spirit of cooperation we would like to see."  Of course,  "foot dragging"
is a polite way of saying "stonewalling" which, in turn, is a polite way of say-

ing "a step away from obstruction of justice charges."

Wuerl had pushed his luck to the limit.  Being that he was caught performing

a triple cover-up, and being that he was accused of having impeded a crimi-
nal investigation via stonewalling, he had no other choice than to strike the
pose of a strict disciplinarian.  This shows that Wuerl was not not not the
caring and concerned bishop that he was made out to be by the 21st Century
media.  Rather, he was a chameleon, looking out for himself.  He changed
colors according to the changes in the political climate.  In fact, he original-
ly presented himself as a "liberal."  He was then paraded around as a "con-
servative."  Wuerl has shown himself to be out for himself.  The following
mainstream media newspaper links provide the evidence:

Photocopy of Cleveland Plain Dealer Article which mentions the existence 
of a fourth predator in the same Pittsburgh diocesan molestation ring:
Wuerl's Cover-up with Mention of Fourth Assailant

The New York Times Report on the Triple Cover-up:

 http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/13/us/3-pennsylvania-priests-accused-of-molesting.html

Photocopy of the San Antonio Express-News Report:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4118/1032/1600/Wuerl%20San%20Antonio%20Express.jpg

Photocopy of the Report found in the Lewiston Daily Sun:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9eYpAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7WQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4475,2371591&dq=zula+barn+parked +car+pettit+resort&hl=en


Photocopy of the Nashua Telegraph's Report on the Cover-up:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GvglAAAAIBAJ&sjid=E_wFAAAAIBAJ&pg=
5495,3148582&hl=en


The Associated Press News Report on Wuerl's Triple Cover-up: 
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news/1988_11_11_AP_ThreePriests_Francis_Pucci_etc_2.htm

Photocopy of the Bryan Times Report, with D.A.'s Additional Statement:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=tQYLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=
jlEDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5427,4088961&dq=wolk+arrested+
pittsburgh+zula+pucci


Donald Wuerl: A Coast to Coast Disgrace

News of Wuerl's triple cover-up made its way from coast to coast, via:

- the New York Times,          - the Saint Petersburg Times,
- the Philadelphia Inquirer,     - the Philadelphia Daily News,
- the Cleveland Plain Dealer,   - the Pittsburgh Post Gazette,
- Maine's Lewiston Daily Sun,    - the San Jose Mercury News,     
- Pennsylvania's Reading Eagle,   -  the San Antonio Express-News,
- California's Lodi News-Sentinel,   - the now defunct Pittsburgh Press,   
- Northwestern Ohio's Bryan Times,    - Oregon's Eugene Register-Guard,
- New Hampshire's Nashua Telegraph,  - South Carolina's Rock Hill Herald.
From as far west as California's San Andreas Fault line, to as far east as the
New York metro area, Donald William Wuerl became an early chapter in the
Vatican II church's sex abuse history.  From as far south as the Florida Gulf
Coast, to as far north as Maine, Wuerl's diocese had already proven itself to
be what best selling author Malachi Martin would later say it was"... one
of the most pathetic dioceses in the United States."

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1988_10_11_Mullan_EditorsNote_Robert_Wolk_1.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mYMcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=
b2MEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2329,10275422&hl=en


http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news3/1989_05_23_UnitedPressInternational_Richard_Zula_3.htm

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4ARlAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2XcNAAAAIBAJ&pg=4517,3545671&dq=zula+diocese+wuerl&hl=en

Concerning George Zirwas:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FFAxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=d3ADAAAAIBAJ&pg=5379,202749&dq=george+zirwas+pittsburgh+cuba&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FNBIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XYIMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1312,127061&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=77AaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fjAEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5477,1539593&hl=en

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=bc00AAAAIBAJ&sjid=KSEGAAAAIBAJ&pg=3062,4367236&hl=en
-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -

September 23, 2018

Proof that Wuerl ignored the Child Protective Services Act ... in his cover-up of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, not to mention Zirwas, Hoehl, Paone, O'Malley, & Huff

Keep in mind that the Donald Wuerl who retaliated against the children of 
Risen Lord Parish, on account of their parents protesting against Wuerl on
TV, was praised as a loving and caring man who only cared about the wel-
fare of children.  Evidence proves that the picture of Wuerl-the-fatherly-
protector was a complete lie.  In fact, below is a photocopy of the evi-
dence that Wuerl only cared about himself.

