However, he did say that his badge number was 46, as Randy Engel
claimed, and that his partner's badge number was 37. However, he
was NOT a detective, as the same Randy Engel claimed. Therefore,
Engel got everything wrong except for the two badge numbers, in
her nightmarish narration of an arrest which has now been 100%
proven to never have existed.
In late February of 2017, I finally made contact with ... and conversed at will with ... one of the two police officers who responded to Diane Thompson's phone call to the police, in 1978.
Randy Engel stated that they arrested Cipolla. In fact, Engel stated that they were detectives. No, they weren't. None the less, one of the two police officers whom Engel claimed to have arrested Anthony Cipolla categorically stated that he did NOT do so.
Randy Engel didn't merely accuse Anthony Cipolla of molestation. She accused him of harassment and terrorism, all the while stating that the Bishop of Pittsburgh at the time and the Allegheny County DA at the time were accomplices to such criminal conduct.
It has now been proven to be a lie that a young Frank Labiaux ... eldest son of a Diane Thompson whose timeline identifies her as a teenage pregnancy queen .... vandalized a church out of sheer frustration for having been molested. Two entirely different youth were arrested for doing so.
Being that this Frank Labiaux is a proven liar in the church vandalism case, one can plausibly conclude that he also lied about being molested. Whatever be the case, Frank Labiaux made his debut, by instantly destroying his credibility.
Then comes the Eggshell Skull Rule, where Anthony Cipolla was forced to endure the stress heaped upon him by libel and defamation.
As I stated perhaps twenty times previously ... and which never sunk into Randy Engel's mind ... Donald Wuerl used the Cipolla Case to finally get out of the spotlight placed on him by Washington County DA John C Pettit.
This Cipolla case was also a diversion for the Edwar Huff indictment. The over-ampliflication of the Cipolla case made the Edward Huff indictment largely unknown by the Pittsburgh people, even though it did make the mainstream media newspaper, at the time.
For those unaware, Diane Thompson and Randy Engel made elaborate and damning accusations against 1} Anthony Cipolla, 2} former DA Bob Colville, and 3} the late Bishop Vincent Leonard, concerning the assertion that Cipolla molested her son, Tucker, in 1978.
The added assertion which was never prefixed with the lawsuit-prevention word, ALLEGED, was that massive and violent retaliation occurred after Thompson "filed charges." No civilian has the power to "file charges."
You see, Engel asserted that an M.N. "Nehouser," Badge #46, and an R. Fogle,Badge #37 arrested Cipolla for molestation, and then filled out an Incidence Report. Engel also claimed that those two officersd hung by Diane Thompson's side, telling her to not "drop charges, de-
spite all of the harassment she was going to get. The narration all turnedmout to be a fraudulent misrepresentation in all features of the case, except for the officers' badge numbers.
In fact, in 1995, Thompson narrated a harrowing tale to a Pittsburgh Post Gazette writer on how disappointed the two detectives looked when she "dropped charges," with tears in her eyes, in the DA's office, signing a paper that she couldn't read, due to the tears in the eyes.
That story ... and the story of her youngest son vandalizing a church out of the frustration of having been molested ... have all now been proven to be libel. Provable lies. Orchestrated falsehoods conjured by one of the most incompetent liars you can encounter.
Let us proceed:
To start, the Detective "M.N. Nehouser," was uniformed police officer Mark Ninehouser. None the less, Mark remembered the case and said that:
... all that he did was take a report from Thompson, and then filled out a form by means of hand-printing it, and NOT handwriting it with cursive handwriting. He said that he simply handed the report to the detectives, and that was it. Nothing more was done by him. Thus:::::
1} Mark Ninehouser did NOT arrest Cipolla. 2} He was not called back to Diane Thompson's home, to respond to a call that she made, reporting that Cipolla was at her kitchen door. 3} Plus, Mark was not called to the scene of any face-slapping of nine year old Tucker by a 70 year old man. That account also turned-out to be a lie told by Diane Thompson.
4} Mark was also NOT called to respond to Diane Thompson's home, on account of any rock throwing incident which broke one of her windows. All in all:
That which happened was NOT done in the way described by Randy Engel or by the media in their 1990s reports about Cipolla. Let's Review:
Concerning police officer, Mark Ninehouser, who respond
to Diane Thompson's original phone call to the police:
1} He categorically stated that he NEVER put any Catholic priest in hand cuffs in 1978, including Anthony Cipolla. Neither he nor his partner Robert W. Fogle arrested Cipolla.
