August 14, 2018

Telephone harassment 5 hrs & 37 mins after PA Grand Jury Report Release

This is written to those of good will.  Firstly ... for the record ... know
that I did NOT testify before the Pennsylvania Grand Jury, and I was
never asked to submit any of the many pieces of evidence I have had
in my possession.  However, I was told that Fr. James Torquato's case
was briefly mentioned in the report, but his name was redacted ----
---- blacked out.

Okay then, take note that shortly after the PA Grand Jury Report was
released, I received a harassing phone call from Melbourne Florida,
number 321-914-9590.  It was a male voice which said that, in the
State of Florida, those who harass some one above a certain age is
guilty of a crime.  I was then told to be prepared.

Concerning this, here is a notice for the person who called me from
321-914-9590.  Do NOT ever call me again.  Do NOT text me.  Do
NOT email me.  Do NOT get a third person to contact me and do
NOT harass any person in my life.  I have already called the police
on you, being that I has repeatedly given notice that that Melbourne
cyber-bully who was caught lying about a Cipolla arrest which nev-
er happened in the first place to never contact me.  She is not to ev-
en get third persons to contact me.  Now, I am telling you directly
to not seek to harass me as she has being doing to me and to those
close to me, for the past three years.

For those unfamiliar, a woman in Florida whom I repeatedly caught
lying about the Cipolla Case has been harassing me & defaming me
for three years.  She constructed TEN blogs that defame and harass
me.  She even posted a photo of my former residence, along with a
Google Map overhead photo which would enable a viewer the ability
to find the home which had new owners.

This woman who has perpetually been harassing me is now accusing
me of harassing her and causing her distress, even though I never call-
ed her and never wrote to her.  In fact, in one of her many posts which
were deleted by the powers-that-be, she claimed that I was stalking her,
while I was in the Chicago vicinity, approximately 1,200 miles away.

She also claimed that I was Anthony Cipolla in disguise, operating a
child molestation protection ring.  Well, this site exposed child moles-
ters. That is not the act of protecting molesters.  Plus, I'm a construction
worker, and molesters don't find the construction world glamorous.  In
fact, one needs to be very rich to operate such a protection ring

Moreover, Anthony Cipolla died shortly after her defamatory post (in
August of 2016.)  The fact that this site gets added posts, even in 2018,
shows that Cipolla was not operating this site.  In fact, Cipolla's chronic
back pain, his neuropathology, and his ill heart made it impossible for
him to run any kind of protection ring.  His last days were days of a
lot of pain.

Anway, that woman made accusations that were super easy to refute,
in her arrest and post-arrest retaliation narrative.  The refutations are
at this site.  As an example, she claimed that a man existed, named
Detective Mark Nehouser, Badge #46, and that he was called to her
abode in 1978, with and his partner, upon which he took evidence to
a hospital and got instant lab test results, (when such testing takes
many days to complete), and arrested Cipolla on the same day.

Well, it turned out that it was uniformed Officer Mark Ninehouser,
Badge #46, who did nothing more than take her statement, hand-
print it on a police form, and then handed it to the real detectives.

Now, I think that I remember seeing in a Randy Engel article that
which was alleged to be the "Police Arrest Report" which does
NOT exist the way in which laymen think such a thing exists.
Well, the report was written in cursive handwriting.  Plus, the
the style was wide-looped feminine.  That certainly was NOT
a handprinted male police officer report.  All in all, that cyber-
bully woman's entire narration of an arrest and post-arrest har-
assment was entirely contrary to criminal law procedure in
every state in America.
Apparently, the woman who has been long-term harassing me is
is going to try to get me criminally charged for all that I wrote
about  the Cipolla Case.  She is once again lunging for my jugular

One note at this point:  There is such a thing as Malicious Prose-
cution and the Filing a False Police Report.  Now, Donald Wuerl
is a public figure.  Cipolla was made into a public figure.  There-
fore, his accusers became partial public figures.  Well, pursuant
to Times v Sullivan, any American is permitted to state opinions
of public figures, to advance the conversation in the issue at hand.

All in all, that woman had been a relentless living Hell to me, since
2015.  She has been doing nothing less than torturing me, and now,
after all of her harassment and defamation of me, she accuses me
of doing that which she has being doing.

Now, if she is willing to lie about me so much, how can you be-
lieve anything that she said about Cipolla?  So take note.  She is
seeking to hurt me really really badly, after all of the work I did
for you who have suffered under Wuerl ... and after the intense
amount of suffering she caused me.

If anyone would like to help me with the 321-914-9590 harass-
ment call and the male harasser attached to it, I would be very
grateful.  I suffered hideously at the hands of Torquato, Wuerl
and others.  This woman is an insect from the most tormenting
regions of Hell to me.  So, please acquire a Florence Nightengale
heart and give some assistance.

Incidentally, I did call the police about an hour or so ago (at the
time of this writing) and received instructions on what I am to
do, to have this three year long harassment of me processed.

Keep in mind that this woman who repeatedly mocked, har-
assed, and defamed me spent a relatively significant amount
of time going online, asking for a law firm to come forth and
sue me.  No one came forth.  Of course, her story of the "arrest
of Cipolla and the ensuing harassment thereafter" is instantly re-
cognized by any law enforcement officer or law student to be
bogus, being that it's contrary to the standard American rules
of criminal procedure.

And of course, there was the attempt to get her donations, to
sue me.  All in all, there has been no demand letter sent to me
and no lawsuit filed against me.  And now, she is claiming that
I caused her extreme anguish through harassment, even though
I never wrote to her, never called her, never stood in her presence,
etc.  Perhaps she suffers from a guilty conscience, on account of
all her easily-provable lies.

The fact that that cyber-bully woman failed to get a law firm to
file a lawsuit against should be a sign to you that I am not com-
mitting libel.

In fact, I previously stated and I state now, that I would be more
than willing to declare Anthony Cipolla a molestor, IF someone
would give me evidence or credible corroborative testimony
against Cipolla.  Well, I was informed that that woman would
let me talk to her two sons.  But, that turned out to be a lie.

She also stated that Randy Engel got a lawfirm to vet the
Randy Engel article that damns Cipolla, and that I would
get the final report after the article gets vetted.  That was
last year.  No, law firm sent me anything that I know of.

In fact, my conversation with former police officer Mark
Ninehouser, Badge #46 assured me that that woman was
lying all along about Cipolla getting arrested by a Detective
Mark Nehouser, Badge #46.

Once again, the harassing phone call made by 321-608-9590 was
made on the same day when the Pennsylvania Clergy Sex Abuse
Grand Jury Report was  released.   And then, a voicemail message
was left.  So, think.  This woman ever so coincidentally undergoes
life-threatening distress days after my notice which that she keeps
harassing me and that I finally have to report her to the police.

Yes, on the same day of the release of the PA Grand Jury Report
which certainly condemns Donlad Wuerl, I got prosecution and
prison for writing that I keep getting harassed and that I finally
have to bring the police into the equation.  So, what happens?
ANS: She preempts and brings the police in, before I fot time
to do so.  So, do you think that she got a heart attack, today?
I did not think that that would happen, being that she is very
vicious in her writing and phone calling --- even to the closest
friend in my life.

None the less, it is obvious that a woman who obsessively spends
her time calling person after person about me, while writing to per-
son after person about me is unfit to have the custody of any youth.
What part of "quit harassing me after three years of doing it," does
she not understand?  Does she think that she has the right to torment
me to death?

Another revelation:  Shortly ago, that cyber-bully woman wrote to
the closest female in my life and proceeded to outright harass her.
In that letter, the bully woman claimed that she located & contact-
ed Torquato's accuser.  Now, I have not seen him for over TEN
years.  Yet, she stated to my closest female friend that Torquato's
accuser told the bully woman that I was recenlty talking to him
and said that I was angry for not getting from my dear friend the
loan I never asked her to make.  The great irony is that I once give
my close friend $10,000 and said that she never had to pay it back.

This is mentioned so that you can see that this cyber-bully woman
in Melbourne Florida keeps trying to sow dissension --- to cause my
friends and associates to fear me and/or hate me and to turn against
me.  Well, that attempt failed, and my dear femal friend and I be-
come even closer.

Now . . .

I have a lot of EVIDENCE which shows that that Florida woman
has been harassing me and even third parties since 2014.  And now,
there is the claim that me writing on my Wuerl-of-Hurt site caused
her great harm.  She wrote that I was stalking her from 1,200 miles,
and that post got deleted.  Yet, she did not see that as causing me
untold distress.  She wrote that I was Cipolla in disguise, operating
a child molester protection ring, when I exposed many a molester.
Yet, she doesn't think that her blatant defamation caused my untold
distress and pain.

She wrote other defamatory things that caused me untold grief,
entirely inconsiderate to how much pain it caused me to this day.
At present, she is accusing me of committing the egregious acts.
Yet, I heard Cipolla's pain when he read what she wrote about
him.  She caused his heart attack.  For example, she wrote that
Cipolla's friend slit all of her tires and smashed all her windows.
Uhhm, no they didn't.  If that happened, Cipolla would have
been taken into custody instantly.  Was was not.