A photocopy of a newspaper article reporting Phase I of Wuerl's uncovered
Triple Cover-up at the time it was uncovered is posted several paragraphs
below here.  Be patient and scroll down to it, so that you will learn how
dishonest Wuerl's propaganda machine always was and is.

This, alone, proves that Wuerl was not the caring and protective bishop that
his embedded propagandist, Ann Rodgers, (formerly of the Pgh Post Gazette)
made him out to be.  Tiny Donald Wuerl ... the Elevator Shoes Kid ... is one
big lie.  I personally learned of Wuerl's ruthlessness and manipulative modus
operandi during both phrases of the James Torquato Retaliations.  To this day,
Wuerl was NEVER man enough to have apologized for those whistleblower
retaliations.

Plus, if Wuerl ... or his then-diocese ... would have been indicted & convicted
for the offense of having concealed Frs. Wolk, Zula, and Pucci, it (or Wuerl)
would have convicted of nothing more than a Summary Offense, in having
violated the Child Services Protection Act.   This means that he ... or his then-
diocese ... would have been required to do no more than pay a fine.  However,
this would have made Wuerl look bad on record, during Vatican paper-reviews.
He probably wouldn't have become a cardinal,  if he or his then-diocese would
have been found guilty of violating the Child's Protective Services Act.

Contradiction Time:  
Wuerl was made out to be a non-compromising disciplinarian, 
but after the Wolk indictiment ... the opposite was illustrated.

"To say he will not be reassigned is a devastating thing," said Wuerl to the
press shortly after he was caught performing his triple cover-up which was
headlined with Father Robert Wolk's indictment.  The same Donald Wuerl
also said to the media, "It is NOT covering up to embrace man who is
suffering."  Yet, Ann Rodgers, (formerly known as Rodgers-Melnick) of
the Pittsburgh Post Gazette had the audacity to deceive the public into be-
lieving Wuerl to be the bishop of zero tolerance that he never was.


Add to this the fact that Wuerl already reassigned the notorious John Hoehl
months prior.  Wuerl had no intention of getting rid of Hoehl until the indict-
ment of Wolk.  Yet, the pathologically bland Ann Rodgers had the audacity
to make it look as if Wuerl were the instant disciplinarian from Day 1.  You
now see how far away from zero tolerance Wuerl was.  After all, he made a
criminal sound like a victim.  You can now also see how much of a liar was
Ann Rodgers of the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.  You need to keep in mind that
a faction who praises Wuerl seeks to have him to get the 2,000 year old Ro-
man Catholic Church to declare the repeatedly condemned Sin of Sodom
a holy act of God.  Apparently, such people have strong stomaches.

Now, in the Year 2002, when Donald W. Wuerl was being made out to be
the holiest male on Earth --- next to the molester Marcial Maciel who was
also lauded as a saint --- would you have been praising Wuerl if you knew
about his triple cover-up?  Would writers have been calling that fraud "one
of the good guys, if you they knew about DA John C. Pettit announcing to
the press that Wuerl was uncooperative during the investigation which re-
sulted in the indictments of Wolk, Richard "Sade" Zula, and Francis Pucci?

Would he have been made the Master of Ceremonies in a St. Patrick's Day
parade, if Pittsburghers knew about Wuerl's public excuse for covering-up
the crimes of three of his priests, followed by Wuerl publicly denying that
it was the act of covering-up at all?   Or would you have categorized him
with Bernard Law & Roger Mahoney?

Would you have been praising Wuerl that year, if Ann Rodgers and the
Pgh Post Gazette were honest enough to report on the James Torquato
case?  It's the case of a former personal secretary of Wuerl spending con-
secutive years not keeping his hands to himself and then retaliating the
moment he was reported.  You know, the Torquato case has dozens of
pieces of evidence attached to it.  It is the single most evidence support-
ed cover-up of Donald Wuerl.

Wuerl was headlined as the bishop who fought the Vatican to remove  "a
molester priest," when the fact is that he only attempted to have the priest
removed from ministry for what was later called a misdiagnosis of Depress-
ion and Suicidal Tendencies.  The priest was never arrested, yet Wuerl let
the papers claim that the priest was.  In fact, that priest, Anthony Cipolla,
received a favorable Pennsylvania State Police background check security
clearance in the Summer of 2014, where within it was stated that Cipolla
has NO ARREST RECORD in the State of Pennsylvania.  For those of
you who are brain dead, Cipolla's 2014 security clearance of a huge deal.