1b} Ninehouser was NOT a detective. He said that he took the report of Diane Thompson's accusations and handed it to the real detectives.
1c} At this point, the following must absolutely be remembered:
Randy Engel wrote that Diane Thompson started getting harassed by Cipolla on July 30, 1978, upon which she called Ninehouser (misspelled as Nehouser by Engel) and Officer Fogle.
Former Officer Ninehouser categorically stated to me that, after he handed his hand-printed report to the detectives, he walked away from the Diane Thompson case. Thus, she did NOT call him, saying that Cipolla was in the house. He did NOT say to her, "Diane, they are going to try to harass you into dropping charges. So, be strong and stand your ground." Etc.
And and and he most certainly did NOT go to her home after "she was forced to drop charges" and give her a copy of the Incidence Report which apparently was a counterfeited one filled out by a non-police officer under the guise that it was done by a police officer. He did not walk up to her and say, "You're going to need this one day."
The whole account about the detectives was a completely fraudulent misrepresentation, and the detectives mentioned by Engel weren't even detectives.
2} Keep in mind that I stated that the Incidence Report which is mentioned by Randy Engel, part of which was photographed and put online, looked like a forgery. For those unaware, the online photo which was purported to be the Incidence Report of 1978 was handwritten with crowded handwriting and the letter "l" always being looped widely. The reason why that photograph was the photo
of a forgery ... of a fraud ... is very simple:
Honorably retired Mark Ninehouser said that he and his fellow
police officers were required to print (hand-print) all police re-
ports. No cursive handwriting was permitted.
The fact that the photo purported to be the actual Incidence Report of 1978 is handwritten with cursive writing ... and not hand-printed ... proves that the sheet of paper called "the one remaining piece of evidence" by Randy Engel is a very counterfeited fraud. No police officer of the 1970s would have filled-out the report in that fashion.
3} Randy Engel stated that Cipolla was arraigned "at City Court" in a Pittsburgh Police Station. This is a complete lie, because no arraignment ever took place in a police station. ALL arraignments took place in one of two places:
1} At Grant Street, at one time.
or
2} At City NIGHT COURT.
Cipolla was never arraigned, because he was NEVER arrested. He was accused in a private criminal complaint and served with a SUMMARY NOTICE only signed by Diane Thompson. She was to appear in city
court ... at the Public Safety Building ... and state due cause as to why Cipolla should be arrested. It was a hearing equal to a preliminary hearing, but without the accuser having been first arrested. It was a hearing that would judge if Cipolla were to be arrested or not.
4} There is NOT any mistaken identity of police officers in this case,
being that Mark Ninehouser remembers the case in outline form, and
being that Randy Engel did get his badge number and Robert Fogle's
number completely correct. Mark's badge number actually was 46,
and Robert's actually was 37, as Engel stated. BUT, they were NOT
detectives.
In addition, there was ... at the time ... a #9 Police Station in the Northside, located on Federal Street. So, that part was gotten correct by Engel. But, there were NEVER arraignments taking place at any police station.
In addition, Engel stated that the incidence report was signed M.N.
Nehouser. So, I asked Mark what the N stood for. He said that he
did NOT have a middle name.
Once again, for those who are incredibly prejudiced against Cipolla:
5} Rest assured that there was NO CALL to the police that a 70 year old man working at any kind of a store slapped Tucker in the face, for having accused Anthony Cipolla of wrong-doing.
6} Rest assured that no one called the police and reported a rock smashing through any window at the residence of Diane Thompson and her children.
Take note that Mark was very articulate, talkative, and easy-going in his conversation with me. He did not stop to think of what he was going to say. He did not have time lapses of momentary silence. He simply spoke spontaneously, hiding nothing. He and I were literally shooting the breeze, it was that easy-going of a conversation.
There is more to convey to you. The bottom line is that two parts of the three-part Randy Engel article that damns Anthony Cipolla and the late Bishop Vincent Leonard to the Depths of Hell is complete libel.
For now, you have enough substantive information that it should easily break the hypnotic trance that Engel has on the weak-minded & gullible. he is NOT a guardian of Truth, Justice, and the American Way. She's a gossipy and libelous hag who actually thinks that the historic red Shoes of the Fisherman are homosexual shoes.
I give you your freedom from Randy Engel's influence and her pretense of being the deliverer of truth and her hatred of the Shoes of the Fisherman. Be free.
Till the next time,
Patrick Anthony Pontillo
 |
| In America, Truth ends up prevailing. |