Someone as vile as the cyber-bully lady in her writings against me
shows signs of mental instability, in combination with the fact that
she has obsessively called everyone or emailed everyone attached
to me, in order to dig up dirt on me.  A person like her is far too
unstable to be allowed to have minors in her custody.

Remember that I NEVER telephoned her. I NEVER texted her.
I NEVER wrote her an email.  I furthermore did NOT drive to
Melbourne Florida.  Therefore, I did NOT stand in her presence
and harass her.  I simply want her to leave me alone.  Now you
see why I always refused to communicate with her in any capa-

All that that cyber-bully woman has to do is delete even the titles
of all remaining defamatory blogs she created and which had the
literary content within them deleted by the powers-that-be.  She
then has to stop writing about me and stop talking about me, and
to stop writing to any of my associates.  She did NOT write about
the merits of the Cipolla Case in her blogs.  Rather, she attacked
me personally, in hominid attacks.

Also remember that I never submitted my evidence in the Cipolla
Case to the PA grand jury.  I was away for a while, and I didn't ev-
en know the procedure to do such a thing.  Needless to say, I did
NOT testify before the grand jury..

Once again, 321-608-6731 on the exact same day as the release of
the Grand Jury Report.  What a coincidence!!!  Your assistance, if
you can give it, will be much appreciated.  Please spare me of this
chronic torment and repeatedly harassment of me.

May 25, 2018

Let's get the Cipolla Case right, once and for all

Anthony Cipolla was NEVER charged with any crime at any time
in his life, and Anthony Cipolla was NEVER arrested at any time
in his life.

Q:  But, what about 1978?

ANS:  Cipolla was NEVER charged, because criminal charges were
PENDING and not yet issued.

Then, the accusing mother of 1978 walked away from the case, by
declining to pursue her private criminal complaint.

One more hearing was required for Cipolla to be formally and of-
ficially charged --- for the assigned magistrate to "issue process"
upon Cipolla.  It was scheduled for late July 1978.  That hearing
never transpired.

Now, there are TWO VERSIONS of the Cipolla Case Narrative.
One version was published for public view in Oct 1995, 2015, and
2016.  The other version of the Cipolla case was published in 2018,
by the Pennsylvania Grand Jury.  The 2018 version is the only one
which carries PROBATIVE VALUE, meaning that it is worth pre-
senting to a jury in a court of law.

The 1995, 2015, and 2016 versions of the Cipolla Case were overly
sensationalized HYPER-EXAGGERATIONS which are an insult
to the intelligence of anyone who even studied a year of law or who
was sent through the criminal court system as a defendant.

The 2016 version was written by conspiracy theorist, Randy Engel,
and it shows that she knows nothing about Pennsylvania Law.  It
is exceptionally NON-FACTUAL, and it is 100% wrong for a web-
site master to link up to the very fictitious Randy Engel article.  The
true Cipolla Case was much more tame and snakelike.  In fact, the
1995, 2015, and 2016 versions of the Cipolla contradict each other
in allegations of fact.  For example ...

... The accusing mother of 1995 told the Pittsburgh Post Gazette
    that she had two elder daughters and two younger sons.  In the
    Year 2016, the same woman told Rand Engel that she had three
    sons and one daughter.  She also claimed that a husband of hers
    was in a Vietnam era special forces training accident in the
    Spartansburg South Carolina military base.  Well, that base
    was a WWII prisoner of war camp (Camp Croft) and it was
    closed in 1947 and turned into a state park, for vacationers.

The same accusing mother of 1978 wrote a number of lies about
me, such as the 2015 assertion that I was Anthony Cipolla in dis-
guise, operating a child/teen molester protection ring.  The truth
is that I am in construction and am NOT wealthy in any defini-
tion of the word.  Thus, I cannot afford to protect anyone, be it
noble revolutionaries or repulsively unnatural criminals.  Furth-
ermore, Anthony Cipolla died in 2016, and several article were
posted at this Wuerlof Hurt site since 2016, proving that I am
NOT Anthony Cipolla and that the woman is a deliberate liar.

Concerning the 2018 Grand Jury, it had access to a secret archive
file to which I never had access.  Ironically, Randy Engel wrote in
2016 that the subject matter found to exist in the secret archive file
no longer existed.  Engel claimed that the Cipolla case was expung-
ed.  Well, the secret archive file prove Engel to be a liar.

Concerning that secret archive file, there exists within it the tale of
the tape.  It's a medical report, mentioning the existence of a lubri-
cant on a child's undergarment.  Well, if that lubricant spot was
not planted there by the accusing mother, in order to frame Ci-
polla, then its case closed, concerning the 1978 case.

Concerning the Randy Engel article, I went into detail, showing
how embarrasingly non-factual it is and how lazy Engel was in
NOT doing any fact checking on simple Pennsylvania procedural

I already wrote of the Grand Jury version of the Cipolla Case v
the super-bogus, hyper-exaggerated versions.  When I have time
to search, I'll find the links to those writings.  I have to leave, right
now, to do some physical-intensive work on a construction yard.
But, one parting comment as to why Wuerl let the overly sensa-
tionalized version of the Cipolla Case be published without him
intervening and letting the publishers know that their version of
the case was hyper-exaggerated.

According to the PA Grand Jury and its access to the secret archive
of Cipolla held in the possession of Donald Wuerl for 18 years, Don-
ald Wuerl knew about the 1978 case the first moment Wuerl reviewed
the Cipolla Case.  Yet, Wuerl wanted everyone to believe that he was
clueless as to the existence of the Cipolla Case until the 1978 accusing
mother contacted him and told him.  In as much . . .

All that Wuerl needed to do, the first year he arrived in Pittsburgh as its
"local ordinary," AKA RULING BISHOP, was review all priests' case
files.  Upon reviewing Cipolla's Case file, he would have seen the exist-
ence of the 1978 case in a NON-exaggerated light.  It would then have
been his automatic duty to keep Cipolla away from youth, unless it could
have been proven that the "lubricant stain" was planted there, to fram Ci-

Well, Wuerl did not remove Cipolla from close access to children the first
year Wuerl became in charge of the RC Diocese of Pittsburgh.  Then came
the Wolk, Zula, & Pucci indictments, along with Wuerl letting George Zir-
was remain in ministry ... all the while getting rid of a John Hoehl whom
Wuerl reinstated, letting Hoehl take flight to West Virgina.  Therefore ...

     Wuerl allowed the super-hyper-exaggeration of the Cipolla Case to
     fill the public's mind via the Oct 1995 edition of the Pittsburgh Post
     Gazette and other publications, in order to deflect Donald Wuerl's
     own accountability in not having removed Cipolla, until after Frs.
     Wolk, Zula, and Pucci were indicted, and not until after Tim Bendig
     went to the newspapers.  Wuerl was put on the spot, especially in light
     of the fact that DA John C Pettit announced that he would continue to
     investigate Wuerl's priests, with the help of about a half dozen out-of-
     state DAs.

To think, Wuerl always thought that he could sneak-on by, in his cover-ups.
He is still living his lie today, in denial after denial, with the of of his propa-
ganda machine which includes a Bill Donohue whom you must boycott.

For those unaware, Donohue was a Pittsburgh-area philosophy professor
who became the president of the Catholic League through the string tug-
ging of Donald Wuerl.  You must morally boycott the Catholic League,
until Donohue is gone.  You must boycott St. Matthew's Cathedral in
Washington DC until Wuerl is gone.  You must boycott the Vatican
until Francis the cover-up artist and heretical teacher is gone.

However, do NOT stop giving to AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED.
Those guys need your money here and now.  Thus,  whatever you were
going to give to Wuerl, Donohue, and the Vatican directly, give to the
charity organization AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED and similar
Catholic organizations..

Concerning the fact that the true Cipolla Case was much more tame than
the hyper-exaggerated & sensationalized Tom Cruz Movie version.  The
actual pattern of priest cover-ups is that of Subtlety, Perniciousness, and
Underhanded Snakelike Behavior.  No smashing of windows and no slit-
ting of tires.  Such cases evaporate, with prelates figuratively saying,
"Molestation?  What molestation?  I do see a thing."

The underhanded sneakiness is what torments the true victims of sexual
aggression, for one reason.  This reason was conveyed to me by a Cali-
fornia activist who was a female victim at a very young age in the Mid-
west of the United States.  That which torments the victims the most is
that the priests get away with what they did, suffering no accountability.

It's the sneaky silent and invisibility that torments the victims, NOT a
Charles Bronson blow-'em-up movie scenario.  Subtlety can kill.

May 24, 2018

The Sovereign State of Pennsylvania's Original Findings on the Anthony Cipolla Investigation, in the Form of an Official Document

Meanwhile, the power-clawer, Donald Wuerl, plays his distorted & dishonest tune . . .
Once again, despite my repeated notices and despite her acknowledgement of
said notices, the provingly false accuser of the deceased man formerly known
as Father Anthony Cipolla wrote to me in gloating arrogance, proudly asking
what I had to say about a short news report from Pittsburgh area news reporter
Andy Sheehan.  He referred to Anthony Cipolla as the homosexual molester,
as if Sheehan had read the Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report... as if Sheenan
were the commissioned adjudicator of the Sovereign State of Pennsylvania.