This triple cover-up also shows Wuerl's motive in letting Anthony Cipolla
be the public scapegoat whose reputation was completely annihilated, de-
spite the overwhelming evidence of Cipolla being the opposite of the media
smear campaign launched against him.  You see, DA John C. Pettit publicly
stated, (and I am going by memory on this quote, meaning that it is to be re-
garded as paraphrased:  "I don't want to make this look like a witch hunt, but
we would be sticking our heads in the sands to think that this is an isolated
incident."  This meant that there would be more investigating . . . there was
to be more "snooping around," "looking around," "scrutinizing."  So, Wuerl
needed a diversionary tactic, to pursuade the law enforcement personnel in
more than one sovereign state involved to be deceived into thinking that
Wuerl was a staunch "zero tolerance" leader.  Wuerl was proven to be
no such person.

Wuerl was in a law enforcement spotlight.  This meant that Wuerl needed
a smokescreen, to deceive the public into thinking that he was a holy and
all so caring saint.   Wuerl did nothing more than masquerade himself as
an angel of light, at the expense of others such as an Anthony Cipolla who,
unlike the effeminate Donald Wuerl, was found to have zero nexus with the
homosexual subculture.  Wuerl, on the other hand, had a definitive nexus
with the neo-Sodomite world.


The newspaper jpegs above prove that the slightly built Donald Wuerl
thrived on a propaganda machine filled with sleight of hand deceptions
and direct falsehoods.

In addition, don't forget that he rode the coattails of John Cardinal Wright,
and without the help of the allegedly homosexual John Wright, the Donald
Wuerl who accommodated banned Dignity Masses for eight consecutive
years would have been nothing.

It was the court system that prompted Wuerl to strike the pose of a strict
disciplinarian.  It was all a fraud to have claimed that Wuerl would come
to the rescue of the victims of predatory priests such as the Edward Huff
whom he kept hiding out in mental institutions and the Father James Tor-
quato whom he sent to Rome while federal court papers had Torquato's
name mentioned throughout them.  Wuerl's artificial pose did not occur
until three simultaneous indictments of three Pittsburgh priests occured
under Wuerl's watch, coupled with a DA John Pettit's public accusation
that Wuerl's diocese performed uncooperative conduct with police inves-
tigators.

Keep in mind that there was no criminal investigation of Wolk, Zula,
and Pucci until an attorney friend-of-the-family of the two young play
toys reported the matter to the police.  The attorney did not do so until
after Wuerl visited the family. Despite visiting the family, Wuerl still
refused to report Wolk, Zula, and Pucci to the police, as was required
in the Child Protective Services Act.  Now you can see more clearly
that everything about Wuerl is either an outright lie and or sleight of
hand deception.

In addition, Wuerl only went to the home of the traumatized family af-
ter their parish pastor was told by them that they were going to report
the three molester priests to law enforcement authorities.  The pastor
then informed Wuerl.

Do not be deceived.  Ann Rodgers made it sound as if Wuerl were a
strict disciplinarian who ousted Hoehl, as soon as he learned of him.
No, Wuerl placed Hoehl into chaplaincy ministry, as he did with Huff.
Wuerl did NOT read Hoehl the riot act until Wolk, Zula, and Pucci
were criminally indicted.  Then, Hoehl became a hot potato.  Wuerl
got rid of Hoehl, so that Wuerl would not get into trouble.  There was
no loving and caring bishop involved.  I tell you solemnly, Wuerl was
absolutely vicious and heartless while in Pittsburgh.  He was the per-
sonification of lies and retaliation.

As a  review, so that it will be clearly understood:

Now, Pgh Post Gazette reporter Ann Rodgers claimed that Wuerl had
an epiphany while visiting the traumatized family and then became the
"model of zero tolerance" thereafter.  This claim is easily proven false
by the fact that District Attorney John Pettit publicly announced that
Wuerl's then Diocese of Pittsburgh did NOT provide the cooperation
that the district attorney sought during the criminal investigation.  It
was a criminal investigation which didn't commence until someone
other than Wuerl notified the police.

If Donald Wuerl were the model of zero tolerance, he would have been
the one who reported Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Plus, Wuerl would NOT
have allowed the 'foot dragging' that a Western Pennsylvanian DA said
was being committed by Wuerl's diocese.  Neither would Wuerl have
reinstated Hoehl and Huff.  That which was told to you by former
Post Gazette writer, Ann Rodgers, and FoxNews are proven false-
hoods.