Quick background:

If you are an occasional visitor to this Wuerl-of-Hurt site, then you know the
tune.  Cipolla's accuser acts beyond smug, thinking that she has me cornered
to the point where I have to drop to my knees and beg mercy from her.  No,
I'm the one who has been extending mercy to her for a heroic length of time.

However, come next week, when I have free time, I finally have to contact
the Melbourne Florida police, the county sheriff of said jurisdiction, and the
State Attorney's General office, to get initiated the process which will have
her two grandchildren's custody taken away from her, as well as finally get-
ting that court order I should have gotten three years ago, when she started
harassing and defaming me.  Of course, defamation in all forms (be it libel,
slander, or invasion-of-privacy-in-a-false-light) is a criminal offense in the
State of Florida.

Her TEN ad hominid blogs, defaming me in every imaginable way, show
signs of a psychological pathology by which she is too mentally unstable
to care after youth.

The only way which I am not going to press the Florida criminal court sys-
tem button is IF AND ONLY IF she deletes all of the blogs that defamed
me, and IF AND ONLY IF she never constructs a new one.  Things have
changed, and those who had been given advantages from the thoroughly
corrupt Vatican II church are soon to be learning how justice truly does
prevail.  Their days are finished.  They simply haven't realized it, yet.
It's only a matter of short time.

Now, in response to that woman's latest unwelcomed email to me:

What do I have to say about Andy Sheehan's report, where within he
calls the late Anthony Cipolla a child molester?

ANS:  Demand letter to Sheehan and to Sheehan's corporate employer,
followed by a libel lawsuit on behalf of the Cipolla family, including
the Vince Cipolla whom I got to know, if necessary.

Now, for those who lived a life of only sound bytes and short news
articles, as well as bumper sticker slogans, here is a newsflash for
you.  Be attentive:

The damning accusations of Tim Bendig against Anthony Cipolla have
already been investigated in two Pennsylvania jurisdictions by authorized
personnel of the Sovereign State of Pennsylvania.  The jurisdictions were
Allegheny County (home of Pittsburgh) and Beaver County (Northwest
of Pittsburgh.)

Now, the Beaver County investigation, alone, endured for THREE
months, and the findings of both Pennsylvania counties were that:


One copy of the OFFICIAL documentation pertaining to the findings
of the Cipolla investigation appears below.   Now, read it.  Perceive it
and know that the Pittsburgh media was complicit with Donald Wuerl's
dishonesty.  Acknowledge ... be enlightened ... be free of the propaganda.

If this is NOT mentioned in the 2018 grand jury report, then it shows the
incompetency or corruption or heavy workload of the grand jury by which
it would constitute a good-faith oversight.  After all, we are only human.
In as much, when something is omitted or newly discovered, then you
simply motion for amendment to the record.

Incidentally, a grand jury is NOT a panel of experts or specialists.  In fact,
a grand jury is chosen like a raffle drawing from a voter registration list.
Thus, the jurists don't know PA criminal procedure, etc.

Wuerl used the Cipolla Case as a diversionary tactic, to get prosecutor
John C. Pettit off his back, due to Pettit prosecuting Wolk, Zula, and
Pucci, AND due to the fact that, during the years when Wuerl was be-
ing hailed as the "loving" & protective zero tolerance hero, he was
covering up the notorious John S. Hoehl, the triply reported Edward
Huff, and the John Wellinger case which actually was a matter of Fr
Ron Lengwin's deliberate negligence.  That's six cover-ups in a short
period of time, in a Pittsburgh that's 6 times smaller in population than
is Philadelphia.

Again, view, perceive, and realize how much of a pathologist liar Wuerl is.
And when do you know Wuerl is lying?  ANS:  When he opens his mouth.

May 23, 2018

PA Grand Jury Report: Pontillo was 100% CORRECT in stating that there was NO 1978 ARREST and no 1978 post-arrest retaliation in Cipolla Case

Wuerl should have been stopped long ago.
Let us review:

The Anthony Cipolla case was presented to the public by the Pittsburgh
Post Gazette and even by Mrs. Randy Engel in ridiculously harrowing
narrations.  Both Engel & the Post Gazette detailed an "arrest" of An-
thony Cipolla by two detectives, followed by a forceful retaliation
against the accusing mom and family.  They both described a Tom
Cruz movie, short of Ninja assassinations exiting black helicopters.

There was even the claim that the accusing mother (Diane Thompson)
and family had to take immediate flight into Cleveland in 1978.  How-
ever, there were located records of small-cash lawsuits against a person
named Diane Thompson who ever-so-coincidentally lived in the same
geographic hub in the 1980s.  Coincidence or was it the same person?

Well, I went into detail, showing you, the public, how there was NO
indictment and NO arrest of Cipolla.  I then showed you how there
was NO post-arrest retaliation of any kind.  I showed you how all
of the allegations of Diane Thompson-Magnum were lies, contrary
to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure, in as far as con-
cerned all of her Arrest & Post-Arrest Retaliation Narrations.

NOW . . .

I also repeatedly stated that I would be more than willing to declare
Anthony Cipolla a molester, IF someone would show me the evi-
dence thereof.  It was the narration of the Cipolla arrest and the
ensuing retaliation narration which I said was a fraud.

Of course, I was 100% correct.  Thus, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette
(in its Oct 13, 1995 edition), Ann Rodgers-Melnick, the accusing
mother herself, and Mrs. Randy Engel (in 2016) who put me on a
wild goose chase, proving that the arrest & retaliation saga was a
a complete falsehood.  Meanwhile, I and the rest of the public were
deprived of the evidence which was used in the recent Pennsylvania
Grand Jury Investigation, in the Cipolla Case, namely the Pittsburgh
diocesan Secret Archive files.

In the Cipolla Case, the star of the show which finally showed an
element of credibility was ONE SHEET OF PAPER mentioning
the existence of a lubricant in a young man's undergarment.  This
is the case-closer, if the lubricant was not planted there by the ac-
cusing mom, in order to frame Anthony Cipolla.  Even at that,
there instantly becomes cause to look further into the evidence
and possibly close the case.  This evidence was deprived of the 
public.  It was in a secret file.  I thought that this was America?

The First Axiom:

It's the cases that allege the dime-a-dozen, commonly experienced
acts of an abusive priest and a cover-up diocese which carries the
credibility --- NOT a hyper-exaggerated Tom Cruz movie plot.

PLUS:  Are you aware of how many people have been convicted,
because they left behind a sales slip, a business card, a cigarette
butt (for DNA purposes), etc?  It's not the exaggerations that
get the attention, it's the subliminal things that close cases.

Also remember that, for seven years (from 2006 - 2013), I declared
Cipolla guilty.  Then, I was advised to fact check all accusations.
When I fact-checked the allegations of the Arrest & Post-arrest
retaliation, all facets of it were falsehoods, except one, and that
one allegation was presently in a false light.

Now remember, it's the subtle things that attract an investigator's
attention.  Lying as Diane Thompson-Mangum did about an ar-
rest & retaliation that never happened destroys all of your credi-

In addition, the Grand Jury Inquest should have occurred in the
Year 2000 or at least 2002.  But of course, Wuerl was grand-
standing, and Ann Rodgers was deceiving people in thinking
that Wuerl was as holy as St John the Baptist, when Wuerl
was nothing but a cover-up artisit, retaliator, and liar.  We
shouldn't have had to have waited until 2018.

Culpability goes to Pgh Post Gazette and Wuerl for this 
exaggerated narration of arrest & near-death retaliation

At this point, keep in mind that ANN RODGERS was an accom-
plice in Donald Wuerl's World of cover-up and retaliation.  She
was NOT a news reporter.  She was a propagandist.  She made
Wuerl out to be the great hero of the ages.  So, she accommodat-
ed ridiculous exaggerations.  The sublime evidence, if authentic,
is enough to light the sirens & alarms in an investigator's mind.

Culture of Cover-up

Then, as to further give circumstantial evidence to the Culture of
Cover-up in the Pittsburgh Diocese, Protestant Ann Rodgers was
appointed to be the Communications Director of the Roman Rite
Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh.  The conjectured reason was that
she knew all the cover-ups and was willing to be complicit in
them.  So, she was hired ... it is conjectured and it is plausible.

Take NOTE:  Ann Rodgers DID know about Torquato and kept his
thoroughly vicious retaliations a secret.  And remember, Torquato
immediately cut off 100% of the diocesan business accounts that
the uncle of Torquato's evidence-based accuser had with the dio-
cese.  Plus, Torquato tried to frame his accuser of a crime that
was impossible to have occurred, because it was reported as
having happened while Torquato's accuser was at work, in a
job that comprised multiple time check-ins per day.

Torquato also provoked the midnight call and ensuing unfriendly
apartment visit by two upset gentlemen who caused me to pay
my landlord for the moderate damages that they caused.  And
always remember, I REFUSED to file any private criminal com-
plaint against those two gentlemen, and I REFUSED to sue them,
because they were being intimidated by Torquato to do what they
attempted to do.  It was Torquato's fault and Wuerl's fault; not

For the record, they attempted to get their hands on the James
Torquato evidence and to get Torquato's accuser to retract his
accusations against Torquato.  I still have the evidence in Pitts-
burgh, and Torquato's accuser NEVER retracted his accusations.

In the Torquato Retaliations, a Father Edward Burns was there,
being that he was in charge of the investigation thereof.   Well,
everytime I would send a communication to the diocese, a re-
taliation ensued.  The only person betraying my communica-
tion to Burns and a guy named Ruggerio was someone in the
office of Burns.  Well, this Father Edward Burns became
BISHOP EDWARD BURNS.  It were as if he were re-
warded for helping Torquato in his retaliations.

Concerning the Blatantly False Cipolla Arrest & Retaliation

I blame this all on Donald Wuerl.  He knew that there was no re-
taliation against the 1978 accusing mother.  There was only the
standard attorney intervention.  Thus, Wuerl had the obligation
to call the Pgh Post Gazette management and let it be known
that the narration of the Arrest & Retaliation that never was
never happened.

Concerning the Hell I endured via Torquato

I blame it entirely on Ann Rodgers. This is because she deceived
me into thinking that Wuerl would be fair with Torquato's accus-
er.   He was the opposite.  In fact, Wuerl was conveniently absent
throughout the entire time thereof.  It were as if there were no
bishop of Pittsburgh; only Torquato's thuggery.

Let's Review:

Rodgers wrote of Wuerl being a zero-tolerance super hero, while
Wuerl was paying homosexual priest George Zirwas to keep silent
about priests whom Zirwas claimed were criminals.

Rodgers was also making Wuerl look like the next Captain America,
while he was covering up Edward Huff.

Then there was the matter of there having been no known action taken
against Br. Ghastin, Br. Hartmann, Fr. LeDoux, and John Wellinger.

Next comes accused Father Ernest Paone.  Wuerl greenlighted Paone's
transfer to the West Coast, namely Los Angeles and Las Vegas.  For
the record, Paone was in Las Vegas in 1992, for only a month.  None
the less, the Donald Wuerl who was said to be a zero-tolerance hero
was transferring accused priests across State lines.

It was Ann Rodgers who mislead the public into believing that the
cover-up artist, Donald Wuerl, was a Zero Tolerance Super Hero.

Concerning Rodgers' legacy of canoniing Donald Wuerl,  know
that the Archdiocese of Washington DC disconnected a Donald-
Wuerl-Zero-Tolerance-Hero website from the Internet.  People
in DC now recognize Wuerl as a disgrace.

However, David Zubik, the Useful Idiot of molester John S Hoehl
does NOT show any intent to remove Wuerl's name from Donald
Wuerl High School.

And remember, the Pennsylvania Grand Jury reported that Donald
Wuerl was paying-off George Zirwas, for Zirwas' silence, since the
Year 1995.  Well, 1995 was the year when Wuerl was being parad-
ed around as the heroic zero tolerance bishop, concerning the An-
thony Cipolla Case which was not presented in its true form, until
2018.  It was presented in a Comic Book version, until then.

If it were not for Ann Rodgers misleading the public into thinking
that Wuerl was a caring and protective bishop, I would have told
Torquato's evidence-based accuser, to shut-up, keep his distance,
and move-on.

I went through total Hell, at the hands of Ann Rodgers' lying propa-
ganda.  She had the duty to warn the public about Wuerl, instead of
deceiving us into thinking that walking into the World of Wuerl was
not going to be the act of walking into the wolves' lair.  When Tor-
quato's accuser and I walked into Wuerl's World, we were attacked
from all angles.

Back to the 1978 Accuser of Cipolla

Some other Thompson assertions were unlikely, and other things were
ridiculous frauds, such as the accusing mother's claim that Anthony Ci-
polla had sores all over his body.  She exaggerated to the point of losing
all of her credibility.

In as much, the PA Grand Jury concurred with Patrick Anthony Pontillo,
proving him to have been 100% correct in him having stated that none
of the overly theatrical arrest and post-arrest retaliations ever occurred.

The grand jury report described a civilized (and perhaps snakelike) crew
of lawyers, playing the predictable game of undue influence, convincing
the accusing mother to let others take care of the Cipolla Case.  The past
allegations of this Diane Thompson-Mangum were much more different
and much more horrifying than her much more tame 2017 grand jury
testimony.  None the less . . .

In review, the true 1978 Cipolla Case was the dime-a-dozen case where
the accusing parent is NOT confronted with clubs and knives.  No tires
get slit.  No windows get smashed.  Lawyers do the talking in a civiliz-
ed tone (and sometimes intimidating tone) of voice, and convince the
parents to let the more educated lawyers take care of the problem.

It was the stereotypical non-violent lawyer swindle.  Plus, the info need-
ed to prove the Cipolla Case was locked away in a secret archive.  So,
if Thompson did not tell her bogus arrest-&-retaliation horror story, we
would have all assumed that Cipolla was as guilty as sin, all along.

In fact, take note:

Diane Thompson was too proud to admit that she was tricked into look-
ing like a jackass in 1978 --- this is IF IF IF the lubricant report really
does exist, and therefore, is valid evidence.  Her very fraudulent retali-
ation horror story was a simple matter of silly human pride.  She was
covering up her feeling of being a disgracefully negligent mom or a
dupe of the diocese.  Well, no one here is wasting our time judging if
she were negligent or not in 1978.  God forgives ... in a confessional.
Tell her to move on.  She is not our goal.  The goal is this:


And yes, he may have a handsome diocesan pension for survival purposes.

SODANO GONE!!!!!!!!!

KASPER GONE!!!!!!!!!

DOLAN GONE!!!!!!!!!

This Diane Thompson-Mangum cost me a lot, in my having to consume
untold amounts of volunteer time, in proving to you how much of a liar
she was, and how much of a dupe Randy Engel was, in the Arrest & Re-
taliation Fiction.

Moreover, this Diane Thompson cost you, because, if she pursued the
Cipolla Case, she would have set a decisive precedent and would have
made Bevilacqua & Wuerl fear to cover-up the criminals  they covered.

Think:  If Diane Thompson didn't  walk away from her private criminal
complaint against Cipolla, then 1) Whip & Chains Zula instantly gone,
2) Wuerl Classmate Wolk gone in a flash,  3) Pucci gone and not allowed
to stay on the diocesan payroll, working as a chaplain,

4) John Hoehl turned over to law enforcement authorities and not given
an escape route to West Virginia, 5) Zirwas outed and not reinstated by
Wuerl in 1995, and then payed by the diocese until his sudden tranquil-
izer death of 2001,  6) Torquato gone and NOT made the pastor of the
Rankin parish,

7) Wellinger instantly investigated instead of given a free pass by Father
Ron Lengwin, 8) Huff gone, and no trips to St. Louis, and no reinstate-
ment into hospital chaplain ministry.  9) No cover-up of the Serra Cath-
olic Adam Ference Shooting which I stated in 2009 involved Brother
Ghastin from Massachusetts.

Wuerl would have been too afraid to perform the cover-ups he did, if
Diane Thompson-Mangum would have simply said, "No," in 1978.
No one held a gun to her head.

One can say that she was alone and had no advisors.  True.  The fault ulti-
mately goes to the attorneys and Vincent Leonard, IF the lubricant finding
were not planted by Diane Thompson-Mangum, to frame Cipolla.

No matter what be the case, she had no right to fabricate a harrowing tale
of an arrest which never occurred and slit tires and smashed windows and
tears in her eyes at DA Bob Colville's office, etc.  Remember, they gave
her her hearing time.  They scheduled her in.  All that she had to do was
show up.  She didn't.  So, she made up an elaborate and bogus excuse as
to why she didn't.  None the less, she could have been an icon for the en-
tire priest-accountability movement, if she didn't withdraw her private
criminal complaint.
Where there is profanation of the sacred there is Donald Wuerl
At trial, she only needed to follow the following rule:  Keep it Simple.
Case Closed.

And as far as went legal fees, she could have gone to a woman's protec-
tion organization and got a fund raising program started.  Civil court
costs a lot.  Criminal Court, when performing ye olde private criminal
complaint prosecution, is affordable for people in the middle class.

Diane Thompson also made Randy Engel look like her Useful Idiot and
a total jackass who can't tell when a crew of liars are performing a con
job on her.  Thus, Engel's credibility is gone.  Her writings are those of
a smugly self-righteous & overly conspiratorial nature, anyway.  If fact,
her writings are vulgar and pornographic trash.

I do NOT want to read about Cardinal This Guy and Bishop That Guy
having sex.  I don't want to have sex with men.  Therefore, I do NOT
want to read about men having sex.  Reading Randy Engel literally
makes you lose your appetite for 5 to 16 hours.  Plus, Engel is easy
to deceive.

Engel's report on the arrest and retaliation which never occurred destroys
the credibility of ever other Engel article.  Of course, in claiming that the
very Irish Catholic Michael Voris is an Opus Dei member, alone, shows
that Engel has a great problem with being in touch with reality.

Now, this Diane Thompson-Mangum publicly declared that I was An-
thony Cipolla in disguise, operating a child molestation ring.  She then
stated that I was stalking her, even though I was 1,200 miles away in
Chicago, and even though the woman grosses me out so badly I would
not be able to endure her presence.  She is the one stalking me, calling
everyone she can, to get me and my writings away from your sight.

It's all because she was a negligent mom and because she doesn't realize
that we don't care.  Tell her that God does for give sins and to move on ...
... move on after making restitution for any thefts or lies.  That's the rule
for everyone.  Tell her to go to confession and to leave me alone for all

I even received a phone call from Florida on the day of the Grand Jury
Report release, telling me that it's a crime to do what I did, and to be
prepared.  I am only ready to pursue a private criminal complaint and
file an $250,000 lawsuit against Mangum and accomplices, for harass-
ment and defamation.  That which I did was tell the public the truth in
the FREEDOM of the PRESS nation of the United States of America.
People died for my right to show how much of a liar Diane Thompson
is.  After all, she and Bendig became "partial" public figures, and
Times v. Sullivan takes effect in such cases.  Opinions against pub-
lic figures is NOT actionable or criminal in the United States; only
crying "fire!" in a crowded theater is.

Now, if I write an untruth, you write and say, "I need to point out that
such and such is not correct."  "This and that is the truth of the matter,
and my evidence is a, b, and c."  Thompson-Mangum didn't do this.
She instantly attacked and attacked and attacked and attacked.  Of
course, there was only one thing wrong that I wrote which had to do
with a hearing date, and I discovered it myself; not her.  I amended
the post on my own accord.

I can pursue my private criminal complaint against her (for harassing
& defaming me for three years) and the individual who recently joined
in the harassment.  I am going out of my way being merciful.  All that
this Diane Thompson-Mangum has to do is DELETE all ten blogs
dedicated to defaming me and delete all other defamation.  She is a
proven liar.  But, I do NOT want to spend my time on her.  I want to
spend it on taking Wuerl completely out of power.  He's beyond evil.

Once again, the weight of the Cipolla report was NOT NOT NOT
based on Diane Thompson's completely false horror tale told to the
Pittsburgh Post Gazette and to Useful Idiot First Class, Rand Engel.

It was based on Pgh Diocesan archive files and the reports of two in-
vestigators who were NOT Mark Nehouser, Badge #46.  It was based
on hidden material to which I and everyone else was deprived, short
of the search warrant.


The huge problem with this 1978 case is that the Allegheny County
DA could have filed charges against Cipolla, without any input from
the accusing mother.  He could have done so, on his own.

In fact, a police officer could have arrested Cipolla and then presented
due cause for arrest before a judge, thereby getting the judge to "sign-
off" on the "police criminal complaint," and instantly put Cipolla in the
criminal court system.  It was NOT done.

All in all, if the evidence against Cipolla were so compelling, then why
did not Bob Colville file charges against him?  Was it because it took
time for the lab tests to come back, and Colville couldn't do anything
until he saw the lab results?  Or was the lubricant observed via eye,
by an attending physician, and didn't carry much courtroom weight?
Was the inaction the act of corrupt complicity?

Pittsburgh during the Holidays.
Now, I explained to the public that the 1978 Cipolla case involved the filing
of a private criminal complaint.  I also explained that the1963 PA law which
prescribed the private criminal complaint process was the result of the 1963
US Supreme Court decision in Buttons v NAACP.

In review, the private criminal complaint form filled out by the accusing
mother was the act of her petitioning the Court to "issue process" on the
named defendant, Anthony Cipolla.  It was NOT an arrest report.  It was
not the filing of charges.  It was Step One.  Then, she declined to go to the
next step, for whatever reason, none of which was due to any slit auto tires.

In Review:

The 2018 PA Grand Jury Report did NOT NOT NOT exonerate the accus-
er of Anthony Cipolla, Diane Thompson-Mangum.  Rather, it proved that,
for the last 23 years, she has been LYING to the public, through & through.

This is BECAUSE her 2017 story told to the grand jury was much differ-
ent than the 1995 horror story that she told to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.
It was much more different than the super horror story she wrote in one
of her TEN cyber-bully weblogs which resulted in authorities deleting
post after post from those weblogs.

The 2017 testimony was also different from the story that Diane Thompson-
Mangum told to Mrs Randy Engel who turned out to be Diane Thompson's
useful idiot, in the many non-facts written into Engel's made-for-TV drama.
Pittsburgh, near the famous Three-Rivers Confluence.
NOW, I also stated that:

1) the accusing mother's claim of Cipolla being plagued with sores through-
out his body was a complete lie.  Pontillo Correct.

and that:

2) Frank Labiaux (her eldest son) did NOT vandalize any Northside church
or chapel with fire extinguishers, being that that act of vandalism happened
the year prior by two delinquents who ended-up slitting all of the tires in the
parking lot of the same church, a year or two later.

The claim was that the fire extinguisher vandalism was done by Frank, out
of frustration for having been molested.  That was an outright lie.  The two
delinquents were apparently hateful juvenile racists, being that the victim
church was the Black Methodist church in town.  In fact, the newspapers
at the time tried to downplay the racial animosity factor, after the mass
tire-slashing incident.

3) I additionally stated that the accusing mother lied (or was forgetful) in
saying that her deposition was video-taped, when a stenographer of record
was on the front page of the deposition.  And to this day, there does NOT
exist that deposition online.  Why can't we read it?

4) I furthermore stated that a child care veteran said that that which the
accusing mom told Randy Engel what Cipolla did to her son Tucker was
anatomically unlikely.  I also located a witness who went to Michigan with
Tim Bendig and Cipolla and who said that Cipolla did nothing of a sexual
nature to either one of them.

5) I also stated that Diane Thompson lied when she said that Tucker was
sitting at the kitchen table, doing his homework, when Cipolla allegedly
showed up at the door.  This is because the day was July 30 and there is
NO SCHOOL in 1978 Pittsburgh in late July, including summer school.

However, this kitchen visit was alleged from 1995 to 2016 under the claim
that Cipolla was indicted and out on bond.  Well, the PA Grand Jury affirm-
ed that was no arrest, and therefore, no bail agreement.  Thus, it is now pos-
sible that Cipolla did show up at the apartment, being that he was not yet
indicted .... not yet arrested ... not yet arraigned.  If Cipolla would have
shown-up there, after having been indicted, he would have violated the
conditions of his bond, and he would have been sent straight to a magi-
strate and then to County Jail.

6) I also stated that the accusing mom lied when she said that there was
a Vietnam era military training camp in Spartansburg, where her alleged
second husband was injured.  Firstly, Camp Croft was a Prisoner of War
camp, and it closed in 1947.

7) I then stated that there did NOT exist a Detective Mark Nehouser,
Badge #46, who put handcuffs around Cipolla and then took him to the
police station.  Rather, there was a uniformed officer, Mark Ninehouser,
Badge #46, who went to the accusing mother's residence, took her state-
ment, and then transposed it on a police form via handprinting, and NOT
cursive handwriting.

I additionally stated that the alleged photo of "the police arrest report" that
was online was a fraud, being that it was written in cursive handwriting,
and the handwriting was wide-looped feminine cursive writing.  All
Pittsburgh police reports, by policy, were to be hand-printed only.

* * * * * * * * * *
8)  More than anything else, I stated that I would be more than willing to
declare Cipolla a molester IF and only if someone would give me evidence
showing this to be the probable case.  I repeatedly stated this, while stating
that Diane Thompson-Mangum completely lied about Cipolla, in as far as
concerned her narration of the arrest and post-arrest retaliation which never

* * * * * * * * * * * *
Bingo for Patrick Anthony Pontillo on that detailed assessment.  In as much,
suing me would be an act of vexatious litigation.  Doing worse would be a
malicious prosecution and a handsome litigation award thereafter.  At this
point, I am not going to lay down and be steamrolled by a cyber-bully who
constructed TEN weblogs dedicated to assassinating my character. This is
especially so, being that I was proven correct by the same grand jury, in all
that I wrote about all other priests mentioned at the Wuerl-of-Hurt site.

I suffered far too much for the cause, where I got paid zero dollars and zero
cents for all of my volunteer work.  Wuerl, Torquato, & Ann Rodgers, alone,
caused me untold suffering.  Plus, Diane Thompson-Mangum defamed me
so hideously, that she asserted that I was Cipolla in disguise, operating a
child molester protection ring.   I'm a construction worker.  You know
the stereotype of the construction worker.  You know, guys who whistle
at the ladies ... and not little children.  But, the truth of the construction
worker is that such a person is instinctive protective of others not as
physically strong.

The outrage of that one lie is that this site of mine EXPOSED MOLESTER
AFTER MOLESTER.  I did the OPPOSITE of run a molester protection
ring.  I simply discovered that the Cipolla case was being presented in a
false light ... until the 2018 presentation of it.

All in all, Wuerl used the Cipolla Case to hide his cover-ups from South-
west PA DA John C. Pettit.  After all, there was Huff, Hoehl, Paone, etc,
in addition to the uncovered cover-up of Wolk, Zula, and Pucci.  Wuerl
used the Cipolla case to GRANDSTAND and promote himself for high
office, also.  That was unconscionable.

© Patrick Anthony Pontillo.  Please ask before using my photos.
Of course, this is the same Wuerl who, in 1979, deceived the press into
thinking that he single-handedly wrote the Teachings of Christ.  He de-
ceived the press by stating something similar to, "When you start writ-
ing, you just can't bring yourself to stop."  So, Wuerl made it sound
as if he went on a writing spree and ended up writing an entire cate-
chism book.

For the record, Wuerl was one of the THREE editors of that catechism
book.  That book had many writers.  The editorial task was to bring
writing style cohesion to the text, being that the many writers had
different writing styles.

Bendig is a noted liar

None the less, Tim Bendig still lied to me four times in a row, and
a number of people conveyed to me that Bendig is a perpetual liar.
ONe person said that "Bendig lies 90% of the time."

In fact, the late WBVP radio talk show host, John Nuzzo (who ev-
en interviewed Malachi Martin,) told me that he was in Bendig's
Two Step Lounge, watching Bendig brag about how gullible was
the Diocese of Pittsburgh, in giving him a six-figure settlement.

The fact that Bendig used the settlement money to buy the bar, and
not use it for intense psychiatric treatment, proved him to be a liar.
He told the press that he now had the chance to go through intense
therapy.  His idea of therapy was that of buying a bar & grill.

This is according to a dead man who died in 2008.  Thus, it is per-
mitted as testimony in any American court, due to the hearsay law

There is more about Bendig that shows him to be a con artist.  How-
ever, I have to keep things confidential.  None the less, I wish that the
person holding the confidential information would please come forth.

Sunset Fire Cloud
I was informed that I would be allowed to talk to Frank & Tucker,
the sons of the accusing mom.  I was promised this long ago, short-
ly before the authorities removed yet more of the accusing mom's
harassment and defamation of me.

I was also informed that a law firm would vett Randy Engel's very
non-factual article (parts 1 & 2 of  3 the parts were non-factual) and
that the law firm would get in touch with me and make a demand.
Well, I was never invited to interview Frank or Tucker, and no law
firm sent me any communication --- that I know of.

My entire statement about the Cipolla Case, in reference to the PA
Grand Jury Report, is this:

Why .... WHY did no one send me a copy of this alleged or factual report
which stated that Tucker had lubricant in his undergarment?  Why were
there not any certifications provided, showing that the report was valid,
being that Diane Thompson could have planted the lubricant in her son's
undergarment herself, for all that we know.

If someone would have sent me that medical report, and if it were authen-
ticated, then I would have thrown my hands up in the air and said, "Okay.
That's all.  I'm done.  I don't have time to pursue this case.  I have other
things to do."

None the less, Diane Thompson-Mangum-Labiaux lied so many times
that her lies utterly defamed even the Pennsylvania law enforcement
agency-bureau and the then-DA of Allegheny County, Bob Colville.

All of her lies about me and her intimidation of me was a waste of her
time.  All that anyone had to do was send me the alleged or actual med-
ical report of lubrication being on Tucker's undergarment.  She ran me
around with lie after lie after lie.  The defense against her attempt to
sue me or to have me prosecuted is known as

                           CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE.

She never had anyone send me that medical report.  She caused a lot
of damage and destroyed her credibility.   Wuerl simply used her for
his rise to power.  The question is:  Is there an authentic report in
existence which states this lubricant finding?  Can the public see it?

Concerning Diane Thompson-Mangum's lies, she also:

1) stated, as was previously mentioned, that I was Anthony Cipolla
in disguise, operating a child molester protection ring.  Shortly there-
after, Cipolla died, and posts kept being placed on this Wuerl-of-Hurt
site, proving that she lied to you.  Dead men don't publish posts on
the Internet . . . usually.

Concerning Thompson-Mangum, she furthermore:

2) stated that I was a grifter, making money off of my internet post-
ings.  The fact is that I never made a penny off of my internet sites.
Proof was that I had NO paypal box and no donation box of any
kind.  All that ever happened was that one person gave me a $100
tip in a time of need, in gratitude for my exposing Wuerl.

MOREOVER, that which I wrote about Wuerl, Wolk, Zula, Pucci,
Ghastin, Hartmann, LeDoux, Zirwas, Wellinger, Hoehl, Torquato, etc
was right-on true.

In continuing, the Cipolla accuser-mom also:

3) stated that I was stalking her, when I was 1,200 miles away from her
in Chicago.

4) stated that I had a violent temper, when I have the security clearances
proving the possession of a civilized person, along with my history go-
ing through super intense disciplines which require a lot of patience.
However, she stated this, to explain why she kept mocking me with
ethnic slurs about my ancestors who lived in the Mount Vesuvius
region of Italy.

She also:

5) stated that I lived in a "trailer court", when I lived amongst many a
swan and a few fountains and lots of lots of golf carts, within the sound
of the Atlantic Ocean for SEVEN years.

For the record, I was a private academy student in a country club family.
My dad was a fully decorated Air Force combat vet and Chief Product
Supervisor of Engineers, in a Pittsburgh Steel Company's research de-

Thompson-Mangum wants to you believe that I am white trash.  Those
of you who know me know that I was published along laureates, includ-
ing a couple national book award winners.  You know that I was induct-
ed into the Phi Sigma Iota Language Honors Society and the Internation-
al High IQ Society, and that I was taught by one of JFK's economic
advisors, even to the point of imitating his accent, saying "Can you
tell me why?"  Yes, he was Professor Can-You-Tell-Me-Why.

Thompson-Mangum also:

6) stated that I am a "drama queen," as if I am a limp wristed & effem-
inate priss.  Uhhhm, I am a Chicago & Pittsburgh construction worker
who worked in -30F wind chills, 97F heat, and in sleet, snow, etc.  This
work was done by me even after having been crushed between a couple
2,430 lb steel beams, so done while I was working on a Mercedes flat
bed truck.

I can assure you that queens do NOT find my world of construction
glamorous enough for them.  If you can find an effeminately flaming
prissy construction worker, you should call Ripley's Believe It Or Not.

Furthermore, the same woman also:

7) stated that, after Cipolla died, I was feigning emotional pain.  Oh,
I wasn't faking anything that day.  That day, I wanted to be left alone.

7) stated that Donald Wuerl would be the next pope.  Uhhhhhm, this
is highly unlikely after the PA Clergy Abuse Grand Jury Report, espe-
cially due to the report of Zirwas & Paone.  Those two were enough
to end Wuerl's career in complete and total disgrace.

Mike Aquilina & Rocco Palmo, Praisers of Donald Wuerl; the end.

In as much, all of you who praised Wuerl, such as you, MR. MIKE
AQUILINA and you, ROCCO PALMO, you will fade away.  I told
the public shortly before August 14, 2018 that it's time to choose
sides.  Aquilina and Palmo picked the wrong side.  You two should
have known to choose the side of the fellow Italian and NOT the
thoroughly corrupt German, Donald Wuerl.  Well, have a nice
change of profession.

The 1978 Accuser

The woman has been nothing but a brawler and a liar, even into the
year when Cipolla died from a heart attack, namely 2016.  Concern-
ing the Cipolla report, all that anyone had to do was send me one
sheet of paper, with a certification note, detailing the lubricant-in-
the-underwear report.  Why was I toyed-with so much?  Why was I
 denied that one sheet of evidence, if it is authentic?

Moreover, keep in mind that I kept in contact with Cipolla, waiting for
him to finally confess wrongdoing.  Then came the documentary evi-
dence where Cipolla was only reviewed at the Vatican for the diagno-
sis of Depression and Suicidal Tendencies, and NOT molestation.

Next came the Tim Bendig phone-call to me, where he lied to me four
times in a row.  I knew that Bendig was a con artist then-and-there.

Part of my Florida photo shoot, several years ago.
None the less, the things that I did affirm about the Cipolla case were
all true.  What you always need to remember is that I kept stating that
I would be more than willing to declare Cipolla a molester, if and only
if someone would produce the evidence pointing to his guilt.

I understand that the Melbourne woman is going to do everything to get
me criminally indicted, prosecuted, and imprisoned in Florida for what
I wrote about her and the Cipolla Case.  Everything that I wrote was true,
with that one caveat about me being willing to declare Cipolla a molester
upon the examination of evidence I have not yet been shown ... and maybe
after I speak with Tucker & Frank, while testing them for contradictions.

All in all, two parts of the three-part Randy Engel article was contrary to
that which the PA Grand Jury stated.  Engel's writings turned out to be as
false as I said they were.  The 1978 Cipolla Case transpirations were far
far more civilized than what the accusing mother, Randy Engel, and the
Pittsburgh Post Gazette made them out to be.  Remember, those theatri-
cal narrations defame then-DA Bob Colville.

Concerning the 1989 Beaver County DA, when the Bendig accusations
were investigated for three months, know that a woman, THERESA
FERRIS-DUKOVICH, was the DA and NOT Robert J. Masters.
Masters' tenure ended in 1967, and he admitted to covering up the
Father Ernest Paone whom Wuerl would eventually transfer to
the West Coast in 1991..

Concerning my assertion that there absolutely was no arrest and no
post-arrest retaliation and no Detective Mark Nehouser, I WAS 100%
correct.  Concerning this, I WILL defend myself to the death from
whatever attacks are coming to me.  Always remember the legal
phrase, CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE.  I do not appreciate
having been left out in the cold, concerning witness and evidence.

Also remember:

1) I was 100% correct about Torquato.

2) 100% correct about Wolk, Zula, Pucci, and Zirwas.

3) I was correct about LeDoux, in the limited amount of reporting
    of him that I did, and I was humble ENOUGH to NOT act as an
    expert in that case.

4) I was also correct about Ghastin, in the limited reporting of him
    that I did.

5)  Hartman's case was something that I reviewed in a very limited
     fashion, too.  The Australian press is the source for this case.

6) I was CORRECT about Edward Huff.

7)  I was CORRECT about John Hoehl, too.  In fact, I personally
     knew Hoehl, and I was there, at his table when he returned
     from the Ontario Clinic and stood up, to give his progress
     report.  Remember, in some of these case, I was there.

Etc, etc, etc.

Again, keep in mind how much this Diane Mangum-Thompson
lied about me in a public forum; TEN wegblogs mocking me, de-
faming me, etc.  Ten times I had to push the button which got the
defamatory and harassing texts offline.  The fact that her material
was deleted be the powers-that-be ten times shows the existence
of a liar, if not someone mentally unstable.

All that she had to do was write a civilized letter to me, stating that
there was a document allegedly in existence that would shed light
on her 1978 accusations.  But no.  She tore into me, at the first
unsolicited and unwelcome email that she sent to me.  That's a
sign of mental instability.  Now I see that it's guilt or embarrass-
ment for being duped by a crew of lawyers.  Well, she was out-

Of course, she knew that I knew that her arrest-and-retaliation soap
opera was a fiction, as was concurred by the PA Grandy Jury Report.
So, she created diversionary tactics, by publicly defaming me in her
ad hominid attacks.  Her writings were not a discussion of the case.
They were merely attacks against me.

All of this is the fault of Donald "grand-stander" Wuerl and the
overly dramatic Ann Rodgers.  As I previously stated, Rodgers
made Wuerl out to be Beowulf,  destroying the evil Grendel.
So, I had to intervene, to show you that this Wuerl was NOT
the heroic model of ZERO tolerance that Rodgers made him
out to be.  It wasn't until 12 years after I starting showing you
how evil Donald Wuerl is that the Sovereign State of Pennsyl-
vaia did so.  Thus, I was 12 years ahead of the Grand Jury.

I had to show you that Wuerl did NOT come to have a saintly
and stellar zero tolerance disposition, after this "1988 enlight-
ening dinner" with a family of molestation victims.  Proof was
that Wuerl continued to hide Wolk, Zula, and Pucci from law
enforcement authorities.

Then came the Torquato Retaliations which Wuerl ratified by
turning his back on the whole thing.  Those retaliations were
a living Hell, and I get no credit or compassion for having en-
dured them.  I could have abandoned Torquato's accuser at
that time.  But, I didn't.

The Pertinence of the Torquato Case

Keep in mind that the Torquato Case's importance is that Wuerl
personally trained and then ordained Torquato, meaning that
Torquato is the showcase model of Wuerl's style of priestly
formation.  Wuerl formed a vicious priest.

The other pertinence of the Torquato Case were the two stages
of retaliation and how Wuerl let the retaliations continue ... and
how much Wuerl let the damage that Torquato caused remain
unamended.  It were as if Wuerl himself were retaliating against
me & the evidence-based accuser's family, via his surrogate,
James Torquato.

Being that I was threatened on the very day of the Grand Jury
Report's release, know that I will defend myself and my work
like any lion.  I ask you, the public, to consider the intense
amount of suffering that Wuerl, Rodgers, Torquato, Mangum,
etc caused me to endure.  The suffering was tremendous, and
now it appears to be going to the next stage.

Best wishes from Chicago to all of you of Good Will.

May 22, 2018

A letter written by the Late Anthony Cipolla

Below, toward the end of this post, is a letter Anthony Cipolla sent to me.
After I read it, I called him and asked him if I could post it for public view.
And of course, public view for my sites span from Asia to Russia to the
Ukraine to the United Arab Emirates to Western Europe to English speak-
ing America to Canada to Australia.  The bottom line here is that, when
Cipolla sent me that letter, he assumed that I would be the only one to
ever read it.

Incidentally ...

For the record, if I pledge my confidentiality you to, it's a law to me.  Proof
is simple:  Name one of my sources.  If you can do so, then you hacked into
my life.  None the less, a lot of writers keep confidentiality.  It isn't hard to

2018 Update:

NOW ... In light of the 2018 Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report, it was found
that there were TWO DIFFERENT STORIES attached to the Cipolla Case.
One story was the one promoted by the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, conspiracy
theory writer Randy Engel, and the 1978 accusing mother herself.

The other story was that which sat in the Pittsburgh diocesan files and which
was regarded as the credible story by the grand jury.

The grand story was far more tame and credible that the overly ridiculous
Post Gazette & Randy Engel story of an ARREST which NEVER happened,
followed by a harrowing post-arrest retaliation which never happened, either.

The fictional version of the Cipolla Case mentioned tires getting slit and win-
dows being smashed.  Then came Randy Engel's play-by-play account of the
arrest and prosecution which never happened.  Everything that Engel claimed
happened is 100% contrary to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.

She even wrote of DA Bob Colville strong-arming the 1978 accusing mom
into signing a sheet of paper which "drops charges."  Of course, once charges
are filed in American, no civilian can dismiss them.  And and and, when you
are indicted, you are NOT sent to Police Station #1, 2,3, or 4 for any kind of
bail hearing and/or arraignment.  You are sent to COUNTY JAIL, and then to
a county magistrate's office. The Engel Article was a fiction that hid from the
true Cipolla Case.  The true Cipolla Case was only one determining question
attached to it.

All in all, the public account of the Cipolla Case was hyper-exaggerated and
hysterically sensationalized to the point of it being libel to DA Bob Colvile
and any friend Cipolla had in 1978.  Donald Wuerl had the moral obligation
to notify the Pittsburgh Post Gazette that the Cipolla Case was being present-
ed in a ridiculously gluttonous form of Tabloid Journalism.  But of course,
that excessively dramatic story made Wuerl look like a holy holy hero who
speared a diabolical camp of monsters.  So, Wuerl let you be deceived into
thinking that he was the most heroic man on the planet, when he was being
a hypocritical snake.

All in all, the version of the Cipolla Case, as was told from 1995 to 2016,
was a hyper-sensationalistic fiction.  In 2018 version is the more sane and
credible version, coming from the diocesan secret archives.  Concerning
the archives, there was the inclusion of a report mentioning the existence
of a lubricant on a young lad's undergarment.

Well, the 1995 to 2016 version of the Cipolla Case claimed that the 1978
accusing mother was strong-armed into signing a sheet of paper that was
going to expunge the Cipolla Case.  Well, the 2018 PA grand jury finding
was that the 1978 Cipolla Case was NOT expunged.  This is another in-
stance where the narration given by the accusing mother of 1978 was a
complete lie, as such a narration was given to the public.  This involves
only Version I of the Cipolla Case narration which ran from 195 to 2016.

In re:  The 2018 PA grand jury version of the case.

It described the predictable and stereotypical way a diocese at the time
handled sexual aggression accusations.  No slit tires.  No smashed win-
dows, etc.  Rather, it described the typical snakejob, headlined by the
prsence of lawyers.  The real Cipolla Case was a dime-a-dozen lawyer
intervention case.  Such a thing, absent of ridiculous Bruce Willis mo-
vie plots, and absent of Tom Cruz adventure movie plots, is what gives
a narration its credibility.

What you must understand about abuse victims is this:

As was confided to me but a certain clergy sexual aggression victim is
that that which tears into & torments a victim's mind is the Subtle &
Pernicious Invisibility of the sexual aggression, so deceptively handled
that the case is made to look as if the sexual aggression never happened.

It's the feeling a absence --- the Whitewashed Wall --- the removal of
all of the stage scenery --- and the complete silence which tortures the
sexual aggression victim.  It's not slit tires and smashed windows which
does it.  It's the Alfred Hitchcock movie feeling that does.  The proverbial
room get emptied-out and whitewashed, as if nothing ever happened in
that proverbial room that tortures a person.  It's the No-Accountability
aspect that tortures the victim.  THEREFORE,  the silent, smooth-talk-
ing and silently intimidating presence of the lawyers which is far far
far more of a nightmare scenario than slit tires and smashed windows.

One more quick point:  I have enumerated this 2018 version of the Ci-
polla Case in an August 2018 post.  For now, simply understand that the
entire case pivots on one piece of evidence:

         a medical report mentioning the existence of a lubricant
         found on the nine year old child's undergarment.  It was
         a report that the writer, Randy Engle, stated no longer
         existed.  The bottom line is this:

        If you can prove that the 1978 accusing mother did NOT plant
        that lubricant in her son's shorts, in order to fame Cipolla, then
        the case is closed.  Remember, it's the subtle things that make
        or break a case.  For example:

If the accusing mother of 1978 had been honest from the beginning, and if
she said that, in 1978, properly attired lawyers sat her down and convinced
her into withdrawing her 1978 private criminal complaint, then the alarms
and rotating lights would have been ringing in my mind, with me thinking
to myself, "Those (censored)!"   That was undue influence.

The subtle & plain things give credibility, NOT a ridiculously harrowing
scene from Starwars, Bruce Willis movies, or Tom Cruz movies.  Simpli-
city brings clarity and at least a significant measure of credibility, if it can
not bring a closed case.  The Cipolla Case of 2018 is entirely different than
the pathetically ridiculous Cipolla Case Narration of 1995 to 2016.

Back to the original part of the September 2015 post on the Cipolla Letter.

We start with the editor's preliminary statement,
and then move to Anthony Cipolla's statement:

Take note of the fact that I have called Tim Bendig a liar, yet he never sued me.
This is pertinent to note, being that Bendig is known to yell  "I'll sue" and "I'll
ruin you," as a reflex action.   For example, a writer for a northeastern metro
newspaper recently contacted me and conveyed the following: 

       I just had a bizarre interaction with Tim Bendig and found your
      site while digging up more information about him.  Has he ever
     threatened to sue you because of your blog?   He strikes me as
     the type.   Has he ever tried any other harassing techniques?

For those unfamiliar, Tim Bendig is the seminary dropout who accused a man
once known as Father Anthony Cipolla of having engaged in long-term sex
abuse that Bendig could never corroborate or even plausibly substantiate.

He made the accusations only after Cipolla told members of the Padre Pio Pray-
er Group to stop sending Bendig donation money, on account of his withdrawal
from the seminary.  Donald Wuerl originally declared Bendig "not credible."

Bendig was found to be a chronic liar, due to the number of people who kept
contacting me and telling me how he lied to them and threatened to 'ruin them.'
The allegations of Bendig's con artist conduct came from as far away as Holly-
wood.  Then, Bendig was given my phone number and he contacted me, only
to lie to me about something that pertained to documentation that I had in pos-
session.  Everything he said was contrary to the documentary evidence that
I possessed.  It involved the following piece of evidence which was a notice
given by the Beaver County PA district attorney's office that there were NO
GROUNDS upon which to file any kind of criminal charge against Cipolla.

One more thing:  Tim Bendig proved that he was more than willing to de-
stroy a human life, concerning someone who turned out to be completely
innocent as accused --- with Jpeg evidence and fact-checking results to
prove said innocence.  That is to say, if Cipolla did molest anyone, then
it was NOT the way described by Bendig or Diane Thompson or certain
Pittsburgh Post Gazette writers.  If you have evidence of Cipolla having
been a molester, I'll post it for you.  Thus far, there was only one source
who made me wary of Cipolla until further fact-checking was done.

Even at that, that which is needed is for the two sons of Diane Thompson
to come forth and make formal statements, stating if whether or not they
accuse Anthony Cipolla of molestation or did their mom fabricate the en-
tire story.

It is very bizarre that "the mommy" was the only one ever to speak on the
1978 accusations against Cipolla.  Usually, a chief of police or detective or
prosecutor makes a public statement in outlining the crimes alleged to have
occurred.  Decades after the fact, someone writes memories on the case.

In fact, in all this time, Bendig's replacement attorney, Douglas Yauger, never
chastised me or came forth to defend Diane Thompson.  Donald Wuerl did not
do so, either.  Neither did one of Wuerl's two principle pit-bull attack dogs.  No
one involved in the Bendig Case or 1978 accusations ever came forth to defend
Diane Thompson and corroborate her damning accusations against the deceased
Anthony Cipolla who was tortured by Diane Thompson during the final year of
his life.  How would you like it if you never got a moment of peace from a brawl-
ing hag who was fact-checked and found to be a pathological liar.

Again, if Cipolla ever molested anyone, it was not according to the accusations
of Diane Thompson who contradicted herself repeatedly and the Tim Bendig
who was declared NOT credible by Donald Wuerl.

Observe how much of a liar Bendig is:  The McGuire Home was heavily monitored, being that it was a
medical facility for the most afflicted of children.  Cipolla would have been caught, if he were having
sodomite relations with Bendig there, and the nuns would have had Cipolla out of the home pronto.
Therefore, the fact that Anthony Cipolla was in good-keeping with the sisters is evidence in itself,
favorable to Cipolla.  Bendig was foolish to have chosen the McGuire Home in his allegations.

Plus, it wasn't a very seductive and/or lust-inducing place, to say the least.  In fact, Bendig
claimed that Cipolla first molested him while Bendig had the flu.  Well, the reasonable person
can assure you that people are not that much of a lustful temptation when they have the flu.  

In 41 years, no one in this youth group ever accused Cipolla of any wrongdoing.  In fact, Cipolla's
youth program in northeastern New Jersey was much larger, and no one from that program ever accused
him of wrongdoing, either ... in the past 42 years.  If Cipolla were the molesting monster Ann Rodgers
and the Pgh Post Gazette made him out to be, the phone at the Pittsburgh diocesan building would have
been ringing off the hook, in 2002, when sex abuse casualties came forth, stating their accusations.

None of the youth on any of Cipolla's pilgrimages accused him of wrongdoing, either.  In addition,
Cipolla had 70+ witnesses, a subset of which were youth, ready to testify for him at the Bendig civil
lawsuit  trial that never came to be.  By now, some credible person somewhere would have come forth
and cried out, "J'accuse!"  But, no one ever did.  This places Bendig's credibility rating into the single
digits, if not  negative ones.   Incidentally, would Wuerl have been motivated to settle out of court, on
account of  Bendig stating that he knew for sure that Donald Wuerl was a practicing homosexual?

Above are very important words that Ann Rodgers left out of her news articles about Cipolla.
Directly below is Anthony Cipolla's own statement, written at night, shortly
after the memory of what Wuerl did to him rocketed though his mind like a
late night movie.  I asked his permission to publicly post it, incidentally, and
received the permission.  So, don't think that I'm betraying any confidentiality.

In regards to my case,  Wuerl  persecuted me to the ultimate degree.   He went
after me, to protect himself, and he couldn't stand the fact that I reported him
to the Office of the Clergy; the very office where he worked as secretary to the
late John Cardinal Wright who was the Prefect of the Office of the Clergy.

Wuerl was covering up for Wright who was a homosexual and an ephebophile.
For me to accuse Wuerl of harassment in the very office where he worked for
10 years was an embarrassment to him.  So, he was determined to use me as
an example that, if any priest would try to go to the Office of the Clergy and
accuse Wuerl of anything, the priest wouldn't get too far.

As a matter of fact, the Office of the Clergy went in favor of Wuerl.  So, I lost
the case (at the initial level of the Vatican judiciary.)  Then, through the ad-
vice of my canon lawyer, I reported Wuerl to the Signatura and won the case.
But, Wuerl publicly said that he had factual information about me (not yet
revealed) and that he would have the decision of the Signatura reversed.

I had already sent everything to the Signatura, including Diane Thompson’s
accusation of sexual impropriety with Tucker Thompson, her 9 yr old son.
Therefore, no one knew what new facts he could possibly have had.   If he
had anything, he certainly had enough time to submit it to the Signatura,
while the case was being investigated.   In fact, Count Neri Capponi who
worked for the Signatura said that Wuerl had nothing, but 'old wives tales.'
To the shock of everyone involved, Wuerl did have the decision reversed.
So, I was in Limbo.

It is strongly believed that Wuerl has his protectors in the Vatican and can 
get whatever he wants.  Wuerl had me forced-laicized.  He assigned me to
St. John Vianney, home for retired priests, and then withdrew my salary
and later my health insurance.

I had no money to live on, to pay medical bills with, and to afford various
other needs.   He then wrote me a letter, saying that I  must send him all of
my income tax returns from 1991 to 1996, so he could set up a task force to
decide on how much money I should receive.  I phoned my CPA who was
shocked at Wuerl's behavior, in the way he was treating me, because I was
never arrested, never arraigned, never tried or convicted, as the other priests.
So why was Wuerl going after me so viciously?

One lawyer phoned me from another state, telling me that he left the Church
because of the news of how Wuerl was treating me.  (He left the church) even
though I tried to convince him (the attorney) that Wuerl is not the Church and
that I strongly believed that Wuerl was highly influenced by the Devil.

I had to find another canon lawyer to at least get my money back, so that I
could live and at least sustain myself.  So, I phoned the Canon Law Society
of America.   They recommended Father Alfred Kunz, a canon lawyer and 
exorcist from Madison, Wisconsin.   Father Kunz told me that what Wuerl
was doing to me was against Canon Law and to not worry; that he would
get my money back.  This was 1996.  On March 4, 1993, Father Kunz was
murdered in cold blood, in his rectory.

I talked with Father two days before he was murdered.  A priest friend
phoned me on my answering machine that I remotely accessed, saying:

      "Father Cipolla, I have some very bad news, your canon lawyer, 
        Father Kunz was murdered last night in his rectory.  I am very
        sorry to tell you this and I feel very bad and I hope to God that
        they catch the person or persons who did this and that they will
        get life."

I just burst into tears and couldn't stop crying or attempt to drive my car.